Volume 20, Number 5—May 2014
Dispatch
Influenza A(H5N2) Virus Antibodies in Humans after Contact with Infected Poultry, Taiwan, 2012
Table 2
Cont. no. | Sample date | Tested antigens, by influenza subtype |
NS1-ELISA titer |
Date and type of influenza vaccination |
Occupation | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H5N2 |
H5N1 |
H1N1pdm09 |
H3N2 |
|||||||||||
HI | MN | HI | NS1-pA | NS1-pB | A(H5N1) | Seasonal | ||||||||
1 | Mar 3 | 40 | <20 | 80 | <10 | 10 | 1.68 | 1.4 | 2012 Mar 3, 30 | NA | Poultry worker | |||
Mar 30 | 80 | 230 | 80 | <10 | 10 | |||||||||
2 | Mar 5 | 40 | 160 | 40 | 20 | 80 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 2012 Mar 6, 28 | 2011 Oct 8 | Poultry worker | |||
Mar 28 | 160 | 450 | 80 | 20 | 80 | |||||||||
3 | Mar 5 | 40 | 20 | 80 | 20 | 40 | 1.70 | 1.34 | 2012 Mar 5 | 2012 Jan 20 | Animal health official | |||
Mar 27 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 20 | 40 | |||||||||
4 | Mar 5 | 40 | <20 | 40 | 10 | 40 | 1.13 | 1.09 | 2012 Mar 5, Apr 2 | 2012 Jan 20 | Animal health official | |||
Apr 2 | 80 | 80 | 40 | 10 | 40 | |||||||||
5 | Mar 6 | 40 | 20 | 40 | <10 | 320 | 1.21 | 1.02 | 2012 Mar 6, Apr 2 | 2011 Nov 26 | Temp. employee | |||
Apr 2 | 80 | 30 | 40 | <10 | 160 | |||||||||
6 | Mar 6 | 20 | <20 | 40 | <10 | 160 | 1.17 | 1.08 | 2012 Mar 6, Apr 2 | 2012 Mar 5 | Temp. employee | |||
Apr 2 | 80 | 160 | 80 | <10 | 640 | |||||||||
7 | Mar 5 | 40 | <20 | 40 | <10 | 40 | 0.98 | 1.05 | 2012 Mar 5, Apr 2 | 2012 Mar 5 | Temp. employee | |||
Apr 2 | 320 | 1,280 | 160 | 10 | 640 |
*Cont., contact; HI, hemagglutination inhibition; MN, microneutralization; NS1, nonstructural protein 1; H1N1pdm09, pandemic influenza A(H1N1); NA, not applicable (did not receive vaccination); temp., temporary.
†Boldface indicates a >4-fold rise in antibody titer by HI or MN tests and a positive anti-NS1 antibody response by NS1-ELISA test between the first and second samples of paired serum samples. A positive anti-NS1 antibody response by NS1-ELISA assay was defined as each paired serum sample having a test absorbance of the second sample 30% higher than that of its first sample (ratio >1.30).
Page created: April 17, 2014
Page updated: April 17, 2014
Page reviewed: April 17, 2014
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.