Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 25, Number 2—February 2019
Dispatch

Lyme Disease Emergence after Invasion of the Blacklegged Tick, Ixodes scapularis, Ontario, Canada, 2010–2016

Manisha A. KulkarniComments to Author , Isha Narula, Andreea M. Slatculescu, and Curtis Russell
Author affiliations: University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.A. Kulkarni, I. Narula, A.M. Slatculescu); Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario (C. Russell)

Main Article

Table 1

Incidence of Lyme disease and characteristics of 639 reported human Lyme disease case-patients in 3 public health units, eastern Ontario, Canada, 2010–2016*

Characteristic No. (%) cases Cumulative incidence, cases/100,000 population† Mean (SD) annual incidence, cases/100,000 population†
Public health unit
KFL 210 (33.0) 109.6 15.7 (13.3)
LGL 224 (35.1) 135.8 19.4 (10.4)
Ottawa 205 (32.1) 23.2 3.3 (2.8)
Total
639 (100.0)
51.5
7.4 (5.2)
Age group, y
0–9 43 (6.7) 32.6 4.7 (4.5)
10–19 39 (6.1) 25.7 3.6 (2.2)
20–29 49 (7.7) 29.0 4.1 (3.3)
30–39 74 (11.6) 47.2 6.7 (4.2)
40–49 80 (12.5) 42.2 6.0 (5.0)
50–59 161 (25.2) 87.9 12.6 (8.5)
60–69 118 (18.5) 89.2 12.7 (9.9)
70–79 56 (8.8) 74.7 10.7 (8.8)
>80
19 (3.0)
38.1
5.4 (4.3)
Sex
F 272 (42.6) 42.7 6.1 (4.5)
M 364 (57.0) 60.4 8.6 (6.1)
Data missing 3 (0.4)

*KFL, Kingston, Frontenac, Lennox, and Addington; LGL, Leeds, Grenville, and Lanark.
†Population based on 2011 census.

Main Article

Page created: January 18, 2019
Page updated: January 18, 2019
Page reviewed: January 18, 2019
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external