Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 20, Number 9—September 2014

Common Exposure to STL Polyomavirus During Childhood

Efrem S. Lim, Natalie M. Meinerz, Blake Primi, David Wang, and Robert L. GarceaComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA (E.S. Lim, D. Wang); University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA (N.M. Meinerz, B. Primi, R.L. Garcea)

Cite This Article


STL polyomavirus (STLPyV) was recently identified in human specimens. To determine seropositivity for STLPyV, we developed an ELISA and screened patient samples from 2 US cities (Denver, Colorado [500]; St. Louis, Missouri [419]). Overall seropositivity was 68%–70%. The age-stratified data suggest that STLPyV infection is widespread and commonly acquired during childhood.

Polyomaviruses are nonenveloped double-stranded circular DNA viruses that infect a wide range of hosts, including humans. The capsid of the virus comprises primarily 72 pentamers of the major coat protein, VP1. Human polyomaviruses have been associated with several diseases (1). BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) has been associated with nephropathy in renal transplant recipients and JC polyomavirus (JCPyV) with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in immunocompromised persons (2,3). Trichodysplasia spinulosa–associated polyomavirus (TSPyV) infection is linked to a rare skin disease in immunocompromised patients called trichodysplasia spinulosa (4). Furthermore, infection with Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) in rare instances leads to Merkel cell carcinomas, an aggressive form of skin cancer (5). Other polyomaviruses, including WU polyomavirus (WUPyV), KI polyomavirus (KIPyV), human polyomavirus 6, human polyomavirus 7, human polyomavirus 9, MW polyomavirus (MWPyV), STL polyomavirus (STLPyV), and human polyomavirus 12, have been identified in specimens from humans, but their role in disease remains to be defined (1).

Seroepidemiology has played an important role in establishing the link between human polyomaviruses and disease and in understanding infection dynamics. The seroprevalences of BKPyV and JCPyV range from 70% to 90% and 40% to 60%, respectively, with an age profile indicating high frequency of early-age infections and lifelong persistence (68). Seropositivity for MCPyV in healthy persons ranges from 25% to 64%; all patients with Merkel cell carcinoma are seropositive (6,9).

STLPyV was recently identified from fecal specimens from a child in Malawi (10). Viral DNA also was detected in fecal specimens from the United States and The Gambia, and STLPyV has been found in a surface-sanitized skin wart surgically removed from the buttocks of a patient with a primary immunodeficiency called WHIM (warts, hypogammaglobulinemia, infections, and myelokathexis) syndrome (11). These observations suggest that STLPyV might infect humans. We defined the seropositivity rate of STLPyV in humans using serum from 2 independent US sites (Denver, Colorado, and St. Louis, Missouri).

The Study

Figure 1

Thumbnail of STL polyomavirus (STLPyV) ELISA. A) Electron microscopy image shows purified STLPyV VP1 capsomeres. Scale bar = 100 nm. B) Serum samples were pre-incubated in the absence (white bars) or presence of soluble STLPyV VP1 pentamers (gray bars), followed by the STLPyV-capture ELISA. Serum was tested in triplicate, and average absorbance values are shown. Error bars indicate SD. Representative data are shown. C) Seroreactivity to STLPyV in the absence (white bars) or presence of competiti

Figure 1. STL polyomavirus (STLPyV) ELISA. A) Electron microscopy image shows purified STLPyV VP1 capsomeres. Scale bar = 100 nm. B) Serum samples were pre-incubated in the absence (white bars) or presence of...

To determine the seropositivity for STLPyV, we developed a capture ELISA using recombinant glutathione S-transferase–tagged STLPyV VP1 capsomeres (Technical Appendix). Electron microscopy of the STLPyV capsomeres showed 10-nm pentamers characteristic of polyomaviruses (Figure 1, panel A). We assessed the specificity of the STLPyV ELISA by pre-incubating 24 serum samples in the presence and absence of soluble STLPyV VP1 pentamers before addition to the immobilized STLPyV glutathione S-transferase–tagged VP1. The ELISA signal intensity was markedly reduced when serum was pre-incubated with STLPyV VP1 pentamers (Figure 1, panel B; compare white bars to gray bars). This result indicates the ELISA seroreactivity could be self-competed with soluble STLPyV pentamers. STLPyV shares 55% aa identity in the VP1 region with its next most closely related polyomavirus, MWPyV (10). Therefore, we examined whether cross-reactivity existed between STLPyV and MWPyV VP1 capsomeres. Competition assays with soluble MWPyV VP1 pentamers showed limited interference with the ELISA seroreactivity (Figure 1, panel C; compare white bars to gray bars). This result indicates that there was no significant cross-reactivity between STLPyV and MWPyV VP1 capsomeres. Taken together, these data demonstrate that the ELISA was specific to STLPyV VP1.

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Age-specific seropositivity for STL polyomavirus (STLPyV) from serum specimens collected in Denver, Colorado, USA (A), and St. Louis, Missouri, USA (B). A total of 500 serum specimens from Denver and 417 from St. Louis were tested for seroreactivity to STLPyV VP1 proteins. Overall seropositivity in Denver was 68% and in St. Louis, 70%. Error bars indicate SD.

Figure 2. Age-specific seropositivity for STL polyomavirus (STLPyV) from serum specimens collected in Denver, Colorado, USA (A), and St. Louis, Missouri, USA (B). A total of 500 serum specimens from Denver and 417...

We screened 500 serum specimens collected from children and adults in Denver for antibodies against STLPyV. The overall seropositivity for STLPyV was 68.0% (Figure 2, panel A). Children 1–3 years of age had the lowest seropositivity rate (23.8%). In contrast, seroprevalence of children 4–20 years of age ranged from 61.1% to 70.8%. Similar seropositivity rates persisted in adults (>21 years of age), ranging from 68.8% to 74.2%.

We next examined a panel of 419 serum specimens from St. Louis that had a higher resolution of age-stratification in young infants. The overall seropositivity for STLPyV was 70.0% (Figure 2, panel B), similar to that in the specimens from Denver (68.0%). Seropositivity for STLPyV in infants dropped from 53.3% in the <0.5-year age group to 37.9% in the 0.5–1-year age group, with the lowest seropositivity of 22.6% in the 1–2-year group. In contrast, seropositivity rates for children >2 years of age were higher, ranging from 60.0% to 85.3%. Finally, seropositivity in adults (>21 years of age) ranged from 91.2% to 95.2%. Thus, these data indicate that exposure to STLPyV occurs during early childhood and that immune responses to STLPyV are maintained in adults.


In our analysis of the seroepidemiology of STLPyV in 2 areas of the United States, we found that prevalence of the virus was similar (68.0%–70.0%). This prevalence is slightly higher than the 41.8% for MWPyV, the polyomavirus most closely related to STLPyV (12). However, the seropositivity of STLPyV is comparable to other human polyomaviruses (>60%), such as BKPyV, KIPyV, WUPyV, MCPyV, human polyomavirus 6, and TSPyV (6,8). We found no cross-reactivity with MWPyV VP1, the most closely-related polyomavirus that shares 55% aa identity in the VP1 region. Thus, the seroepidemiology strongly supports the notion that STLPyV is a bona fide infectious agent of humans.

Age stratification of the seropositive specimens suggested an initial waning of immune response followed by rapid seroconversion during childhood. In the St. Louis specimens, seropositivity was higher for the <0.5-year and 0.5–1-year age groups (53.3% and 37.9%, respectively) than for the 1–2-year group (22.6%). This observation was followed by an increase in STLPyV seropositivity in the 2–3-year group and older age groups (60.0%). Specimens from Denver were too few to reliably stratify the data to the same resolution. Nonetheless, we observed a similar trend in specimens from Denver where the seropositivity for the 1–3-year age group (23.8%) was lower than for the 4–6-year group (61.1%). These data indicate that immune responses to STLPyV decreased in the first 2 years of age, which suggests waning maternal antibodies. However, seropositivity was rapidly acquired thereafter, indicating high exposure of STLPyV in children. Because the specimens were selected from hospital-associated blood draws of children of unknown health status, seropositivity rates for healthy children might have varied somewhat from the results we obtained. Nonetheless, the trends we observed with STLPyV are similar to profiles that have been reported for JCPyV, BKPyV, TSPyV, MCPyV, WUPyV, and KIPyV (6,1315).

STLPyV has not been clearly associated with any disease. However, the high overall seropositivity rate suggests widespread infection in the population at large. None of the pathogenic human polyomaviruses (JCPyV, BKPyV, MCPyV, TSPyV) have been clearly associated with acute disease at the time of initial infection. Rather, immunosuppression is a critical co-factor that is coupled to the ability of polyomaviruses to persist throughout life or to integrate into the genome, as in the case of MCPyV, ultimately leading to disease. Our study demonstrates that a large segment of the general population has been infected by STLPyV and might harbor persistent STLPyV infection, assuming the persistence paradigms of JCPyV and BKPyV hold true for STLPyV. A recent report identified STLPyV DNA in a skin wart specimen from an adult with primary immunodeficiency (11). Thus, it is critical to determine whether human diseases exist that are caused by STLPyV, especially in immunocompromised persons.

Dr Lim is a postdoctoral research associate at Washington University in St. Louis. His research focuses on the discovery and characterization of novel viruses and human pathogens.



R.L.G. was supported by National Institutes of Health grant CA37667. D.W. holds an investigator in the pathogenesis of infectious disease award from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund. E.S.L. is an Eli and Edythe Broad Fellow of the Life Sciences Research Foundation.



  1. DeCaprio  JA, Garcea  RL. A cornucopia of human polyomaviruses. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013;11:26476 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ferenczy  MW, Marshall  LJ, Nelson  CD, Atwood  WJ, Nath  A, Khalili  K, Molecular biology, epidemiology, and pathogenesis of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, the JC virus-induced demyelinating disease of the human brain. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25:471506 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kuypers  DR. Management of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in renal transplant recipients. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2012;8:390402 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. van der Meijden  E, Janssens  RW, Lauber  C, Bouwes Bavinck  JN, Gorbalenya  AE, Feltkamp  MC. Discovery of a new human polyomavirus associated with trichodysplasia spinulosa in an immunocompromized patient. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1001024 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Feng  H, Shuda  M, Chang  Y, Moore  PS. Clonal integration of a polyomavirus in human Merkel cell carcinoma. Science. 2008;319:1096100 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kean  JM, Rao  S, Wang  M, Garcea  RL. Seroepidemiology of human polyomaviruses. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000363. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Viscidi  RP, Rollison  DE, Sondak  VK, Silver  B, Messina  JL, Giuliano  AR, Age-specific seroprevalence of Merkel cell polyomavirus, BK virus, and JC virus. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2011;18:173743. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Moens  U, Van Ghelue  M, Song  XB, Ehlers  B. Serological cross-reactivity between human polyomaviruses. Rev Med Virol. 2013;23:25064 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Tolstov  YL, Pastrana  DV, Feng  HC, Becker  JC, Jenkins  FJ, Moschos  S, Human Merkel cell polyomavirus infection II. MCV is a common human infection that can be detected by conformational capsid epitope immunoassays. Int J Cancer. 2009;125:12506. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lim  ES, Reyes  A, Antonio  M, Saha  D, Ikumapayi  UN, Adeyemi  M, Discovery of STL polyomavirus, a polyomavirus of ancestral recombinant origin that encodes a unique T antigen by alternative splicing. Virology. 2013;436:295303. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Pastrana  DV, Fitzgerald  PC, Phan  GQ, Raiji  MT, Murphy  PM, McDermott  DH, A divergent variant of the eleventh human polyomavirus species, St. louis polyomavirus. Genome Announc. 2013;1:e00812–3.
  12. Nicol  JT, Leblond  V, Arnold  F, Guerra  G, Mazzoni  E, Tognon  M, Seroprevalence of human Malawi polyomavirus. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:3213 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Nguyen  NL, Le  BM, Wang  D. Serologic evidence of frequent human infection with WU and KI polyomaviruses. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:1199205. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Martel-Jantin  C, Pedergnana  V, Nicol  JT, Leblond  V, Trégouët  DA, Tortevoye  P, Merkel cell polyomavirus infection occurs during early childhood and is transmitted between siblings. J Clin Virol. 2013;58:28891. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. van der Meijden  E, Bialasiewicz  S, Rockett  RJ, Tozer  SJ, Sloots  TP, Feltkamp  MC. Different serologic behavior of MCPyV, TSPyV, HPyV6, HPyV7 and HPyV9 polyomaviruses found on the skin. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e81078. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2009.140561

Table of Contents – Volume 20, Number 9—September 2014

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Robert L. Garcea, University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Molecular, Cellular, & Developmental Biology, and The BioFrontiers Institute, Jennie Smoly Caruthers Biotechnology Building, Campus Box 596, Boulder, CO 80309, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: August 14, 2014
Page updated: August 14, 2014
Page reviewed: August 14, 2014
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.