Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link

Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.

Volume 27, Number 6—June 2021
Dispatch

Ebola Virus IgG Seroprevalence in Southern Mali

Sidy Bane, Kyle Rosenke, Ousmane Maiga, Friederike Feldmann, Kimberly Meade-White, Julie Callison, David Safronetz, Nafomon Sogoba, and Heinz FeldmannComments to Author 
Author affiliations: University of Sciences, Techniques, and Technologies of Bamako, Bamako, Mali (S. Bane, O. Maiga, N. Sogoba); National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, Montana, USA (K. Rosenke, F. Feldmann, K. Meade-White, J. Callison, H. Feldmann),; Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (D. Safronetz)

Suggested citation for this article

Abstract

Mali had 2 reported introductions of Ebola virus (EBOV) during the 2013–2016 West Africa epidemic. Previously, no evidence for EBOV circulation was reported in Mali. We performed an EBOV serosurvey study in southern Mali. We found low seroprevalence in the population, indicating local exposure to EBOV or closely related viruses.

Figure

NDIV map showing 3 study sites, Bamba, Banzana, and Soromba (red circles), for investigation of Ebola virus IgG seroprevalence in southern Mali. Red line indicates first Ebola virus introduction into Mali; purple dashed line indicates the second. Inset map shows NDIVs of countries in West Africa. NDIV, normalized difference vegetation index.

Figure. NDIV map showing 3 study sites, Bamba, Banzana, and Soromba (red circles), for investigation of Ebola virus IgG seroprevalence in southern Mali. Red line indicates first Ebola virus introduction into...

The West Africa Ebola virus disease epidemic of 2013–2016 mainly affected the countries of Guinea, Sierra Leone, and Liberia; its cause was Ebola virus (EBOV; genus Ebolavirus, species Zaire ebolavirus) strain Makona (1). EBOV was introduced into Senegal and more noticeably into Nigeria; it was also exported into several countries in Europe as well as the United States (1). Overall, this outbreak was the largest on record, resulting in ≈30,000 Ebola virus disease (EVD) cases and 11,000 deaths (1). During this epidemic, EBOV was also introduced twice into Mali from Guinea, both times through the border crossing close to Kouremalé (Figure). One introduction came through a young child who had a laboratory-confirmed EVD case, which resulted in no transmission despite intimate contact with others (2). The second introduction came through an imam who had a non–laboratory confirmed probable EVD case, with limited transmission. In total, Mali reported 9 cases and 7 deaths throughout 2014 (2). Before those introductions, EBOV or other filovirus infections in general were not previously reported from Mali. As of April 2021, limited efforts have been made to investigate EBOV prevalence in the country, and a small study did not reveal serologic evidence for human exposure to EBOV (3).

Southern Mali’s borders with Cote d’Ivoire, Guinea, and Burkina Faso are likely to harbor similar arthropod, rodent, and bat species with the neighboring countries, suggesting the possibility that similar zoonotic pathogens may be present (4,5) (Figure). Therefore, we tested human serum samples originally collected in southern Mali for Lassa fever surveillance (6) for the presence of EBOV antibodies.

The Study

We used 600 serum samples from healthy volunteers collected in 2015 in Bamba, Banzana, and Soromba, located in southern Mali, close to the border with Cote d’Ivoire (Figure) (6). The human study protocol was originally approved to determine the seroprevalence for Lassa virus and then later addended to also identify the seroprevalence for EBOV (protocol nos. 15-I-N023 and 18-I-N060). We used 2 commercial ELISA kits (Alpha Diagnostic International, https://www.4adi.com) that detect human IgG to Zaire EBOV nucleoprotein (NP) and glycoprotein (GP). We performed the assays according to the manufacturer’s instructions by using heat-inactivated serum samples (56°C for 60 min). All tests were run in a biosafety class IIa cabinet by personnel wearing personal protective equipment including N95 face mask, face shield, laboratory coat, and double gloves.

All serum samples were first screened at a 1:100 dilution using the anti-EBOV GP assay. We observed unexpected high reactivity at this serum dilution (122/600; 20.3%) (Table) that was probably unspecific low-affinity binding or cross-reactivity with other viruses. To reduce unspecific reactivity, we next tested all positive serum samples at 1:400 dilution using the anti-EBOV GP assay, resulting in 3.7% (22/600) positivity, and anti-EBOV NP assay, resulting in 4.0% (24/600) seropositivity (Table). Finally, we tested all samples that were positive at 1:400 dilution at a 1:1,600 serum dilution; anti-EBOV GP assay had 0.2% (1/600) positivity and anti-EBOV NP assay 0.7% (4/600) seropositivity (Table). Our testing algorithm considered positives at a 1:100 dilution an equivocal test result. A positive reaction at a serum dilution of >1:400 was considered a positive test result. Using this algorithm, we detected antibodies to EBOV GP, EBOV NP, or both in 37/600 (6.1%) of the study population. Nine (1.5%) participants had positive IgG responses to both EBOV NP and GP antigens (Table). Our results indicate that the population in southern Mali has had or still has exposure to EBOV or closely related ebolaviruses. The overall seroprevalence range was 1.5% (seropositivity in both) –6.1% (a single assay >1:400).

Several scenarios may explain the results of this study. First, EBOV or a related filovirus is endemic and circulating in its reservoir species in southern Mali leading to occasional human exposure. This scenario is supported by a similar geographic environment in the southern neighboring countries that had documented EBOV seroprevalence (4,5) (Figure). A drawback of this hypothesis is the current failure of finding EBOV or closely related viruses in wildlife species, particularly bats, in most West Africa countries. However, Bombali virus, a new Ebolavirus species, was discovered in bats in Sierra Leone and Guinea (7,8); serologic testing has also indicated circulation in pigs in Sierra Leone and Guinea (9,10).

A second scenario is that exposure in southern Mali was temporary and occurred through human-to-human contact from cross-border movement during the West Africa EVD outbreak. This scenario may be supported by the sample collection time, February 2015 but remains questionable because no patients with EVD symptoms have been reported in this region. However, this also holds true for Lassa virus; 1 case of Lassa fever has been reported in southern Mali despite high prevalence in the local rodent reservoir (6).

Third, all seropositivity is due to cross-reactivity with other viruses or to unspecific, low-affinity antibody binding. Filovirus serology, especially for EBOV, has been controversial over the years. Early reports of sometimes high seropositivity in certain regions and populations in Africa were generally thought to be the result of cross-reactivity from the use of assays with low specificity (11). However, serologic testing tremendously improved with highly specific and sensitive assays (12). Thus, the assumption of false positives as an explanation for the results seems unlikely. The conservation in the NP and GP used as antigens in this study was 67%–75% for NP and 54%–65% for GP among Ebolavirus species but does not exclude cross-reactivity among species according to the manufacturer information. In general, GP antibodies are considered more specific due to lower conservation of this protein among ebolavirus species. In our study, the EBOV GP ELISA screening test produced high reactivity at a 1:100 dilution, which probably does not reflect real EBOV seroprevalence as reported from other western and central Africa countries (13,14). The antigen used in the anti-EBOV GP assay is produced in insect cells; populations may have developed antibodies to insect cell proteins due to exposure through insect consumption (15). The NP antigen is produced in Escherichia coli bacteria and likely has less protein contaminants than the GP preparation because of more sophisticated antigen purification. However, this concept is speculative; we did not test serum samples in the anti-EBOV NP assay at a 1:100 dilution due to limited sample quantity.

Finally, caution may be necessary when interpreting serologic test results for EBOV and related filoviruses in populations in Africa. Because more reliable, highly specific and sensitive serologic tests are available, more attention should be given to establish proper algorithms for interpretation. Confirmation by independent tests including virus neutralization assays will help. Unfortunately, serum sample volumes in this study were too low to enable such confirmatory testing.

Conclusions

Given the limitations of our study and a conservative approach for interpretation, our results indicate that the population in southern Mali has been and likely still is exposed to EBOV, other Ebolavirus species, or related filoviruses at a seroprevalence of 1.5%–6.1%, which is in the range described previously in west and central African countries (13,14). Additional work is needed to support this finding, including human surveillance in other regions of Mali. Public health preparedness in Mali should include filoviruses. Initial ecologic studies aiming at identifying potential reservoir species of filoviruses seem justified for southern Mali.

Dr. Bane is a PhD candidate at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Sciences, Techniques, and Technologies of Bamako, Mali. His research interests are hemorrhagic fever viruses with focus on Ebola virus and Lassa virus.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank Rose Perry for assistance with the graphical work. We thank the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease International Center for Excellence in Research in Mali for their support of field and laboratory work. Research on samples from human subjects was conducted in accordance with the policies and regulations of the NIH and adhered to the principles of the Belmont Report (1979).

This work was funded by the Mali International Center for Excellence in Research, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health, United States.

Top

References

  1. Boisen  ML, Hartnett  JN, Goba  A, Vandi  MA, Grant  DS, Schieffelin  JS, et al. Epidemiology and management of the 2013–16 West African Ebola outbreak. Annu Rev Virol. 2016;3:14771. DOIPubMed
  2. Diarra  B, Safronetz  D, Sarro  YD, Kone  A, Sanogo  M, Tounkara  S, et al. Laboratory response to 2014 Ebola virus outbreak in Mali. J Infect Dis. 2016;214(suppl 3):S1648. DOIPubMed
  3. Safronetz  D, Sacko  M, Sogoba  N, Rosenke  K, Martellaro  C, Traoré  S, et al. Vectorborne Infections, Mali. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:3402. DOIPubMed
  4. O’Hearn  AE, Voorhees  MA, Fetterer  DP, Wauquier  N, Coomber  MR, Bangura  J, et al. Serosurveillance of viral pathogens circulating in West Africa. Virol J. 2016;13:163. DOIPubMed
  5. Pigott  DM, Golding  N, Mylne  A, Huang  Z, Henry  AJ, Weiss  DJ, et al. Mapping the zoonotic niche of Ebola virus disease in Africa. eLife. 2014;3:e04395. DOIPubMed
  6. Sogoba  N, Rosenke  K, Adjemian  J, Diawara  SI, Maiga  O, Keita  M, et al. Lassa virus seroprevalence in Sibirilia commune, Bougouni district, southern Mali. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:65763. DOIPubMed
  7. Goldstein  T, Anthony  SJ, Gbakima  A, Bird  BH, Bangura  J, Tremeau-Bravard  A, et al. The discovery of Bombali virus adds further support for bats as hosts of ebolaviruses. Nat Microbiol. 2018;3:10849. DOIPubMed
  8. Karan  LS, Makenov  MT, Korneev  MG, Sacko  N, Boumbaly  S, Yakovlev  SA, et al. Bombali virus in Mops condylurus bats, Guinea. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;25:17745. DOIPubMed
  9. Fischer  K, Jabaty  J, Suluku  R, Strecker  T, Groseth  A, Fehling  SK, et al. Serological evidence for the circulation of ebolaviruses in pigs from Sierra Leone. J Infect Dis. 2018;218(suppl_5):S30511. DOIPubMed
  10. Fischer  K, Camara  A, Troupin  C, Fehling  SK, Strecker  T, Groschup  MH, et al. Serological evidence of exposure to ebolaviruses in domestic pigs from Guinea. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2020;67:72432. DOIPubMed
  11. Formella  M, Gatherer  D. The serology of Ebolavirus - a wider geographical range, a wider genus of viruses or a wider range of virulence? J Gen Virol. 2016;97:312030. DOIPubMed
  12. Shorten  RJ, Brown  CS, Jacobs  M, Rattenbury  S, Simpson  AJ, Mepham  S. Diagnostics in Ebola virus disease in resource-rich and resource-limited settings. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0004948. DOIPubMed
  13. Bower  H, Glynn  JR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of seroprevalence surveys of ebolavirus infection. Sci Data. 2017;4:160133. DOIPubMed
  14. Schoepp  RJ, Rossi  CA, Khan  SH, Goba  A, Fair  JN. Undiagnosed acute viral febrile illnesses, Sierra Leone. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:117682. DOIPubMed
  15. Raheem  D, Carrascosa  C, Oluwole  OB, Nieuwland  M, Saraiva  A, Millán  R, et al. Traditional consumption of and rearing edible insects in Africa, Asia and Europe. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019;59:216988. DOIPubMed

Top

Figure
Table

Top

Suggested citation for this article: Bane S, Rosenke K, Maiga O, Feldmann F, Meade-White K, Callison J, et al. Ebola virus IgG seroprevalence in southern Mali. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Jun [date cited]. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2705.203510

DOI: 10.3201/eid2706.203510

Original Publication Date: April 27, 2021

Table of Contents – Volume 27, Number 6—June 2021

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Heinz Feldmann, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, 903 S 4th St, Hamilton, MT 59840, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: April 21, 2021
Page updated: April 27, 2021
Page reviewed: April 27, 2021
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external