Volume 21, Number 1—January 2015
Letter
Diverse Francisella tularensis Strains and Oropharyngeal Tularemia, Turkey
Table
Francisella tularensis–positive clinical samples from 14 patients with oropharyngeal tularemia, Turkey, December 2009–January 2011*
| Patient no. (sample no.) | City | CanSNP subgroup† | MLVA genotype‡ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (F0737) | Corum | B.20/21/33 | i |
| 2 (F0738) | Cankırı | B.28/29 | b |
| 3 (F0739) | Yozgat | B.28/29 | b |
| 4 (F0740) | Zonguldak | B.7/8 | a |
| 5 (F0741) | Corum | B.20/21/33 | e |
| 6 (F0742) | Corum | B.20/21/33 | e |
| 7 (F0743) | Corum | B.20/21/33§ | ND |
| 8 (F0744)¶ | Bala/Ankara | B.20/21/33 | e |
| 9 (F0745) | Ankara | B.20/21/33 | d |
| 10 (F0746) | Corum | B.20/21/33 | j |
| 11 (F0747) | Bala/Ankara | B.20/21/33 | g |
| 12 (F0748) | Corum | B.20/21/33 | f |
| 13 (F0749) | Ankara | B.20/21/33 | c |
| 14 (F0750) | Emirdağ/Afyon | B.20/21/33 | h |
*Clinical samples collected in 2011 from patients with cervical lymphadenitis at Hacettepe University Medical Faculty, Pediatric Infectious Disease unit, Ankara, Turkey. CanSNP, canonical single-nucleotide polymorphism; MLVA, multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis; ND, not determined.
†Subgroups published in (3,4,6,7). CanSNP branches tested on samples in this study: B.3, B.4, B.5, B.6, B.7, B.8, B.9, B.10, B.11, B.13, B.20, B.21, B.22, B.26, B.27, B.28, B.29, B.30, B.31, B.32, and B.33.
‡MLVA markers (M03, M05, M06, M20) (2).
§Subgroup classification based on approximation because genotype for B.33 remains unresolved.
¶This patient was an adult (all others were children).
References
- Akalin H, Helvaci S, Gedikoglu S. Re-emergence of tularemia in Turkey. Int J Infect Dis. 2009;13:547–51 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vogler AJ, Birdsell D, Wagner DM, Keim P. An optimized, multiplexed multi-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis system for genotyping Francisella tularensis. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2009;48:140–4. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chanturia G, Birdsell DN, Kekelidze M, Zhgenti E, Babuadze G, Tsertsvadze N, Phylogeography of Francisella tularensis subspecies holarctica from the country of Georgia. BMC Microbiol. 2011;11:139 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gyuranecz M, Birdsell DN, Splettstoesser W, Seibold E, Beckstrom-Sternberg SM, Makrai L, Phylogeography of Francisella tularensis subsp. holarctica, Europe. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18:290–3. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karlsson E, Svensson K, Lindgren P, Byström M, Sjödin A, Forsman M, The phylogeographic pattern of Francisella tularensis in Sweden indicates a Scandinavian origin of Eurosiberian tularaemia. Environ Microbiol. 2013;15:634–45. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Svensson K, Granberg M, Karlsson L, Neubauerova V, Forsman M, Johansson A. A real-time PCR array for hierarchical identification of Francisella isolates. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e8360. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vogler AJ, Birdsell D, Price LB, Bowers JR, Beckstrom-Sternberg SM, Auerbach RK, Phylogeography of Francisella tularensis: global expansion of a highly fit clone. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:2474–84. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ulu-Kilic A, Gulen G, Sezen F, Kilic S, Sencan I. Tularemia in central Anatolia. Infection. 2013;41:391–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johansson A, Berglund L, Eriksson U, Goransson I, Wollin R, Forsman M, Comparative analysis of PCR versus culture for diagnosis of ulceroglandular tularemia. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:22–6 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang Y, Peng Y, Hai R, Xia L, Li H, Zhang Z, Diversity of Francisella tularensis subsp. holarctica lineages, China. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:1191–4. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
1These authors contributed equally to this article.