Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 20, Number 12—December 2014

Zoonotic Bartonella Species in Cardiac Valves of Healthy Coyotes, California, USA

Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Spencer P. Kehoe, Bruno B. ChomelComments to Author , Matthew J. Stuckey, Rickie W. Kasten, Nandhakumar Balakrishnan, Benjamin N. Sacks, and Edward B. Breitschwerdt
Author affiliations: University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA (S.P. Kehoe, B.B. Chomel, M.J. Stuckey, R.W. Kasten, B.N.Sacks); North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA (N. Balakrishnan, E.B. Breitschwerdt)

Cite This Article

Bartonellae are vector-borne gram-negative, aerobic, intracellular bacteria with a tropism for erythrocytes and endothelial cells (1). These bacteria, many of which are zoonotic, infect a wide range of domestic and wild animal species, causing a spectrum of disease manifestations and pathologies (2). Bartonellae, especially Bartonella vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii (B. v. berkhoffii), cause valvular endocarditis, especially of the aortic valve in mammals, including humans, dogs, cats, and cattle (1,3). Fleas and possibly ticks can vector B. v. berkhoffii (4). Bartonella species, typically observed in 5- to 7-year-old mid-sized to large dogs, account for ≈28% of endocarditis in dogs (3,5). Bartonellae, including B. v. berkhoffii, account for ≈3% of human endocarditis cases (1,6). In dogs and humans, these bacteria appear to have a specific tropism for aortic and mitral valves (1). Similar to lesions that develop with Coxiella burnetii endocarditis (7), valvular vegetative lesions can result from chronic Bartonella infection.

In California, coyotes (Canis latrans) are a major reservoir for B. v. berkhoffii (8). Natural Bartonella reservoir hosts are often asymptomatic, but to our knowledge, the possible role of Bartonella-induced endocarditis in coyotes has never been investigated. We hypothesized that B. v. berkhoffii or other Bartonella species could cause endocarditis in coyotes. We also hypothesized that bartonellae might preferentially localize to the aortic and/or mitral valves before vegetative lesions develop. Hence, coyotes served as a naturally occurring epidemiologic and physiologic sentinel model for studying infection kinetics and pathology induced by this bacterium in a reservoir host (coyotes).

The Study

During the early 2000s, a total of 70 coyotes trapped in 9 northern California counties as part of a depredation control program were assessed for zoonotic heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) disease (9). Coyote hearts and spleens were collected at that time and stored at –70°C in a manner to avoid DNA carryover during handling, storage, and processing. In 2012 and 2013, the hearts were dissected for macroscopic evidence of aortic and mitral valve vegetative endocarditis lesions. A board-certified veterinary pathologist examined possible valvular lesions or thickened regions; however, because the samples had been frozen, microscopic histopathologic examination was not conducted. We extracted DNA from aortic and mitral valves and spleens using DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kits (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). B. v. berkhoffii–spiked rabbit blood was the DNA extraction positive control. We tested extracted samples by PCR for Bartonella DNA targeting the citrate synthase gene (gltA) (10). PCR of spleen tissue was a substitute for blood culture detection of bacteremia. B. henselae DNA and distilled water were PCR-positive and -negative controls, respectively. Partial gene sequencing was performed on PCR-positive tissues. Nineteen aortic valve, mitral valve, and splenic DNA samples from 14 coyotes (B. v. berkhoffii PCR-positive animals by gltA PCR and sequencing) were genotyped by using primers targeting 16–23S intergenic transcribed spacer (ITS) region, as previously described (11) with minor modifications in annealing temperature (68°C for 15 s) and extension (72°C for 18 s). We conducted statistical analysis for differences in tissue tropism using Epi Info version 6 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA).


Thumbnail of Molecular prevalence of Bartonella species in 70 coyotes from 9 counties, California, USA. Shaded areas are counties where coyotes were trapped during the early 2000s. Bartonella-positive coyotes were identified from the 9 counties as follows: Yuba, 6 (33%) of 18 trapped coyotes; Santa Clara, 3/22 (14%); Mendocino, 2/11 (18%); Napa, 2/6 (33%); Sonoma, 1/5 (20%); Glenn, 1/4 (25%); Yolo, 0/1; Butte, 0/1; Solano, 0/2.

Figure. Molecular prevalence of Bartonella species in 70 coyotes from 9 counties, California, USA. Shaded areas are counties where coyotes were trapped during the early 2000s. Bartonella-positive coyotes were identified from the...

Of the 70 coyotes collected from 9 counties (Figure), 45 (64%) were male. Coyotes’ ages ranged from <1 year (57 [81%]) to >5 years (3 [4%]). Nine (20%) male and 6 (24%) female coyotes were PCR positive for Bartonella species. Fourteen (93%) of the 15 Bartonella-positive coyotes were <3 years old, of which 13 (87%) were <1 year old. Prevalence by county ranged from 0% to 33% (Figure).

We found no gross vegetative aortic or mitral valvular endocarditis lesions. Fifteen (21%) coyotes tested positive by PCR for Bartonella gltA gene. Overall, 8 aortic valves, 5 mitral valves, and 4 spleens were PCR positive. Aortic and mitral cardiac valves of 1 coyote (no. 93) tested positive by PCR for B. v. berkhoffii, and the aortic valve and spleen of another coyote (no. 110) were PCR positive (Table). Although a higher percentage of positive cardiac valves were aortic (53%) than mitral (33%), the difference was not significant. However, when we compared the number of Bartonella-infected cardiac valves (11 valves) with Bartonella-infected spleens (3 spleens), we found that Bartonella DNA was amplified 4.16 times (95% CI 1.02–24.12) more often from cardiac valves than from spleens.

Partial DNA sequencing showed that aortic valves from 8 (53%) of 15 coyotes were B. v. berkhoffii positive, compared with mitral valves from 4 (27%) and spleens from 3 (20%) coyotes. B. rochalimae was amplified from the spleen of coyote no. 99, and B. henselae DNA was amplified from the mitral valve of coyote no. 137 (Table). Of 14 coyotes tested for B. v. berkhoffii genotypes by 16–23S ITS PCR, 8 were positive, whereas Bartonella DNA was not amplified from the remaining 6 tissue DNA samples by using ITS primers. By sequence analyses, 4 coyotes were infected with B. v. berkhoffii genotype I, 3 with genotype II, and 1 with genotype III.


Our study documents the presence of 3 zoonotic Bartonella species in heart valves and/or spleen of free-ranging coyotes from northern California. Despite the absence of gross vegetative endocardial lesions, Bartonella DNA was amplified and sequenced from >20% of the coyotes, mainly from cardiac valves; only 4 (6%) coyotes had PCR-positive spleens, compared with 12 (17%) coyotes with PCR-positive cardiac valves. We hypothesize that Bartonella in the spleen indicated early or ongoing bacteremia, whereas bartonellae in the heart valves, in their absence in the spleen, indicated valvular bacterial localization, possibly facilitating persistent infection that could evolve through time to endocarditis. This evolution has been observed for C. burnetii infection in humans (12), for which the mean reported interval from illness onset to endocarditis diagnosis is 12–24 months (7). Bartonella endocarditis is usually seen in middle-aged dogs (mean age 6.3 years ± 2.8) (3,5) and in adult humans (mean age 54 years ± 16) (6). Because 93% of the PCR-positive coyotes were <3 years old, they were very likely too young for vegetative endocarditis to have developed.

Nevertheless, the fact that ≈20% of the cardiac valve tissues were PCR positive for Bartonella perhaps indicates that the bacteria had localized to the valves of infected coyotes. B. v. berkhoffii can induce vasoproliferative lesions in animals (13); thus, cases of Bartonella endocarditis might represent only a small fraction of infected animals that have chronic cardiac valvular localization. All 3 B. v. berkhoffii genotypes identified in these coyotes have been previously involved in humans or dogs with endocarditis (14,15). To our knowledge, B. henselae and B. v. berkhoffii genotype III have not been previously identified in coyotes; thus, these mammals can be added to the list of susceptible species. Coyotes might be a natural reservoir for B. v. berkhoffii genotype III, which so far has been mainly described in California gray foxes (14).

In conclusion, Bartonella infection of a natural reservoir appears to lead to cardiac valve tropism. This tropism could result in development of endocarditis, a severe and often lethal complication of Bartonella infection.

Mr Kehoe is a fourth-year veterinary student at the University of California, Davis. His primary research interests include zoologic and wildlife medicine and health and emerging zoonotic infections.



We investigated whether Bartonella spp. could cause endocarditis in coyotes or localize to cardiac valves before lesions develop. Bartonella DNA was amplified more often from coyote cardiac valves than spleen. Bartonella infection apparently leads to cardiac valve tropism, which could cause endocarditis, an often lethal complication in mammals, including humans.



  1. Chomel  BB, Kasten  RW, Williams  C, Wey  AC, Henn  JB, Maggi  R, Bartonella endocarditis: a pathology shared by animal reservoirs and patients. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1166:1206 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Boulouis  HJ, Chang  CC, Henn  JB, Kasten  RW, Chomel  BB. Factors associated with the rapid emergence of zoonotic Bartonella infections. Vet Res. 2005;36:383410. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. MacDonald  KA, Chomel  BB, Kittleson  MD, Kasten  RW, Thomas  WP, Pesavento  P. A prospective study of canine infective endocarditis in northern California (1999–2001): emergence of Bartonella as a prevalent etiologic agent. J Vet Intern Med. 2004;18:5664 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Yore  K, Digangi  B, Brewer  M, Balakrishnan  N, Breitschwerdt  EB, Lappin  M. Flea species infesting dogs in Florida and Bartonella spp. prevalence rates. Vet Parasitol. 2014;199:2259 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Sykes  JE, Kittleson  MD, Pesavento  PA, Byrne  BA, MacDonald  KA, Chomel  BB. Evaluation of the relationship between causative organisms and clinical characteristics of infective endocarditis in dogs: 71 cases (1992–2005). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2006;228:172334. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Houpikian  P, Raoult  D. Diagnostic methods. Current best practices and guidelines for identification of difficult-to-culture pathogens in infective endocarditis. Cardiol Clin. 2003;21:20717. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Stein  A, Raoult  D, Q fever endocarditis. Eur Heart J. 1995;16 Suppl B:19.
  8. Chang  CC, Kasten  RW, Chomel  BB, Simpson  DC, Hew  CM, Kordick  DL, Coyotes (Canis latrans) as the reservoir for a human pathogenic Bartonella sp.: molecular epidemiology of Bartonella vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii infection in coyotes from central coastal California. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:4193200 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Sacks  BN, Chomel  BB, Kasten  RW, Chang  CC, Sanders  RK, Leterme  SD. Validation for use with coyotes (Canis latrans) of a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for Dirofilaria immitis. Vet Parasitol. 2002;109:4558. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Norman  AF, Regnery  R, Jameson  P, Greene  C, Krause  DC. Differentiation of Bartonella-like isolates at the species level by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism in the citrate synthase gene. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:1797803 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Varanat  M, Maggi  RG, Linder  KE, Breitschwerdt  EB. Molecular prevalence of Bartonella, Babesia, and hemotropic Mycoplasma sp. in dogs with splenic disease. J Vet Intern Med. 2011;25:128491. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fenollar  F, Fournier  PE, Carrieri  MP, Habib  G, Messana  T, Raoult  D. Risks factors and prevention of Q fever endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:3126. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Beerlage  C, Varanat  M, Linder  K, Maggi  RG, Cooley  J, Kempf  VA, Bartonella vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii and Bartonella henselae as potential causes of proliferative vascular diseases in animals. Med Microbiol Immunol (Berl). 2012;201:31926. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Maggi  RG, Chomel  B, Hegarty  BC, Henn  J, Breitschwerdt  EB. A Bartonella vinsonii berkhoffii typing scheme based upon 16S–23S ITS and Pap31 sequences from dog, coyote, gray fox, and human isolates. Mol Cell Probes. 2006;20:12834 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cadenas  MB, Bradley  J, Maggi  RG, Takara  M, Hegarty  BC, Breitschwerdt  EB. Molecular characterization of Bartonella vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii genotype III. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:185860 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2012.140578

Table of Contents – Volume 20, Number 12—December 2014

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Bruno B. Chomel, Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, VM3B, 1089 Veterinary Medicine Dr, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: November 19, 2014
Page updated: November 19, 2014
Page reviewed: November 19, 2014
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.