Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 24, Number 3—March 2018

Cache Valley Virus in Aedes japonicus japonicus Mosquitoes, Appalachian Region, United States

Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Fan Yang1, Kevin Chan, Paul E. Marek, Philip M. Armstrong, Pengcheng Liu, Jacob E. Bova, Joshua N. Bernick, Benjamin E. McMillan, Benjamin G. Weidlich, and Sally L. PaulsonComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA (F. Yang, K. Chan, P.E. Marek, P. Liu, J.E. Bova, J.N. Bernick, B.E. McMillan, B.G. Weidlich, S.L. Paulson); The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, Connecticut, USA (P.M. Armstrong)

Cite This Article


We detected Cache Valley virus in Aedes japonicus, a widely distributed invasive mosquito species, in an Appalachian forest in the United States. The forest contained abundant white-tailed deer, a major host of the mosquito and virus. Vector competence trials indicated that Ae. j. japonicus mosquitoes can transmit this virus in this region.

Cache Valley virus (CVV; family Bunyaviridae, genus Orthobunyavirus) is widespread throughout North and Central America and infects many species of domestic ungulates (sheep and cattle), but white-tailed deer are a likely reservoir (1). Although this virus has been isolated from >30 mosquito species in several genera, the principal vectors remain unknown (2,3). However, on the basis of field isolations and laboratory transmission studies, Anopheles quadrimaculatus and An. punctipennis mosquitoes probably play major roles in its transmission cycle (1,4).

CVV infection is common in sheep and causes spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, and congenital defects (5). The virus is neuroinvasive in humans, and there have been 3 confirmed cases and 1 death in the United States (2,6). Medical laboratories rarely test for CVV, which underestimates its true incidence and effect on human health, but serologic studies have reported high human infection rates (up to 18%) in virus-endemic areas (7). We report detection of CVV in the invasive mosquito Aedes japonicus japonicus in Blacksburg, Virginia, USA, and demonstrate that this species is a competent vector of the virus.

The Study

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Study site used for detection of Cache Valley virus in Aedes japonicus japonicus mosquitoes, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA, 2015. Insets show location of Blacksburg in Montgomery County (black box) and the county in Virginia (black shading).

Figure 1. Study site used for detection of Cache Valley virus in Aedes japonicus japonicus mosquitoes, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA, 2015. Insets show location of Blacksburg in Montgomery County (black box) and the county...

We collected adult mosquitoes during June 1–August 21, 2015, by using gravid traps in a forested area (area 196,115 m2) (Figure 1). We collected 1,197 Ae. triseriatus and 690 Ae. j. japonicus adult female mosquitoes; identified them to species on the basis of morphology; and pooled them by species, trap number, and date (Table 1). Pools (626 of Ae. triseriatus and 442 of Ae. j. japonicus) consisting of 1–50 mosquitoes were stored at −80°C. We screened samples on Vero cells for cytopathic effect and confirmed the presence of virus in positive samples by using a plaque assay (8).

We amplified virus isolates on Vero cells to a titer of 105 PFU/mL and extracted virus RNA from infected cell supernatants by using the QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA). We used reverse transcription PCR and Bunyaviridae-specific universal primers BCS82C and BCS332V to produce a 251-bp amplicon of the small RNA segment, which was then sequenced (9). Sequencing was performed by Eton Bioscience, Inc. (San Diego, CA, USA). A BLAST ( query indicated that the isolates were CVV.

We amplified large RNA segments by using reverse transcription PCR and CVV-specific primers CVV_L (5′-AGTCAGCCAAAACAGCCACT-3′) and CVV_R (5′-TACAAATCTAGGGGGCATGG-3′) and amplified medium RNA segments by using primers M14C and M4510R (9,10). Resulting amplicons were sequenced and identified as CVV by performing a BLAST query. Medium RNA segments encoding the Gc protein were amplified by using the primer pair CVV_M_L (5′-CTGTCACGGTGCTAGTAGGAAAGATGTG-3′) and CVV_M_R (5′-AGTAGTGTGCTACCGGTATCAAAAACAGC-3′) and then sequenced.

We detected CVV in 2 Ae. j. japonicus female mosquitoes collected from different traps on August 7 (Table 1). For the week of August 4–11, we calculated the CVV minimum infection rate to be 11.5/1,000 mosquitoes (173 mosquitoes tested individually). This late-season occurrence of CVV is consistent with results of a study in Connecticut, USA (4). Although Ae. triseriatus mosquitoes were more abundant than Ae. j. japonicus mosquitoes and have a similar biology as the invasive mosquito, we did not detect CVV in Ae. triseriatus mosquitoes.

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Phylogeny of Cache Valley virus (CVV) isolates in mosquitoes collected in Blacksburg, Virginia, USA (GenBank accession nos. KX583998 and KX583999), and reference isolates. The tree was inferred from the medium RNA segment of the virus polyprotein gene and estimated by using mixed model partitioned Bayesian analysis. State, year, host, and GenBank accession number are listed for each isolate. Historical lineages (1 and 2) of CVV are indicated. Shading in lineage 2 indicates strains i

Figure 2. Phylogeny of Cache Valley virus (CVV) isolates in mosquitoes collected in Blacksburg, Virginia, USA (GenBank accession nos. KX583998 and KX583999), and reference isolates. The tree was inferred from the medium RNA...

We used the medium RNA segment to infer phylogeny with CVV isolates reported by Armstrong et al. (10). We translated RNA sequences to amino acid sequences and aligned them visually, which was trivial because of invariant length and lack of insertion−deletion events. The alignment was composed of 1,803 bp from 100 isolates. We partitioned sequences by codon position and evaluated alternative models of nucleotide site substitution. We inferred phylogenetic trees by using a Markov chain Monte Carlo method in MrBayes 3.2.5 with a simultaneous estimation of topology, branch lengths, and other parameters (11). Stabilization of 4 concurrent chains occurred at 1 million generations, and the first 250,000 trees were discarded as a burn-in. We averaged branch lengths and other parameters and constructed a consensus tree (Figure 2) from the posterior distribution that contained support values for each clade in posterior probabilities.

CVV isolates were grouped into 2 clades or lineages (Figure 2) (10). Lineage 1 viruses were from the United States and Canada during 1952–2011 and lineage 2 were more recent strains from the northeastern United States. Virus isolates from Virginia were genetically similar to each other (3-bp differences) and grouped in the newly emergent lineage 2 of CVV. This monophyletic lineage shares a most recent common ancestor with a virus from Mexico isolated in 1961 (GenBank accession no. AF231118). This sister-group relationship suggests a derivation of this group from Mexico (10). However, additional historical samples from the region in Veracruz, Mexico, and elsewhere during the history of its introduction into the northeastern United States would further provide understanding of the phylogeography of the virus.

To determine vector competence of local mosquitoes for CVV, we established a laboratory strain from uninfected Ae. j. japonicus mosquitoes. Week-old female mosquitoes from the F2 generation were offered an infectious blood meal in a membrane feeder. This blood meal contained 1 mL of the CVV-4B isolate and 9 mL of sheep blood (Colorado Serum Company, Denver, CO, USA). We transferred postfeeding, engorged mosquitoes to 0.7-L cages and held them for 14 days at 25°C, a relative humidity of 75%, and a 16:8 (L:D) photoperiod and provided 10% sucrose. We measured rates of nondisseminated and disseminated infection (virus present in legs and wings) and oral transmission (virus present in saliva). We conducted this experiment 3 times.

Infectious blood meal titers ranged from 1.6 × 105 to 4.6 × 106 PFU/mL (Table 2). Ae. j. japonicus female mosquitoes were susceptible to oral infection with CVV and capable of transmitting the virus. After a 14-day incubation, CVV was present in 41% of abdomens, 38% of legs and wings, and 28% of saliva samples (Table 2). We found no significant differences among the 3 replicates for infection or transmission rates (p>0.05 by χ2 test).


Ae. j. japonicus mosquitoes are an invasive species that has spread throughout most of the eastern United States and are a competent vector of several endemic viruses (12). Although CVV was previously isolated from Ae. j. japonicus mosquitoes in the northeastern United States (4,13), we report isolation of CVV from this species in Appalachia and show that it is a competent vector of the virus. In the laboratory, vector competence of Ae. j. japonicus mosquitoes was equivalent to that for other species believed to be part of the CVV transmission cycle. For example, transmission rates for An. quadrimaculatus mosquitoes ranged from 20% to 33% after imbibing infectious blood meals with virus titers similar to those used in our study (1).

Ae. j. japonicus mosquitoes readily feed on humans and large animals, such as white-tailed deer (12). Consequently, this species probably contributes to local transmission of CVV. The study site is in close proximity to humans and pastured sheep and is frequented by deer (Figure 1). Therefore, all components for establishment of a focus of CVV are present. If Ae. j. japonicus mosquitoes are capable of transovarial transmission, as is the case with La Crosse virus, another bunyavirus (14), these mosquitoes could then contribute to concentrating the virus within this limited geographic area. Emergence of La Crosse virus in the Appalachian region of the United States has been associated with invasions by Ae. j. japonicus and Ae. albopictus mosquitoes (15). Thus, additional studies are needed to determine the role of Ae. j. japonicus mosquitoes in the transmission, maintenance, and presence of CVV.

At the time of this study, Dr. Yang was a medical entomologist and chemical ecologist in the Department of Entomology Department, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA. He is currently a microbiologist at the California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA. His research interests are the ecology and surveillance of vectorborne diseases.



We thank Eton Bioscience, Inc. (San Diego, CA, USA) for performing sequencing.

This study was supported by the Entomology Department of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. P.E.M. was supported by the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, US Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch Project (VA-160028).



  1. Blackmore  CG, Blackmore  MS, Grimstad  PR. Role of Anopheles quadrimaculatus and Coquillettidia perturbans (Diptera: Culicidae) in the transmission cycle of Cache Valley virus (Bunyaviridae: Bunyavirus) in the midwest, USA. J Med Entomol. 1998;35:6604. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Campbell  GL, Mataczynski  JD, Reisdorf  ES, Powell  JW, Martin  DA, Lambert  AJ, et al. Second human case of Cache Valley virus disease. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:8546. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Calisher  CH, Francy  DB, Smith  GC, Muth  DJ, Lazuick  JS, Karabatsos  N, et al. Distribution of Bunyamwera serogroup viruses in North America, 1956-1984. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1986;35:42943. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Andreadis  TG, Armstrong  PM, Anderson  JF, Main  AJ. Spatial-temporal analysis of Cache Valley virus (Bunyaviridae: Orthobunyavirus) infection in anopheline and culicine mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in the northeastern United States, 1997-2012. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2014;14:76373. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Edwards  JF. Cache Valley virus. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 1994;10:51524. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Nguyen  NL, Zhao  G, Hull  R, Shelly  MA, Wong  SJ, Wu  G, et al. Cache valley virus in a patient diagnosed with aseptic meningitis. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:19669. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Blitvich  BJ, Saiyasombat  R, Talavera-Aguilar  LG, Garcia-Rejon  JE, Farfan-Ale  JA, Machain-Williams  C, et al. Orthobunyavirus antibodies in humans, Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18:162932. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Barker  CM, Paulson  SL, Cantrell  S, Davis  BS. Habitat preferences and phenology of Ochlerotatus triseriatus and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in southwestern Virginia. J Med Entomol. 2003;40:40310. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kuno  G, Mitchell  CJ, Chang  GJ, Smith  GC. Detecting bunyaviruses of the Bunyamwera and California serogroups by a PCR technique. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:11848.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Armstrong  PM, Andreadis  TG, Anderson  JF. Emergence of a new lineage of Cache Valley virus (Bunyaviridae: Orthobunyavirus) in the Northeastern United States. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;93:117. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ronquist  F, Teslenko  M, van der Mark  P, Ayres  DL, Darling  A, Höhna  S, et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 2012;61:53942. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kaufman  MG, Fonseca  DM. Invasion biology of Aedes japonicus japonicus (Diptera: Culicidae). Annu Rev Entomol. 2014;59:3149. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ngo  KA, Maffei  JG, Dupuis  AP II, Kauffman  EB, Backenson  PB, Kramer  LD. Isolation of Bunyamwera serogroup viruses (Bunyaviridae, Orthobunyavirus) in New York state. J Med Entomol. 2006;43:10049.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Harris  MC, Dotseth  EJ, Jackson  BT, Zink  SD, Marek  PE, Kramer  LD, et al. La Crosse virus in Aedes japonicus japonicus mosquitoes in the Appalachian Region, United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:6469. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Leisnham  PT, Juliano  SA. Impacts of climate, land use, and biological invasion on the ecology of immature Aedes mosquitoes: implications for La Crosse emergence. EcoHealth. 2012;9:21728. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2403.161275

1Current affiliation: California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, USA.

Table of Contents – Volume 24, Number 3—March 2018

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Sally L. Paulson, Department of Entomology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 216-A Price Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: February 16, 2018
Page updated: February 16, 2018
Page reviewed: February 16, 2018
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.