Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 25, Number 7—July 2019
Synopsis

Added Value of Comprehensive Program to Provide Universal Access to Care for Sputum Smear–Negative Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis, China

Fei Huang, Susan van den Hof, Yan Qu, You Li, Hui ZhangComments to Author , Lixia Wang, Miaomiao Sun, Wei Lu, Shuangyi Hou, Tianhua Zhang, Shitong Huan, Daniel P. Chin, and Frank Cobelens
Author affiliations: Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China (F. Huang, Y. Qu, Y. Li, H. Zhang, L. Wang); The Royal Netherlands Tuberculosis Foundation, The Hague, the Netherlands (S. van den Hof); Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (S. van den Hof, F. Cobelens); PATH, Beijing (M. Sun); Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jiangsu, China (W. Lu); Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hubei, China (S. Hou); Shaanxi Provincial Institute for Tuberculosis Control and Prevention, Shaanxi, China (T. Zhang); Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Beijing (S. Huan); Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, USA (D.P. Chin)

Main Article

Table 2

Drug resistance testing and results by prefecture and smear status in study of comprehensive program to provide universal access to care for sputum smear–negative drug-resistant tuberculosis, China*

Characteristic Yichang, no. (%)
Zhenjiang, no. (%)
Baseline Intervention Baseline Intervention
Smear-positive patients
Patients given a diagnosis 1,177 (100) 949 (100) 631 (100) 560 (100)
Patients tested for drug resistance 36 (3.1) 863 (90.9) 470 (74.5) 518 (92.5)
Rapid resistance result available 36 (3.1) 828 (87.2) 453 (71.8) 457 (81.6)
Drug resistance test result
No resistance to rifampin and isoniazid 24 (2.0) 715 (75.3) 405 (64.2) 389 (69.5)
Resistance to only isoniazid 3 (0.3) 46 (4.8) 26 (4.1) 38 (6.8)
Any rifampin resistance 9 (0.8) 67 (7.1) 21 (3.3) 30 (5.4)
MDR TB 6 (0.5) 30 (3.2) 14 (2.2) 18 (3.2)
Resistance to only rifampin
3 (0.3)
37 (3.9)

7 (1.1)
12 (2.1)
Smear-negative patients
Patients given a diagnosis 2,258 (100) 2,055 (100) 1,156 (100) 800 (100)
Cultures performed 14 (0.6) 1,842 (89.6) 19 (1.6) 749 (93.6)
Cultures positive 12 (0.5) 358 (17.4) 19 (1.6) 52 (6.5)
Patients tested for drug resistance† 1 (<0.1) 352 (17.1) 22 (1.9) 53 (6.6)
Rapid resistance result available 1 (<0.1) 330 (16.1) 21 (1.8) 47 (5.9)
Drug resistance test result
No resistance to rifampin and isoniazid 0 299 (14.5) 19 (1.6) 43 (5.4)
Resistance to only isoniazid 1 (<0.1) 19 (0.9) 0 3 (0.4)
Any rifampin resistance‡ 0 12 (0.6) 2 (0.2) 1 (0.1)
MDR TB 0 10 (0.5) 2 (0.2) 1 (0.1)
Resistance to only rifampin 0 2 (0.1) 0 0

*Differences in numbers of patients tested and numbers with a test result reflect indeterminate test results. MDR TB, multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (i.e., resistant to rifampin and isoniazid); TB, tuberculosis.
†Including 10 smear-negative patients who had no culture results and 24 smear-negative culture-negative patients for whom a line-probe assay was performed directly for sputum.
‡Including 2 smear-negative patients for whom a line-probe assay was performed directly for sputum.

Main Article

Page created: June 17, 2019
Page updated: June 17, 2019
Page reviewed: June 17, 2019
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external