Volume 29, Number 12—December 2023
Research Letter
Novel Ozark Orthohantavirus in Hispid Cotton Rats (Sigmodon hispidus), Arkansas, USA
Abstract
We report a novel orthohantavirus, putatively named Ozark orthohantavirus, in hispid cotton rats captured within the Ozark Plateau in Arkansas, USA. This virus phylogenetically clusters with other orthohantaviruses that cause severe human disease. Continued orthohantavirus surveillance and virus sequencing are needed to address the potential public health threat of this virus.
Orthohantaviruses (family Hantaviridae, genus Orthohantavirus) are a group of zoonotic viruses primarily found in muroid rodents; many of the viruses are pathogenic in humans (1). Pathogenic orthohantaviruses in the Americas are hosted by rodents in subfamilies Sigmodontinae and Neotominae and cause hantavirus cardiopulmonary syndrome (HCPS) in humans, which has a 30%–40% case-fatality rate (2,3). Although several pathogenic orthohantaviruses have been identified in the Americas, the specific etiologic virus is unknown for many HCPS cases (2).
We report a novel orthohantavirus species, putatively named Ozark orthohantavirus or Ozark virus (OZV), in hispid cotton rats (Sigmodon hispidus) in Arkansas, USA. Hispid cotton rats are a reservoir host of a notable pathogenic orthohantavirus, Black Creek Canal virus (BCCV) (4), in the United States and have also been identified as the host of the proposed Muleshoe virus (5). Despite the wide distribution of hispid cotton rats in North America (22 US states and northern Mexico), previously published orthohantavirus surveillance and detection in this rat species has been limited to only Florida and Texas in the United States.
We analyzed frozen lung tissue samples collected from euthanized hispid cotton rats previously captured during 2020 and 2021 in the Ozark Plateau region of Arkansas, USA (6). Of 338 rat samples previously tested, 26 (7.7%) were orthohantavirus-seropositive; seropositive rats had been captured in 5 distinct grassland sites (6).
We performed homogenization, filtration, and nuclease pretreatment of available lung tissue samples from 13 orthohantavirus-seropositive rodents captured in 3 of the 5 unique grassland sites (Appendix Table) (7,8). We then extracted RNA by using Invitrogen TRIzol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, https://www.thermofisher.com) according to manufacturer guidelines. We used the NEBNext rRNA Depletion Kit (human/mouse/rat) to remove host rRNA, then the NEBNext Ultra II RNA Library Prep Kit (both from New England Biolabs, https://www.neb.com) to construct libraries. We performed next-generation sequencing by using the Illumina NovaSeq system (https://www.illumina.com). We quality filtered and de novo assembled the raw data and annotated the contigs by using LazyPipe (9).
We obtained complete genome sequences of OZV coding regions for small (S), medium (M), and large (L) segments from 2 rat samples and partial genome sequences from 6 other rat samples that included 3 additional complete S and 4 additional complete M segment sequences (Appendix Table). We used Open Reading Frame (ORF) Finder (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/orffinder) to detect ORFs and the Expasy translate tool (https://www.expasy.org) to translate ORFs to amino acid sequences. We compared corresponding nucleic acid and protein phylogenies of each OZV genome segment with BCCV and other related orthohantavirus sequences obtained from GenBank by using IQ-TREE2 (http://www.iqtree.org). We then used the Sequence Demarcation Tool version 1.2 program (http://web.cbio.uct.ac.za/~brejnev) to compare protein sequence pairwise identities of each OZV segment with those of closely related orthohantaviruses. Finally, we performed pairwise evolutionary distance (PED) analyses by using TREE-PUZZLE version 5.2 (http://www.tree-puzzle.de) with a PED cutoff value of 0.1 for species classification (10).
OZV nucleotide sequences most closely clustered with other sigmodontine-borne orthohantaviruses, particularly BCCV and Bayou virus (BAYV), which are pathogenic to humans, and Catacamas virus (CATV), which is not known to cause human infections (2). OZV S segment contig lengths were 1,988 and 1,884 nt and were 80.84% similar to BCCV, 81.15% similar to BAYV, and 80.93% similar to CATV S gene segments (Appendix Figures 1). OZV M segment contig lengths were 3,690 and 3,709 nt and were 77.91% similar to BCCV and 78.11% similar to BAYV (Appendix Figures 2). OZV L segment contig lengths were 6,523 and 6,462 nt and were 80.32% similar to BCCV, 80.16% similar to BAYV, and 80.01% similar to CATV (Appendix Figures 3). Pairwise relationships for protein sequences among OZV and related viruses were similar to those observed for nucleotide sequences (Figure; Appendix Figures 4–6). PED results for sigmodontine- and neotomine-borne orthohantaviruses indicated that OZV is a novel species with a PED value >0.1 and is closely related to BCCV, BAYV, and CATV (Appendix Figure 7).
OZV is the second definitive orthohantavirus species identified in hispid cotton rats. This discovery also expands the geographic distribution of orthohantavirus-carrying hispid cotton rats in the United States, previously limited to Florida and Texas; because of OZV’s similarity to BCCV and BAYV, which cause severe disease, this discovery provides crucial public health information. OZV identification also informs broader orthohantavirus evolution, especially for within-host evolution and divergence. Although uncommon, multiple orthohantaviruses in a single reservoir host species have been observed, particularly in cricetid-borne orthohantaviruses in the Americas (3).
In conclusion, hispid cotton rats are primarily found in grassland and agricultural habitats, and their range comprises the entire state of Arkansas. At least 1 HCPS case has been recorded in Arkansas; because of its close phylogenetic relationship with known human pathogens, OZV should be considered a potential cause of future HCPS cases in Arkansas, surrounding states, and other areas that harbor hispid cotton rats. Continued surveillance is needed to address the potential public health threat of OZV throughout the distribution range of the hispid cotton rat host.
Dr. Mull is an assistant professor at Shawnee State University in Ohio, USA. His research interests focus on wildlife ecology and understanding pathogen dynamics, particularly rodentborne zoonotic viruses.
Acknowledgments
We thank Abigail Stolt and Amy Schexnayder for their assistance with RNA extractions and reverse transcription PCR procedures.
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation, Division of Environmental Biology (grant no. NSF DEB 1911925).
References
- Vaheri A, Strandin T, Hepojoki J, Sironen T, Henttonen H, Mäkelä S, et al. Uncovering the mysteries of hantavirus infections. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013;11:539–50. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mull N, Jackson R, Sironen T, Forbes KM. Ecology of neglected rodent-borne American orthohantaviruses. Pathogens. 2020;9:325. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mull N, Seifert SN, Forbes KM. A framework for understanding and predicting orthohantavirus functional traits. Trends Microbiol. 2023;31:1102–10. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rollin PE, Ksiazek TG, Elliott LH, Ravkov EV, Martin ML, Morzunov S, et al. Isolation of black creek canal virus, a new hantavirus from Sigmodon hispidus in Florida. J Med Virol. 1995;46:35–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rawlings JA, Torrez-Martinez N, Neill SU, Moore GM, Hicks BN, Pichuantes S, et al. Cocirculation of multiple hantaviruses in Texas, with characterization of the small (S) genome of a previously undescribed virus of cotton rats (Sigmodon hispidus). Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1996;55:672–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mull N, Schexnayder A, Stolt A, Sironen T, Forbes KM. Effects of habitat management on rodent diversity, abundance, and virus infection dynamics. Ecol Evol. 2023;13:
e10039 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar - Conceição-Neto N, Zeller M, Lefrère H, De Bruyn P, Beller L, Deboutte W, et al. Modular approach to customise sample preparation procedures for viral metagenomics: a reproducible protocol for virome analysis. Sci Rep. 2015;5:16532. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vaheri A, Vapalahti O, Plyusnin A. How to diagnose hantavirus infections and detect them in rodents and insectivores. Rev Med Virol. 2008;18:277–88. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Plyusnin I, Kant R, Jääskeläinen AJ, Sironen T, Holm L, Vapalahti O, et al. Novel NGS pipeline for virus discovery from a wide spectrum of hosts and sample types. Virus Evol. 2020;6:veaa091.
- Laenen L, Vergote V, Calisher CH, Klempa B, Klingström J, Kuhn JH, et al. Hantaviridae: current classification and future perspectives. Viruses. 2019;11:788. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
Figure
Cite This ArticleOriginal Publication Date: November 14, 2023
1Current affiliation: Shawnee State University, Portsmouth, Ohio, USA.
Table of Contents – Volume 29, Number 12—December 2023
EID Search Options |
---|
Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword. |
Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country. |
Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue. |
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:
Nathaniel Mull, Shawnee State University, 940 Second St, Portsmouth, OH 45662, USA
Top