Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link

Volume 24, Number 2—February 2018

Research

Risk Communication and Ebola-Specific Knowledge and Behavior during 2014–2015 Outbreak, Sierra Leone

Maike WintersComments to Author , Mohamed F. Jalloh, Paul Sengeh, Mohammad B. Jalloh, Lansana Conteh, Rebecca Bunnell, Wenshu Li, Zangin Zeebari, and Helena Nordenstedt
Author affiliations: Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (M. Winters, M.F. Jalloh, Z. Zeebari, H. Nordenstedt); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (M.F. Jalloh, R. Bunnell, W. Li); FOCUS1000, Freetown, Sierra Leone (P. Sengeh, M.B. Jalloh); Ministry of Health and Sanitation Sierra Leone, Freetown (L. Conteh)

Main Article

Table 6

Mediation analyses for knowledge, misconceptions, protective behavior, and risk behavior among respondents to Ebola knowledge, attitude, and practice surveys, Sierra Leone, 2014–2015*

Category
 Beta A (SE)
 Beta B (SE)
 Beta AB (SE)
 p value† AB
Mediation analyses for knowledge and protective behavior
Type of information
Electronic media 0.558 (0.091) 0.662 (0.047) 0.369 (0.066) <0.001
Print media 0.387 (0.088) 0.662 (0.047) 0.256 (0.061) <0.001
New media 0.342 (0.069) 0.662 (0.047) 0.226 (0.048) <0.001
Government 0.444 (0.048) 0.662 (0.047) 0.294 (0.038) <0.001
Community 0.365 (0.049) 0.662 (0.047) 0.242 (0.037) <0.001
No. sources
0–1 source
2 sources 0.317 (0.055) 0.664 (0.047) 0.210 (0.039) <0.001
3 sources 0.737 (0.060) 0.664 (0.047) 0.489 (0.052) <0.001
4–5 sources
 1.341 (0.096)
 0.664 (0.047)
 0.890 (0.090)
 <0.001
Mediation analyses for misconceptions and risk behavior
Type of information
Electronic media 0.350 (0.092) 0.400 (0.047) 0.140 (0.040) <0.001
Print media −0.022 (0.084) 0.400 (0.047) −0.009 (0.034) 0.791
New media 0.157 (0.068) 0.400 (0.047) 0.063 (0.028) 0.024
Government 0.227 (0.049) 0.400 (0.047) 0.091 (0.022) <0.001
Community 0.329 (0.050) 0.400 (0.047) 0.132 (0.025) <0.001
No. sources
0–1 source
2 sources 0.063 (0.056) 0.400 (0.047) 0.025 (0.023) 0.277
3 sources 0.510 (0.062) 0.400 (0.047) 0.204 (0.034) <0.001
4–5 sources 0.622 (0.089) 0.400 (0.047) 0.249 (0.046) <0.001

*Beta coefficients of the adjusted ORs (adjusted for region, gender, age, religion, educational level, level of outbreak and all other information sources): A, B refer to the paths in Technical Appendix Figure 2 (https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/EID/article/24/2/17-1028-Techapp1.pdf); AB is the multiplication of A and B. OR, odds ratio.
†χ2 test with 1 df.

Main Article

Page created: January 17, 2018
Page updated: January 17, 2018
Page reviewed: January 17, 2018
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external