Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 29, Number 2—February 2023
Dispatch

Nipah Virus Exposure in Domestic and Peridomestic Animals Living in Human Outbreak Sites, Bangladesh, 2013–2015

Ausraful IslamComments to Author , Deborah L. Cannon, Mohammed Ziaur Rahman, Salah Uddin Khan, Jonathan H. Epstein, Peter Daszak, Stephen P. Luby, Joel M. Montgomery, John D. Klena, and Emily S. Gurley
Author affiliations: icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh (A. Islam, M.Z. Rahman, E.S. Gurley); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (D.L. Cannon, J.M. Montgomery, J.D. Klena); Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (S.U. Khan); EcoHealth Alliance, New York, New York, USA (J.H. Epstein, P. Daszak); Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA (S.P. Luby); Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA (E.S. Gurley)

Main Article

Table 1

Spillover human Nipah virus infection cases and bat roost and animal sampling, 6 sites, Bangladesh, 2013–2015*

Characteristic Outbreak site
1 2 3 4 5 6 All sites
Date of outbreak
 2013 Jan
 2013 Mar
 2014 Jan
 2014 Jan
 2015 Jan
 2015 Jan
No. human cases
 2
 7
 4
 4
 7
 5
District
 Rajshah
 Manikgonj
 Faridpur
 Magura
 Faridpur
 Naogaon
Bat roost sampled, Y/N
 Y
 Y
 Y
 Y
 N
 Y
Ct value, median (IQR)
 38.62 
(38.50–38.72)
 29.94 
(29.60–33.90)
 37.5
 N/A
 N/A
 37.25
Nipah virus RNA in urine underneath roost
 Pos
 Pos
 Pos
 Neg
 N/A
 Pos
Distance from households to bat roosts, m, median (IQR)
 609 
(367–1,200)
 770 
(400–1,970)
 583
(499–812)
 325 
(152–1,040)
 359 
(162–520)
 1,065 
(224–1,190)
Months from outbreak to sampling animals (sampling date)
 9 mo 
(2013 Oct)
 8 mo 
(2013 Nov)
 4 mo 
(2014 May)
 6 mo 
(2014 Jul)
 5 mo 
(2015 Jun)
 8 mo 
(2015 Sep)
Domestic animals sampled and tested, no. (%)
Cattle 0/43 0/47 0/50 0/50 1/45 (2) 2/39 (5) 3/274 (1)
Goat 0/49 0/51 0/50 0/50 0/69 0/61 0/330
Total
 0/92
 0/98
 0/100
 0/100
 1/114 (1)
 2/100 (2)
 3/604 (1)
Peridomestic animals sampled and tested, no. (%)
Dog 1/36 (3) 0/28 1/27 (4) 1/35 (3) 0/44 2/19 (11) 5/189 (3)
Cat 0/14 1/22 (5) 3/15 (20) 0/8 0/6 0/20 4/85 (5)
Rat 0/28 0/23 0/36 0/17 0/17 0/21 0/142
House shrew 0/12 0/25 0/13 0/33 0/23 0/30 0/136
Total 1/90 (1) 1/98 (1) 4/91 (4) 1/93 (1) 0/90 2/90 (2) 9/552 (2)

*Ct, cycle threshold; IQR, interquartile range; NA, data not available; neg, negative; pos, positive.

Main Article

Page created: December 13, 2022
Page updated: January 21, 2023
Page reviewed: January 21, 2023
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external