Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 24, Number 7—July 2018
Research

Reemergence of Reston ebolavirus in Cynomolgus Monkeys, the Philippines, 2015

Catalino Demetria, Ina Smith, Titus Tan, Daniel Villarico, Edson Michael Simon, Rex Centeno, Mary Tachedjian, Satoshi Taniguchi, Masayuki Shimojima, Noel Lee J. Miranda, Mary Elizabeth Miranda, Melissa Marie R. Rondina, Rowena Capistrano, Amado Tandoc, Glenn Marsh, Debbie Eagles, Ramses Cruz, and Shuetsu FukushiComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Research Institute for Tropical Medicine, Muntinlupa City, Philippines (C. Demetria, T. Tan, D. Villarico, E.M. Simon, R. Centeno, R. Capistrano, A. Tandoc III); CSIRO Australian Animal Health Laboratory, East Geelong, Victoria, Australia (I. Smith, M. Tachedjian, G. Marsh, D. Eagles); National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan (S. Taniguchi, M. Shimojima, S. Fukushi); INA Research Philippines, Muntinlupa City (N.L.J. Miranda, M.E. Miranda, M.M.R. Rondina, R. Cruz)

Main Article

Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree (neighbor-joining) of the full genomes of Ebola viruses and comparison to the Reston 2015 viruses DrpZ52BF (GenBank accession no. MF540570) and DrpZ210BG (GenBank accession no. MF540571) produced by using MEGA 6 software (https://www.megasoftware.net). Bold text indicates the genomes being sequenced. Numbers along branches indicate bootstrap values. Scale bar indicates nucleotide substitutions per site.

Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree (neighbor-joining) of the full genomes of Ebola viruses and comparison to the Reston 2015 viruses DrpZ52BF (GenBank accession no. MF540570) and DrpZ210BG (GenBank accession no. MF540571) produced by using MEGA 6 software (https://www.megasoftware.net). Bold text indicates the genomes being sequenced. Numbers along branches indicate bootstrap values. Scale bar indicates nucleotide substitutions per site.

Main Article

Page created: June 18, 2018
Page updated: June 18, 2018
Page reviewed: June 18, 2018
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external