Volume 28, Number 2—February 2022
Research Letter
Surveillance of Rodent Pests for SARS-CoV-2 and Other Coronaviruses, Hong Kong
Table
Information on rodents with unambiguous (n = 1) or inconclusive (n = 11) positive serum samples in ELISA testing in study of surveillance of rodent pests for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and other coronaviruses, Hong Kong*
Animal code | Rattus species | Collection date | District | ELISA A/CO |
sVNT, inhibition, % | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st replicate | 2nd replicate | |||||
Rat-027 |
R. tanezumi |
Feb 11 |
Sham Shui Po |
0.019 |
0.855 |
1.281 |
Rat-069 |
R. norvegicus |
Feb 24 |
Kowloon City |
0.837 |
0.964 |
0.991 |
Rat-070 |
R. norvegicus |
Feb 24 |
Kowloon City |
1.199 |
0.472 |
–2.128 |
Rat-073 |
R. tanezumi |
Feb 25 |
Yau Tsim Mong |
1.445 |
0.033 |
2.224 |
Rat-076 |
R. norvegicus |
Feb 25 |
Sham Shui Po |
1.644 |
0.027 |
1.136 |
Rat-089 |
R. norvegicus |
Mar 1 |
Yau Tsim Mong |
1.324 |
–0.041 |
1.209 |
Rat-090 |
R. norvegicus |
Mar 1 |
Yau Tsim Mong |
1.636 |
–0.027 |
–0.532 |
Rat-096 |
R. norvegicus |
Mar 2 |
Yau Tsim Mong |
0.934 |
–0.007 |
3.748 |
Rat-097 |
R. norvegicus |
Mar 2 |
Yau Tsim Mong |
1.592 |
0.013 |
–4.666 |
Rat-098 |
R. tanezumi |
Mar 2 |
Sham Shui Po |
1.920 |
–0.724 |
–2.466 |
Rat-102 |
R. norvegicus |
Mar 3 |
Kwai Tsing |
0.992 |
–0.499 |
0.145 |
Rat-213† | R. norvegicus | May 10 | Yau Tsim Mong | 13.643 | 14.497 | 31.7 |
*A/CO was interpreted as negative if <0.9, borderline if 0.9–1.1, and seropositive if >1.1, according to manufacturer instructions. Serum was considered unambiguously positive if both replicates were seropositive. Positive cutoff for sVNT was 20% inhibition, as described elsewhere (9). A/CO, absorbance cutoff; sVNT, surrogate virus neutralization test. †Positive in both ELISA and sVNT.
References
- Wu F, Zhao S, Yu B, Chen YM, Wang W, Song ZG, et al. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. [Correction in Nature. 2020;580:E7]. Nature. 2020;579:265–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chandler JC, Bevins SN, Ellis JW, Linder TJ, Tell RM, Jenkins-Moore M, et al. SARS-CoV-2 exposure in wild white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118:
e2114828118 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar - Oude Munnink BB, Sikkema RS, Nieuwenhuijse DF, Molenaar RJ, Munger E, Molenkamp R, et al. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 on mink farms between humans and mink and back to humans. Science. 2021;371:172–7. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bosco-Lauth AM, Root JJ, Porter SM, Walker AE, Guilbert L, Hawvermale D, et al. Peridomestic mammal susceptibility to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021;27:2073–80. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Damas J, Hughes GM, Keough KC, Painter CA, Persky NS, Corbo M, et al. Broad host range of SARS-CoV-2 predicted by comparative and structural analysis of ACE2 in vertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117:22311–22. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gu H, Chen Q, Yang G, He L, Fan H, Deng YQ, et al. Adaptation of SARS-CoV-2 in BALB/c mice for testing vaccine efficacy. Science. 2020;369:1603–7. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shuai H, Chan JF, Yuen TT, Yoon C, Hu JC, Wen L, et al. Emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants expand species tropism to murines. EBioMedicine. 2021;73:
103643 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar - Xu X, Zheng X, Li S, Lam NS, Wang Y, Chu DKW, et al. The first case study of wastewater-based epidemiology of COVID-19 in Hong Kong. Sci Total Environ. 2021;790:
148000 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
1These coauthors contributed equally to this article.