Volume 23, Number 9—September 2017
Research Letter
Antimicrobial Drug–Resistant Shiga Toxin–Producing Escherichia coli Infections, Michigan, USA
Table
Serotype | No. isolates | No. (%) isolates |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Any resistance | Ampicillin resistance | Ciprofloxacin resistance | SXT resistance | ||
O157 |
146 |
8 (5.5) |
7 (4.8) |
0 (0) |
5 (3.4) |
Non-O157 |
207 |
23 (11.1) |
19 (9.2) |
1 (0.5) |
9 (4.3) |
O26 |
53 |
4 (7.6) |
4 (7.6) |
0 (0) |
1 (1.9) |
O45 |
50 |
6 (12.0) |
5 (10.0) |
0 (0) |
2 (4.0) |
O103 |
75 |
6 (8.0) |
5 (6.7) |
1 (1.3) |
4 (5.3) |
O111 | 29 | 7 (24.1) | 5 (17.2) | 0 (0) | 2 (6.9) |
*We tested 358 isolates by disk diffusion for resistance to ampicillin (10 μg in disk), SXT (25 μg in disk), and ciprofloxacin (5 μg in disk). MICs were determined by using Etest. Strains were classified as resistant or susceptible according to Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines; E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as a control. Five isolates had unknown serotypes and were excluded from analysis. Isolate numbers for individual antibiotics do not always add up to the total number of isolates with any resistance because some isolates were resistant to >1 drug. SXT, trimethoprim/
sulfamethoxazole.
Page created: August 17, 2017
Page updated: August 17, 2017
Page reviewed: August 17, 2017
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.