Volume 20, Number 2—February 2014
Research
Monitoring Human Babesiosis Emergence through Vector Surveillance New England, USA
Table 1
Region |
Year became disease endemic |
Year tick sample collected |
B. burgdorferi infection prevalence (no. positive/no. tested) |
B. microti infection prevalence (no. positive/no. tested) |
Tick ratio* |
Co-infection prevalence
(no. positive/no. tested) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nantucket, MA | 1969 | 2010 | 0.21 (18/87) | 0.09 (8/87) | 2.33 | 0.01 (1/87) |
Southeastern CT | ||||||
Lyme | 1996 | 2007 | 0.13 (23/182) | 0.15 (28/182) | 0.82 | 0.04 (8/182) |
Old Lyme | 1992 | 2007 | 0.20 (13/65) | 0.20 (13/65) | 1.00 | 0.06 (4/65) |
Combined sites |
0.15 (36/247) |
0.17 (41/247) |
0.88 |
0.05 (12/247) |
||
Northeastern CT | ||||||
Hampton | 2007 | 2010 | 0.29(43/147) | 0.10 14/147) | 2.90 | 0.05 (8/147) |
South Mansfield | 2002 | 2010 | 0.11 (12/111) | 0.09 (10/111) | 1.22 | 0.01 (1/111) |
North Mansfield | 2002 | 2010 | 0.13 (18/139) | 0.01 (1/138) | 13.00 | 0.00 (0/138) |
Willington | Not endemic | 2010 | 0.36 (51/142) | 0.03 (4/142) | 12.00 | 0.02 (3/142) |
Eastford | Not endemic | 2007 | 0.31 (93/298) | 0.03 (10/298) | 10.33 | 0.03 (10/298) |
Combined sites | 0.26 (217/836) | 0.05 (39/836) | 5.20 | 0.03 (24/828) |
*Ratio of I. scapularis ticks infected with B. burgdorferi and that of ticks infected with B. microti.
Page created: January 17, 2014
Page updated: January 17, 2014
Page reviewed: January 17, 2014
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.