Volume 20, Number 12—December 2014
Research
Residual Infestation and Recolonization during Urban Triatoma infestans Bug Control Campaign, Peru1
Table 2
Treatment received | No. households | Initial prevalence, % |
Estimated residual infestation |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Observed | Estimated | Prevalence, % | No. (%) infested households | |||
I and II | 35,207 | 20.1 | 35.6 | 0.006 | 2 (0.3) | |
I only | 7,521 | 7.0 | 12.2 | 0.16 | 14 (2.1) | |
II only | 4,169 | 4.0 | 6.9 | 0.09 | 4 (0.5) | |
Not treated |
9,594 |
ND |
6.9† |
6.9 |
666 (97.1) |
|
Total | 56,491 | 16.2 | 25.8 | 1.2 | 686 (100) |
*Estimates are calculated by using equations in Table 3 (estimated sensitivity of inspectors p = 57% [range 46%–66%] and probability of clearing households of infestation through 1 treatment c = 98.7% [range 98.4%–98.9%]). ND, no data.
†Extrapolation of the prevalence in households participating only in the second treatment to households that were never treated.
1The authors have provided a Spanish version of this article online (http://www.spatcontrol.net/articles/Barbu2014/traduccionEspanol.pdf).
Page created: November 18, 2014
Page updated: November 18, 2014
Page reviewed: November 18, 2014
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.