Volume 28, Number 1—January 2022
Research Letter
Unexpectedly High Prevalence of Hepatitis C Virus Infection, Southern Laos
Table
Variable |
Positive no./total no. (%) |
Bivariate |
Multivariate |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR (95% CI) |
p value |
OR (95% CI) |
p value |
|||
Sex | ||||||
F | 42/417 (10.1) | Referent | NA | Referent | NA | |
M |
46/336 (13.7) |
1.4 (0.9–2.2) |
0.126 |
1.5 (0.9–2.6) |
0.08 |
|
Age group, y | ||||||
<30 | 18/403 (4.5) | Referent | Referent | NA | ||
>30 |
70/350 (20) |
5.3 (3.1–9.2) |
<0.001 |
4.2 (2.1–8.5) |
<0.001 |
|
District† | ||||||
Lao Ngarm | 7/207 (3.4) | Referent | NA | NA | ||
Saravan | 9/190 (4.7) | 1.4 (0.5–3.9) | 0.495 | NA | NA | |
Samuoi‡ | 62/254 (24.4) | 9.2 (4.1–20.7) | <0.001 | NS | NS | |
Ta Oi | 8/67 (11.9) | 3.9 (1.3–11.1) | 0.012 | NS | NS | |
Toomlarn | 2/25 (8) | 2.5 (0.5–12.7) | 0.274 | NA | NA | |
Vapy | 0/5 (0) | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
Khongxedone | 0/2 (0) | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
Lakhonepheng |
0/3 (0) |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
Marital status | ||||||
Single | 7/268 (2.6) | Referent | NA | Referent | NA | |
Married or other |
81/485 (16.7) |
7.5 (3.4–16.4) |
<0.001 |
2.7 (1.0–7.3) |
0.04 |
|
Occupation | ||||||
Student or other | 7/231 (3) | Referent | NA | NA | NA | |
Employee | 14/67 (20.9) | 8.5 (3.3–21.9) | <0.001 | NS | NS | |
Farmer |
67/455 (14.7) |
5.5 (2.5–12.2) |
<0.001 |
NS |
NS |
|
Ethnicity | ||||||
Non-Pako | 22/488(4.5) | Referent | NA | Referent | NA | |
Pako |
66/265 (24.9) |
7 (4.2–11.7) |
<0.001 |
5.1 (2.7–9.7) |
<0.001 |
|
Religion | ||||||
Buddhist or other | 7/258 (2.7) | Referent | NA | Referent | NA | |
Animism |
81/495 (16.4) |
7 (3.2–15.4) |
<0.001 |
3 (1.2–7.6) |
0.02 |
|
Place of birth | ||||||
At hospital or unknown | 57/440 (12.9) | Referent | NA | NA | NA | |
At home |
31/313 (9.9) |
0.7 (0.4–1.2) |
0.2 |
NA |
NA |
|
Diagnosis | ||||||
Hepatitis non-related or unknown | 86/702 (12.3) | Referent | NA | Referent | NA | |
Related to hepatitis | 2/51 (3.9) | 0.2 (0.1–1.2) | 0.09 | 0.2 (0.1–1.1) | 0.07 |
*NA, not applicable; NS, not significant; OR, odds ratio. †District was not included in the multivariate analysis because it reduced the power of the model. ‡Samuoi district correlated strongly with Pako ethnicity (Pearson correlation coefficient, R = 0.48, p<0.001).
1These authors contributed equally to this manuscript.
Page created: November 01, 2021
Page updated: December 20, 2021
Page reviewed: December 20, 2021
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.