Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 23, Number 11—November 2017

Mycobacterium lepromatosis Lepromatous Leprosy in US Citizen Who Traveled to Disease-Endemic Areas

Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Abinash VirkComments to Author , Bobbi Pritt, Robin Patel, James R. Uhl, Spencer A. Bezalel, Lawrence E. Gibson, Barbara M. Stryjewska, and Margot S. Peters
Author affiliations: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA (A. Virk, B. Pritt, R. Patel, J.R. Uhl, S.A. Bezalel, L.E. Gibson, M.S. Peters); National Hansen’s Disease Programs, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA (B.M. Stryjewska)

Cite This Article


We report Mycobacterium lepromatosis infection in a US-born person with an extensive international travel history. Clinical symptoms, histopathology, and management are similar to those of infections caused by M. leprae. Clinicians should consider this pathogen in the diagnosis of patients with symptoms of leprosy who have traveled to endemic areas.

A 59-year-old white man born in the United States came to the Travel and Tropical Medicine Clinic at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota, USA) in March 2017 reporting 12 months of progressive skin lesions and prior onset of peripheral neuropathy and arthritis. The lesions started on his forearms, then progressed to nearly diffuse involvement of his face, neck, ears, and trunk. The lesions were not pruritic, painful, or ulcerative. Two years earlier, arthralgia of his hips, knees, and hands led to a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis on the basis of positive results for rheumatoid factor, negative cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody, and antinuclear antibodies. He received prednisone for several weeks, then methotrexate (20 mg/wk). He also had an electromyography-confirmed sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy that began 1 year before this presentation. After an unsuccessful empiric course of topical corticosteroid therapy, skin biopsies were collected from his neck and forearm; results showed sheets of histiocytes and scattered well-formed granulomas with perineural involvement. Fite stain was positive for numerous intracellular acid-fast bacilli, leading to a diagnosis of lepromatous leprosy; the patient was referred to the Division of Infectious Diseases at Mayo Clinic for further evaluation.

The patient was an administrator who worked indoors and did not have substantive outdoor exposure. He was born and raised in the United States but had an extensive travel history as an adult to many countries over several decades, including 2 trips to the Pacific coast of Mexico (7 days each in Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco, in April 2005, and Acapulco in March 2007), a region to which Mycobacterium lepromatosis leprosy is endemic (1). He had no known exposure to a person with leprosy or to armadillos, which are known vectors for leprosy.

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Signs of Mycobacterium lepromatosis infection in 59-year-old white male US citizen, 2017. A) Leonine facies with partial loss of eyebrows and nodular lesion of chin. B) Right ear nodularity with focal crusted ulceration. C) Confluent erythema from face to neck.

Figure 1. Signs of Mycobacterium lepromatosis infection in 59-year-old white male US citizen, 2017. A) Leonine facies with partial loss of eyebrows and nodular lesion of chin. B) Right ear nodularity with focal...

On physical examination, we found nearly diffuse erythema and induration of the patient’s face, ears, neck (Figure 1), and chest, as well as his upper extremities, more focally involving the dorsal aspects of the forearms. He had partial loss of eyebrows bilaterally. The right auricle had a small, crusted ulcer. His nasal mucosa was thickened and nasal passages almost blocked. Ulnar and superficial cervical nerves were not easily palpated. He showed no clinical signs of active synovitis.

Initial laboratory test results were within reference ranges or negative, including complete blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, creatinine, QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube Test (Quest Diagnostics, Madison, NJ, USA), HIV serologies, rhumatoid factor (despite positive test 2 years prior), and cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies. Chest radiograph results were unremarkable.

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Skin biopsies of 59-year-old white male US citizen showing Mycobacterium lepromatosis infection, 2017. A) Hematoxylin and eosin–stained section of a specimen from the chin showing granulomatous dermal inflammation (original magnification ×100); inset shows nerve involvement (arrows) that is diagnostic for leprosy (original magnification ×400). B) Fite-stained section of a specimen from the chin highlights numerous acid-fast bacilli within histiocytes (original magnification ×1,000);

Figure 2. Skin biopsies of 59-year-old white male US citizen showing Mycobacterium lepromatosis infection, 2017. A) Hematoxylin and eosin–stained section of a specimen from the chin showing granulomatous dermal inflammation (original magnification ×100);...

Skin biopsies of the neck, chin, and forearm showed patchy or diffuse granulomatous dermal inflammation, with foamy and epithelioid histiocytes. We found numerous acid-fast bacilli within histiocytes and invading nerves (Figure 2), highlighted by Fite, Gomori methenamine silver, and Gram stains; Ziehl-Neelsen stain highlighted only a few organisms. The combination of clinical, histopathologic, and histochemical staining features was diagnostic for multibacillary lepromatous leprosy.

We achieved a diagnosis by using the broad-range 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR assay on the formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded block of the chin biopsy, as follows: specimens were lysed with proteinase K, then incubated with 0.1-mm silica beads in a thermomixer at 100°C with rapid mixing. DNA was extracted from the lysate with the Genomic DNA Clean & Concentrator 10 kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA). We used PCR with 5 µL of the DNA extract and previously described primers (2) on a Roche LightCycler 480 (Roche Molecular Systems Inc., Branchburg, NJ, USA) with SYBR Green stain. The PCR target is an ≈400-base-pair portion, including the V3-V4 region, of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene. The amplified product, which we sequenced by using Sanger sequencing, showed identical nucleotides to M. lepromatosis strain FJ924 (positions 368–765, GenBank accession no. EU203590) and a 3-nt difference from Mycobacterium leprae Br4923 (GenBank accession no. FM211192).

The presence of M. lepromatosis was also confirmed by using M. lepromatosis–specific PCR at the National Hansen’s Disease Program (Baton Rouge, LA, USA). In consultation with this program, we prescribed clarithromycin, rifampin, and dapsone in April 2017. Within 3 months of treatment, the patient had decreased skin induration, nasal obstruction, and pinna thickening but minimal improvement in arthralgias or peripheral neuropathy symptoms. No immune reactions occurred during treatment.

Until the advent of molecular methods, all leprosy worldwide was assumed to have been caused by M. leprae. In 2008, a novel Mycobacterium species, M. lepromatosis, was identified by multigene analysis on tissue obtained from 2 immigrants to the United States from Mexico who died from diffuse lepromatous leprosy (3), which is endemic to Mexico and Costa Rica and is rarely reported from other geographic locations (4).

Comparative genomics show that M. leprae and M. lepromatosis are closely related and derived from a common ancestor (4) with ≈9.1% genetic difference between them, suggesting species-level divergence of ≈10 million (5) to 13.9 million (4) years ago. A phylogeographic survey suggests that M. lepromatosis is not widespread (4). Since 2008, PCR testing of patients identified M. lepromatosis from Mexico (1,6), Singapore (7), Canada (8), and Myanmar and Brazil (9).

Unlike M. leprae (10), M. lepromatosis has not been found in armadillos. Red squirrels are infected with M. lepromatosis in the United Kingdom (11), but the geographic distribution, zoonotic transmission risks, and other animal reservoirs are unknown.

Excluding the patient we report, M. lepromatosis lepromatous leprosy has been diagnosed in 10 persons (including the 2 index case-patients) in the United States: all were immigrants (8 from Mexico, 2 from Costa Rica) (3,6,12). Our report emphasizes that US citizens can acquire M. lepromatosis when traveling to Mexico or other locations as tourists. Our patient’s earliest symptoms of arthritis and neuropathy were in December 2014, suggesting acquisition in Puerto Vallarta (2005) or Acapulco (2007), consistent with the leprosy incubation period of 7–8 years (6). His signs and symptoms were similar to those of patients from Mexico (1,6,12,13) and a patient from Canada in whom peripheral neuropathy developed 1–2 years before onset of skin lesions. Nasal mucosal involvement was prominent in both. Loss of eyebrows, eyelashes, or both is common in M. lepromatosis infection (6,8,13) and might be an early sign of infection. Future reports may help determine if this feature is specific for M. lepromatosis. In the case reported by Han et al., (13), cure was associated with nearly complete regrowth of eyebrows and eyelashes.

The full spectrum of manifestations, outcomes, and global burden of M. lepromatosis infection remain unknown. In a study of persons who had leprosy, specifically diffuse lepromatous leprosy in Mexico, M. lepromatosis was identified more often (63.2%) than M. leprae and caused dual infections in 16.1% (1).

Leprosy can resemble autoimmune disorders, including systemic lupus erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis. Chronic polyarthritis is described in up to 75% of leprosy patients, possibly secondary to an immune response to mycobacterial heat-shock proteins (14,15). Overlapping occurrences of rheumatoid and leprous arthritis make it difficult to differentiate these disorders. The arthritis in the patient we report could be leprous.

Reported patients who have M. lepromatosis and M. leprae lepromatous leprosy have been treated similarly (12). Because of the multibacillary load and higher risk for immune reactions and pigmentation, especially with clofazimine or minocycline, we prescribed clarithromycin, rifampin, and dapsone for this patient. He was maintained, at our advice, on methotrexate to modulate these reactions.

In summary, M. lepromatosis lepromatous leprosy is a travel-related hazard for travelers to Mexico or other disease-endemic areas. Specific exposure risks for acquisition of M. lepromatosis are unknown. The presence of leprosy-like skin lesions should prompt detailed evaluation, including skin biopsy for histopathology, histochemical stains for mycobacterial organisms, and 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR to identify the causative agent.

Dr. Virk has been a consultant in the Division of Infectious Diseases at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, since 1997. She is the chair of the Enterprise Antimicrobial Stewardship Program at the Mayo Clinic and previously was the director of the Travel and Tropical Medicine Clinic.



A.V. is an inventor for Travel Health and Wellness, LLC; R.P. reports grants from CD Diagnostics, BioFire, Curetis, Merck, Hutchison Biofilm Medical Solutions, Accelerate Diagnostics, Allergan, and The Medicines Company. R.P. is a consultant to Curetis; monies are paid to Mayo Clinic. In addition, R.P. has a patent on Bordetella pertussis/parapertussis PCR issued; a patent on a device/method for sonication with royalties paid by Samsung to Mayo Clinic; and a patent on an anti-biofilm substance issued. R.P. serves on an Actelion data monitoring board; receives travel reimbursement from Roche, ASM, and IDSA; an editor’s stipend from ASM and IDSA; and honoraria from the NBME, Up-to-Date, and the Infectious Diseases Board Review Course.



  1. Han  XY, Sizer  KC, Velarde-Félix  JS, Frias-Castro  LO, Vargas-Ocampo  F. The leprosy agents Mycobacterium lepromatosis and Mycobacterium leprae in Mexico. Int J Dermatol. 2012;51:9529. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Gomez  E, Cazanave  C, Cunningham  SA, Greenwood-Quaintance  KE, Steckelberg  JM, Uhl  JR, et al. Prosthetic joint infection diagnosis using broad-range PCR of biofilms dislodged from knee and hip arthroplasty surfaces using sonication. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:35018. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Han  XY, Seo  YH, Sizer  KC, Schoberle  T, May  GS, Spencer  JS, et al. A new Mycobacterium species causing diffuse lepromatous leprosy. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008;130:85664. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Singh  P, Benjak  A, Schuenemann  VJ, Herbig  A, Avanzi  C, Busso  P, et al. Insight into the evolution and origin of leprosy bacilli from the genome sequence of Mycobacterium lepromatosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:445964. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Han  XY, Sizer  KC, Thompson  EJ, Kabanja  J, Li  J, Hu  P, et al. Comparative sequence analysis of Mycobacterium leprae and the new leprosy-causing Mycobacterium lepromatosis. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:606774. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Sotiriou  MC, Stryjewska  BM, Hill  C. Two cases of leprosy in siblings caused by Mycobacterium lepromatosis and review of the literature. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;95:5227. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Han  XY, Sizer  KC, Tan  HH. Identification of the leprosy agent Mycobacterium lepromatosis in Singapore. J Drugs Dermatol. 2012;11:16872.
  8. Jessamine  PG, Desjardins  M, Gillis  T, Scollard  D, Jamieson  F, Broukhanski  G, et al. Leprosy-like illness in a patient with Mycobacterium lepromatosis from Ontario, Canada. J Drugs Dermatol. 2012;11:22933.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Han  XY, Aung  FM, Choon  SE, Werner  B. Analysis of the leprosy agents Mycobacterium leprae and Mycobacterium lepromatosis in four countries. Am J Clin Pathol. 2014;142:52432. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Truman  RW, Singh  P, Sharma  R, Busso  P, Rougemont  J, Paniz-Mondolfi  A, et al. Probable zoonotic leprosy in the southern United States. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:162633. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Avanzi  C, Del-Pozo  J, Benjak  A, Stevenson  K, Simpson  VR, Busso  P, et al. Red squirrels in the British Isles are infected with leprosy bacilli. Science. 2016;354:7447. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Han  XY, Jessurun  J. Severe leprosy reactions due to Mycobacterium lepromatosis. Am J Med Sci. 2013;345:659. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Han  XY, Quintanilla  M. Diffuse lepromatous leprosy due to Mycobacterium lepromatosis in Quintana Roo, Mexico. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53:36958. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Henriques  CC, Lopez  B, Mestre  T, Grima  B, Panarra  A, Riso  N. Leprosy and rheumatoid arthritis: consequence or association? BMJ Case Rep. 2012;2012.
  15. Atkin  SL, el-Ghobarey  A, Kamel  M, Owen  JP, Dick  WC. Clinical and laboratory studies of arthritis in leprosy. BMJ. 1989;298:14235. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2311.171104

Table of Contents – Volume 23, Number 11—November 2017

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Abinash Virk, Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: October 17, 2017
Page updated: October 17, 2017
Page reviewed: October 17, 2017
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.