Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 23, Number 1—January 2017
Letter

Loiasis in US Traveler Returning from Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea, 2016

On This Page
Figures
Article Metrics
1
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus

Cite This Article

Abstract

The filarial parasite Loa loa overlaps geographically with Onchocera volvulus and Wuchereria bancrofti filariae in central Africa. Accurate information regarding this overlap is critical to elimination programs targeting O. volvulus and W. bancrofti. We describe a case of loiasis in a traveler returning from Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea, a location heretofore unknown for L. loa transmission.

Loiasis (African eye worm disease) is caused by infection with Loa loa, a parasitic vector-borne filarial worm endemic to 10 countries in central and western Africa, including Equatorial Guinea (1). The worm, spread by the bite of Chrysops dimidiata and C. silacea flies, is of public health concern because of its geographic overlap with Onchocerca volvulus and Wuchereria bancrofti worms, which cause onchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis, respectively (2). Mass drug administration programs for onchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis often include ivermectin, which can cause serious and occasionally fatal adverse neurologic reactions in persons with high levels of circulating L. loa microfilariae (3). To avoid such reactions, an accurate picture of the geographic distribution of L. loa infection is needed. Given the importance of epidemiologic data in the management of filarial infections, we report a case of loiasis in a US woman who had traveled to Equatorial Guinea.

In May 2016, a 25-year-old woman sought care in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA, for fatigue, swelling of her left ankle, right knee pain, and intensely pruritic skin lesions on her lower extremities. She had lived on Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea, during October 2015–March 2016 while studying local wildlife. On Bioko Island, she frequented local water sources to bathe and wash clothes and consistently took atovaquone/proguanil for malaria prophylaxis. She did not spend time on Equatorial Guinea’s mainland or travel to other nations in central or western Africa. Her flight from the United States to Bioko Island connected in Ethiopia; she did not leave the airport.

Symptoms developed soon after her return to North Carolina in late March 2016. Laboratory evaluations performed at that time showed a leukocyte count of 8.5 × 103 cells/µL (reference range 3.4–10.8 × 103 cells/µL), hemoglobin level of 13.9 (reference range 11.1–15.9 g/dL), platelet count of 219 (reference range 150–379 × 103 cells /µL), and absolute eosinophil count of 2,300/µL (reference range 40–400/µL).

In May, her physical examination was notable only for edema of the left lower extremity adjacent to her ankle. Three separate midday blood smears for microfilariae were negative. Laboratory tests showed a leukocyte count of 11.5 × 103 cells/µL, absolute eosinophil count of 4,200/µL, and IgE level of 175 IU/mL (reference range 0–100 IU/mL). Results of antifilarial IgG4 and Strongyloides IgG tests (performed by LabCorp, Burlington, NC, USA) were negative.

Figure

Thumbnail of Cutaneous manifestations of Loa loa (African eye worm) infection in a US traveler who returned from a 6-month stay on Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea, 2016. Urticarial lesions on the left thigh showing a coincident papular eruption (A) and behind the left ear (B).

Figure. Cutaneous manifestations of Loa loa (African eye worm) infection in a US traveler who returned from a 6-month stay on Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea, 2016. Urticarial lesions on the left thigh...

Over the subsequent 4 weeks, new pruritic, erythematous plaques appeared on her right flank and left thigh and behind her left ear (Figure). Blood testing at the Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD, USA), showed negative results for a 1-mL Nuclepore (Whatman GE Lifesciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) filtration for microfilariae; L. loa–specific PCR (4); and rapid diagnostic testing, using the SD BIOLINE Oncho/LF IgG4 biplex test (Standard Diagnostics, Inc., Seoul, South Korea) for detection of specific antibodies against O. volvulus and W. bancrofti. Testing also showed a BmA IgG (5) level of 100.6 µg/mL (reference value <14.0 µg/mL); a normal BmA IgG4 antibody level; and a luciferase immunoprecipitation systems assay result of 456,969 light units (LU)/mL for LL-SXP1 IgG (negative value <3,000 LU/mL) and 19,193 LU/mL for LL-SXP1 IgG4 (negative value <1,700 LU/mL) (6).

The patient was treated with diethylcarbamazine for 21 days. After completion of treatment, her symptoms improved, and her leukocyte and eosinophil counts returned to within reference ranges.

Recent years have seen renewed interest in the epidemiology and geographic distribution of L. loa in central and western Africa because of the risk of encephalopathy in patients given ivermectin as part of large programs to control filarial infections. Although the intermediate hosts of L. loa are present on Bioko Island, previous loiasis cases were reported only in persons who had been exposed to Chrysops flies on mainland Africa (7). Given the presence of these vectors on Bioko Island and the patient’s lack of exposure to any other L. loa–endemic region, transmission of L. loa on Bioko Island seems probable. Of note, a previous study found 1 of 541 skin snips tested on Bioko Island to be PCR-positive for L. loa, a finding thought to have been caused by skin snip sample contamination with capillary blood (8).

The signs and symptoms of L. loa infection exhibited by the US patient reinforce the perception that loiasis in returned travelers is often quite distinct from that in persons with lifelong exposure in a region where the disease is endemic (9,10). The course of infection also points to differences in IgG- and IgG4-based antifilarial serologic testing early in infection (5) and provide evidence that the use of species-specific recombinant antigens can more accurately help with specific parasite diagnosis (6).

Knowledge of the geographic distribution of L. loa infection is critical because loiasis overlaps with other filarial diseases, such as onchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis. The intermediate vectors responsible for L. loa transmission, Chrysops flies, are known to live on Bioko Island; the case we present suggests that local transmission of L. loa and prevalence of loiasis on the island may be higher than previously thought.

Dr. Priest is an infectious diseases clinician and Medical Director for Infection Prevention and Antimicrobial Stewardship for Novant Health, an integrated health care system. His interests include clinical care of patients with infectious diseases, antimicrobial stewardship, and infection prevention.

Dr. Nutman is deputy chief and head of the Helminth Immunology Section and Clinical Parasitology Section of the Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health. His major research interest is the immune responses in parasitic helminth infections (primarily the filarial infections) and their regulation.

Top

Acknowledgment

We thank Robert Cheke for his advice and assistance with this manuscript.

Top

David H. PriestComments to Author  and Thomas B. Nutman

Author affiliations: Novant Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA (D.H. Priest); National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA (T.B. Nutman)

Top

References

  1. Metzger  WG, Mordmüller  B. Loa loa-does it deserve to be neglected? Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14:3537. DOIPubMed
  2. Bockarie  MJ, Kelly-Hope  LA, Rebollo  M, Molyneux  DH. Preventive chemotherapy as a strategy for elimination of neglected tropical parasitic diseases: endgame challenges. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013;368:20120144. DOIPubMed
  3. Boussinesq  M, Gardon  J, Gardon-Wendel  N, Chippaux  JP. Clinical picture, epidemiology and outcome of Loa-associated serious adverse events related to mass ivermectin treatment of onchocerciasis in Cameroon. Filaria J. 2003;2(Suppl 1):S4. DOIPubMed
  4. Fink  DL, Kamgno  J, Nutman  TB. Rapid molecular assays for specific detection and quantitation of Loa loa microfilaremia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5:e1299. DOIPubMed
  5. Lal  RB, Ottesen  EA. Enhanced diagnostic specificity in human filariasis by IgG4 antibody assessment. J Infect Dis. 1988;158:10347. DOIPubMed
  6. Burbelo  PD, Ramanathan  R, Klion  AD, Iadarola  MJ, Nutman  TB. Rapid, novel, specific, high-throughput assay for diagnosis of Loa loa infection. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:2298304. DOIPubMed
  7. Cheke  RA, Mas  J, Chainey  JE. Potential vectors of loiasis and other tabanids on the island of Bioko, Equatorial Guinea. Med Vet Entomol. 2003;17:2213. DOIPubMed
  8. Moya  L, Herrador  Z, Ta-Tang  TH, Rubio  JM, Perteguer  MJ, Hernandez-González  A, et al. Evidence for suppression of onchocerciasis transmission in Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0004829. DOIPubMed
  9. Nutman  TB, Miller  KD, Mulligan  M, Ottesen  EA. Loa loa infection in temporary residents of endemic regions: recognition of a hyperresponsive syndrome with characteristic clinical manifestations. J Infect Dis. 1986;154:108. DOIPubMed
  10. Herrick  JA, Metenou  S, Makiya  MA, Taylar-Williams  CA, Law  MA, Klion  AD, et al. Eosinophil-associated processes underlie differences in clinical presentation of loiasis between temporary residents and those indigenous to Loa-endemic areas. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60:5563. DOIPubMed

Top

Figure

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2301.161427

Related Links

Top

Table of Contents – Volume 23, Number 1—January 2017

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

David H. Priest, 1381 Westgate Center Dr, Winston-Salem, NC 27103, USA

Send To

character(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

Top

Page created: December 16, 2016
Page updated: December 16, 2016
Page reviewed: December 16, 2016
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external