Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 21, Number 3—March 2015
Dispatch

Moxifloxacin Prophylaxis against MDR TB, New York, New York, USA

Lisa TrieuComments to Author , Douglas C. Proops, and Shama D. Ahuja
Author affiliations: New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Bureau of Tuberculosis Control, New York, New York, USA

Cite This Article

Abstract

Contacts of persons infected with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB) have few prophylaxis options. Of 50 contacts of HIV- and MDR TB–positive persons who were treated with moxifloxacin, 30 completed treatment and 3 discontinued treatment because of gastrointestinal symptoms. Moxifloxacin was generally well-tolerated; further research of its efficacy against MDR TB is needed.

Limited data exist on safety of prophylaxis for contacts to persons with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB). All MDR TB strains are resistant to at least isoniazid and rifampin, precluding the use of these drugs for MDR TB prophylaxis. Current local, national, and international guidelines suggest using antibiotics to which the strain from the index case-patient is susceptible (16; Table 1); however, no randomized controlled trial has been conducted to support this recommendation. Global spread of MDR TB necessitates identification of treatment options with acceptable safety and tolerability for persons infected with drug-resistant strains. Choosing appropriate treatment for HIV-positive persons exposed to TB is even more crucial considering the increased risk among these persons for progression from TB infection to active disease (79).

In 2005, two TB outbreaks occurred in New York City (NYC) among HIV-positive persons with 2 distinct MDR TB strains. In both outbreaks, contacts were defined as 1) residents of a building on the floor on which a case-patient resided or visited during the infectious period and 2) health care staff members who provided direct care to case-patients. Eligible contacts were treated with moxifloxacin to prevent progression from TB infection to disease. We present the 9-year follow-up from these exposures and the outcomes of the treated contacts.

The Investigation

The first outbreak we investigated occurred in a facility that provided housing and harm-reduction services to a predominantly HIV-positive, homeless, and drug-using population (site A). The first TB case-patient identified was a 53-year-old HIV-positive man residing there, in whom pulmonary TB was diagnosed by a positive (4+) acid-fast bacilli (AFB) sputum smear and positive culture. His chest radiograph showed extensive bilateral infiltrates and a large pulmonary cavity; he died 4 days after initiating treatment. Subsequent drug-susceptibility results indicated the strain was resistant to isoniazid, rifampin, ethambutol, pyrazinamide, streptomycin, rifabutin, and kanamycin. Within 3 months, TB was diagnosed in 2 additional HIV-positive residents of site A; genotype and drug-resistance phenotype matched those of the index case-patient. A contact investigation and active case finding were initiated at site A, and 3 additional MDR TB cases with matching genotype were identified.

Of 105 close contacts identified, 84 (80%) were HIV-positive, 16 (15%) were HIV-negative, and 5 (5%) had unknown HIV status (Table 2). Among the 21 contacts not known to be HIV-positive, 1 person had a positive tuberculin skin test (TST) result, had normal chest radiograph results, and started moxifloxacin prophylaxis; however, the patient was lost to follow-up after 2 months. Among the 84 HIV-positive contacts, TST results of 2 were positive and that of 1 other contact was positive after a negative result documented 3 years before. Fifty-one (61%) HIV-positive contacts were lost to follow-up or refused evaluation or prophylaxis. Before being tested, 1 (1%) contact died as a result of HIV-related causes. Of the remaining 32 (38%) HIV-positive persons, 26 (81%) started moxifloxacin prophylaxis; 16 (62%) completed treatment, 5 (19%) were lost to follow-up within 2 months (including the 3 who tested TS positive), 3 (12%) were discharged from treatment because of adverse reactions, and 2 (8%) were either medically discharged for unknown reasons or refused to continue treatment.

The second outbreak occurred at a long-term care facility housing HIV-positive, previously homeless persons (site B). The index case-patient was a 49-year-old HIV-positive man for whom smear-positive (2+), culture-positive pulmonary TB was diagnosed. A TB strain resistant to isoniazid, rifampin, and rifabutin was identified; the patient died 1 month later. Contact investigation and active case finding were initiated at site B. Within 6 months of the index case-patient’s diagnosis, 5 additional TB cases were identified in 4 HIV-positive residents and 1 HIV-negative staff member. On the basis of genotype, the strain the index case-patient was diagnosed with matched the strain of the 3 residents and staff member. All isolates also had the same drug resistance phenotype. The other HIV-positive resident had a clinical diagnosis of TB meningitis (no culture results available).

In the site B outbreak, 136 close contacts were identified (Table 2): 83 (61%) HIV-positive residents and 53 (39%) staff members with unknown HIV status. Of the 53 staff members, 22 (42%) were previously TST-positive but had normal chest radiograph results during this evaluation; 25 (47%) tested negative, and 6 (11%) were not evaluated. No staff members were eligible for prophylaxis. Of the 83 HIV-positive residents, 3 (4%) had positive TST results; 2 had documented negative results within the year before their positive result, strengthening evidence of TB transmission in site B.

Considering the drug susceptibility pattern of this strain, a combination of moxifloxacin and pyrazinamide was recommended for all HIV-positive contacts once active disease was ruled out. Among exposed residents, 40 (48%) either died of non–TB-related causes or were lost to follow-up before completing TB evaluation, and 12 (14%) either refused treatment or were not started on treatment because of physician decision. Of the remainder, 24 initiated moxifloxacin and pyrazinamide treatment; 14 (58%) completed treatment, and 10 (42%) refused or were lost-to-follow up after a median 3 (range 1–5) months of treatment. The 2 contacts whose TST results were converted were placed on alternative regimens.

To determine whether TB symptoms subsequently developed in any contact in either outbreak, we compared them to cases identified in the NYC TB registry. As of March 2014, after a maximum of 8.5 years of follow-up at site A and 9 years at site B, 1 contact, a resident at site B who completed 1 month of moxifloxacin and pyrazinamide treatment in 2006 had TB disease caused by a different drug-susceptible strain develop during 2009.

Conclusions

Globally, an estimated 480,000 persons were infected with MDR TB in 2013 (World Health Organization Global Tuberculosis Report 2013, http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/91355/1/9789241564656_eng.pdf). Although the current priority is accurate diagnosis and treatment of persons with active disease, preventing MDR TB in infected contacts is also crucial. Programs with capacity for contact investigation are faced with the question of what prophylaxis to recommend for persons who have contact with persons who are positive for MDR TB because data are scarce on efficacy and safety of treatment options for these persons.

Currently recommended treatment regimens (Table 1) are not without risk. Studies demonstrate serious adverse effects associated with the use of pyrazinamide in combination with either ethambutol (10) or a fluoroquinolone, including ofloxacin (11,12) and levofloxacin (13,14). However, a recent study of contacts treated with moxifloxacin- or levofloxacin-based prophylaxis found no serious adverse events and fewer cases of disease among those treated than those untreated (15).

Of the 50 contacts initiating moxifloxacin-based prophylaxis in the 2 outbreaks, 30 (60%) completed treatment. Therapy was generally well-tolerated; 3 contacts discontinued treatment because of gastrointestinal symptoms, (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea). None of the contacts manifested TB symptoms regardless of treatment status. Those contacts at greatest risk for development of disease may have done so during the outbreak investigation.

Because of the lack of safety information for moxifloxacin-based prophylaxis, we reported these findings despite key limitations. These outbreak investigations were conducted as part of routine TB control activities; thus, treatment regimens were not standardized across the study populations, and contacts were not actively followed. However, these outbreaks demonstrate known exposure to infectious MDR TB case-patients with strong evidence of transmission to a high-risk HIV-positive population. Because of robust disease reporting and broad surveillance coverage, we are able to report on outcomes in NYC within <9 years of follow-up time. This study demonstrates that moxifloxacin-based regimens can be used to treat HIV-positive persons exposed to MDR TB with few serious adverse effects, although we were unable to assess efficacy of the regimen. More research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of prophylaxis for MDR TB.

Ms. Trieu is a city research scientist at the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Bureau of Tuberculosis Control. Her primary research interests are in the fields of tuberculosis epidemiology and public health. She currently serves as the Data Team Lead at the Bureau.

Top

Acknowledgment

We thank Sonal Munsiff, Kareen Joseph, Tracy Agerton, and Rachel Wiseman for their work and expertise during the outbreak investigations reported. We also thank our laboratory partners at the NYC Public Health Laboratory, the Public Health Research Institute at Rutgers University, and the NY State Wadsworth Center. Finally, we acknowledge the continued efforts of the NYC Bureau of Tuberculosis Control staff for case management and conducting contact investigation in NYC.

Top

References

  1. American Thoracic Society. Targeted tuberculin testing and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161:S22147 and. DOIPubMed
  2. Curry International Tuberculosis Center and California Department of Public Health. Drug-resistant tuberculosis: a survival guide for clinicians. 2nd ed. San Francisco; 2011 [cited 2014 Dec 19]. http://www.currytbcenter.ucsf.edu/drtb/
  3. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Management of contacts of MDR TB and XDR TB patients. Stockholm: The Centre; 2012 [cited 2014 Dec 19]. http://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/201203-Guidance-MDR-TB-contacts.pdf
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Management of persons exposed to multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. MMWR Recomm Rep. 1992;41(RR-11):6171 .PubMed
  5. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Bureau of Tuberculosis Control. Tuberculosis: clinical policies and protocols. 4th ed. New York: The Department; 2008 [cited 2014 Dec 19]. http://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/downloads/pdf/tb/tb-protocol.pdf
  6. World Health Organization. Guidelines on the management of latent tuberculosis infection. Geneva: The Organization; 2015 [cited 2014 Dec 19]. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/136471/1/9789241548908_eng.pdf?ua=1
  7. Sharma  SK, Mohan  A, Kadhiravan  T. HIV–TB co-infection: epidemiology, diagnosis & management. Indian J Med Res. 2005;121:55067 .PubMed
  8. Markowitz  N, Hansen  NI, Hopewell  PC, Glassroth  J, Kvale  PA, Mangura  BT, Incidence of tuberculosis in the United States among HIV-infected persons. The Pulmonary Complications of HIV Infection Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:12332 and. DOIPubMed
  9. Schluger  NW, Burzynski  J. Tuberculosis and HIV infection: epidemiology, immunology, and treatment. HIV Clin Trials. 2001;2:35665 and. DOIPubMed
  10. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2013. Geneva: The Organization; 2014 [cited 2014 Dec 19]. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/91355/1/9789241564656_eng.pdf
  11. Younossian  AB, Rochat  T, Ketterer  JP, Wacker  J, Janssens  JP. High hepatotoxicity of pyrazinamide and ethambutol for treatment of latent tuberculosis. Eur Respir J. 2005;26:4624 and. DOIPubMed
  12. Ridzon  R, Meador  J, Maxwell  R, Higgins  K, Weismuller  P, Onorato  IM. Asymptomatic hepatitis in persons who received alternative preventive therapy with pyrazinamide and ofloxacin. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24:12645 and. DOIPubMed
  13. Horn  DL, Hewlett  D Jr, Alfalla  C, Peterson  S, Opal  SM. Limited tolerance of ofloxacin and pyrazinamide prophylaxis against tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:1241 and. DOIPubMed
  14. Papastavros  T, Dolovich  LR, Holbrook  A, Whitehead  L, Loeb  M. Adverse events associated with pyrazinamide and levofloxacin in the treatment of latent multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. CMAJ. 2002;167:1316 .PubMed
  15. Adler-Shohet  FC, Low  J, Carson  M, Girma  H, Singh  J. Management of latent tuberculosis infection in child contacts of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2014;33:6646 and. DOIPubMed
  16. Bamrah  S, Dorina  F, Setik  L, Song  R, Kawamura  LM. A. Heetderks A, et al. Treatment for LTBI in contacts of MDR-TB patients, Federated States of Micronesia, 2009–2012. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014;18:912–8.

Top

Tables

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2103.141313

Table of Contents – Volume 21, Number 3—March 2015

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Lisa Trieu, NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Bureau of Tuberculosis Control, 42-09 28th Street, 21st Fl, CN-72B, WS21-10, Long Island City, NY 11101, USA

Send To

character(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

Top

Page created: February 20, 2015
Page updated: February 20, 2015
Page reviewed: February 20, 2015
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external