Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 21, Number 1—January 2015

Tularemia in Children, Turkey, September 2009–November 2012

Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Hasan Tezer, Aslınur Ozkaya-ParlakayComments to Author , Hakan Aykan, Mustafa Erkocoglu, Belgin Gülhan, Ahmet Demir, Saliha Kanik-Yuksek, Anil Tapisiz, Meltem Polat, Soner Kara, Ilker Devrim, and Selcuk Kilic
Author affiliations: Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (H. Tezer, A. Tapisiz, M. Polat, S. Kara); Ankara Hematology Oncology Children’s Training and Research Hospital, Ankara (A. Ozkaya-Parlakay, H. Aykan, M. Erkocoglu, B. Gülhan, A. Demir, S. Kanik-Yuksek); Dr. Behcet Uz Children's Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey (I. Devrim); Public Health Institution of Turkey, Ankara (S. Kilic)

Cite This Article


Tularemia, a zoonotic disease caused by Francisella tularensis, is found throughout most of the Northern Hemisphere. It is not well known and is often misdiagnosed in children. Our aim with this study was to evaluate the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis for 100 children with tularemia in Turkey. The mean patient age was 10.1 ± 3.5 years (range 3–18 years), and most (63%) patients were male. The most common physical signs and laboratory findings were cervical lymphadenopathy (92%) and elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (89%). Treatment response was higher and rate of relapse lower for children 5–10 years of age than for those in other age groups. Associated with treatment failure were female sex, treatment delay of ≥16 days, and use of doxycycline. Tularemia is endemic to Turkey, and the number of cases has been increasing among children as well as adults.

Tularemia, caused by Francisella tularensis, is a potentially fatal, multisystemic disease in humans. Tularemia occurs throughout most of the Northern Hemisphere, and the number of cases is increasing in various parts of Europe, especially in the Balkans, Turkey, and Scandinavian countries. There are 4 recognized subspecies of F. tularensis, which differ in their pathogenicity and geographic distribution: tularensis (type A), holarctica (type B), novicida, and mediasiatica. Among them, subspecies tularensis and holarctica are of particular clinical and epidemiologic relevance (14). Although the highly virulent subspecies tularensis is restricted almost exclusively to North America, subspecies holarctica is found in Europe, Asia, and North America and represents the most common subspecies involved in human and animal infection (4).

The clinical forms of tularemia are ulceroglandular or glandular, oculoglandular, oropharyngeal, respiratory, and typhoidal (1). Each form somehow reflects the mode of transmission. The clinical picture and severity of the disease in humans vary considerably depending on the route of infection, the virulence of the causative organism, and the immune status of the host. The ulceroglandular form has been reported as the most prevalent clinical form of the disease in northern Europe, whereas the oropharyngeal form has been most commonly reported in Turkey, Bulgaria, and Kosovo and is attributed to the consumption of contaminated water and food (510).

Tularemia is endemic to Turkey, and most cases are reported to occur in late summer or early autumn (10). Various studies on clinical course, treatment, and treatment failure in elderly patients are available in the literature (7,1012). However, the clinical course of tularemia in children is not well known, and cases in children are often misdiagnosed. Our aim was to demonstrate the clinical features and outcomes for children with tularemia.

Material and Methods

We conducted a retrospective records review for 100 children with a presumptive diagnosis of tularemia who were admitted to the Ankara Hematology Oncology Children’s Training and Research Hospital and Gazi University Hospital from September 2009 through November 2012. The diagnosis of tularemia was confirmed by detection of specific antibodies by microagglutination test and/or F. tularensis nucleic acid in a clinical specimen (lymph node aspirate).

Microagglutination testing was performed as described (1) by using safranin-stained F. tularensis cells from the National Collection of Type Cultures (F. tularensis NCTC 10857, F. tularensis subsp. holartica live vaccine strain) cells. In brief, 2-fold serial dilutions of serum were incubated overnight with safranin-stained, formalin-killed F. tularensis cells at 35°C, and a titer was assigned according to the last well demonstrating full agglutination. According to the legal health regulations in Turkey, a diagnosis of tularemia is serologically confirmed by the presence of at least 1 of the following laboratory findings: 1) compatible clinical signs or symptoms and specific antibodies at significantly high titers (>1:160) and 2) a >4-fold increase in 2 successive titers (>1:160 for the convalescent-phase titer). Therefore, antibody titers >1:160 were considered to be positive.

DNA from clinical samples was extracted by using a commercial purification system with columns (QIAamp DNA extraction mini kit; QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Clinical samples from patients with suspected tularemia were screened for evidence of the tularemia agent by using conventional PCR.

Affliation with the genus Francisella was confirmed by amplification of the 17-kDa outer membrane lipoprotein gene fragment as described by Sjöstedt et al. (13). Primers TUL4–435 (5′-GCT GTA TCA TCA TTT AAT AAA CTG CTG-3′) and TUL4–863 (5′-TTG GGA AGC TTG TAT CAT GGC ACT-3′), which amplify a 420-bp fragment of the 17-kDa lipoprotein, were used. Samples were added to a PCR mixture containing a final concentration of 200 mmol/L (each) deoxynucleoside triphosphate mixture, 10X Hot Start PCR Buffer (Fermentas/Thermo Scientific, Vilnius, Lithuania), 0.4 mmol/L (each) primer (Ella Biotech GmbH, Martinsried, Germany), 2.5 mmol/L MgCl2 (Fermentas/Thermo Fisher Scientific), 1 μL bovine serum albumin (1 mg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich), and 1.25 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas/Thermo Fisher Scientific) in a total reaction volume of 50 μL. The reaction was performed in a DNA thermal cycler (Thermo Hybaid OMN-E, Ashford, UK) at a denaturation temperature of 94°C for 4 min and was followed by 40 cycles at 94°C for 40 s, 64°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 45 s, and final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The PCR products were sized on agarose gels and stained with ethidium bromide.

After confirmation of isolates as F. tularensis by PCR with tul4 primers, conventional PCR selective for the region of difference – 1 was used to determine subspecies identity (14). PCR for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex was also performed on lymph node aspirates. Patients with abdominal pain were evaluated by abdominal ultrasonography.

Treatment options varied according to the patient’s age. One of the following regimens was administered: gentamicin (5 mg/kg 2 or 3 times daily, intravenously or intramuscularly) for 10 days, doxycycline (100 mg orally 2×) for 14 days, ciprofloxacin (20 mg/kg 2×) for 10–14-days, or streptomycin (30–40 mg/kg/day, divided into 2 doses/day, intramuscularly) for 10 days. Doxycycline was not the drug of choice for patients younger than 8 years.

Good response was defined as complete recovery from the illness after treatment with antimicrobial drugs only (no suppuration, no need for surgical procedures, and no relapse). Therapeutic failure was defined as the presence of 1 of the following: increased lymph node size, occurrence of new lymphadenopathy, or both; persistent or recurrent fever; and constantly elevated or increasing acute-phase reactants (erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein levels).

Statistical analyses were performed by using SPSS version 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Numerical variables are expressed as means (or medians) and standard deviations. Categorical variables are expressed as frequencies and percentages. For categorical variables, if the χ2 condition was met, multiple group comparisons were performed by χ2 test; if not, Monte Carlo simulation was used in multiple group comparisons and the Fisher exact test was used to compare 2 groups. Numerical variables with normal distribution were compared by using the Student t-test, and those with nonnormal distribution were compared by using the Mann–Whitney U test. Logistic regression analysis (method = ENTER) was used to determine the risk factors. A p value <0.05 was considered to be significant.


Figure 1

Thumbnail of Diagnosis of tularemia for 100 children, by patient age group and sex, Ankara, Turkey, September 2009–November 2012.

Figure 1. Diagnosis of tularemia for 100 children, by patient age group and sex, Ankara, Turkey, September 2009–November 2012.

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Diagnosis of tularemia for 100 children, by month, Ankara, Turkey, September 2009–November 2012.

Figure 2. Diagnosis of tularemia for 100 children, by month, Ankara, Turkey, September 2009–November 2012.

A total of 100 children with laboratory-confirmed tularemia were included in the study. Most (63%) of the children were male. Mean patient age was 10.1 ± 3.5 years (range 3–18 years); half (50%) were younger than 10 years, and only 9% were younger than 5 years (Figure 1). Most (96%) patients were from Ankara Province, and only 4% were from the Aegean region. Most (62%) patients lived in villages in Ankara, and the rest (16%) came from an area ≈250 km in diameter. More than half (60%) of the patients were admitted to the hospital during winter and autumn (Figure 2). In terms of risk factors, in addition to tap water, natural stream water was available and had been widely used for drinking and cooking; 76% of the patients had a history of drinking water from these sources. Contact with rodents was reported for 32% of patients, and 44% of patients had at least 1 neighbor who had been exposed to rodents. None of the patients had a history of tularemia.

Clinical Findings

The most common clinical signs were swelling on the neck (cervical lymphadenopathy) (92%), fever (63%), and tonsillitis (55%) (Table 1). Abdominal lymphadenopathy was found in 3 patients. Oropharyngeal tularemia was diagnosed for 90 patients, ulceroglandular tularemia for 7, and oculoglandular tularemia for 3 (Table 1). No patient died during or after therapy.

During the initial visits, skin rashes were found on 6 patients; 4 of these patients had papular lesions on the extremities, and the other 2 had erythema nodosum without associated symptoms of tularemia. During follow-up visits, 1 of the patients with erythema nodosum had oculoglandular tularemia and the other had oropharyngeal tularemia.

Laboratory Findings

Diagnoses were primarily established by microagglutination test results (titer >1:160) for 98 patients and by F. tularensis–specific PCR analysis for 2 patients. The microagglutination method revealed titers of 1:40–1:2,560. The median agglutinin titer was 1:810. Paired serum samples from 2 patients with low acute-phase titers revealed a 4–fold increase in titer.

The other abnormal laboratory findings were elevated leukocyte counts and erythrocyte sedimentation rates. Mean leukocyte count was 11,918 ± 3,924/mm3 (range 5,600–23,800/mm3). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate was elevated for 89% of the patients (mean 60.13 ± 27.5 mm/h, range 8–120 mm/h), and for 68% of patients the rate was >50 mm/h. For 18 patients, only C-reactive protein was elevated (median 2.51 mg/dL, range 0.1–19.2 mg/dL). Ultrasonography was performed for 89 patients with lymphadenopathy and for 77 of these patients revealed cystic necrotic abscesses characterized by central hypoechogenicity and septations. No significant difference was found between erythrocyte sedimentation rate (>50 mm/h vs. <50 mm/h) and C-reactive protein levels, respectively, of patients with good response (p = 0.133, p = 0.819), those who needed surgical procedures (p = 0.131, p = 0.103), those who experienced spontaneous suppuration (p = 0.448, p = 0.674), and those who experienced relapse (p = 0.325, p = 0.963).

Treatment Response

No deaths occurred during the 12-month follow-up period. Of 62 patients in the treatment failure group, previous medications included β-lactams/macrolides. Another 2 patients had received a diagnosis of tuberculosis according to pathologic findings and were receiving antituberculosis treatment at the time of diagnosis.

Initial therapy consisted of intravenous gentamicin (56 patients), oral doxycycline (23 patients), oral ciprofloxacin (20 patients), or intramuscular streptomycin (1 patient). The duration of antimicrobial drug treatment was 10–14 days. Relapse rates were similar for patients who received gentamicin, doxycycline, or ciprofloxacin (p = 0.306).

Figure 3

Thumbnail of Data regarding outcome for 100 children with tularemia, Ankara, Turkey, September 2009–November 2012.

Figure 3. Data regarding outcome for 100 children with tularemia, Ankara, Turkey, September 2009–November 2012.

Complete recovery with no complications (e.g., suppuration, need for surgical procedures, or relapse) occurred for 54 patients. However, for 8 patients with a good response, although surgery was not needed, a surgical procedure was performed to hasten the healing process. While receiving specific antimicrobial drug therapy, 9 patients experienced spontaneous suppuration. During the 12-month follow-up period after initial treatment (antimicrobial drug alone or with surgical procedures), 74 patients neither required re-treatment nor experienced relapses. A surgical procedure was performed for 43 (58.1%) of these 74 patients. The remaining 26 patients experienced relapses that required a second course of therapy (Table 2). All 26 patients received antimicrobial drugs, and 17 underwent surgical procedures. Among these 17 patients, 10 underwent a second surgical procedure. All 17 patients recovered completely and did not experience any relapses during the 12-month follow-up period. Outcome data are shown in Figure 3. Excisional biopsy specimens from 15 patients underwent histopathologic examination and revealed chronic necrotizing lymphadenitis with histiocytic infiltration and caseous necrosis.

Factors Predicting Response to Treatment

Complete recovery rate (good response) was higher among children 5–10 years of age than among those in the other age groups (<5 and >10 years) (p = 0.018) (Table 2). The need for surgical procedures (p = 0.36) and spontaneous suppuration of lymph nodes (p = 0.46) were similar for children in all age groups. Rates of relapse were significantly lower for children 5–10 years of age than for those in the other age groups (p = 0.03) (Table 2).

Treatment Delay

For 56 patients, the time from diagnosis to treatment initiation was >2 weeks. Good response rate (p = 0.02) was significantly lower and relapse rate was significantly higher (p = 0.03) among patients for whom treatment was delayed >16 days, and spontaneous suppuration rate (p = 0.23) and need for surgical procedures (p = 0.12) were similar among patients for whom treatment was delayed >16 days and those for whom treatment was delayed <16 days (Table 2).

According to regression analysis, significant factors for treatment failure were female sex, treatment delay >16 days, and doxycycline use. The significant factor for spontaneous suppuration was treatment delay >16 days (Table 3).


Tularemia is endemic to Turkey. Although most studies have examined adult populations, tularemia can occur in patients of all ages and is more prevalent among children 5–9 years of age and in persons older than 75 years (6,1012,1517). Ulceroglandular tularemia is the most commonly reported clinical form throughout the world (1,4,5,18). However, prevalence of oropharyngeal tularemia is higher in Turkey, Bulgaria, Kosovo, and Norway (6,7,10,1517,19), as is reported here.

In studies reported from Turkey, cases of tularemia in patients younger than 10 years were extremely rare; in a report of 61 tularemia cases, no patient was younger than 10 years, and in another study, only 2 patients were younger than 10 years (11,17). In our study, half of the patients were younger than 10 years. The prevalence of tularemia among children probably tended to increase because of increased exposure of farmers’ infants and school-aged children to farm animals, rodents, or rodent excreta while helping their families with farming and drinking nonchlorinated (natural spring) water.

The source of infection and the mode of transmission often remain elusive for patients with tularemia. However, the high prevalence of oropharyngeal tularemia has been associated with the consumption of contaminated water (6,1012). Tularemia outbreaks that are associated with the consumption of hunted animals usually occur in summer and early autumn (1,35), whereas waterborne tularemia outbreaks usually occur in autumn and winter (1012,2022). Similar to cases in adults, almost all of the cases in children in our study occurred in winter or autumn.

F. tularensis subsp. holarctica usually causes mild infections with low mortality rates. For patients with tularemia, physical examination usually reveals unilateral cervical lymphadenopathy, tonsillitis, and fever. The most commonly reported finding in tularemia patients is lymphadenopathy (6,11,12,22). In our study, the most common (92%) complaint at admission was a mass in the neck region (cervical lymphadenopathy), followed by tonsillitis and fever.

Secondary skin manifestations of tularemia are erythema multiforme, erythema nodosum, and papular lesions. Skin manifestations might occur in all forms of tularemia and probably result from the systemic spread of organisms (23,24). In our study, erythema nodosum was observed in only 2 (2.6%) patients, less than that observed in other studies (69,11,15). Of note, none of the patients had any signs or symptoms suggesting tularemia at illness onset. In a study of 50 patients in Finland, the frequency of skin lesions was ≈50% (25). In our study, the frequency of skin lesions was as low as 6%.

Routine peripheral blood counts do not provide a diagnostic clue for tularemia. The standard test for diagnosis of tularemia is culture, which is difficult and requires a Biosafety Level 3 facility (1). Therefore, other methods, mainly serologic testing and PCR, have generally been preferred for the diagnosis of this disease (2629). The most frequently ordered diagnostic testing for F. tularensis infection is serology. In Turkey, antibody titers of >1:160 obtained by microagglutination testing are generally consistent with infection (6,1012,21,30). However, antibody levels do not usually increase until the second week of illness (10,30). In addition, the existence of antibody-negative but culture-positive patients has been reported in the literature (30). In another study, for some tularemia patients with negative microagglutination test results, diagnosis was made only by ELISA or PCR (28). In our study, microagglutination titers were >1:160 for 98 patients, and PCRs were positive for 2 patients with negative serologic test results. In the literature, the sensitivity and specificity of microagglutination testing, based on the results obtained for samples from healthy persons and patients with illnesses other than tularemia, were 97.6% and 98.7%, respectively (30).

In our study, 92 patients had cervical lymphadenopathy. Despite negative microagglutination test results, PCRs for F. tularensis in the tissue were positive. The patients recovered fully after taking antimicrobial drugs specific for tularemia. Thus, in our opinion, although microagglutination testing had been recommended for the diagnosis of tularemia, PCR testing should be considered for patients with signs and symptoms strongly suggestive of tularemia and with negative microagglutination test results.

PCR testing has been performed on samples (lymph node aspirates) collected during epidemics in Turkey (2009–2012) (12,31,32). The sensitivity of PCR ranged from 33.9% to 91.0% for patients with culture- and/or serology-verified oropharyngeal and glandular tularemia, depending on the duration of illness, and PCR was more sensitive than culture of lymph node aspirates (63.3% vs. 23.3%) (12,31,32). PCR is the most rapid and sensitive test available for detecting F. tularensis in patient specimens (26).

Beta-lactams, cephalosporins, and clindamycin are considered to be ineffective for the treatment of F. tularensis infections (5,6). In the United States and Europe, treatment with aminoglycosides has been the mainstay of treatment for children with tularemia (3,33,34). Because of the possible ototoxic side effects of aminoglycosides, evaluation of hearing function before treatment and monitoring of inner ear function during treatment are highly recommended (1,11). Expert groups in Europe recommend quinolones as an effective treatment alternative for subsp. holarctica infections (29,33). In our study, ciprofloxacin was preferred for 26 patients. No relapses occurred in these patients, although our sample size was not large enough to enable us to draw definitive conclusions. Further randomized studies in large patient populations are needed. Tetracyclines should be administered for at least 14–21 days because relapses in patients receiving these bacteriostatic agents have been reported (11). In patients younger than 8 years, the lack of alternative oral medications for tularemia constitutes a major problem. A study that evaluated 67 cases in children established that the time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 26 days (range 8–92 days). Delayed treatment was explained by the use of antimicrobial drugs not effective against F. tularensis in at least 20 patients. For some patients, although tularemia was suspected, treatment delays were attributed to lack of oral alternatives to aminoglycosides (34). Duration of treatment depends on the clinical course of the disease. In our study, the relapse rates were similar among patients receiving each of the 4 antimicrobial drugs, including doxycycline.

Delayed initiation of antimicrobial therapy was reported to be strongly associated with treatment response. In a recent study from Turkey that included adults, initiation of therapy after 14 days was reported to be associated with treatment failure (29) as it was in previous reports (9). In our study, factors that significantly affected treatment failure were female sex, treatment delay >16 days, and doxycycline use.

Recently a small-scale study from Turkey, which included children, reported that all children responded well to treatment regardless of age (17). However, in our study, response to treatment was better and rates of relapse were lower among children 5–10 years of age than among children in other age groups. This finding may be the target of immunopathogenesis research.

In conclusion, our study indicated that tularemia affects children differently than adults, suggesting that tularemia should be kept in mind as a diagnosis for children with severe lymphadenopathy and tonsillitis who show no response to β-lactam antimicrobial drugs. Additionally, according to our results, prognosis varied by age, and treatment failure was associated with female sex, treatment delay >16 days, and doxycycline use.

Dr Tezer is a physician at the Gazi University School of Medicine hospital. His research interest is zoonotic diseases, especially tularemia and Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever.



  1. World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on tularemia [cited 2013 Jul 22].
  2. Sjöstedt  A. Tularemia: history, epidemiology, pathogen physiology, and clinical manifestations. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1105:129. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Eliasson  H, Broman  T, Forsman  M, Bäck  E. Tularemia: current epidemiology and disease management. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2006;20:289311. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ellis  J, Oyston  PC, Green  M, Titball  RW. Tularemia. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15:63146 and. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Tärnvik  A, Priebe  HS, Grunow  R. Tularaemia in Europe: an epidemiological overview. Scand J Infect Dis. 2004;36:3505. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Helvaci  S, Gedikoğlu  S, Akalin  H, Oral  HB. Tularemia in Bursa, Turkey: 205 cases in ten years. Eur J Epidemiol. 2000;16:2716. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Reintjes  R, Dedushaj  I, Gjini  A, Jorgensen  TR, Cotter  B, Lieftucht  A, Tularemia outbreak investigation in Kosovo: case control and environmental studies. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:6973. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Komitova  R, Nenova  R, Padeshki  P, Ivanov  I, Popov  V, Petrov  P, Tularemia in Bulgaria 2003–2004. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2010;4:68994 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Christova  I, Velinov  T, Kantardjiev  T, Galev  A. Tularaemia outbreak in Bulgaria. Scand J Infect Dis. 2004;36:7859. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kılıç  S. A general overview of Francisella tularensis and the epidemiology of tularemia in Turkey [in Turkish]. Flora. 2010;15:3758.
  11. Celebi  G, Baruönü  F, Ayoğlu  F, Cinar  F, Karadenizli  A, Celebi  G, Tularemia, a reemerging disease in northwest Turkey: epidemiological investigation and evaluation of treatment responses. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2006;59:22934 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ulu-Kilic  A, Gulen  G, Sezen  F, Kilic  S, Sencan  I. Tularemia in Central Anatolia. Infection. 2013;41:3919 and. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sjöstedt  A, Kuoppa  K, Johansson  A, Sandström  G. The 17 kDa lipoprotein and encoding gene of Francisella tularensis LVS are conserved in 241 strains of Francisella tularensis. Microb Pathog. 1992;13:2439. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Broekhuijsen  M, Larsson  P, Johansson  A, Bystrom  M, Eriksson  U, Larsson  E, Genome-wide DNA microarray analysis of Francisella tularensis strains demonstrates extensive genetic conservation within the species but identifies regions that are unique to the highly virulent F. tularensis subsp. tularensis. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:292431. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Arikan  OK, Koç  C, Bozdoğan  O. Tularemia presenting as tonsillopharyngitis and cervical lymphadenitis: a case report and review of the literature. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2003; 260: 298–300. PMID: 12883950
  16. Senol  M, Ozcan  A, Karincaoglu  Y, Aydin  A, Ozerol  IH. Tularemia: a case transmitted from a sheep. Cutis. 1999;63:4951 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Celebi  S, Hacimustafaoglu  M, Gedikoglu  S. Tularemia in children. Indian J Pediatr. 2008;75:112932 and. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Eliasson  H, Lindbäck  J, Nuorti  JP, Arneborn  M, Giesecke  J, Tegnell  A. The 2000 tularemia outbreak: a case–control study of risk factors in disease-endemic and emergent areas, Sweden. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:95660. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Larssen  KW, Afset  JE, Heier  BT, Krogh  T, Handeland  K. Vikøren T,et al. Outbreak of tularaemia in central Norway, January to March 2011. Euro Surveill. 2011;16. pii:19828. PMID: 21489376
  20. Ozdemir  D, Sencan  I, Annakkaya  AN, Karadenizli  A, Guclu  E, Sert  E, Comparison of the 2000 and 2005 outbreaks of tularemia in the Duzce region of Turkey. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2007;60:512 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Meriç  M, Sayan  M, Willke  A, Gedikoğlu  S. A small water-borne tularemia outbreak [in Turkish]. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2008;42:4959 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ulu Kılıç  A, Kılıç  S, Sencan  I, Ciçek Şentürk  G, Gürbüz  Y, Tütüncü  EE, A water-borne tularemia outbreak caused by Francisella tularensis subspecies holarctica in Central Anatolia region [in Turkish]. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2011;45:23447 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Syrjälä  H, Karvonen  J, Salminen  A. Skin manifestations of tularemia: a study of 88 cases in northern Finland during 16 years (1967–1983). Acta Derm Venereol. 1984;64:5136 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Cerný  Z. Skin manifestations of tularemia. Int J Dermatol. 1994;33:46870. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Jounio  U, Renko  M, Uhari  M. An outbreak of holarctica-type tularemia in pediatric patients. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2010;29:1602. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Johansson  A, Berglund  L, Eriksson  U, Göransson  I, Wollin  R, Forsman  M, Comparative analysis of PCR versus culture for diagnosis of ulceroglandular tularemia. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:226 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Anda  P, Segura del Pozo  J, Díaz García  JM, Escudero  R, García Peña  FJ, López Velasco  MC, Waterborne outbreak of tularemia associated with crayfish fishing. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7:57582. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Willke  A, Meric  M, Grunow  R. Sayan M, Finke EJ, Splettstösser W, et al. An outbreak of oropharyngeal tularaemia linked to natural spring water. J Med Microbiol. 2009;58:112–6.
  29. Meric  M, Willke  A, Finke  EJ, Grunow  R, Sayan  M, Erdogan  S, Evaluation of clinical, laboratory, and therapeutic features of 145 tularemia cases: the role of quinolones in oropharyngeal tularemia. APMIS. 2008;116:6673. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Celebi B, Yeşilyurt M. Evaluation of a commercial immunochromatographic assay for the serologic diagnosis of tularemia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;74:15 Kiliç S. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Uyar  M, Cengiz  B, Unlü  M, Celebi  B, Kılıç  S, Eryılmaz  A. Evaluation of the oropharyngeal tularemia cases admitted to our hospital from the provinces of Central Anatolia [in Turkish]. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2011;45:5866 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Akıncı  E, Ülgen  F, Kılıç  S, Yılmaz  S, Yıldız  S, Özdemir  B, Evaluation of tularemia cases originated from Central Anatolia, Turkey [in Turkish]. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2011;45:7624 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Pérez-Castrillón  JL, Bachiller-Luque  P, Martín-Luquero  M, Mena-Martín  FJ, Herreros  V. Tularemia epidemic in northwestern Spain: clinical description and therapeutic response. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:5736. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Uhari  M, Syrjälä  H, Salminen  A. Tularemia in children caused by Francisella tularensis biovar palaearctica. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1990;9:803 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2101.131127

Table of Contents – Volume 21, Number 1—January 2015

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Aslınur Ozkaya-Parlakay, Ankara Hematology Oncology Children’s Training and Research Hospital, Pediatric Infectious Diseases Unit, Dıskapı, 06110, Ankara, Turkey

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: December 17, 2014
Page updated: December 17, 2014
Page reviewed: December 17, 2014
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.