Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 22, Number 10—October 2016
Dispatch

Effect of Geography on the Analysis of Coccidioidomycosis-Associated Deaths, United States

Jason A. Noble, Robert G. Nelson, Gudeta D. Fufaa, Paul Kang, Shira Chani Shafir, and John N. GalgianiComments to Author 
Author affiliations: University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona, USA (J.A. Noble, P. Kang); National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA (R.G. Nelson, G.D. Fufaa); University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA (S.C. Shafir); University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona, USA (J.N. Galgiani)

Main Article

Table

Differences in coccidioidomycosis-associated deaths, by geography, sex, and race/ethnicity, Arizona, California, and United States overall, 1990–2008

Characteristic US mortality rate* Incidence rate ratio† (95% CI)
Relative risk‡ (95% CI)
United States Arizona California United States Arizona California
Sex
F 0.31 Referent Referent Referent Referent Referent Referent
M
0.93
3.03
(2.80–3.27)
2.24
(1.95–2.54)
3.49
(2.68–3.69)

2.32
(1.97–2.73)
1.76
(1.38–2.26)
2.79
(2.10–3.71)
Race/ethnicity
Non-Hispanic white 0.40 Referent Referent Referent Referent Referent Referent
Hispanic 1.82 4.45
(4.06–4.88) 1.36
(1.13–1.64) 2.48
(2.09–2.96) 6.74
(5.59–8.14) 2.10
(1.53–2.88) 5.21
(3.87–6.99)
African American 0.69 1.70
(1.52–1.91) 3.41
(2.65–4.38) 5.15
(4.27–6.22) 1.38
(1.16–1.60) 3.42
(2.55–4.60) 3.50
(2.84–4.31)
Asian 1.25 2.84
(2.42–3.35) 2.19
(1.38–3.49) 1.88
(1.51–2.37) 5.48
(4.32–6.79) 5.51
(2.82–10.7) 2.70
(2.01–3.61)
Native American 2.67 6.52
(5.14–8.30) 2.50
(1.91–3.28) 1.39
(0.58–3.38) 8.15
(6.09–10.9) 2.18
(1.52–3.12) 3.01
(1.31–6.89)

*Per 1 million person-years.
†Univariate analysis (sex or race/ethnicity).
‡Multivariate analysis (sex and race/ethnicity).

Main Article

Page created: September 20, 2016
Page updated: September 20, 2016
Page reviewed: September 20, 2016
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external