Volume 24, Number 8—August 2018
Dispatch
Distinguishing Zika and Dengue Viruses through Simple Clinical Assessment, Singapore
Table 2
Case definition |
Characteristic |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Source | Criteria | Patient meets criteria | Zika virus positive, n = 34 | Zika virus negative, n = 57 | Total, n = 91 | Sensitivity, % | Specificity, % | |
CDC |
Clinically compatible illness with >1 of the following not explained by another etiology: fever, rash, arthralgia, or conjunctivitis† |
Yes |
34 |
56 |
90 |
100 |
2 |
|
WHO | Fever and/or rash and any of the following: arthralgia, arthritis, nonpurulent conjunctivitis | Yes | 24 | 19 | 43 | 71 | 67 | |
No | 10 | 38 | 48 |
*CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; WHO, World Health Organization.
†We excluded 2 additional criteria, complications of pregnancy and neurologic manifestations, because they were not present in our study population.
1These authors contributed equally to this article.
2These authors contributed equally to this article.
3These authors contributed equally to this article.
Page created: July 18, 2018
Page updated: July 18, 2018
Page reviewed: July 18, 2018
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.