Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 22, Number 8—August 2016
Dispatch

Survival and Growth of Orientia tsutsugamushi in Conventional Hemocultures

Figures
Tables
Article Metrics
11
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Author affiliations: Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane, Laos (S. Dittrich, E. Card, W. Phuklia, W.E. Rudgard, J. Silousok, P. Phoumin, L. Bouthasavong, S. Azarian, V. Davong, D.A.B. Dance, M. Vongsouvath, R. Phetsouvanh, P.N. Newton); Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health–University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (S. Dittrick, D.A.B. Dance, R. Phetsouvanh, P.N. Newton); London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom (W.E. Rudgard, S. Azarian, P.N. Newton)

Cite This Article

Abstract

Orientia tsutsugamushi, which requires specialized facilities for culture, is a substantial cause of disease in Asia. We demonstrate that O. tsutsugamushi numbers increased for up to 5 days in conventional hemocultures. Performing such a culture step before molecular testing could increase the sensitivity of O. tsutsugamushi molecular diagnosis.

Orientia tsutsugamushi, the causative agent of scrub typhus, has long been a pathogen of major public health concern in the Asia-Pacific region (1,2). Reports from India, China, and Southeast Asia suggest that a substantial proportion of fevers and central nervous system infections are caused by this bacterium (3,4). The World Health Organization has called scrub typhus “probably one of the most underdiagnosed and underreported febrile illnesses requiring hospitalization in the region” (5). Furthermore, Orientia-infected patients are emerging outside the so-called tsutsugamushi triangle, from the Middle East, Africa, and South America (68). Orientia spp. DNA was recently detected in rodents from Asia, Europe, and Africa (9).

To improve patient management and clarify the epidemiology and pathogenicity of O. tsutsugamushi, physicians and researchers need sensitive and specific diagnostic tools (10). The current diagnostic reference standard is a 4-fold antibody rise between acute- and convalescent-phase serum samples; however, because results are determined retrospectively, they cannot influence patient management. O. tsutsugamushi is an intracellular pathogen, and traditionally its growth has been assumed to require specialized cell culture at Biosafety Level 3, which is only available at a limited number of specialized centers. Therefore, molecular detection of O. tsutsugamushi in patients’ EDTA-blood buffy coat has become the tool of choice for routine diagnosis and epidemiologic studies (11,12). In other pathogens with low bacterial loads, propagation of the organism before molecular amplification has increased target density and improved sensitivity of diagnostic tools such as quantitative PCR (qPCR) or isolation in cell cultures (13). In line with these findings, we hypothesized that O. tsutsugamushi can survive and potentially grow in conventional hemoculture media within the co-inoculated human host cells and that this capacity for growth could be used to improve diagnostic and analytical sensitivities.

The Study

We conducted this study at the Microbiology Laboratory, Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane, Laos, the only microbiology laboratory in Vientiane with a routine, accessible hemoculture service for sepsis diagnosis (4,14). Study patients provided written informed consent; ethical approval was granted by the Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee, University of Oxford (Oxford, UK), and the National Ethics Committee for Health Research, Laos.

One pair of hemocultures was incubated aerobically at 35°C–37°C for 7 days. As part of a weekly routine molecular diagnostic service, admission EDTA anti-coagulated buffy coats (≈200 μL) from febrile patients were collected to test for O. tsutsugamushi and Rickettsia spp. by qPCR (11). Serial dilutions of plasmids (pGEM-T Vector Systems; Promega, Southhampton, UK) and nontemplate controls were included in all runs as external controls; they always showed the appropriate result. During the 2014 rainy season (May–October), we collected consecutive hemoculture fluids after 24 h of incubation (0.5 mL/bottle; total 1 mL/patient; n = 760) (15). Each aliquot contained ≈0.1 mL blood or 0.01 mL buffy coat per mL media. If the EDTA buffy coat qPCR result (cycle quantitation value≤40) was positive within the 7-day hemoculture incubation period (n = 11), the respective bottles were sampled at subsequent times so PCR positivity could be estimated (Table).

Hemoculture fluids were centrifuged (10 min at 15,900 × g) to pellet intracellular and extracellular bacteria, and DNA was extracted by using a method that removes inhibitors with benzyl alcohol (guanidine hydrochloride lysis/column extraction) (16). The same qPCR protocols were used for buffy coat (1 μL/reaction) and hemoculture fluids (7 µL/reaction), with bovine serum albumin (40 μg/reaction) added in the latter (11,13). We estimated bacterial loads using plasmid standard curves and calculated bacterial multiplication factor by dividing bacterial numbers, at follow-up days, by the number in the first sample.

Of the 760 buffy coat samples, 21 were positive for O. tsutsugamushi by qPCR; therefore, to estimate survival and growth, we collected aliquots of hemoculture fluids during days 1–7 (n = 11). During that period, 100/760 (13%) hemocultures were positive for other organisms; however, none of the known O. tsutsugamushi–infected patients were co-infected with an alternative pathogen. In addition, hemoculture fluids from the first 277 patients with buffy coats negative for O. tsutsugamushi by qPCR, underwent O. tsutsugamushi qPCR testing to explore whether using hemoculture fluids as an additional diagnostic sample could improve molecular detection of O. tsutsugamushi.

Figure

Thumbnail of Growth curve of Orientia tsutsugamushi in hemoculture bottles from individual patients, Ventiane, Laos, 2014. The increase in bacterial numbers is represented as bacterial multiplication factor and plotted on a log2 axis. Patient codes in key match those listed in the Table.

Figure. Growth curve of Orientia tsutsugamushi in hemoculture bottles from individual patients, Ventiane, Laos, 2014. The increase in bacterial numbers is represented as bacterial multiplication factor and plotted on a log2 axis....

For nearly all (20/21) of the O. tsutsugamushi–positive patients, >1 hemoculture samples were available. Of these, >1 hemoculture sample from 17/20 (85%) patients tested positive (Table). Despite the initial 1:10 dilution of blood in hemoculture fluid, 66% (14/21) of patients with buffy coat–positive qPCR results also had a positive result in the first hemoculture fluid sample (Table). Due to logistical constraints, only 11/21 patients could be tested at multiple time points; samples from 7/11 (63%) showed a marked increase in O. tsutsugamushi density between day 1 and day 7 (Figure). The increase ranged from 2-fold to 210-fold (median 3.25-fold), and data suggest that Orientia bacterial density peaked in the first 5 days and subsequently declined (Figure).

During the same period, 10/760 patients were diagnosed with Rickettsia spp. infection by blood culture qPCR. In contrast to the positive results for O. tsutsugamushi, all samples were negative by Rickettsia spp. hemoculture fluid qPCR, regardless of sampling day.

Of samples from the 277 patients tested for O. tsutsugamushi in hemoculture fluid incubated for 24 h, those from an additional 3 patients, negative by qPCR at admission, were positive (cycle quantitation value ≤40). In this pilot study, combining buffy coat and hemoculture fluid testing, the number of O. tsutsugamushi–positive patients increased by 3 (27%). Results are consistent with our hypothesis that qPCR on incubated hemoculture fluid alone or in combination with admission buffy coat testing could improve the sensitivity of molecular diagnosis of O. tsutsugamushi infection.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that O. tsutsugamushi remains viable and growing in hemoculture, presumably in human leukocytes. This observation opens up new possibilities for detecting O. tsutsugamushi and other intracellular organisms, albeit seemingly not Rickettsia spp. With the discovery of Orientia spp. outside the tsutsugamushi triangle, improved tools are needed to aid the timely identification of infections in disease-endemic communities and among returning travelers to facilitate appropriate treatment (4). In areas without sophisticated laboratory facilities, the combination of hemoculture amplification and direct diagnostic (e.g., antigen capture) has been proposed for simplified Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi diagnosis and resistance molecular screening (13). Similarly, innovative approaches to identify O. tsutsugamushi infections after >1 days could be developed. Because O. tsutsugamushi is categorized as a Hazard Group 3 pathogen, sampling and processing of hemocultures from patients with suspected scrub typhus should be conducted with appropriate biosafety precautions.

Furthermore, the possibility of using hemoculture as a simple transport tool for samples from remote areas should be investigated. Clinical isolates from remote areas can also show O. tsutsugamushi diversity, which can guide the development of diagnostic tests and vaccines (3).

The underlying mechanisms and the reason O. tsutsugamushi, but not Rickettsia spp., grows in hemoculture fluid are unclear. We compared the diagnostic possibilities of preincubating blood samples in hemoculture fluid before qPCR with using qPCR on buffy coat samples to investigate its advantage as a diagnostic tool. Further investigations are needed to confirm our findings, explore whether O. tsutsugamushi really multiplies in hemoculture fluids, and assess multiplication rates of host cells and pathogens in these fluids. Such studies can provide evidence for the optimal system and number of incubation days that would maximize the effects for the O. tsutsugamushi diagnostic. These findings could also affect the detection of other underdiagnosed intracellular pathogens that scientists assume cannot be detected in hemoculture fluids.

Dr. Dittrich is a molecular microbiologist with a specific interest in infectious disease diagnostics. This work was carried out while she was working the University of Oxford based in Laos, where her main focus was to understand the causative agents of disease and improve diagnostic tools for their detection. She currently works as a senior scientific officer in the Acute Febrile Illness Program at the Foundation of Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND) in Geneva, Switzerland.

Top

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to all the doctors and nursing staff of Mahosot Hospital, the staff of the Microbiology Laboratory, and Daniel Paris. We also thank the Directors of Mahosot Hospital, the Minister of Health, and the Director of the Curative Department, Ministry of Health, for their support in this study. We acknowledge Jeanne Salje for inspiring discussions during the analysis and writing up the results of this project.

This study was funded by the Wellcome Trust of Great Britain.

Top

References

  1. Kelly  DJ, Fuerst  PA, Ching  WM, Richards  AL. Scrub typhus: the geographic distribution of phenotypic and genotypic variants of Orientia tsutsugamushi. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(Suppl 3):S20330. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Sayen  JJ, Pond  HS, Forrester  JS, Wood  FC. Scrub typhus in Assam and Burma; a clinical study of 616 cases. Medicine (Baltimore). 1946;25:155214. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Varghese  GM, Janardhanan  J, Mahajan  SK, Tariang  D, Trowbridge  P, Prakash  JA, Molecular epidemiology and genetic diversity of Orientia tsutsugamushi from patients with scrub typhus in 3 regions of India. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:649. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dittrich  S, Rattanavong  S, Lee  SJ, Panyanivong  P, Craig  SB, Tulsiani  SM, Orientia, rickettsia, and leptospira pathogens as causes of CNS infections in Laos: a prospective study. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3:e10412. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Paris  DH, Shelite  TR, Day  NP, Walker  DH. Unresolved problems related to scrub typhus: a seriously neglected life-threatening disease. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;89:3017. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Balcells  ME, Rabagliati  R, Garcia  P, Poggi  H, Oddo  D, Concha  M, Endemic scrub typhus-like illness, Chile. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:165963. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Izzard  L, Fuller  A, Blacksell  SD, Paris  DH, Richards  AL, Aukkanit  N, Isolation of a novel Orientia species (O. chuto sp. nov.) from a patient infected in Dubai. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:44049. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ghorbani  RP, Ghorbani  AJ, Jain  MK, Walker  DH. A case of scrub typhus probably acquired in Africa. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25:14734. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cosson  JF, Galan  M, Bard  E, Razzauti  M, Bernard  M, Morand  S, Detection of Orientia sp. DNA in rodents from Asia, West Africa and Europe. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:172. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. La Scola  B, Raoult  D. Laboratory diagnosis of rickettsioses: current approaches to diagnosis of old and new rickettsial diseases. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:271527.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mayxay  M, Castonguay-Vanier  J, Chansamouth  V, Dubot-Pérès  A, Paris  DH, Phetsouvanh  R, Causes of non-malarial fever in Laos: a prospective study. Lancet Glob Health. 2013;1:e4654. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Paris  DH, Blacksell  SD, Nawtaisong  P, Jenjaroen  K, Teeraratkul  A, Chierakul  W, Diagnostic accuracy of a loop-mediated isothermal PCR assay for detection of Orientia tsutsugamushi during acute scrub typhus infection. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5:e1307. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Nic Fhogartaigh  C, Dance  DA, Davong  V, Tann  P, Phetsouvanh  R, Turner  P, A novel technique for detecting antibiotic-resistant typhoid from rapid diagnostic tests. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53:175860. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Phetsouvanh  R, Phongmany  S, Soukaloun  D, Rasachak  B, Soukhaseum  V, Soukhaseum  S, Causes of community-acquired bacteremia and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Vientiane, Laos. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;75:97885.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dittrich  S, Rudgard  WE, Woods  KL, Silisouk  J, Phuklia  W, Davong  V, The utility of blood culture fluid for the molecular diagnosis of Leptospira: a prospective evaluation. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;94:73640. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=26880775&dopt=AbstractDOIGoogle Scholar
  16. Villumsen  S, Pedersen  R, Krogfelt  KA, Jensen  JS. Expanding the diagnostic use of PCR in leptospirosis: improved method for DNA extraction from blood cultures. PLoS One. 2010;5:e12095. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figure
Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2208.151259

Table of Contents – Volume 22, Number 8—August 2016

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Sabine Dittrich, Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND), Geneva, Switzerland

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: July 15, 2016
Page updated: July 15, 2016
Page reviewed: July 15, 2016
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external