Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 21, Number 4—April 2015
Dispatch

Outbreak of Severe Zoonotic Vaccinia Virus Infection, Southeastern Brazil

Figures
Tables
Altmetric
24
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Jônatas Santos Abrahão, Rafael Kroon Campos, Giliane de Souza Trindade, Flávio Guimarães da Fonseca, Paulo César Peregrino Ferreira, and Maurício Teixeira LimaComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Author affiliation: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil

Cite This Article

Abstract

In 2010, a vaccinia virus isolate caused an atypically severe outbreak that affected humans and cattle in Brazil. Of 26 rural workers affected, 12 were hospitalized. Our data raise questions about the risk factors related to the increasing number and severity of vaccinia virus infections.

After the World Health Organization declared in 1980 that smallpox had been eradicated, smallpox vaccination was suspended (1). This fact led to the emergence of a generation of humans that is susceptible to infection by zoonotic viruses of the genus Orthopoxvirus, which includes cowpox virus in Europe; monkeypox virus, which occurs naturally in Africa and of which 1 introduction was event reported in the United States; and vaccinia virus (VACV) in Asia and South America (25).

Especially during the past decade, orthopoxvirus (OPV) infections have increased worldwide, and the immunologic status of the population against OPV is a major risk factor for its reemergence (6). We describe an outbreak of atypically severe VACV infection in which 12 rural workers in Brazil, who were not vaccinated against smallpox, were hospitalized because of systemic clinical manifestations.

The Study

In June 2010, an outbreak of exanthematic VACV infection was reported in the rural region of Doresópolis County (20°17′13 ′′S, 45°54′10 ′′ W), Minas Gerais State, Brazil. This region is characterized by small rural properties, where cattle are kept for milk production. Outbreaks of VACV infection had been reported in the neighboring counties in previous dry seasons. In dairy cattle, typical lesions had developed on teats and udders that caused a decrease in milk production; however, the source (index case) was not identified. The reported virulence of the disease in cattle was not atypical and was similar to previously described cases (4).

During our collection of epidemiologic data, we were directed to the local health facility, where 12 rural workers were hospitalized because of high fever; lymphadenopathy; prostration; and painful vesicular–pustular lesions on the hands, arms, faces, and/or knees. All patients were occupationally infected (after milking cows that had lesions on teats). Patients reported that in case of multiple lesions, autoinoculation probably occurred from lesions on hands, the first site of infection; therefore, we have no clinical evidence of “generalized vaccinia.” Three patients also had convulsion, vomiting, diarrhea, and mental confusion.

The patients received clinical support and remained hospitalized for 3–18 days. They had no history of immunologic disorders and took no medications that could cause this severe clinical condition. The patients were 15–26 years of age, and none had a history of smallpox vaccination; 1 patient reported having similar clinical illness in 2009. Our investigations also identified 14 additional rural workers who were occupationally infected but not hospitalized; 7 were >40 years old and probably vaccinated against smallpox.

To characterize the etiologic agent of this outbreak, we collected serum from 4 infected cows, scabs from 3 cows, and swab samples from the lesions of 4 hospitalized patients and 1 nonhospitalized patient. The serum samples were submitted to plaque reduction–neutralizing tests as previously described (7). Neutralizing antibodies against OPV were detected in 3 (75%) cows; titers ranged from 1:40 to 1:160 neutralizing units/mL. Scabs and swab samples were macerated, and the supernatant, which was diluted 1:100 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), was used in a nested PCR for the C11R (viral growth factor) gene, as described previously (8,9). OPV-specific fragments from all samples were amplified. The samples were also submitted to viral isolation in BSC-40 cells. We isolated the virus from 3 of the nested PCR viral growth factor–positive samples (1each from a cow, a hospitalized patient, and a nonhospitalized patient). All isolates induced the formation of small plaques, similar to group 1 VACV isolates previously identified in Brazil (4). After we observed typical poxvirus cytopathic effect, the viruses were plaque-purified and used to reinoculate a Vero cell monolayer for viral amplification.

The viral DNA from the A56R (hemagglutinin) gene was amplified and sequenced from all isolated viruses (10). The A56R gene is traditionally used for phylogenetic analysis and usually clusters VACV from Brazil (VACV-BR) into 2 groups (group 1: mice, nonvirulent; group 2: mice, virulent) (4). In addition, we sequenced DNA from the A26L viral gene (A-type inclusion body) (11). The obtained PCR fragments were directly sequenced in both orientations in triplicate (Mega-BACE 1,000 sequencer; GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK). The sequences were aligned with previously published OPV sequences from GenBank by using ClustalW (12), and the alignments were manually verified by using MEGA 4.0 software (http://www.megasoftware.net). We named these isolates VACV DOR2010 (provisional GenBank accession no. 1606198).

Figure

Thumbnail of Phylogenetic trees based on the nucleotide sequences of the A56R (A) and A26L (B) genes of orthopoxvirus showing that DOR clusters with Brazilian vaccinia virus(VACV) genogroup 1.The trees were constructed by using the neighbor-joining method and the Tamura-Nei model of nucleotide substitutions with a bootstrap of 1,000 replicates using MEGA 4.0 (http://www.megasoftware.net). Dots highlight VACV DOR2010 among group 1 VACV isolates. GenBank accession numbers appear in parentheses. Sc

Figure. Phylogenetic trees based on the nucleotide sequences of the A56R (A) and A26L (B) genes of orthopoxvirus showing that DOR clusters with Brazilian vaccinia virus(VACV) genogroup 1.The trees were constructed by...

Optimal alignment of the nucleotides from the A56R and A26L genes using ClustalW showed that all amplified DNA sequences from DOR2010 were identical and were highly identical to several group 1 VACV-BR isolates (99.7% identity [A56R] and 99.8% identity [A26L] average) (Figure). DOR2010 also showed a signature deletion of 18 nt in the A56R sequences of other group 1 VACV-BR isolates. Therefore, no special genetic feature was identified in the DOR2010 isolates in regard to A56R and A26L. Phylogenetic trees based on the nucleotide sequences of the A56R and A26L genes of OPV showed that DOR clustered with VACV-BR group 1 (Figure).

Given the severity of the outbreak, we investigated the virulence of this isolate in mice (following the rules of the Committee of Ethics for Animal Experimentation, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil). Sixteen BALB/c mice were divided into 4 groups of 4 mice each. We intranasally inoculated 4 mice with 10-μL doses of viral suspensions containing 106 plaque-forming units, as described previously (4). Two groups were inoculated with VACV-GuaraniP1 or VACV-GuaraniP2 (4), which served as virulent or nonvirulent controls, respectively. Another group was inoculated with PBS. The animals infected with VAVC-GuaraniP1 exhibited ruffled fur, arched backs, and weight loss. No clinical signs were observed in mice inoculated with DOR2010, VACV-GuaraniP2, or PBS, which supported the grouping of the DOR2010 sample into the nonvirulent cluster.

Conclusions

Our biologic, epidemiologic, and molecular data indicate that the VACV isolate DOR2010 was associated with an outbreak of severe, exanthematous vaccinia virus infection that resulted in the hospitalization of 12 workers in a rural area in Brazil. During the past decade, VACV has spread to all regions of Brazil, and no specific official national programs are in place to prevent the disease (4,1315). Notifications and scientific efforts are needed to clarify the circulation, virulence, and diversity of VACV. Our data showed that DOR2010 does not present any special feature in A56R or A26L that justifies this unprecedented severity and infectivity among humans. Other studies suggested that group 2 VACV might be associated with severe illness, but such is not the case in the outbreak studied; however, very limited information is available about the relation between viral genotype and virulence in humans. Although useful for pathogenesis studies, our data indicate that the mouse model might not be considered a precise approach to indicate virulence potential of a viral isolate in humans (4). Exposure of OPV-nonvaccinated workers to VACV might, in part, explain those clinical features. Although previously infected—and vaccinated—patients were among the patients studied (Table), vaccination history (based on age, vaccine scar, and patient report) was strongly associated with severity of disease. The increased number of VACV outbreaks in recent years should be analyzed in the context of a worldwide phenomenon involving other zoonotic OPVs (16). We believe that the increased number of notifications will be followed by a concomitant increase in reports of atypically severe cases. A worldwide scientific and governmental debate is essential for zoonotic OPV control and prevention on the different continents affected by these viruses.

Dr. Abrahão is a biologist and professor of virology at the Laboratório de Vírus, Microbiology Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil. His research interests focus on monitoring and preventing emerging infectious diseases.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank all of our colleagues from Laboratório de Vírus, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, for their technical support.

Financial support was provided by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Pro-Reitoria de Pesquisa da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (PRPq-UFMG), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) and Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento (MAPA). E.G.K., P.P.F., C.A.B., G.S.T., and F.G.F. are CNPq researchers.

Top

References

  1. Damon  IK. Poxviruses. In: Knipe DM, Howley PM, Griffin DE, Lamb RA, Martin MA, Roizman B, et al., editors. Fields virology. Vol II. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2007. p. 2947–75.
  2. Reynolds  MG, Carroll  DS, Karem  KL. Factors affecting the likelihood of monkeypox’s emergence and spread in the post-smallpox era. Curr Opin Virol. 2012;2:335–43. PubMed
  3. Ducournau  C, Ferrier-Rembert  A, Ferraris  O, Joffre  A, Favier  AL, Flusin  O, Concomitant human infections with 2 cowpox virus strains in related cases, France, 2011. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19:19969 . DOIPubMed
  4. Kroon  EG. Mota BEF, Abrahão JS, Fonseca FG, Trindade GS. Zoonotic Brazilian vaccinia virus: from field to therapy. Antiviral Res. 2011;92:15063 . DOIPubMed
  5. Singh  RK, Hosamani  M, Balamurugan  V, Bhanuprakash  V, Rasool  TJ, Yadav  MP. Buffalopox: an emerging and re-emerging zoonosis. Anim Health Res Rev. 2007;8:10514 . DOIPubMed
  6. Shchelkunov  SN. An increasing danger of zoonotic orthopoxvirus infections. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003756. DOIPubMed
  7. Abrahão  JS. Silva-Fernandes AT, Lima LS, Campos RK, Guedes MI, Cota MM, et al. Vaccinia virus infection in monkeys, Brazilian Amazon. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:9769. DOIPubMed
  8. Abrahão  JS, Lima  LS, Assis  FL, Alves  PA, Silva-Fernandes  AT, Cota  MM, Nested-multiplex PCR detection of orthopoxvirus and parapoxvirus directly from exanthematic clinical samples. Virol J. 2009;6:140. DOIPubMed
  9. Abrahão  JS, Drumond  BP, Trindade Gde  S, da Silva-Fernandes  AT, Ferreira  JM, Alves  PA, Rapid detection of orthopoxvirus by semi-nested PCR directly from clinical specimens: a useful alternative for routine laboratories. J Med Virol. 2010;82:6929. DOIPubMed
  10. Ropp  SL, Jin  Q, Knight  JC, Massung  RF, Esposito  JJ. PCR strategy for identification and differentiation of small pox and other orthopoxviruses. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:206976 .PubMed
  11. Leite  JA, Drumond  BP, Trindade  GS, Bonjardim  CA, Ferreira  PC, Kroon  EG. Brazilian vaccinia virus strains show genetic polymorphism at the ati gene. Virus Genes. 2007;35:5319. DOIPubMed
  12. Thompson  JD, Higgins  DG, Gibson  TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:467380. DOIPubMed
  13. Damaso  CR, Esposito  JJ, Condit  RC, Moussatché  N. An emergent poxvirus from humans and cattle in Rio de Janeiro State: Cantagalo virus may derive from Brazilian smallpox vaccine. Virology. 2000;277:43949. DOIPubMed
  14. Trindade  GS, Emerson  GL, Carroll  DS, Kroon  EG, Damon  IK. Brazilian vaccinia viruses and their origins. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:96572. DOIPubMed
  15. Drumond  BP, Leite  JA, da Fonseca  FG, Bonjardim  CA, Ferreira  PC, Kroon  EG. Brazilian vaccinia virus strains are genetically divergent and differ from the Lister vaccine strain. Microbes Infect. 2008;10:18597. DOIPubMed

Top

Figure
Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2104.140351

Table of Contents – Volume 21, Number 4—April 2015

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Erna Geessien Kroon, Instituto de Ciencias Biologicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais—ICB, Dept Microbiologia, Lab de Virus, Av Antonio Carlos 6627, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Send To

character(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

Top

Page created: March 17, 2015
Page updated: March 17, 2015
Page reviewed: March 17, 2015
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external