Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 22, Number 3—March 2016
Letter

Borrelia miyamotoi and Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis in Ixodes ricinus Ticks, Romania

Cite This Article

To the Editor: Ixodes spp. ticks are vectors for human and animal pathogens. Ix. ricinus ticks are widely distributed, frequently reported to feed on humans, and the main vector for a large variety of tickborne pathogens (1). The effect of ticks and tickborne diseases on public health, animal health and welfare, and animal production appears to be an increasing global problem, which will lead to considerable economic costs (2).

Borrelia miyamotoi is a spirochete that belongs to the relapsing fever group and causes symptoms similar to those of other relapsing fever group pathogens and Lyme borreliosis, including erythema migrans−like skin lesions (3). The geographic distribution of B. miyamotoi is sporadic; it has been detected in Ixodes spp. ticks in many countries in Europe and in North America and Asia. In Russia, the United States, and recently in the Netherlands, B. miyamotoi was detected in humans and confirmed to cause disease (4,5). In Romania, pathogens that cause Lyme borreliosis and reptile-associated borreliae were identified in different tick populations (6,7). However, no information is available on the presence of relapsing fever group borreliae in this country.

Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis and Anaplasma phagocytophilum are obligate, intracellular, tickborne pathogens of the family Anaplasmataceae; both are emerging zoonotic agents. Candidatus N. mikurensis causes monocytotropic ehrlichiosis in canids and humans and granulocytic anaplasmosis in humans and domestic animals (8). These 2 pathogens are found throughout Europe in Ix. ricinus ticks (8). A. phagocytophilum has been reported in questing Ix. ricinus ticks, dogs, wild boars, hedgehogs, and tortoises in Romania (9). Recently, Candidatus N. mikurensis was detected in an Ix. ricinus tick that had bitten a human in Romania (10). This recently discovered tickborne agent was shown to be a risk for disease in humans and has been detected in questing Ix. ricinus ticks throughout Europe and in animal tissue samples and human patients (8).

Relapsing fever spirochetes and potential public health risks associated with tickborne pathogens are a serious medical problem. Thus, we assessed the presence of B. miyamotoi, A. phagocytophilum, and Candidatus N. mikurensis in questing Ix. ricinus ticks in Romania.

Questing Ix. ricinus ticks were available from previous studies conducted by our research group. A random sampling approach was used as described (7). To detect potentially pathogenic bacteria, 468 questing Ix. ricinus ticks were collected from 4 regions from Romania, randomly selected, and analyzed.

Detection of pathogens was performed by using multiplex quantitative PCRs (qPCRs) specific for the flaB and ospA genes of B. miyamotoi, the msp2 gene of A. phagocytophilum, and the groEL gene of Candidatus N. mikurensis. We used IQ Multiplex Powermix (Bio-Rad, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and a final reaction volume of 20 μL (8). For detection of A. phagocytophilum and Candidatus N. mikurensis, we also performed multiplex qPCR as described (8). For detection of B. miyamotoi, a specific region of the flab gene was targeted by using multiplex qPCR according to a previous described protocol (1). For quality control of qPCRs, we included positive and negative controls. Sequences of qPCR products were analyzed and compared with sequences available in GenBank.

B. miyamotoi was detected in 7 ticks: 2 (1.59%) of 126 males, 2 (0.68%) of 296 females, and 3 (6.52%) of 46 nymphs. A. phagocytophilum was detected in 16 ticks: 1 (0.79%) of 126 males, 11 (3.72%) of 296 females, and 4 (8.70%) of 46 nymphs. Candidatus N. mikurensis was detected in 25 ticks: 5 (3.97%) of 126 males, 18 (6.08%) of 296 females, and 2 (4.35%) of 46 nymphs. Overall prevalences were 1.50% for B. miyamotoi, 3.42% for A. phagocytophilum, and 5.34% for Candidatus N. mikurensis. Prevalences of each pathogen in specific varied by locality (Table). No co-infections were detected.

We analyzed flab, msp2, and groEL gene sequences obtained by qPCR. These sequences showed 99%–100% identities with gene sequences of B. miyamotoi (GenBank accession no. KJ847050), A. phagocytophilum (accession no. KP164415), and Candidatus N. mikurensis (accession no. FJ966365).

In Romania, the density of Ix. ricinus ticks is high and their host diversity is extensive (7). However, data for effects of tickborne pathogens on public health are scarce in this country. In this study, we detected B. miyamotoi, A. phagocytophilum, and Candidatus N. mikurensis in questing Ix. ricinus ticks in Romania, which confirms the emerging trend of these pathogens in Europe. Because of the scarcity of information on human infections with these pathogens in Romania, serologic and molecular investigations and their implementation are needed for diagnosis, which might help in assessing the effect of these pathogens on public health.

Top

Acknowledgments

This article was published in the framework of the European Social Fund, Human Resources Development Operational Program 2007−2013 (project POSDRU/159/1.5/S/136893) and EurNegVec COST Action TD1303.

This study supported by grant no. TE 298/2015 from the Executive Agency for Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation Funding.

Top

Zsuzsa KalmárComments to Author , Hein Sprong, Andrei D. Mihalca, Călin M. Gherman, Mirabela O. Dumitrache, Elena C. Coipan, Manoj Fonville, and Vasile Cozma

Author affiliations: University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Romania (Z. Kalmár, A.D. Mihalca, C.M. Gherman, M.O. Dumitrache, V. Cozma); National Institute of Public Health and Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands (H. Sprong, E.C. Coipan, M. Fonville)

Top

References

  1. Hansford  KM, Fonville  M, Jahfari  S, Sprong  H, Medlock  JM. Borrelia miyamotoi in host-seeking Ixodes ricinus ticks in England. Epidemiol Infect. 2015;143:107987. DOIPubMed
  2. Jongejan  F, Uilenberg  G. The global importance of ticks. Parasitology. 2004;129(Suppl):S314. DOIPubMed
  3. Platonov  AE, Karan  LS, Kolyasnikova  NM, Makhneva  NA, Toporkova  MG, Maleev  VV, Humans infected with relapsing fever spirochete Borrelia miyamotoi, Russia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:181623. DOIPubMed
  4. Crowder  CD, Carolan  HE, Rounds  MA, Honig  V, Mothes  B, Haag  H, Prevalence of Borrelia miyamotoi in Ixodes ticks in Europe and the United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:167882. DOIPubMed
  5. Fonville  M, Friesema  IH, Hengeveld  PD, Docters van Leeuwen  A, Jahfari  S, Harms  MG, Human exposure to tickborne relapsing fever spirochete Borrelia miyamotoi, the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:12445.PubMed
  6. Kalmár  Z, Cozma  V, Sprong  H, Jahfari  S, D'Amico  G. Mărcuțan DI, et al. Transstadial transmission of Borrelia turcica in Hyalomma aegyptium ticks. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0115520.
  7. Kalmár  Z, Mihalca  AD, Dumitrache  MO, Gherman  CM, Magdaş  C, Mircean  V, Geographical distribution and prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi genospecies in questing Ixodes ricinus from Romania: a countrywide study. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2013;4:403–8.
  8. Jahfari  S, Fonville  M, Hengeveld  P, Reusken  C, Scholte  EJ, Takken  W, Prevalence of Neoehrlichia mikurensis in ticks and rodents from north-west Europe. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:74.
  9. Matei  IA, Kalmár  Z, Magdaş  C, Magdaş  V, Toray  H, Dumitrache  MO, Anaplasma phagocytophilum in questing Ixodes ricinus ticks from Romania. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2015;6:408–13.
  10. Andersson  M, Zaghdoudi-Allan  N, Tamba  P, Stefanache  M, Chitimia  L. Co-infection with 'Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis' and Borrelia afzelii in an Ixodes ricinus tick that has bitten a human in Romania. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2014;5:706–8.

Top

Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2203.150140

Related Links

Top

Table of Contents – Volume 22, Number 3—March 2016

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Zsuzsa Kalmár, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Calea Mănăștur 3–5, Cluj-Napoca 400372, Romania

Send To

character(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

Top

Page created: February 18, 2016
Page updated: February 18, 2016
Page reviewed: February 18, 2016
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external