Volume 26, Number 1—January 2020
Research
Effect of Acute Illness on Contact Patterns, Malawi, 2017
Judith R. Glynn
, Estelle McLean, Jullita Malava, Albert Dube, Cynthia Katundu, Amelia C. Crampin, and Steffen Geis
, Estelle McLean, Jullita Malava, Albert Dube, Cynthia Katundu, Amelia C. Crampin, and Steffen Geis
Table 2
Number and proportions of patients and caregivers who visited congregate settings in 24-hour periods in study of the effect of acute illness on contact patterns, Malawi, 2017
| Setting, date of visit | Patients, no. (%) |
Caregivers | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age 0–5, y | Age 6–17, y | Age >18 y | ||
| All* | ||||
| Clinic day | 166 | 84 | 119 | 247 |
| Next day | 169 | 85 | 116 | 250 |
| 2 wk later |
165 |
85 |
119 |
248 |
| Church | ||||
| Clinic day | 1 (0.6) | 3 (3.6) | 2 (1.7) | 11 (4.5) |
| Next day | 11 (6.5) | 4 (4.7) | 5 (4.3) | 23 (9.2) |
| 2 wk later |
13 (7.9) |
10 (11.8) |
11 (9.2) |
32 (12.9) |
| Funeral | ||||
| Clinic day | 2 (1.2) | 0 | 1 (0.8) | 6 (2.4) |
| Next day | 5 (3.0) | 0 | 2 (1.7) | 15 (6.0) |
| 2 wk later |
4 (2.4) |
0 |
8 (6.7) |
14 (5.6) |
| Market | ||||
| Clinic day | 45 (27.1) | 16 (19.0) | 28 (23.5) | 86 (34.8) |
| Next day | 14 (8.3) | 8 (9.4) | 28 (24.1) | 68 (27.2) |
| 2 wk later |
26 (15.8) |
22 (25.9) |
52 (43.7) |
92 (37.1) |
| Vehicle | ||||
| Clinic day | 107 (64.5) | 50 (59.5) | 65 (54.6) | 153 (61.9) |
| Next day | 5 (3.0) | 4 (4.7) | 15 (12.9) | 27 (10.8) |
| 2 wk later |
15 (9.1) |
4 (4.7) |
30 (25.2) |
33 (13.3) |
| School | ||||
| Clinic day | 1 (0.6) | 2 (2.4) | 1 (0.8) | 3 (1.2) |
| Next day | 3 (1.8) | 10 (11.8) | 6 (5.2) | 3 (1.2) |
| 2 wk later |
12 (7.3) |
26 (30.6) |
7 (5.9) |
5 (2.0) |
| Any other households | ||||
| Clinic day | 114 (68.7) | 47 (56.0) | 61 (51.3) | 187 (76.1) |
| Next day | 142 (84.0) | 68 (80.0) | 72 (62.1) | 204 (81.6) |
| 2 wk later | 155 (93.9) | 75 (88.2) | 95 (79.8) | 225 (90.7) |
*Numbers vary between visits because a few persons missed interviews.
Page created: December 18, 2019
Page updated: December 18, 2019
Page reviewed: December 18, 2019
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.