Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 23, Number 9—September 2017
Research Letter

White-Nose Syndrome Fungus in a 1918 Bat Specimen from France

Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Michael G. Campana, Naoko P. Kurata, Jeffrey T. Foster, Lauren E. Helgen, DeeAnn M. Reeder, Robert C. Fleischer, and Kristofer M. HelgenComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA (M.G. Campana, N.P. Kurata, L.E. Helgen, R.C. Fleischer); University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, USA (J.T. Foster); Bucknell University, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, USA (D.M. Reeder); University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia (K.M. Helgen)

Cite This Article


White-nose syndrome, first diagnosed in North America in 2006, causes mass deaths among bats in North America. We found the causative fungus, Pseudogymnoascus destructans, in a 1918 sample collected in Europe, where bats have now adapted to the fungus. These results are consistent with a Eurasian origin of the pathogen.

We report the earliest known historical incidence of the fungus Pseudogymnoascus (formerly Geomyces) destructans, detected in a museum specimen of a bat (Myotis bechsteinii) collected in France in 1918. This fungal pathogen causes white-nose syndrome (WNS) in bats (1). Since its introduction into eastern North America around 2006, WNS has devastated bat populations across the continent (2). P. destructans has also been found across the Eurasian landmass (3,4) without documented mass bat deaths. Epidemiologic evidence among bats and fungal genetics indicate that the fungus has been recently introduced into North American bat populations (57).

To clarify the epidemiologic history of WNS and to investigate physical evidence of its presence in specific locations in the past, we screened 138 19th- and 20th-century bat specimens (housed at the National Museum of Natural History [USNM], Washington, DC) from North America (n = 41), Europe (n = 83), and East Asia (n = 14) for P. destructans DNA (Technical Appendix). We sampled dry museum skins and intact bodies stored in 70% ethanol; some were originally fixed in formalin. We swabbed bat rostra and wings to collect potentially preserved P. destructans biomolecules and stored swabs in 100% ethanol until DNA extraction.

We extracted DNA in a dedicated ancient DNA laboratory at the National Zoological Park (Washington, DC) by using stringent protocols to prevent false positive results from modern DNA contamination (8). Before extraction, we removed swabs from the ethanol and let them air dry. We then let swabs digest overnight at 55°C in 600 μL extraction buffer (1× Tris-EDTA buffer, pH 8.0, 0.019 mmol/L EDTA, 0.01 mmol/L NaCl, 1% SDS, 10 mg/mL DTT, and 1 mg/mL proteinase K) (8). Later extractions omitted DTT. We extracted digested samples twice in 600 μL phenol and once in 600 μL chloroform. We removed and concentrated the aqueous phase by using Amicon Ultra-4 30 kDA molecular weight cutoff columns (Millipore Sigma, Merck, Billerica, MA, USA) to a final volume of ≈250 μL. We included 1 extraction blank for every 10–11 historical samples.

We screened extracts for P. destructans by using a previously described species-specific quantitative PCR targeting 103 bp (including primers) of the intergenic spacer region (9). Each extract was amplified in 2–8 replicate PCRs. Multiple, no-template controls (2,3) were included in each PCR setup. Positive products from experiments in which quantifiable contamination (>0.1 genome equivalents/μL sample) was observed in >1 negative control were discarded; these experiments were repeated with fresh reagents.

One sample (USNM 231170) tested positive in 2 of 3 PCRs. We performed a second independent extraction on this sample. The replicate extraction tested positive in 4 of 5 PCRs. Two of the USNM 231170–positive PCR products were confirmed by using Sanger sequencing and comparison to publicly available P. destructans sequences in GenBank. These sequences were 100% identical to P. destructans sequences from North America (GenBank accession nos. JX270192.1 and JX415267.1). In addition, 2 samples (USNM 15513 and 154222) yielded positive products in a single PCR each, but we were unable to replicate these results. No usable sequence was obtained from the USNM 15513 amplicon; the USNM 154222 sequence differed from the North American sequence by a single thymine deletion. DNA sequences were deposited in GenBank (accession nos. MF370925–6).

The 1 confirmed case of P. destructans infection among the museum samples we studied (USNM 231170, male, skin and skull) was in a Bechstein’s bat (Myotis bechsteinii) collected on May 9, 1918, at Forêt de Russy, Centre-Val de Loire, France. This sequence is unlikely to represent P. destructans from a recently collected infected bat from North America because recently collected specimens have been purposefully stored with care in a separate room within the USNM mammal department, away from the historical bat collection. Furthermore, none of the historical samples of bats collected in North America, which are more likely to be cross-contaminated with potentially infected specimens compared with European specimens, tested positive for P. destructans.

We provide evidence of the presence of P. destructans ≈100 years ago in Europe. In addition, we found no evidence of P. destructans in bats collected in eastern North America during 1861–1971. Although false negatives are highly likely because of the age, preparation, and storage of these specimens, these results are consistent with a Eurasian origin of the current WNS epidemic and strong association of the fungus with Eurasian bats of the genus Myotis (3,6,10). Bats across Eurasia have adapted to P. destructans over more than a century, but the fungus was initially detected in North America during the early 21st century, and the bats on this continent have no immunity. This result extends the documented temporal occurrence of P. destructans as a bat-associated fungus to the early 20th century and highlights the value of archived museum specimens for epidemiologic study of emerging fungal diseases, including WNS.

Dr. Campana is a computational genomics scientist at the Smithsonian Institution Conservation Biology Institute’s Centers for Conservation Genomics. His research interests include analysis of animal and pathogen population genomics by using a combination of ancient DNA and computational genomics.



We thank Don Wilson and Nicole Edmison for assistance with specimens and sampling.

The Smithsonian Institution’s Grand Challenges Consortia funded this research.



  1. Lorch  JM, Meteyer  CU, Behr  MJ, Boyles  JG, Cryan  PM, Hicks  AC, et al. Experimental infection of bats with Geomyces destructans causes white-nose syndrome. Nature. 2011;480:3768. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Frick  W, Puechmaille  SJ, Hoyt  JR, Nickel  BA, Langwig  KE, Foster  JT, et al. Disease alters macroecological patterns of North American bats. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2015;24:7419. DOIGoogle Scholar
  3. Puechmaille  SJ, Wibbelt  G, Korn  V, Fuller  H, Forget  F, Mühldorfer  K, et al. Pan-European distribution of white-nose syndrome fungus (Geomyces destructans) not associated with mass mortality. PLoS One. 2011;6:e19167. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hoyt  JR, Sun  K, Parise  KL, Lu  G, Langwig  KE, Jiang  T, et al. Widespread bat white-nose syndrome fungus, northeastern China. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:1402. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Warnecke  L, Turner  JM, Bollinger  TK, Lorch  JM, Misra  V, Cryan  PM, et al. Inoculation of bats with European Geomyces destructans supports the novel pathogen hypothesis for the origin of white-nose syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:69997003. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Leopardi  S, Blake  D, Puechmaille  SJ. White-nose syndrome fungus introduced from Europe to North America. Curr Biol. 2015;25:R2179. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Zukal  J, Bandouchova  H, Brichta  J, Cmokova  A, Jaron  KS, Kolarik  M, et al. White-nose syndrome without borders: Pseudogymnoascus destructans infection tolerated in Europe and Palearctic Asia but not in North America. [Erratum in: Sci Rep. 2016;6:26049]. Sci Rep. 2016;6:19829. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fleischer  RC, Olson  SL, James  HF, Cooper  AC. Identification of the extinct Hawaiian eagle (Haliaeetus) by mtDNA sequence analysis. Auk. 2000;117:10516. DOIGoogle Scholar
  9. Muller  LK, Lorch  JM, Lindner  DL, O’Connor  M, Gargas  A, Blehert  DS. Bat white-nose syndrome: a real-time TaqMan polymerase chain reaction test targeting the intergenic spacer region of Geomyces destructans. Mycologia. 2013;105:2539. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Wibbelt  G, Kurth  A, Hellmann  D, Weishaar  M, Barlow  A, Veith  M, et al. White-nose syndrome fungus (Geomyces destructans) in bats, Europe. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:123743. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar


Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2309.170875

Table of Contents – Volume 23, Number 9—September 2017

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Kristofer M. Helgen, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; e-mail

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: August 17, 2017
Page updated: August 17, 2017
Page reviewed: August 17, 2017
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.