Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 21, Number 12—December 2015

NADC30-like Strain of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus, China

On This Page
Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus

Cite This Article

To the Editor: Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS), which is characterized by reproductive failure in sows and respiratory disease in pigs of all ages, is a viral disease with serious economic consequences for the global pork industry (1). PRRS virus (PRRSV), the causative agent of this disease, was identified in Europe in 1991 and the United States in 1992 (2,3). PRRSV is an enveloped, positive-strand RNA virus of the family Arteriviridae. This virus is divided into European genotype 1 and North American genotype 2. Emerging novel PRRSV strains have caused many outbreaks of severe PRRS (47). We report emergence of a novel PRRSV (NADC30-like) in China that is genetically similar to the NADC30 strain isolated in the United States in 2008 (8).

During August–December 2014, severe outbreaks of PRRS were observed on 7 intensive pig farms in Beijing, Tianjing, Shanxi, Henan, and Zhejing, China. Pregnant sows had abortions and stillbirth and piglets had respiratory disorders (case-fatality rate 30%–50%).

A total of 58 tissue samples from stillborn piglets, serum samples from diseased sows and piglets, and lungs and lymph nodes of dead piglets were tested for viral RNA by using reverse transcription PCR and primers specific for PRRSV open reading frame (ORF) 7, which encodes nucleocapsid protein, as described (9). Viral RNA was detected in 63.8% (4/7, 7/13, 5/5, 4/4, 5/10, 6/6, and 6/13 for the 7 farms, respectively) of samples tested.

All virus-positive lung samples were then used to amplify the entire ORF5 gene, which encodes major envelope glycoprotein 5 and is one of the most variable regions in the PRRSV genome. Amplified fragments were sequenced to analyze variation of PRRSV as described (10).

Comparative analyses of sequences showed that amplified ORF5s of viruses isolated on an individual farm had 100% identities and amplified ORF5s of viruses from 7 farms had 89.7%–97.7% nucleotide identities (88.6%–98.0% for deduced amino acids) with each other (GenBank accession nos. KP861625–31) and higher nucleotide (92.2%–97.0%) and amino acid (91.5%–96.5%) identities with NADC30. The ≈10% amino acid divergence among ORF5s from the 7 farms suggests possible variation of NADC30 during its transmission. These viruses had lower nucleotide (84.9%–87.6%) and amino acid (84.1%–88.6%) identities with representative PRRSV strains from China, including CH1a, HB-1(sh)/2002, HB-2(sh)/2002, and JXwn06, and lower nucleotide (85.1%–86.7%) and amino acid (82.1%–86.1%) identities with VR-2332.

A strain of PRRSV (CHsx1401) was isolated from a lung sample by using porcine pulmonary alveolar macrophages. Third-passage viral cultures were used for genomic sequencing as described (9). Genomic fragment amplification was conducted by using reverse transcription PCR and 14 pairs of primers (10), which had minor modifications made on the basis of the genomic sequence of NADC30 available in GenBank. Comparative analyses of all coding regions and their deduced amino acid sequences of the virus were performed with representative PRRSV strains from China and the United States. Similar to the genome of NADC30, the genome of CHsx1401 (GenBank accession no. KP861625) was 15,020 nt, excluding its poly A tail.

Amino acid alignment of the nonstructural protein 2 (NSP2) highly variable region of CHsx1401 with those other strains showed that this virus had amino acid deletions that were identical to that in NADC30 (8) and MN184 isolated in the United States (4). These deletions were identified as a 111-aa deletion at position 323–433, a 1-aa deletion at position 481, and a 19-aa deletion at position 533–551 (Technical Appendix Figure) when compared with sequence of prototype strain VR-2332.


Thumbnail of Phylogenetic analysis of whole genomes of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) CHsx1401 (triangle) (GenBank accession no. KP861625); representative prototype strain VR-2332 (U87392); isolates BJ-4 (AF331831), CH-1a (AY032626), HB-1(sh)/2002 (AY150312), and HB-2(sh)/2002 (AY262352) from China; highly pathogenic strains JXA1 (EF112445), JXwn06 (EF641008), and HUN4 (EF635006); strains MN184A (DQ176019), MN184B (DQ176020), MN184C (EF488739), and NADC30 (JN654459)

Figure. Phylogenetic analysis of whole genomes of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) CHsx1401 (triangle) (GenBank accession no. KP861625); representative prototype strain VR-2332 (U87392); isolates BJ-4 (AF331831), CH-1a (AY032626), HB-1(sh)/2002 (AY150312),...

Two recent virus isolates from China (HENAN-XINX and HENAN-HEB), whose sequences were submitted to GenBank in 2013, also had these deletions. Genome sequence of CHsx1401 had 95.7% nucleotide identity with NADC30, 93.0% identity with HENAN-XINX, and 93.2% identity with HENAN-HEB, but only 85.8% identity with VR-2332 and 83.8% identity with JXwn06, a highly pathogenic strain from China. Phylogenetic analysis of the whole genome of PRRSV was performed by using a distance-based neighbor-joining method with 1,000 bootstrap replicates in MEGA6 ( CHsx1401 was shown to be genetically more closely related to NADC30 and clustered into a specific branch (Figure).

Additional comparative analyses of viral protein amino acid sequences of CHsx1401 with those of NADC30, MN184A, MN184B, MN184C, JXwn06, and VR-2332 indicated that CHsx1401 had higher similarity with NADC30 (91.2%–99.1%) than with MN184 serial strains (78%–98.2%) and lower similarity with HP-PRRSV (JXwn06) from China and VR-2332 strains, except for NSP1α and NSP11 (Technical Appendix Table). These data also indicate that CHsx1401 is genetically similar to NADC30.

Recent widespread outbreaks of PPRS in China were associated with a novel NADC30-like strain of PPRSV. Whole genomic analysis showed that the strain differed from previously identified PRRSV strains in China, but had an overall genetic similarity and a unique deletion in the NSP2-coding region that was identical to that of NADC30, which originated in the United States. We propose that the NADC30 strain was introduced into China in recent years by importing of breeding pigs and has since undergone mutations, resulting in variant viruses.



This study was supported by the Major Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (31490603) and the earmarked fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System of China (CARS-36) from the Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China.


Lei Zhou1, Zichun Wang1, Yuping Ding, Xinna Ge, Xin Guo, and Hanchun YangComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Author affiliation: China Agricultural University, Beijing, China



  1. Lunney  JK, Benfield  DA, Rowland  RR. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus: an update on an emerging and re-emerging viral disease of swine. Virus Res. 2010;154:16. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Wensvoort  G, Terpstra  C, Pol  JM, ter Laak  EA, Bloemraad  M, de Kluyver  EP, Mystery swine disease in The Netherlands: the isolation of Lelystad virus. Vet Q. 1991;13:12130. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Benfield  DA, Nelson  E, Collins  JE, Harris  L, Goya  SM, Robison  D, Characterization of swine infertility and respiratory syndrome (SIRS) virus (isolate ATCC-VR2332). J Vet Diagn Invest. 1992;4:12733. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Han  J, Wang  Y, Faaberg  KS. Complete genome analysis of RFLP 184 isolates of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Virus Res. 2006;122:17582. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Tian  K, Yu  X, Zhao  T, Feng  Y, Cao  Z, Wang  C, Emergence of fatal PRRSV variants: unparalleled outbreaks of atypical PRRS in China and molecular dissection of the unique hallmark. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e526. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Zhou  L, Yang  H. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in China. Virus Res. 2010;154:317. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Karniychuk  UU, Geldhof  M, Vanhee  M, Van Doorsselaere  J, Saveleva  TA, Nauwynck  HJ. Pathogenesis and antigenic characterization of a new East European subtype 3 porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus isolate. BMC Vet Res. 2010;6:309. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brockmeier  SL, Loving  CL, Vorwald  AC, Kehrli  ME Jr, Baker  RB, Nicholson  TL, Genomic sequence and virulence comparison of four type 2 porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus strains. Virus Res. 2012;169:21221. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Zhou  L, Chen  S, Zhang  J, Zeng  J, Guo  X, Ge  X, Molecular variation analysis of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in China. Virus Res. 2009;145:97105. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhou  L, Yang  X, Tian  Y, Yin  S, Geng  G, Ge  X, Genetic diversity analysis of genotype 2 porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viruses emerging in recent years in China. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:748068. Epub 2014 Feb 25. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2112.150360

1These authors contributed equally to this article.

Related Links


Table of Contents – Volume 21, Number 12—December 2015

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Hanchun Yang, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan West Rd, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, China

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: November 17, 2015
Page updated: November 17, 2015
Page reviewed: November 17, 2015
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.