Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 19, Number 9—September 2013

Mumps Postexposure Prophylaxis with a Third Dose of Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine, Orange County, New York, USA

Amy Parker FiebelkornComments to Author , Jacqueline Lawler, Aaron T. Curns, Christina Brandeburg, and Gregory S. Wallace
Author affiliations: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA (A. Parker Fiebelkorn, A.T. Curns, G.S. Wallace); Orange County Health Department, Goshen, New York, USA (J. Lawler, C. Brandeburg)

Main Article

Table 2

Classification by age group of eligible family members who did or did not receive a dose of MMR vaccine as postexposure prophylaxis, Orange County, New York, USA, 2009–2010*

Age, y No. received 3rd MMR dose No. received 2nd MMR dose No. received 1st MMR dose No. that received any dose (dose unknown)† No. that did not receive any dose Total no. eligible
1–3 0 3 2 0 39 44
4–6 10 2 0 0 24 36
7–17 17 1 0 0 52 70
>18 1 0 0 8 79 88
Unknown 0 0 0 0 1 1
Total (%) 28 (12) 6 (3) 2 (1) 8 (3) 195 (82) 239

*MMR, measles-mumps-rubella vaccine.
†MMR vaccine doses were administered as postexposure prophylaxis.

Main Article

Page created: August 23, 2013
Page updated: August 23, 2013
Page reviewed: August 23, 2013
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.