Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 22, Number 3—March 2016
Research

Changes in Predominance of Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis Profiles of Bordetella pertussis Isolates, United States, 2000–2012

Pamela K. CassidayComments to Author , Tami H. Skoff, Selina Jawahir, and M. Lucia Tondella
Author affiliations: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (P.K. Cassiday, T.H. Skoff, M.L. Tondella); Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA (S. Jawahir)

Main Article

Figure 3

Geographic comparison of predominant pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) profiles of Bordetella pertussis isolates, United States. A) Predominant profiles in Massachusetts and Minnesota compared with isolates from other states, 2000–2012. B) Predominant profiles in Vermont and Washington compared with isolates from other states, 2012.

Figure 3. Geographic comparison of predominant pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) profiles of Bordetella pertussis isolates, United States. A) Predominant profiles in Massachusetts and Minnesota compared with isolates from other states, 2000–2012. B) Predominant profiles in Vermont and Washington compared with isolates from other states, 2012.

Main Article

Page created: February 18, 2016
Page updated: February 18, 2016
Page reviewed: February 18, 2016
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external