Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link

Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.

Volume 28, Number 2—February 2022
Dispatch

Zoonotic Infection with Oz Virus, a Novel Thogotovirus

Ngo T.B. Tran, Hiroshi Shimoda, Keita Ishijima, Kenzo Yonemitsu, Shohei Minami, Yudai Kuroda, Kango Tatemoto, Milagros V. Mendoza, Ryusei Kuwata, Ai Takano, Masahiko Muto, Kyoko Sawabe, Haruhiko Isawa, Daisuke Hayasaka, Ken MaedaComments to Author , and Supriyono
Author affiliations: Yamaguchi University, Yoshida, Japan (N.T.B. Tran, H. Shimoda, S. Minami, Supriyono, A. Takano, D. Hayasaka, K. Maeda); National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Toyama, Tokyo, Japan (K. Ishijima, K. Yonemitsu, Y. Kuroda, K. Tatemoto, M.V. Mendoza, K. Sawabe, H. Isawa, K. Maeda); Okayama University of Science, Imabari, Japan (R. Kuwata); Yamaguchi Prefectural Grand Medical Center, Hofu, Japan (M. Muto)

Cite This Article

Abstract

Oz virus is a novel thogotovirus isolated from ticks that causes lethal infection in mice. We conducted serosurveillance of Oz virus infection among humans and wild mammals in Japan using virus-neutralization tests and ELISAs. Results showed that Oz virus may be naturally infecting humans and other mammalian hosts.

The genus Thogotovirus, family Orthomyxoviridae, comprises viruses that are most frequently transmitted by a variety of hard and soft tick species (1). Although most thogotoviruses are associated with tick species, there are several exceptions, such as Sinu virus, which was isolated from mosquitoes (2); Dielmo orthomyxovirus, isolated from Culicoides midges (3); and Araguari virus, isolated only from vertebrates (4). Thogoto, Dhori, and Bourbon viruses have been associated with human disease. Thogoto and Dhori viruses have been reported to cause encephalitis, febrile illness, and death in humans (5,6), and Bourbon virus to cause febrile illness and death in humans (7). In addition, Thogoto virus has been reported to cause abortions in sheep (8), and many wild animals are positive for Bourbon virus antibodies (9).

Oz virus, a new member of the genus Thogotovirus, was first isolated from a pool of 3 Amblyomma testudinarium tick nymphs collected in Ehime prefecture, Japan (10). Phylogenetic analyses revealed that Oz virus is more closely related to Dhori, Batken, and Bourbon viruses than to other thogotoviruses (10). In addition, Oz virus has been shown to cause lethal infection in experimentally challenged suckling mice. To determine the potential of Oz virus as a zoonotic pathogen, we performed serosurveillance of Oz virus infection among mammals, including humans, in Japan.

The Study

To examine whether mammals are naturally infected with Oz virus, we collected serum samples from 24 hunters and 240 wild animals (40 Japanese macaques [Macaca fuscata], 124 wild boars [Sus scrofa], and 76 sika deer [Cervus nippon]) captured in Yamaguchi prefecture, Japan, during 2013–2019. Because Yamaguchi prefecture is close to Ehime prefecture and the environment in Yamaguchi is very similar to that in Ehime, we used stocked samples in Yamaguchi prefecture for the first surveillance of Oz virus infection. To test for the presence of Oz virus antibodies in the serum samples, we performed a PRNT80 (80% plaque-reduction neutralizing test) using Oz virus (Table 1). Among humans, 8.3% of the serum samples had Oz virus neutralization (VN) antibodies; VN titers were 1:40 and 1:80. In wild animals, serum from 47.5% of macaques, 60.5% of wild boars, and 73.7% of sika deer in Yamaguchi had Oz virus VN antibodies (Table 1).

We applied ELISA protocol used for serosurveillance of many infectious diseases (1113) to detect Oz virus antibodies in the serum samples from wild animals. We extracted proteins from Oz virus or mock-infected Vero cells and used the extracts as ELISA antigens. To prepare the primary antibody, we diluted serum samples 1:100 in phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween 20 and 0.4% Block Ace. We used peroxidase conjugated recombinant protein A/G (Thermo Fisher Scientific, https://www.thermofisher.com) as the secondary antibody and KPL ABTS peroxidase substrate (SeraCare Life Sciences, https://www.seracare.com) as the detection reagent. We measured absorbance using a spectrophotometer (Bio-Rad Laboratories, https://www.bio-rad.com) with a 405 nm filter and subtracted the value of the corresponding control mock-infected cells from all values.

Figure 1

Dot plot comparison between VN test and ELISA against Oz virus in serum samples from wild animals in Yamguchi prefecture, Japan. A) Macaques (n = 40); B) wild boar (n = 124); C) sika deer (n = 76). The correlation coefficient between VN test and ELISA from macaques was 0.9163, from wild boars was 0.8807, and from sika deer was 0.7569. The optimal cutoff value of ELISA was calculated by 2-graph receiver-operating characteristic curve. The optimal cutoff values were set at 0.225 for macaques, 0.197 for wild boar, and 0.317 for sika deer serum samples and are indicated by dotted lines.

Figure 1. Dot plot comparison between VN test and ELISA against Oz virus in serum samples from wild animals in Yamguchi prefecture, Japan. A) Macaques (n = 40); B) wild boar (n...

To determine ELISA cutoff values, we tested serum samples from the 40 macaques, 124 wild boars, and 76 sika deer captured in Yamaguchi prefecture. We compared the optical density values of the ELISA to the results of the VN test by 2-graph receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis as described elsewhere (14). In macaques, the correlation coefficient between the ELISA and VN test was 0.9163, and an ELISA cutoff value of 0.2245 produced 100% sensitivity and specificity. In wild boars, the correlation coefficient was 0.8807, with 88.0% sensitivity and 89.8% specificity at an ELISA cutoff value of 0.1965. In sika deer, the correlation coefficient was 0.7569, sensitivity 78.6%, and specificity 80.0% at an ELISA cutoff value of 0.3165 (Figure 1).

Figure 2

Collection sites of serum samples from macaques, wild boars, and sika deer for study of Oz virus seroprevalence in Japan. Gray shading indicates prefectures in which samples were collected; black shading indicates Ehime prefecture, where Oz virus was first isolated.

Figure 2. Collection sites of serum samples from macaques, wild boars, and sika deer for study of Oz virus seroprevalence in Japan. Gray shading indicates prefectures in which samples were collected; black...

Next, we surveyed Oz virus infection among macaques, wild boars, and sika deer in many prefectures in Japan using the established ELISA (Table 2; Figure 2). Among 197 macaques captured during 2007–2019, seropositivity rates were 47.5% in Yamaguchi, 33.3% in Wakayama, and 6.3% in Mie prefectures. Among 879 wild boars captured during 2007–2014, seropositivity rates were 10.3% in Oita, 55.8% in Yamaguchi, 34.8% in Wakayama, 10.5% in Gifu, and 0% in both Toyama and Tochigi prefectures. Among 450 sika deer, seropositivity rates were 37.8% in Yamaguchi, 11.1% in Wakayama, 8.3% in Gifu, and 30% in Chiba prefectures.

First, we applied PRNT80 to detect Oz virus antibodies in humans and wild animals in Yamaguchi prefecture. The results showed that 60.5% of wild boars, a major host of A. testudinarium, and 73.7% of sika deer in Yamaguchi prefecture during 2013 and 2015 had Oz virus VN antibodies, indicating that the virus was infecting wild animals in the western part of Japan. Next, we examined wild macaques for Oz virus infection; 48% were infected, and the antibody titers were high. In addition, 2 persons who hunted wild boars and sika deer in Yamaguchi prefecture had Oz virus antibodies. These results indicate that humans and macaques are also exposed to Oz virus.

We compared results from an ELISA, established for this study, using an Oz virus–infected cell extract for the surveillance of Oz virus infection among many mammalians, with those from the VN test to determine correlation between the 2 tests. The correlation coefficient was 0.9163 for macaques, 0.8807 for wild boars, and 0.7569 for sika deer, suggesting that the ELISA is effective for serosurveillance of Oz virus infection in samples from many animal species. However, because its sensitivity and specificity differed among animal species and values were lower for sika deer, in particular, cutoff values should be determined for each animal species. In addition, VN testing should be performed to confirm the presence of Oz virus antibodies.

Our nationwide surveillance of Oz virus infection in Japan indicated that many wild animals were positive for Oz virus antibodies. However, wild boars in Toyama and Tochigi prefectures did not have Oz virus antibodies, suggesting that the virus might not be distributed in the northern and eastern parts of Japan. A. testudinarium is the major tick species that infests humans in the southern and western parts of Japan (15), and because we found Oz virus mainly in those areas, it appears that the distribution of Oz virus–infected animals correlates with the habitat of the tick. In addition, because 2 hunters in Yamaguchi prefecture tested positive for Oz virus antibodies, further investigation is needed to determine whether Oz virus might be a zoonotic pathogen, especially because intracerebral inoculation of the virus in suckling mice causes lethal disease (10).

Mrs. Tran is a PhD student in the Joint Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, Japan. Her research interest is zoonoses.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank Mr. Hashimura and Mr. Matsuzaki for the collection of macaque serum samples, Akiko Nakamura and Kishiko Matsumoto for the collection of human serum samples, Tsutomu Takeda for the collection of wild boar serum samples in Tochigi, Kazuo Suzuki for the collection of serum samples from wild animals, and Toshiya Kimura and Hiroto Shinomiya for advice on Oz virus infection in Ehime. We also acknowledge all of the hunters who provided support and cooperated with the collection of serum samples.

This study was supported by grants from AMED (Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development) (JP20wm0225009, JP21fk0108613, JP19fk0108097, JP20fk0108067 and JP16fk0108117). N.T.B.T. received a scholarship from the Government of Vietnam Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development.

All animal samples used in this study were collected with the appropriate hunting permits issued by the respective local government. This article does not contain any studies with live animals. Human serum samples were collected from 24 hunters in Yamaguchi with the approval of the institutional review board of Yamaguchi University (number H26–116).

Top

References

  1. Hubálek  Z, Rudolf  I, Nowotny  N. Arboviruses pathogenic for domestic and wild animals. Adv Virus Res. 2014;89:20175. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Contreras-Gutiérrez  MA, Nunes  MRT, Guzman  H, Uribe  S, Suaza Vasco  JD, Cardoso  JF, et al. Sinu virus, a novel and divergent orthomyxovirus related to members of the genus Thogotovirus isolated from mosquitoes in Colombia. [Erratum in: Virology. 2017;503:114.]. Virology. 2017;501:16675. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Temmam  S, Monteil-Bouchard  S, Robert  C, Baudoin  JP, Sambou  M, Aubadie-Ladrix  M, et al. Characterization of viral communities of biting midges and identification of novel Thogotovirus species and Rhabdovirus genus. Viruses. 2016;8:77. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Da Silva  EV, Da Rosa  AP, Nunes  MR, Diniz  JA, Tesh  RB, Cruz  AC, et al. Araguari virus, a new member of the family Orthomyxoviridae: serologic, ultrastructural, and molecular characterization. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;73:10508. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Moore  DL, Causey  OR, Carey  DE, Reddy  S, Cooke  AR, Akinkugbe  FM, et al. Arthropod-borne viral infections of man in Nigeria, 1964-1970. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1975;69:4964. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Butenko  AM, Leshchinskaia  EV, Semashko  IV, Donets  MA, Mart’ianova  LI. [Dhori virus—a causative agent of human disease. 5 cases of laboratory infection] [in Russian]. Vopr Virusol. 1987;32:7249.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kosoy  OI, Lambert  AJ, Hawkinson  DJ, Pastula  DM, Goldsmith  CS, Hunt  DC, et al. Novel thogotovirus associated with febrile illness and death, United States, 2014. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:7604. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Davies  FG, Soi  RK, Wariru  BN. Abortion in sheep caused by Thogoto virus. Vet Rec. 1984;115:654. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Jackson  KC, Gidlewski  T, Root  JJ, Bosco-Lauth  AM, Lash  RR, Harmon  JR, et al. Bourbon virus in wild and domestic animals, Missouri, USA, 2012–2013. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;25:17523. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ejiri  H, Lim  CK, Isawa  H, Fujita  R, Murota  K, Sato  T, et al. Characterization of a novel thogotovirus isolated from Amblyomma testudinarium ticks in Ehime, Japan: A significant phylogenetic relationship to Bourbon virus. Virus Res. 2018;249:5765. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Shimoda  H, Inthong  N, Noguchi  K, Terada  Y, Nagao  Y, Shimojima  M, et al. Development and application of an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for serological survey of Japanese encephalitis virus infection in dogs. J Virol Methods. 2013;187:859. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Suzuki  J, Nishio  Y, Kameo  Y, Terada  Y, Kuwata  R, Shimoda  H, et al. Canine distemper virus infection among wildlife before and after the epidemic. J Vet Med Sci. 2015;77:145763. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Yonemitsu  K, Minami  S, Noguchi  K, Kuwata  R, Shimoda  H, Maeda  K. Detection of anti-viral antibodies from meat juice of wild boars. J Vet Med Sci. 2019;81:1559. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ikawa-Yoshida  A, Yoshii  K, Kuwahara  K, Obara  M, Kariwa  H, Takashima  I. Development of an ELISA system for tick-borne encephalitis virus infection in rodents. Microbiol Immunol. 2011;55:1007. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Okino  T, Ushirogawa  H, Matoba  K, Hatsushika  R. A bibliographical study of human cases of hard tick (Acarina: Ixodidae) bites received abroad and found in Japan. Kawasaki Med J. 2007;33:18994.

Top

Figures
Tables

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2802.211270

Original Publication Date: January 13, 2022

Table of Contents – Volume 28, Number 2—February 2022

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Ken Maeda, Department of Veterinary Science, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, 1-23-1 Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8640, Japan

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: December 03, 2021
Page updated: January 22, 2022
Page reviewed: January 22, 2022
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external