Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link

Volume 24, Number 1—January 2018

CME ACTIVITY - Synopsis

Zika Virus Testing and Outcomes during Pregnancy, Florida, USA, 2016

Colette Shiu1, Rebecca Starker1, Jaclyn Kwal, Michelle Bartlett, Anise Crane, Samantha Greissman, Naiomi Gunaratne, Meghan Lardy, Michelle Picon, Patricia Rodriguez, Ivan Gonzalez, and Christine L. CurryComments to Author 
Author affiliations: University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA (C. Shiu, R. Starker, J. Kwal, M. Bartlett, A. Crane, S. Greissman, N. Gunaratne, M. Lardy, M. Picon, P. Rodriguez, I. Gonzalez, C.L. Curry); Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami (P. Rodriguez, I. Gonzalez, C.L. Curry)

Main Article

Table 1

Demographic characteristics of 2,327 pregnant women tested for Zika virus, Miami–Dade County, Florida, USA, 2016

Characteristic Result
Age, y, mean ± SD
 28.9 ± 6.09
Race/ethnicity,* no. (%)
Non-Hispanic white 262 (11.3)
Non-Hispanic black 741 (31.8)
Hispanic 996 (42.8)
Haitian 265 (11.4)
Asian/Pacific Islander 42 (1.8)
Native American 2 (0.1)
Other
 19 (0.8)
Insurance, no. (%)
Public 1,535 (66.0)
Private 350 (15.0)
Not insured
 442 (19.0)
Primary language, no. (%)
English 1,472 (63.3)
Spanish 609 (26.2)
Haitian Creole 214 (9.2)
Other 32 (1.4)

*Race/ethnicity listed as “ethnic group” and was patient self-identified.

Main Article

1These authors contributed equally to this article.

Page created: December 18, 2017
Page updated: December 18, 2017
Page reviewed: December 18, 2017
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external