Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 20, Number 10—October 2014
CME ACTIVITY - Research

Risk Factors for Human Lice and Bartonellosis among the Homeless, San Francisco, California, USA

Denise L. BonillaComments to Author , Charsey Cole-Porse, Anne Kjemtrup, Lynn M. Osikowicz, and Michael Y. Kosoy
Author affiliations: California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, USA (D.L. Bonilla); California Department of Public Health, Sacramento, California (C. Cole-Porse, A. Kjemtrup); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA (L. Osikowicz, M. Kosoy)

Main Article

Table 1

Association of body louse infestation and explanatory variables in a homeless population surveyed during 2008–2010 and 2012, San Francisco, California, USA

Variable No. (%) with body lice (n = 60) No. (%) without body lice (n = 143) p value*
Sex 0.00†
Male 55 (91.7) 90 (62.9)
Female 5 (8.3) 52 (36.4)
No response
0
1 (0.7)

Race/ethnicity 0.05†
White 27 (45.0) 64 (44.8)
African American 21 (35.0) 30 (21.0)
Hispanic 6 (10.0) 22 (15.4)
Native American 4 (6.7) 20 (14.0)
Asian
2 (3.3)
7 (4.9)

Age group 0.19
19–28 y 1 (1.7) 11 (7.7)
29–38 y 7 (11.7) 20 (14.0)
39–48 y 27 (45.0) 43 (30.1)
49–58 y 19 (31.7) 54 (37.8)
59–68 y 5 (8.3) 15 (10.5)
No response
1 (1.7)
0

Sleeping 0.01†
Inside 30 (50.0) 104 (72.7)
Outside 30 (50.0) 38 (26.6)
No response
0
1 (0.7)

Exchange clothing 0.76
Frequently 6 (10.0) 17 (11.9)
Often 3 (5.0) 6 (4.2)
Sometimes 8 (13.3) 27 (18.9)
Never 41 (68.3) 91 (63.6)
No response
2 (3.3)
2 (1.4)

Time homeless 0.97
<1 y 29 (48.3) 64 (44.8)
1–5 y 15 (25.0) 38 (26.6)
>5 y 11 (18.3) 25 (17.5)
Not homeless 3 (5.0) 9 (6.3)
No response
2 (3.3)
7 (4.9)

Reason for examination 0.02†
Bugs 5 (8.3) 28 (19.6)
Itch 32 (53.3) 50 (35.0)
Lice 18 (30.0) 37 (25.9)
Services (free shirt) 5 (8.3) 28 (19.6)

*p value of χ2 test evaluating the distribution of variables between those with and without body lice.
†Indicates the distribution of the variable is significantly (p<0.05) different between groups.

Main Article

Page created: September 10, 2014
Page updated: September 10, 2014
Page reviewed: September 10, 2014
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external