Volume 20, Number 1—January 2014
Research
Effects of Drinking-Water Filtration on Cryptosporidium Seroepidemiology, Scotland
Table 3
Characteristic |
Location, water filtration status |
|||
Dundee |
Glasgow |
|||
Before |
After |
Before |
After |
|
Mean age, y | 42.3 (40.8–43.9) | 45.5 (43.8–47.2) | 38.8 (37.9–39.6) | 42.7 (41.7–43.6) |
Female, % | 44.2 (38.3–50.3) | 45.2 (38.7–52) | 47.1 (43.9–50.3) | 43.1 (39.6–46.8) |
Swam in past 12 mo, % | 64.6 (58.6–70.2)† | 48.3 (41.6–55.1)‡ | 58.4 (55.1–61.5)† | 50.1 (46.4–53.7)‡ |
Have with <5 children, % | 8.5 (5.7–12.5)† | 9.5 (6.2–14.3)‡ | 7.4 (5.9–9.2)† | 7.5 (5.8–9.7)‡ |
Have pets, % | 43.8 (37.9–49.9)† | 38.8 (32.4–45.5)‡ | 32.3 (29.3–35.4)† | 30.8 (27.5–34.3)‡ |
Drink unboiled water, % | 96.2 (93.1–97.9)† | 95.2 (91.4–97.4)‡ | 89.2 (87.1–91.1)† | 88.4 (85.8–90.5)‡ |
Drink bottled water, % | 69.2 (63.4–74.5)1 | 63.2 (56.4–69.4) ‡ | 77.4 (74.6–80)† | 73.7 (70.3–76.8)‡ |
*Before, before filtration in Glasgow (periods 1 and 2); after, after filtration in Glasgow (periods 3 and 4).
†Percentage of persons who answered “yes” to the question at period 1, period 2, or both.
‡Percentage of persons who answered “yes” to the question at period 3, period 4, or both.
Page created: January 03, 2014
Page updated: January 03, 2014
Page reviewed: January 03, 2014
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.