Volume 28, Number 2—February 2022
Research
Widespread Detection of Multiple Strains of Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus in Ticks, Spain
Table 3
Region (province) | No. pools (no. ticks) |
No. (%) positive pools | Tick species found with CCHFV (no. pools) |
Animals found with CCHFV-infected ticks (no.) | Genotypes† |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Madrid (Madrid) | 90 (230) | 7 (7.7) | Hyaloma lusitanicum (6), Dermacentor marginatus (1)‡ | Mouflon (1), wild boar (1), red deer (1) | IV |
Castile and León (Avila) | 338 (829) | 1 (0.3) | Rhipicephalus annulatus (1) | Fallow deer (1) | IV |
Castile-La Mancha (Toledo) | 642 (1,817) | 76 (11.8) | H. lusitanicum (76) | Red deer§ | III |
Extremadura (Cáceres) |
2,889 (7,917) |
44 (1.5) |
H. lusitanicum (42), Ixodes ricinus (2)¶ |
Red deer (22), wild boar (2) |
I, III, IV |
Total | 3,959 (10,793) | 128 (3.2) | NA | Red deer (>23), wild boar (3), fallow deer (1), mouflon (1) | I, III, IV |
*CCHFV, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus; NA, not applicable. †Genotypes: I, West Africa (Africa 1); II, Central Africa (Africa 2); III, South and West Africa (Africa 3); IV, Middle East/Asia, divided into groups Asia 1 and Asia 2; V, Europe/Turkey (Europe 1); VI, Greece (Europe 2). ‡Collected from wild boar. §In Castile-La Mancha, ticks of the same species but collected from different animals were mixed in a single tube, so it was not possible to determine the number of animals with positive ticks. ¶Collected from red deer.
Page created: December 15, 2021
Page updated: January 22, 2022
Page reviewed: January 22, 2022
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.