Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 25, Number 3—March 2019
Dispatch

Acute Flaccid Myelitis Associated with Enterovirus D68 in Children, Argentina, 2016

Figures
Tables
Article Metrics
28
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Author affiliations: Hospital de Niños “Ricardo Gutiérrez,” Buenos Aires, Argentina (C.M. Carballo, M. García Erro, N. Sordelli, A.S. Mistchenko, M. Rodriguez, M.M. Contrini, E.L. Lopez); Fundación para la Lucha contra las Enfermedades Neurológicas de la Infancia (FLENI), Buenos Aires (G. Vazquez, C. Cejas); Administración Nacional de Laboratorios e Institutos de Salud (ANLIS) “Dr. Carlos G. Malbrán,” Buenos Aires (D.M. Cisterna, M.C. Freire)

Cite This Article

Abstract

After a 2014 outbreak of severe respiratory illness caused by enterovirus D68 in the United States, sporadic cases of acute flaccid myelitis have been reported worldwide. We describe a cluster of acute flaccid myelitis cases in Argentina in 2016, adding data to the evidence of association between enterovirus D68 and this polio-like illness.

We report a cluster of acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) cases in Buenos Aires, Argentina, in 2016. AFM was defined as acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showing lesions predominantly affecting the gray matter of the spinal cord (1). We prospectively studied all patients with AFP who were admitted to Hospital de Niños “Ricardo Gutiérrez” in Buenos Aires during April 24–August 24, 2016, under the Argentine National Surveillance Acute Flaccid Paralysis Program for poliovirus as part of the World Health Organization AFP Program in the Americas. We obtained fecal samples or rectal swab specimens, serum samples, nasopharyngeal swab specimens, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples.

Fecal samples were tested at the National Reference Center for the Argentine National Surveillance Acute Flaccid Paralysis Program for enterovirus, including wild-type and vaccine-derived poliovirus. We screened clinical samples for enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) using a panrhinovirus and enterovirus nested PCR of enterovirus targeting the 5′ untranslated region (2). We purified the amplified products and prepared them for Sanger sequencing. We performed BLAST searches (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) of GenBank sequences to identify which picornavirus was present. We obtained viral protein 1 partial sequences as previously described (3). In addition, we studied a wide panel of viruses (parainfluenza virus 1, 2, and 3; influenza A/B; respiratory syncytial virus; adenovirus; metapneumovirus; rhinovirus; varicella zoster virus; herpes simplex virus; cytomegalovirus) by reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) and studied bacteria by culture. We performed MRI and electromyography for all patients.

Fourteen children were admitted with AFP during April–August 2016. Six were confirmed to have AFM by case definition; the other 8 had alternative diagnoses, including Guillain-Barré syndrome (3), influenza virus myositis (2), encephalitis by echovirus (in 1 child with Down syndrome), acute transient hip synovitis (1), and transverse myelitis (1). Patients’ clinical, demographic, and outcome findings are shown in Table 1, diagnostic findings in Table 2.

In 4 (66.7%) of 6 patients, we confirmed EV-D68 infection by nested RT-PCR. In 1 patient, enterovirus was detected but not typed; in 1 patient, no agent was detected. All patients had distinctive neuroimaging changes. We followed confirmed AFM cases for 6 months to assess clinical improvement.

The median age of patients with AFM was 3.9 (range 1–5) years; 4 (66.7%) of the 6 were female, and 3 (50%) had a history of asthma. All patients had prodromal signs or symptoms before onset of neurologic symptoms: 100% had upper respiratory tract infection (URTI); 4 (66.7%) had fever; and 1 (16.7%) had vomiting and abdominal pain. Neurologic symptoms appeared 1–11 (median 2) days after URTI symptoms.

Results of hematology and chemistry analysis were normal for 5 (83%) patients. Patient 1 had leukocytosis (leukocytes 18,000 cells/mm3, with 82% neutrophils) and elevated levels of alanine aminotransferase (103 IU/L [reference 10–43 IU/L]), aspartate aminotransferase (97 IU/L [reference 10–35 IU/L]), and creatine kinase (6,591 IU/L [reference 24–170 IU/L]). During follow-up, patient 1 showed an increased creatine kinase level that could not be related to enterovirus infection.

All confirmed AFM case-patients showed T2 gray matter hyperintensity within the spinal cord on MRI. Electromyography showed early signs of denervation and low motor neuron function in all 5 patients in whom the test could be done. Specimen collection was performed 9.5 (range 3–30) days after URTI symptoms started and 7.5 (range 1–18) days after onset of neurologic symptoms.

Figure

Thumbnail of Molecular characterization of enterovirus D68 strains from Argentina, 2016, compared with reference strains from GenBank. Tree based on phylogenetic analyses of partial viral protein 1 genomic region (nucleotide positions 2554–2799, corresponding to the Fermon strain). Bold indicates strains detected in this study (GenBank accession nos. MF445419–20). We generated trees using the neighbor-joining method, as implemented in MEGA 6 software (http://www.megasoftware.net). Bootstrap valu

Figure. Molecular characterization of enterovirus D68 strains from Argentina, 2016, compared with reference strains from GenBank. Tree based on phylogenetic analyses of partial viral protein 1 genomic region (nucleotide positions 2554–2799, corresponding...

We identified enterovirus using nested RT-PCR of nasopharyngeal samples in 5 (83%) of 6 patients; 4 (80%) of 5 were typed as EV-D68, but in 1 patient (20%) the viral load was too low for typing. We identified EV-D68 in 2 (33%) of 6 fecal specimens. We performed molecular characterization of EV-D68 strains based on phylogenetic analyses of a partial VP1 genomic region (Figure).

Results of nested RT-PCR for enterovirus were negative for all CSF samples; results of the respiratory virus panel were negative for all patients. Neither bacteria nor fungus were isolated in blood or CSF samples. Serum PCR to identify herpes simplex virus, varicella zoster virus, and cytomegalovirus also yielded negative results.

Intravenous immunoglobulin was empirically infused in 5 (83%) patients; 2 (33%) received systemic corticosteroids. Three patients required intensive care unit admission. All patients had neurologic sequelae: persisting palsy in >1 limbs and atrophy of muscles with a shortening of limbs. Two patients required chronic noninvasive ventilatory support during 6 months of follow-up. No patients died.

Conclusions

AFM has been associated with different etiologic agents (1). EV-D68 is a nonpolio enterovirus characterized by affinity for α2–6-linked sialic acids typically found in the upper respiratory tract, making the respiratory tract the preferred target for EV-D68 replication, unlike most enteroviruses, which replicate in the gut (1,4). Although there is no definitive evidence of causality between EV-D68 and AFM, since the 2014 EV-D68 respiratory outbreak in North America, AFM cases possibly associated with EV-D68 have been reported in the United States, Canada, Australia, Norway, Great Britain, and France (1,5). We report a cluster of AFM associated with EV-D68 in Argentina; another institution in Argentina (Hospital Garrahan) has also reported a case series of AFM (6,7).

The cluster in this report occurred over a 3-month period, during the 2016 autumn–winter season, which is the typical enterovirus season in Buenos Aires. Clinical and neurologic findings were similar to those of cases reported in other countries, including URTI preceding the neurologic features (4,8,9). Patients were admitted with asymmetric, acute, and progressive weakness of limbs; areflexia; and muscle pain. These symptoms have been reported as polio-like syndrome; however, testing and MRI should be performed for multiple viruses, including enteroviruses and EV-D68, to detect distinctive spinal cord lesions. No sensory sensitivity involvement was observed. Two patients had cranial nerve dysfunction. Laboratory findings were similar to those previously described, including CSF abnormalities (1,4,8).

Different hypotheses to explain difficulties in isolation of EV-D68 have been reported (4). It is possible that most of the nasopharyngeal specimens in previous studies and in our cluster were taken after 7 days of URTI, when the viral load is usually low, as reported by Imamura et al. (10). In our case series, enterovirus was identified in respiratory secretions in 5 (83.3%) of 6 patients, even though specimen collection was performed >7 days (mean 9 days) after AFM onset (in 1 patient, viral load was too low for genotyping). The negative nasopharyngeal specimen was collected at 18 days after onset.

Isolation of EV-D68 in fecal samples is uncommon because the virus is both heat and acid labile (1). However, in 2 (33.3%) of our 6 patients, EV-D68 was identified in fecal samples.

Reported rates of CSF detection of known neurotropic enteroviruses, such as polioviruses and enterovirus A71, are as low as 0%–5%, although viruses could be detected in brain or spinal cord tissue (4,11). A recent mouse model of AFM caused by EV-D68 showed that EV-D68 infects anterior horn motor neurons, resulting in motor neuron death (9). In our series, CSF samples tested negative for EV-D68 and other pathogens.

No specific treatment for EV-D68 AFM is available; the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends only support measures (7,12). Zhang et al. demonstrated that commercial immunoglobulin contained high levels of neutralizing antibodies against EV-D68 strains during the 2014 outbreak in the United States (13). No vaccines are available.

EV-D68 belonging to subclade B3 was identified in our cluster by molecular sequencing. This subclade was associated with EV-D68 circulation in the United States and Europe in 2016 (14).

We show a cluster of AFM associated with EV-D68 in Argentina. Our findings contribute to global evidence of EV-D68 as a possible cause of localized polio-like illness.

Dr. Carballo is a pediatric infectious diseases specialist at the Hospital de Niños “Ricardo Gutierrez” in Buenos Aires. Her research interests are pediatric infectious diseases.

Top

References

  1. Messacar  K, Abzug  MJ, Dominguez  SR. 2014 outbreak of enterovirus D68 in North America. J Med Virol. 2016;88:73945. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Casas  I, Klapper  PE, Cleator  GM, Echevarría  JE, Tenorio  A, Echevarría  JM. Two different PCR assays to detect enteroviral RNA in CSF samples from patients with acute aseptic meningitis. J Med Virol. 1995;47:37885. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) 2014 outbreak strain-specific real-time reverse 327 transcription/polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) assay instructions. 2014 [cited 2017 Jul 14]. http://www.cdc.gov/non-polio-enterovirus/hcp/ev-329 d68-hcp.html
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Enterovirus D68. 2016 [cited 2017 May 26]. https://www.cdc.gov/non-polio-enterovirus/about/ev-d68.html
  5. Holm-Hansen  CC, Midgley  SE, Fischer  TK. Global emergence of enterovirus D68: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16:e6475. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Pérez  G, Rosanova  MT, Freire  MC, Paz  MI, Ruvinsky  S, Rugilo  C, et al. Unusual increase of cases of myelitis in a pediatric hospital in Argentina [in Spanish] Arch Argent Pediatr. 2017;115:3649.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=28737865&dopt=AbstractPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ruggieri  V, Paz  MI, Peretti  MG, Rugilo  C, Bologna  R, Freire  C, et al. Enterovirus D68 infection in a cluster of children with acute flaccid myelitis, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2016. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2017;21:88490. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Greninger  AL, Naccache  SN, Messacar  K, Clayton  A, Yu  G, Somasekar  S, et al. A novel outbreak enterovirus D68 strain associated with acute flaccid myelitis cases in the USA (2012-14): a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15:67182. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hixon  AM, Yu  G, Leser  JS, Yagi  S, Clarke  P, Chiu  CY, et al. A mouse model of paralytic myelitis caused by enterovirus D68. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13:e1006199. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Imamura  T, Okamoto  M, Nakakita  S, Suzuki  A, Saito  M, Tamaki  R, et al. Antigenic and receptor binding properties of enterovirus 68. J Virol. 2014;88:237484. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kreuter  JD, Barnes  A, McCarthy  JE, Schwartzman  JD, Oberste  MS, Rhodes  CH, et al. A fatal central nervous system enterovirus 68 infection. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011;135:7936.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Rhoden  E, Zhang  M, Nix  WA, Oberste  MS. In vitro efficacy of antiviral compounds against enterovirus D68. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:777981. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhang  Y, Moore  DD, Nix  WA, Oberste  MS, Weldon  WC. Neutralization of Enterovirus D68 isolated from the 2014 US outbreak by commercial intravenous immune globulin products. J Clin Virol. 2015;69:1725. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Wang  G, Zhuge  J, Huang  W, Nolan  SM, Gilrane  VL, Yin  C, et al. Enterovirus D68 subclade B3 strain circulating and causing an outbreak in the United States in 2016. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1242. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figure
Tables

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2503.170897

Original Publication Date: January 02, 2019

Table of Contents – Volume 25, Number 3—March 2019

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Carolina M. Carballo, Infectious Diseases, Pedro Goyena 770 Fl 12 / App 02, Buenos Aires 1405, Argentina

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: February 19, 2019
Page updated: February 19, 2019
Page reviewed: February 19, 2019
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external