Volume 25, Number 10—October 2019
Research
Early Diagnosis of Tularemia by Flow Cytometry, Czech Republic, 2003–20151
Table 3
Category | Time, d |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Median | 95% CI | Interquartile range | Range | |
Time relative to onset of patient symptoms | ||||
Diagnostic test type | ||||
Flow cytometry, n = 58 | 18.5 | 15.5–22.0 | 9.75–33.25 | 2–128 |
Serologic test, n = 58 |
29.5 |
24.0–37.0 |
21.0–42.0 |
2–140 |
Time to first positive serologic test result relative to rise in CD3+/CD4–/CD8– T cells | ||||
Patient population | ||||
All, n = 58 | 7.0 | 1.0–12.0 | 0–18.75 | –50 to 62 |
Delayed seroconverters, n = 34 | 14.0 | 8.0–22.0 | 7.5–22.0 | 1–62 |
*A positive flow cytometry test result for tularemia was defined as >8% of peripheral blood CD3+ T cells having the CD4–/CD8– phenotype. A positive serologic test result for tularemia included probable and confirmed diagnoses and was defined for probable cases as an antibody titer of >1:20 in any acute phase blood sample or for confirmed cases as an antibody titer of >1:160 in any blood sample or a seroconversion from negative to positive (any titer) or a 4-fold increase in titer between acute and convalescent patient samples (agglutination test; Tularemia Diagnostic Set, Bioveta a.s., https://www.bioveta.eu).
1Preliminary data from this study were presented at the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases; April 9–12, 2016; Amsterdam, the Netherlands (abstract no. O367).