Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 27, Number 11—November 2021

Ehrlichiosis and Anaplasmosis among Transfusion and Transplant Recipients in the United States

Sanjida J. Mowla, Naomi A. Drexler, Cara C. Cherry, Pallavi D. Annambholta, Ian T. Kracalik, and Sridhar V. BasavarajuComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA (S.J. Mowla); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (S.J. Mowla, N.A. Drexler, C.C. Cherry, P.D. Annambholta, I.T. Kracalik, S.V. Basavaraju)

Cite This Article


CME Logo


In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by Medscape, LLC and Emerging Infectious Diseases. Medscape, LLC is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

Medscape, LLC designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.00 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s). Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 1.0 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.

All other clinicians completing this activity will be issued a certificate of participation. To participate in this journal CME activity: (1) review the learning objectives and author disclosures; (2) study the education content; (3) take the post-test with a 75% minimum passing score and complete the evaluation at; and (4) view/print certificate.

Release date: October 13, 2021; Expiration date: October 13, 2022
Learning Objectives

Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:

  • Assess donor-derived ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis cases in the United States among solid organ transplant recipients, based on a case series, review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) investigations, and literature review

  • Evaluate donor-derived ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis cases in the United States among transfusion recipients, based on a case series, review of CDC investigations, and literature review

  • Determine the clinical implications of donor-derived ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis cases in the United States among solid organ transplant and transfusion recipients, based on a case series, review of CDC investigations, and literature review

CME Editor

Tony Pearson-Clarke, MS, Technical Writer/Editor, Emerging Infectious Diseases. Disclosure: Tony Pearson-Clarke, MS, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author

Laurie Barclay, MD, freelance writer and reviewer, Medscape, LLC. Disclosure: Laurie Barclay, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.


Disclosures: Sanjida J. Mowla, MPH; Naomi A. Drexler, MPH, DrPH; Cara C. Cherry, DVM; Pallavi Annambholta, DrPH; Ian T. Kracalik, PhD; and Sridhar V. Basavaraju, MD, have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.



Ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis are emerging tickborne diseases that can also be transmitted through blood transfusions or organ transplants. Since 2000, ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis cases in the United States have increased substantially, resulting in potential risk to transplant and transfusion recipients. We reviewed ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis cases among blood transfusion and solid organ transplant recipients in the United States from peer-reviewed literature and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention investigations. We identified 132 cases during 1997–2020, 12 transfusion-associated cases and 120 cases in transplant recipients; 8 cases were donor-derived, and in 13 cases illness occurred <1 year after transplant. Disease in the remaining 99 cases occurred ≥1 year after transplant, suggesting donor-derived disease was unlikely. Severe illness or death were reported among 15 transfusion and transplant recipients. Clinicians should be alert for these possible infections among transfusion and transplant recipients to prevent severe complications or death by quickly treating them.

Ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis are emerging tickborne diseases caused by Ehrlichia and Anaplasma spp. obligate intracellular bacteria (1,2). Tick bites are the primary route of infection, but transmission can also occur through blood transfusion or solid organ transplantation, because these pathogens infect leukocytes and circulate throughout the blood stream (2). In the United States, human ehrlichiosis is caused primarily by Ehrlichia chaffeensis but can also result from E. ewingii or E. muris eauclairensis infections (1,3). Anaplasmosis is caused by Anaplasma phagocytophilum (1). Although distinct diseases, ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis share clinical and laboratory features. Early symptoms often include fever, chills, headache, malaise, myalgia, or nausea, and many infections go unrecognized and undiagnosed (35). Laboratory features often include leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and elevated hepatic transaminases (35).

Both diseases have incubation periods of 5–14 days from the time of tick transmission, and during early illness infected asymptomatic persons or those with mild illness might be unknowingly accepted as blood donors (3,5). In general, higher rates of ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis are reported among adults >40 years of age, and most patients are men (57). Illness onset is most commonly reported during June and July, corresponding to peak tick activity (3,5). Approximately half of ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis patients require hospitalization, and 7% require critical care (3,8). Case-fatality rates are ≈1% for E. chaffeensis ehrlichiosis and 0.3% for anaplasmosis patients based on national surveillance reports (3,5). In part because of immunosuppressive therapies to prevent organ rejection, transplant and transfusion recipients may be more susceptible to ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis. Relative risk (RR) for severe outcomes among immunosuppressed compared with immunocompetent case-patients was higher for hospitalization (RR 1.4), life-threatening complications (RR 2.4), and death (RR 2.3), highlighting the potential severity of disease in immunocompromised populations (3,915).

In the United States, ehrlichiosis was first reported in 1987 and anaplasmosis in 1994, and both became nationally notifiable diseases in 1999 (3,5,16,17). Since 2000, reported cases of ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis in the United States have increased substantially. Reported E. chaffeensis ehrlichiosis cases have increased >10-fold, from 200 in 2000 to 2,093 in 2019 (18,19). Reported anaplasmosis cases increased >16-fold, from 348 cases in 2000 to 5,655 in 2019 (19,20).

Increasing rates of reported ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis might be related to several factors, including improved diagnostics, changes in reporting practices, and expanded human contact with animal reservoirs and tick vectors (2,3,21,22). E. chaffeensis and E. ewingii are primarily transmitted by the lone star tick (Amblyomma americanum); A. phagocytophilum is transmitted by either the blacklegged tick (Ixodes scapularis) or the western blacklegged tick (I. pacificus) (3,5). E. muris eauclaurensis is transmitted by I. scapularis ticks. E. chaffeensis ehrlichiosis is most frequently reported in the southeastern and south-central regions of the United States, and anaplasmosis is most often reported in the upper midwestern and northeastern regions.

PCR and serologic testing using an indirect immunofluorescence antibody assay are the primary laboratory methods for diagnosing ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis (3,5). Because infection transmitted through blood or organs is rare, it might not be diagnosed in solid organ transplant and transfusion recipients. In addition, nonspecific signs and symptoms and a higher index of suspicion for other opportunistic infections might complicate diagnosis (14), which is unfortunate because early detection and treatment can prevent severe illness and death (23). Here, we summarize and discuss the risks of ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis cases in the United States among solid organ transplant and transfusion recipients, with a focus on donor-derived infections.


We conducted a literature search to identify articles published during January–August 2020 describing ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis in solid organ transplant or blood transfusion recipients in the United States. We used PubMed search terms “ehrlichiosis AND transfusion,” “ehrlichiosis AND transplant,” “anaplasmosis AND transfusion,” and “anaplasmosis AND transplant.” We included articles describing case reports, case series, or other clinical descriptions related to Ehrlichia and Anaplasma spp. infections in the setting of solid organ transplantation or transfusion of blood products in the United States. We excluded infections in hematopoietic stem cell recipients because these are not reported to a national notifiable disease system. For articles meeting inclusion criteria, we further reviewed references to identify any case reports or case descriptions not found in the initial PubMed search. Duplicate cases were only counted once for this review. We summarized transplant- and transfusion-associated cases as presented in the literature; we made no additional exclusions based on diagnostic criteria, and we only determined cases to be donor-derived if the authors presented them as such in the literature or investigations.

In the United States, all suspected or confirmed cases of donor-derived diseases are reported to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and are investigated by the Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC). Nationally notifiable diseases such as ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis are referred to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for investigation and determination of whether the infection was transmitted from a donor to a recipient. We also included cases of transplant-associated ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis identified as part of these DTAC investigations by CDC if not already accounted for in the peer-reviewed literature (Figure 1). From each reviewed article or CDC-led case investigation, we collected available information on geographic region, recipient characteristics, Ehrlichia or Anaplasma species, transmission route, age of blood component transfused or type of organ transplanted, time between transplantation and infection, symptoms and clinical details, diagnostic methods, donor and recipient histories of tick exposure, donor characteristics, likely source of infection, and whether the recipient survived or died.


Ehrlichiosis and Anaplasmosis Cases Reported among Transfusion Recipients

During the 1997–2020 investigation period, 12 cases of transfusion-transmitted ehrlichiosis or anaplasmosis were reported in the United States (Appendix Table 1). Of the 12 transfusion-transmitted cases, 8 resulted from transfused red blood cell components and 3 from transfused platelet components (2 apheresis and 1 whole blood–derived); the component for 1 case was not identified. Ten (83.3%) of 12 transfusion-associated cases were A. phagocytophilum infections; 1 case was associated with E. ewingii and 1 with E. chaffeensis (Figure 2, panels C, D). Median age of transfusion recipients was 66 years (range 9–85 years); sex was equally distributed. Of the transfusion-associated cases of ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis, 3 occurred in Minnesota; 2 in Wisconsin; and 1 each in Georgia, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New York, and Oklahoma (Figure 2, panels A, B). Disease in all cases was diagnosed using PCR, and additional serologic testing was used for 2 cases. Most (83.3%) transfusion case-patients survived infection; one third of cases were associated with mild symptoms. Intensive care unit (ICU) treatment was noted for 2 anaplasmosis patients, prompted by respiratory failure, hypotension, and hypoxia. In addition, 3 anaplasmosis patients had multisystem organ failure, but ICU treatment was not mentioned for these cases. Two patients died, one from anaplasmosis and the other from other medical complications.

Ehrlichiosis and Anaplasmosis Cases Reported among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

During the investigation period, 107 cases of ehrlichiosis and 7 cases of anaplasmosis were described in the literature among solid organ transplant recipients. Of these, 63 included patient-specific information. We described the remaining 51 cases in aggregate and reported on them separately. An additional 6 cases of ehrlichiosis among solid organ transplant recipients were investigated by CDC, resulting in a total of 120 cases of ehrlichiosis or anaplasmosis described among transplant recipients during the investigation period.

E. chaffeensis ehrlichiosis was the most common organ donor-derived infection, reported among 8 solid organ transplant recipients: 2 cases we identified from the literature and the 6 investigated by CDC (Appendix Table 2). Of these, 7 (87.5%) case-patients were kidney transplant recipients and 1 was a liver transplant recipient. Fever was reported among all solid organ transplant recipients. Diagnostic methods were PCR (87.5%) and serologic testing (12.5%). Most (87.5%) patients were male, median age was 57 years (range 5–69 years), and median time between transplantation and infection was 13.5 days (range 10–25 days). Of the donor-derived ehrlichiosis cases, 2 occurred in Maryland; 3 in Missouri; and 1 each in New York, New Jersey, and Illinois (Figure 2, panel E). Among the 8 donor-derived ehrlichiosis cases, 2 deaths were reported among the kidney transplant recipients, both occurring <1 month after transplantation (Appendix Table 3). None of the confirmed transplant-derived case reports described ICU admission among the patients.

Thirteen cases of ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis occurred <1 year after transplantation but could not be confirmed as donor-derived. The median time between transplantation and symptom onset in these 13 cases was 5 months (range 2 weeks–9 months) (Appendix Table 4). Of those cases, 4 were identified in Tennessee (Figure 2, panel F). E. chaffeensis infection was associated with 11 (84.6%) cases, and A. phagocytophilum infection was associated with 2 (15.4%) cases. Of the 13 cases, 5 (38.5%) occurred in kidney recipients, 4 (30.8%) in heart recipients, 2 (15.4%) in kidney and pancreas recipients, and 1 (7.7%) in a liver and lung recipient. Most (76.9%) patients were male, median age was 50 years (range 35–63 years), and PCR was the most common (76.9%) diagnostic method. Most (92.3%) patients infected <1 year after transplantation survived; however, 1 kidney and pancreas recipient with A. phagocytophilum infection died.

Forty-eight records of individual cases of ehrlichiosis or anaplasmosis that occurred ≥1 year after transplant were most likely attributable to posttransplant infections acquired through tick bites (Appendix Table 5). Median time from transplant to symptom onset was 6 years (range 1–21 years), most patients (75.0%) were male, and median age was 51 years (range 11–73 years). Among these patients, records described Ehrlichia infection for 43 (89.6%) and Anaplasma infection for 5 (10.4%). E. chaffeensis was implicated in 30 (69.8%) of 43 cases of ehrlichiosis, E. ewingii in 12 (27.9%), and an unspecified Ehrlichia sp. in 1 (2.3%). Twenty-three patients (53.5%) received kidneys, 8 (18.6%) livers, 7 (16.3%) lungs, 4 (9.3%) hearts, and 1 (2.3%) a pancreas. Of the 5 reported cases of anaplasmosis occurring ≥1 year after transplant, 4 (80.0%) occurred in kidney recipients and 1 (20.0%) in a liver recipient. Among the 43 cases of ehrlichiosis in solid organ transplant recipients who had illness onset ≥1 year after transplant, 26 (60.6%) occurred in Missouri and 12 (27.9%) in Tennessee; exact location was not specified in 1 report, but the case occurred in Alabama, Tennessee, or Mississippi. Among the 5 cases of anaplasmosis, 2 occurred in Minnesota, 1 in Maine, 1 in Wisconsin, and 1 in Connecticut. One patient had possible reactivation of a previous Anaplasma infection secondary to potent immunosuppression 9 months after the original infection. There were 2 reports of Ehrlichia reinfection that described distinct strains of E. chaffeensis and E. ewingii found in a secondary infection. Secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, which is characterized by severe and potentially fatal inflammation, developed in 1 kidney transplant recipient. Of the solid organ transplant recipients with ehrlichiosis or anaplasmosis occurring ≥1 year after transplant, 47 (97.9%) of 48 survived. One pancreas recipient with an E. chaffeensis infection died. Seven cases occurring ≥1 year of solid organ transplantation did report ICU admission, possibly relating to long-term immunosuppression among transplant recipients.

Of the 51 cases of ehrlichiosis from Missouri for which we report data in aggregate, 18 (35.3%) occurred in kidney recipients, 12 (23.5%) in heart recipients, 12 (23.5%) in lung recipients, 7 (13.7%) in liver recipients, and 2 (4.0%) in kidney-pancreas recipients. Additional information on disease, pathogen species, and demographics was not available for these 51 cases.


This study reviewed ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis cases among transfusion and solid organ transplant recipients described in published literature and reports from 6 CDC investigations. During the study period, 12 cases of transfusion-transmitted ehrlichiosis or anaplasmosis were reported, 2 of which resulted in death. In addition, 8 cases of organ donor–derived ehrlichiosis were reported (7 kidney transplant recipients and 1 liver recipient), 2 of which resulted in death. A. phagocytophilum was the most common causative agent among transfusion-derived infections. In contrast, among transplant recipients, E. chaffeensis was the most common causative agent. Donor-derived infections were observed among patients of a broad range of ages (5–85 years). Although children are not considered a high-risk group for anaplasmosis in particular, pediatric infection should not be discounted among transfusion and transplant recipients. Time from transplant or transfusion to the development of signs and symptoms varied widely and in most cases was longer than the typical incubation period for a tick-transmitted infection. Delays in symptom onset might be affected by the colony size and the site of the inoculated bacteria. Transfusion- or transplant-transmitted ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis are rare but can result in severe outcomes including the death of the recipient.

Although known cases of transfusion- and transplant-transmitted ehrlichiosis or anaplasmosis are uncommon, studies of asymptomatic infection among blood donors and the survivability of infection in blood suggest the risk of transmission is greater than previously recognized. In endemic areas, seroprevalence studies found 11.3% of blood donors in New York, 0.5% in Wisconsin, and 3.5% in Connecticut had detectable antibodies against A. phagocytophilum (24,25). In Iowa, ≈1% of blood donors studied were seropositive for and displayed symptoms of ehrlichiosis after blood donation, although recipient lookback reported by physicians indicated that these transfusions did not result in transfusion-transmitted illnesses (26). However, serosurveys do not report active or incident infections, only the proportion of participants previously exposed to an Ehrlichia or Anaplasma agent. Some studies also examined the survivability of Ehrlichia and Anaplasma species in donor blood. Blood from anaplasmosis patients in 2 studies found viable A. phagocytophilum survived under refrigerated storage conditions for up to 18 days in whole blood (27,28). One in vitro study reported E. chaffeensis remained viable for up to 11 days within refrigerated packed red blood cells (29).

Donor-derived ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis highlight the importance of donor risk mitigation strategies in the setting of blood transfusion and solid organ transplantation and the potential role of laboratory-based screening. Recognizing and diagnosing tickborne diseases is complicated by long incubation periods and potential asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic infections. Although several laboratory tests are used to diagnose ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis, no tests have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to screen blood or organ donors for these diseases. Furthermore, serologic screening of donors might not identify active Ehrlichia or Anaplasma infections or could exclude healthy donors (28). PCR testing would more accurately screen contaminated blood and organ products, but no FDA-licensed test is available. Donor deferral on the basis of travel or residence would be impractically broad because of the widespread endemicity of ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis across regions of the United States. To minimize blood supply disruptions based on travel deferrals for Zika virus and babesia, FDA previously recommended universal antibody testing and regional nucleic acid testing in states with the highest rates of risk for infection (30,31). Similar screening may eventually be necessary for ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis as the prevalence and incidence of these infections increases in the United States. CDC will continue to monitor the occurrence of transfusion- or transplant-transmitted ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis.

Among this study’s limitations, for sources identified through the literature we were limited to the information provided in the case reports, which might not always have represented a full account of the patient experience. Data on donor demographics were extremely limited. Donor state of residence might have provided a more accurate insight on likelihood of donor infection by state which might have broader implications for blood and organ screening criteria. Next, for the purposes of this evaluation, we relied on the characterizations by the original authors or investigators to categorize cases as donor- or transplant-derived ehrlichiosis or anaplasmosis. Finally, we included only cases published in peer-reviewed literature or reported to CDC, possibly underreporting transfusion- and transplant-associated infections. In 2019, the Rickettsial Zoonoses Branch, Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, CDC, added questions relating to recent transfusion and organ transplant to their tickborne rickettsial disease surveillance system ( to better track donor-derived infections.

Because Ehrlichia and Anaplasma species primarily infect leukocytes, leukoreduction has been presumed to reduce risk for ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis through passive removal (23,32,33). However, 83% (10/12) of components implicated in transfusion-transmitted cases in this study were leukoreduced. In cell culture models, because of their presence in plasma also, E. chaffeensis survived in red blood cells stored in additive solution, suggesting leukoreduction alone will not prevent transmission of Ehrlichia and Anaplasma species (29). Adopting pathogen reduction technology, such as psoralen and ultraviolet light to inactivate infectious agents, for platelet and plasma products would provide additional safety measures to reduce risk for transfusion-transmitted Ehrlichia and Anaplasma infections. Pathogen-reduced plasma has demonstrated a ≥3.6-log reduction in viable A. phagocytophilum (34). However, this method has not been approved for red blood cell products, which were implicated in 8 of 12 cases of transfusion-transmitted ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis in this study.

Identifying risk factors for Ehrlichia and Anaplasma infections among deceased organ donors is challenging because clinical, demographic, and social information about deceased donors is often obtained from family members, who might not have access to or recall all historical details (35). Also, routine laboratory screening of organ donors, required for multiple infectious diseases, including HIV/AIDS, does not yet include testing for infection with Ehrlichia and Anaplasma species. In addition, the number of posttransplant infections reported in this review highlights the risk among blood product or organ recipients. Therefore, clinicians must closely monitor recipients of blood transfusions or solid organs during long-term management and consider these pathogens when recipients develop signs or symptoms of infection. Because the prevalence of tickborne disease infections is rising, additional risk mitigation interventions will likely be necessary to enhance blood and organ safety.



We thank Paige Armstrong for her contributions to preparing this manuscript.

Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data provided for this report was supported in part by the US Health Resources and Services Administration (



  1. Vannorsdall  MD, Thomas  S, Smith  RP, Zimmerman  R, Christman  R, Vella  JP, et al. Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in a renal allograft recipient: review of the clinical spectrum of disease in solid organ transplant patients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2002;4:97101. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ismail  N, Bloch  KC, McBride  JW. Human ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis. Clin Lab Med. 2010;30:26192. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Nichols Heitman  K, Dahlgren  FS, Drexler  NA, Massung  RF, Behravesh  CB. Increasing incidence of ehrlichiosis in the United States: a summary of national surveillance of Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Ehrlichia ewingii infections in the United States, 2008–2012. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;94:5260. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakken  JS, Dumler  JS. Human granulocytic anaplasmosis. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2015;29:34155. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dahlgren  FS, Heitman  KN, Drexler  NA, Massung  RF, Behravesh  CB. Human granulocytic anaplasmosis in the United States from 2008 to 2012: a summary of national surveillance data. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;93:6672. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fishbein  DB, Dawson  JE, Robinson  LE. Human ehrlichiosis in the United States, 1985 to 1990. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:73643. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Paddock  CD, Childs  JE. Ehrlichia chaffeensis: a prototypical emerging pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003;16:3764. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dumler  JS. Anaplasma and Ehrlichia infection. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005;1063:36173. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Alhumaidan  H, Westley  B, Esteva  C, Berardi  V, Young  C, Sweeney  J. Transfusion-transmitted anaplasmosis from leukoreduced red blood cells. Transfusion. 2013;53:1816. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cotant  C, Okulicz  JF, Brezina  B, Riley  DJ, Conger  NG. Human monocytic ehrlichiosis in a renal transplant patient. Scand J Infect Dis. 2006;38:699702. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fine  AB, Sweeney  JD, Nixon  CP, Knoll  BM. Transfusion-transmitted anaplasmosis from a leukoreduced platelet pool. Transfusion. 2016;56:699704. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Goel  R, Westblade  LF, Kessler  DA, Sfeir  M, Slavinski  S, Backenson  B, et al. Death from transfusion-transmitted anaplasmosis, New York, USA, 2017. [Erratum in Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24:1773.]. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24:154850. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sachdev  SH, Joshi  V, Cox  ER, Amoroso  A, Palekar  S. Severe life-threatening Ehrlichia chaffeensis infections transmitted through solid organ transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis. 2014;16:11924. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Safdar  N, Love  RB, Maki  DG. Severe Ehrlichia chaffeensis infection in a lung transplant recipient: a review of ehrlichiosis in the immunocompromised patient. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:3203. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Trofe  J, Reddy  KS, Stratta  RJ, Flax  SD, Somerville  KT, Alloway  RR, et al. Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in pancreas transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2001;3:349. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen  SM, Dumler  JS, Bakken  JS, Walker  DH. Identification of a granulocytotropic Ehrlichia species as the etiologic agent of human disease. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32:58995. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Maeda  K, Markowitz  N, Hawley  RC, Ristic  M, Cox  D, McDade  JE. Human infection with Ehrlichia canis, a leukocytic rickettsia. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:8536. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. CDC. Ehrlichiosis: epidemiology and statistics [cited 2021 June 23].
  19. CDC. Nationally notifiable infectious diseases and conditions, United States: annual tables [cited 2021 June 23].
  20. CDC. Anaplasmosis: epidemiology and statistics [cited 2021 June 23].
  21. Dahlgren  FS, Mandel  EJ, Krebs  JW, Massung  RF, McQuiston  JH. Increasing incidence of Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in the United States, 2000-2007. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011;85:12431. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Springer  YP, Eisen  L, Beati  L, James  AM, Eisen  RJ. Spatial distribution of counties in the continental United States with records of occurrence of Amblyomma americanum (Ixodida: Ixodidae). J Med Entomol. 2014;51:34251. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Biggs  HM, Behravesh  CB, Bradley  KK, Dahlgren  FS, Drexler  NA, Dumler  JS, et al. Diagnosis and management of tickborne rickettsial diseases: Rocky Mountain spotted fever and other spotted fever group rickettsioses, ehrlichioses, and anaplasmosis—United States. A practical guide for health care and public health professionals. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016;65:144. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Aguero-Rosenfeld  ME, Donnarumma  L, Zentmaier  L, Jacob  J, Frey  M, Noto  R, et al. Seroprevalence of antibodies that react with Anaplasma phagocytophila, the agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis, in different populations in Westchester County, New York. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:26125. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Leiby  DA, Chung  AP, Cable  RG, Trouern-Trend  J, McCullough  J, Homer  MJ, et al. Relationship between tick bites and the seroprevalence of Babesia microti and Anaplasma phagocytophila (previously Ehrlichia sp.) in blood donors. Transfusion. 2002;42:158591. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Arguin  PM, Singleton  J, Rotz  LD, Marston  E, Treadwell  TA, Slater  K, et al. An investigation into the possibility of transmission of tick-borne pathogens via blood transfusion. Transfusion-Associated Tick-Borne Illness Task Force. Transfusion. 1999;39:82833. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kalantarpour  F, Chowdhury  I, Wormser  GP, Aguero-Rosenfeld  ME. Survival of the human granulocytic ehrlichiosis agent under refrigeration conditions. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:23989. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. McQuiston  JH, Childs  JE, Chamberland  ME, Tabor  E. Transmission of tick-borne agents of disease by blood transfusion: a review of known and potential risks in the United States. [Erratum in Transfusion. 2000;40:891.]. Transfusion. 2000;40:27484. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. McKechnie  DB, Slater  KS, Childs  JE, Massung  RF, Paddock  CD. Survival of Ehrlichia chaffeensis in refrigerated, ADSOL-treated RBCs. Transfusion. 2000;40:10417. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Food and Drug Administration. Recommendations for reducing the risk of transfusion-transmitted babesiosis [cited on 2021 June 23].
  31. Food and Drug Administration. Information for blood establishments regarding FDA’s determination that Zika virus is no longer a relevant transfusion-transmitted infection [cited 2021 September 7].
  32. Annen  K, Friedman  K, Eshoa  C, Horowitz  M, Gottschall  J, Straus  T. Two cases of transfusion-transmitted Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Am J Clin Pathol. 2012;137:5625. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Proctor  MC, Leiby  DA. Do leukoreduction filters passively reduce the transmission risk of human granulocytic anaplasmosis? Transfusion. 2015;55:12428. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Food and Drug Administration. INTERCEPT blood system for cryoprecipitation package insert for the manufacturing of pathogen reduced plasma, cryoprecipitate reduced [cited on 2021 June 23].
  35. Vora  NM, Basavaraju  SV, Feldman  KA, Paddock  CD, Orciari  L, Gitterman  S, et al.; Transplant-Associated Rabies Virus Transmission Investigation Team. Raccoon rabies virus variant transmission through solid organ transplantation. JAMA. 2013;310:398407. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Follow Up

Earning CME Credit

To obtain credit, you should first read the journal article. After reading the article, you should be able to answer the following, related, multiple-choice questions. To complete the questions (with a minimum 75% passing score) and earn continuing medical education (CME) credit, please go to Credit cannot be obtained for tests completed on paper, although you may use the worksheet below to keep a record of your answers.

You must be a registered user on If you are not registered on, please click on the “Register” link on the right hand side of the website.

Only one answer is correct for each question. Once you successfully answer all post-test questions, you will be able to view and/or print your certificate. For questions regarding this activity, contact the accredited provider, For technical assistance, contact American Medical Association’s Physician’s Recognition Award (AMA PRA) credits are accepted in the US as evidence of participation in CME activities. For further information on this award, please go to The AMA has determined that physicians not licensed in the US who participate in this CME activity are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Through agreements that the AMA has made with agencies in some countries, AMA PRA credit may be acceptable as evidence of participation in CME activities. If you are not licensed in the US, please complete the questions online, print the AMA PRA CME credit certificate, and present it to your national medical association for review.

Article Title: 
Ehrlichiosis and Anaplasmosis among Transfusion and Transplant Recipients in the United States
CME Questions
1. Your patient is a 62-year-old male kidney transplant recipient with fever and respiratory symptoms in whom ehrlichiosis is suspected. On the basis of the case series and literature review by Mowla and colleagues, which one of the following statements about donor-derived ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis cases in the United States among solid organ transplant recipients is correct?
A. During 1997 to 2020, most cases of ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis in transplant recipients were donor-derived
B. Ehrlichia chaffeensis ehrlichiosis was the most common organ donor-derived infection, occurring in 8 solid organ transplant recipients (7 kidney, 1 liver transplant recipient)
C. Half of cases in transplant recipients had fever
D. None of the donor-derived ehrlichiosis cases died, but two thirds of the confirmed cases were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU)
2. According to the case series and literature review by Mowla and colleagues, which one of the following statements about donor-derived ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis cases in the United States among transfusion recipients is correct?
A. Of the 12 cases of transfusion-transmitted ehrlichiosis or anaplasmosis reported from 1997 to 2020, 8 were a result of transfused platelet components
B. Most transfusion-associated cases were ehrlichiosis
C. Among anaplasmosis cases, 2 had ICU treatment for respiratory failure, hypotension, and hypoxia
D. One third of transfusion recipients with donor-derived ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis died
3. On the basis of the case series and literature review by Mowla and colleagues, which one of the following statements about clinical implications of donor-derived ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis cases in the United States among solid organ transplant and transfusion recipients is correct?
A. Transfusion- or transplant-transmitted ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis are rare but cause severe outcomes including recipient death, mandating clinician awareness of these infections
B. Ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis cases in the US have been stable since 2000
C. Solid organ transplant donors should be screened using approved laboratory screening interventions
D. Studies of asymptomatic infection among blood donors and survivability of infection in blood suggest the risk for transmission is lower than previously recognized


Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2711.211127

Original Publication Date: October 13, 2021

Related Links

Table of Contents – Volume 27, Number 11—November 2021

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Sridhar V. Basavaraju, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Mailstop V18-4, Atlanta, GA 30329-4027, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: August 25, 2021
Page updated: October 13, 2021
Page reviewed: October 13, 2021
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.