Volume 27, Number 7—July 2021
Dispatch
Prevalence of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus in Dromedary Camels, Tunisia
Table
Sampling parameter | No. dromedaries | ELISA serologic testing, no. (%) positive for MERS-CoV IgG | Molecular biology rRT-PCR, no. (%) positive for MERS-CoV RNA |
---|---|---|---|
Sex | |||
M | 131 | 86 (65.6) | 14 (10.7) |
F | 370 | 317 (85.7) | 85 (23.0) |
p value |
<0.05 |
<0.01 |
|
Age group | |||
Juvenile | 45 | 2 (4.4) | 18 (40.0) |
0–6 mo | 4 | 0 (0) | 1 (25.0) |
6–24 mo | 41 | 2 (4.9) | 17 (41.5) |
Adult | 456 | 401 (87.9) | 81 (17.8) |
2–6 y | 81 | 62 (76.5) | 19 (23.5) |
6–12 y | 179 | 157 (87.7) | 28 (15.6) |
12–25 y | 190 | 176 (87.9) | 32 (16.8) |
>25 y | 6 | 6 (100) | 2 (33.3) |
p value, juvenile compared with adult |
<0.00001 |
<0.01 |
|
Sampling site | |||
Ksar Ghilane, n = 6 | 211 | 154 (73.0) | 49 (23.2) |
Site 1 | 28 | 20 (71.4) | 7 (25.0) |
Site 2 | 20 | 8 (40.0) | 0 (0) |
Site 3 | 30 | 26 (86.7) | 6 (20.0) |
Site 4 | 20 | 19 (95.0) | 1 (5.0) |
Site 5 | 73 | 50 (68.5) | 25 (34.2) |
Site 6 | 40 | 31 (77.5) | 10 (25.0) |
Bazma, n = 7 | 168 | 152 (90.5) | 32 (19.1) |
Site 1 | 25 | 24 (96.0) | 2 (8.0) |
Site 2 | 30 | 25 (83.3) | 8 (26.7) |
Site 3 | 15 | 13 (86.7) | 3 (20.0) |
Site 4 | 15 | 14 (93.3) | 1 (6.7) |
Site 5 | 21 | 20 (95.2) | 4 (19.0) |
Site 6 | 16 | 13 (81.3) | 6 (37.5) |
Site 7 | 46 | 43 (93.5) | 8 (17.4) |
Douz, n = 5 | 53 | 32 (60.4) | 4 (7.5) |
Site 1a | 4 | 3 (75.0) | 0 (0) |
Site 1b | 4 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Site 2 | 24 | 18 (75.0) | 3 (12.5) |
Site 3 | 18 | 10 (55.6) | 1 (5.6) |
Site 4 | 3 | 1 (33.3) | 0 (0) |
Mahrouga, n = 2 | 69 | 65 (94.2) | 14 (20.3) |
Site 1 | 42 | 40 (95.2) | 3 (7.1) |
Site 2 | 27 | 25 (92.6) | 11 (40.7) |
p value for comparisons among all 4 main sites |
0.05 |
Not significant |
|
Total | 501 | 403 (80.4) | 99 (19.8) |
*MERS-CoV, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus; rRT-PCR, real-time reverse transcription PCR.
1These authors contributed equally to this article.
Page created: May 06, 2021
Page updated: June 17, 2021
Page reviewed: June 17, 2021
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.