Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 27, Number 4—April 2021
Research Letter

Increased Likelihood of Detecting Ebola Virus RNA in Semen by Using Sample Pelleting

Courtney M. Bozman, Mosoka Fallah, Michael C. Sneller, Catherine Freeman, Lawrence S. Fakoli, Bode I. Shobayo, Bonnie Dighero-Kemp, Cavan S. Reilly, Jens H. Kuhn, Fatorma Bolay, Elizabeth Higgs, and Lisa E. HensleyComments to Author 
Author affiliations: National Institutes of Health, Frederick, Maryland, USA (C.M. Bozman, B. Dighero-Kemp, J.H. Kuhn, L.E. Hensley); National Public Health Institute of Liberia, Monrovia, Liberia (M. Fallah, C. Freeman, L.S. Fakoli III, B.I. Shobayo, F. Bolay); National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA (M.C. Sneller, E. Higgs); University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA (C.S. Reilly)

Cite This Article

Abstract

Ebola virus RNA can reside for months or years in semen of survivors of Ebola virus disease and is probably associated with increased risk for cryptic sexual transmission of the virus. A modified protocol resulted in increased detection of Ebola virus RNA in semen and improved disease surveillance.

During 2013–2016, Ebola virus (EBOV; family Filoviridae, genus Ebolavirus, species Zaire ebolavirus) caused an unprecedented outbreak of Ebola virus disease (EVD) that began in Guinea and subsequently affected Liberia, Sierra Leone, and, to a much lesser degree, several other countries in West Africa. Due in part to the lack of medical infrastructure and response preparedness in these countries, the outbreak ultimately involved 28,652 human infections and 11,325 deaths (1,2).

The large number of EVD survivors enabled detailed studies, such as the Partnership for Research on Ebola Virus (PREVAIL) III study (3), which aimed at characterizing potential EVD sequelae and EBOV persistence in a cohort of 1,144 EVD survivors in Liberia over the course of 5 years. An unexpected observation of these studies was the persistence of EBOV RNA and sometimes-replicating EBOV in the brain, eyes, and semen of survivors (4). EBOV RNA persistence in semen of EVD survivors, measurable up to 40 months (3,5), has been associated with rare events of sexual EBOV transmission and EVD outbreak flareups (6).

Assuming a causal relationship between EBOV RNA and EBOV presence in semen, we collaborated with the overseas response team to initiate an ongoing (and unpublished) trial, PREVAIL IV, to counter sexual EBOV transmission from survivors through reduction of viral RNA concentrations in semen by using the candidate medical countermeasure remdesivir. However, interpretation of data obtained in studies such as PREVAIL IV is crucially dependent on the sensitivity of EBOV RNA detection in semen samples.

The GeneXpert Systems (Cepheid, https://www.cepheid.com) are diagnostic platforms that implement single-use cartridges to simultaneously extract and detect RNA by using reverse transcription PCR. During PREVAIL III (3), the GeneXpert IV System was applied to standard processing of EBOV survivor semen samples using EBOV nucleoprotein and glycoprotein RNA-specific GeneXpert cartridges Cepheid) (7): 100 μL of semen sample was transferred directly into 2.5 mL of lysis buffer provided in the kit and incubated for 10 min, followed by a second incubation of 5 min in presence of 100 μL of 1 M dithiothreitol (Sigma-Aldrich, https://www.sigmaaldrich.com). Within 30 min of processing, 1 mL of this solution was then loaded into the cartridge, run according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and analyzed with GeneXpert Diagnostic Software (8).

We sought to further increase the EBOV RNA detection sensitivity (then 3.1% and 2.9% with whole samples) of this protocol for semen. For this experiment, 1,661 EVD survivor samples and nonsurvivor controls from PREVAIL III and IV with sample volumes >1.6 mL were divided into 2 cohorts and processed either as described above (whole sample) or first pelleted (pellet sample) by using 2 replicate experiments each (A and B).

For pelleting, we centrifuged 300 μL of each semen sample at 10,000 × g for 10 min. After pelleting, we discarded supernatants, resuspended pellets by pipetting in 100 μL of kit-provided lysis buffer and incubated for 10 min, and incubated for 5 min in presence of 100 μL of 1 M dithiothreitol. Then, we loaded 100 μL of each sample onto cartridges and processed the same way as the standard, unpelleted control sample. Samples were considered valid and positive when both the kit-provided sample processing control and probe check control passed kit criteria and EBOV nucleoprotein or glycoprotein RNA was detected.

Overall, an average of 3.0% of the whole sample-cohort was positive, compared with an average of 5.0% of the pellet-sample cohort, thereby almost doubling the detection rate (p<0.0001) (Table). We observed variability among replicates A and B (0.7% for the pellet and 0.2% for the whole sample), but this difference was not significant (p = 0.35) according to the F-test for the equality of 2 variances.

Mixed-effects logistic regression models appropriate to the study design (with random effects for specimens and random effects for replicates nested within specimens) yielded an estimated relative sensitivity of 2.24 (95% CI 1.51–2.98; p<0.0001) in favor of the pellet-based procedure. Thus, when semen sample volumes from EVD survivors are >300 μL, we recommend pelleting 300 μL to increase the EBOV RNA detection rate and using the GeneXpert IV System.

Ms. Bozman is a response support scientist at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD. Her primary research interest is outbreak response in an international setting.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank Anya Crane for critically editing the manuscript.

This study was supported in part by the Laulima Government Solutions prime contract with the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (contract no. HHSN272201800013C to C.M.B. and B.D.-K.).

J.H.K. performed this work as an employee of Tunnell Government Services, a subcontractor of Laulima Government Solutions (contract no. HHSN272201800013C).

Top

References

  1. Decroo  T, Fitzpatrick  G, Amone  J. What was the effect of the West African Ebola outbreak on health programme performance, and did programmes recover? Public Health Action. 2017;7(Suppl 1):S12. DOIPubMed
  2. Bullard SG. A day-by-day chronicle of the 2013–2016 Ebola outbreak. Springer: Cham (Switzerland); 2018 [cited 2021 Jan 1]. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-76565-5_8
  3. Sneller  MC, Reilly  C, Badio  M, Bishop  RJ, Eghrari  AO, Moses  SJ, et al.; PREVAIL III Study Group. A longitudinal study of Ebola sequelae in Liberia. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:92434. DOIPubMed
  4. Jacob  ST, Crozier  I, Fischer  WA II, Hewlett  A, Kraft  CS, Vega  MA, et al. Ebola virus disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020;6:13. DOIPubMed
  5. Keita  AK, Vidal  N, Toure  A, Diallo  MSK, Magassouba  N, Baize  S, et al.; PostEbogui Study Group. PostEbogui Study Group. A 40-month follow-up of Ebola virus disease survivors in Guinea (PostEbogui) reveals long-term detection of Ebola viral ribonucleic acid in semen and breast milk. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019;6:ofz482. DOIPubMed
  6. Schindell  BG, Webb  AL, Kindrachuk  J. Persistence and sexual transmission of filoviruses. Viruses. 2018;10:683. DOIPubMed
  7. Loftis  AJ, Quellie  S, Chason  K, Sumo  E, Toukolon  M, Otieno  Y, et al. Validation of the Cepheid GeneXpert for detecting Ebola virus in semen. J Infect Dis. 2017;215:34450.PubMed
  8. Pettitt  J, Higgs  E, Fallah  M, Nason  M, Stavale  E, Marchand  J, et al. Assessment and optimization of the GeneXpert diagnostic platform for detection of Ebola virus RNA in seminal fluid. J Infect Dis. 2017;215:54753.PubMed

Top

Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2704.204175

Original Publication Date: March 09, 2021

Table of Contents – Volume 27, Number 4—April 2021

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Lisa E. Hensley, Integrated Research Facility at Fort Detrick, Division of Clinical Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National, Institutes of Health, B-8200 Research Plaza, Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD 21702, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: January 15, 2021
Page updated: March 19, 2021
Page reviewed: March 19, 2021
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external