Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 29, Number 8—August 2023
Research Letter

Six Extensively Drug-Resistant Bacteria in an Injured Soldier, Ukraine

Author affiliations: Multidrug-Resistant Organism Repository and Surveillance Network, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA (P.T. Mc Gann, F. LeBreton, B.T. Jones, H.D. Dao, M.J. Martin, M.J. Nelson, T. Luo, J.W. Bennett); Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, Landstuhl, Germany (A.C. Wyatt, J.R. Smedberg, J.M. Kettlewell, J.S. Hawley-Malloy); 512th Field Hospital, Rhine Ordinance Barracks, Germany (B.M. Cohee)

Cite This Article

Abstract

Blood and surveillance cultures from an injured service member from Ukraine grew Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecium, and 3 distinct Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Isolates were nonsusceptible to most antibiotics and carried an array of antibiotic resistant genes, including carbapenemases (blaIMP-1, blaNDM-1, blaOXA-23, blaOXA-48, blaOXA-72) and 16S methyltransferases (armA and rmtB4).

The ongiong conflict in Ukraine has placed extraordinary pressure on medical infrastructure and health delivery services in the region (1). Previous reports from Eastern Ukraine have noted the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumanii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacterales infections during hospitalization (2). Those strains encompassed a variety of clonal lineages, with many carrying carbapenemases, extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), and 16S methyltransferases (2,3). We describe the isolation of 6 extensively drug-resistant (XDR) organisms from a single soldier from Ukraine.

A man in his mid-50s suffered multiple traumatic injuries after a vehicle fire, including full-thickness burns covering 60% of his total body surface. He was initially treated in a medical facility near Dnipro, Ukraine, before being transferred to a hospital in Kyiv, Ukraine, where healthcare practitioners performed burn wound debridement and escharotomies. Thereafter, the patient was transported to a US military hospital in Germany, where doctors obtained blood, urine, respiratory, and peri-rectal surveillance cultures. Surveillance cultures grew A. baumannii, Enterococcus faecium, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and 2 distinct morphologies of P. aeruginosa. Blood cultures grew a third P. aeruginosa (Table). By using the Vitek 2 automated system (bioMérieux, https://www.biomerieux.com), the gram-negative organisms were found to be nonsusceptible to almost every antibiotic tested (Appendix Table 1), with the exception of A. baumannii, which was susceptible to tetracycline (MIC 2 µg/mL). The E. faecium was nonsusceptible to vancomycin. Researchers used a customized Sensititer panel (Thermo Scientific, https://www.thermofisher.com) to test the gram-negative organisms against colistin, eravacycline, imipenem/relebactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, omadacycline, and plazomicin; they used disk diffusion (Hardy Diagnostics, https://hardydiagnostics.com) to test against cefiderocol (Appendix Table 1). Researchers performed whole-genome sequencing of all isolates by using an Illumina Miseq and the MiSeq Reagent Kit version 3 (600 cycles, 2 × 300 bp) (Illumina, https://www.illumina.com).

The K. pneumoniae isolate, designated MRSN 110821, was nonsusceptible to every antibiotic tested (Appendix Table 1). Testing identified 24 antimicrobial resistance genes, including the carbapenemases blaNDM-1 and blaOXA-48, the RMTase armA, and the ESBL blaCTX-M-15 (Table). Five plasmid replicons were identified (Appendix Table 2), but long-read sequencing is underway to better understand the plasmid structure (data not shown). Colistin resistance likely resulted from a previously characterized E82K mutation in the 2-component transcriptional regulator PhoP (4). Cefiderocol resistance could be linked to mutations in the outer membrane protein OmpK36 combined with NDM (5). The isolate also carried several hypervirulence genetic markers, including ybt16 (yersiniabactin siderophore), iuc1 (aerobactin), and rmpADC/rmpA2 (mucoviscosity and capsule).

Figure

Core genome, SNP-based phylogenetic tree for Klebsiella pneumoniae from an injured service member from Ukraine (MRSN 110821) and 17 closely related sequence type 395 K. pneumoniae. In addition to MRSN 110821, the dataset included 14 subclade B2 isolates and 3 NDM-1/OXA-48–producing isolates available in public databases. Country of origin, year of collection, and presence (closed circle) or absence (open circle) of selected virulence and antimicrobial resistance genes are indicated. The midpoint was used as a root for the phylogenetic tree. K. pneumoniae MRSN 110821 from this study and the 2 highly related strains from Germany are highlighted in boldface. Scale bar indicates the ratio of substitutions per site for a 1,665 bp alignment of variable sites in the core genomes of the 18 strains.

Figure. Core genome, SNP-based phylogenetic tree for Klebsiella pneumoniae from an injured service member from Ukraine (MRSN 110821) and 17 closely related sequence type 395 K. pneumoniae....

The isolate belonged to clade B1 of the clonal lineage sequence type (ST) 395 (6) and was K-antigen capsular biosynthesis loci, K39, and O-antigen type O2 variant 1 (O2v1). ST395 was first described in France in 2010, and carbapenemase-producing strains are increasingly being reported across Europe (6). We downloaded all clade B1 ST395 isolates from Pathogenwatch (https://pathogen.watch) and constructed a phylogenetic tree (Figure). We included 3 ST395 genomes identified by Sandfort et al, which they cultured from patients from Ukraine who were hospitalized in Germany (7). Of note, MRSN 110821 was separated by just 20 single nucleotide polymorphisms from NRZ-78043a from the Sandfort study and by just 19 from NRZ-78056b from that same study (Figure). Those 3 isolates clustered more broadly with isolates from Russia and Finland (Figure), but have since acquired armA, blaNDM-1, and the mucoviscosity and capsule loci rmpADC, further increasing their antibiotic resistance profile and virulence potential.

We found A. baumannii MRSN 110819 to be resistant to all antibiotics except cefiderocol, colistin, eravacycline, and omadacycline (Appendix Table 1). The isolate carried 18 AMR genes, including the RMTase armA, the ESBL blaCTX-M-115, and 2 carbapenemases, blaOXA-23 and blaOXA-72 (Table). The isolate was assigned to ST78, a clonal group known as the Italian clone because it emerged in Italy in the mid-2000s (8). This clonal group has also been identified in war wounds of service members from Ukraine during the earlier conflict in Eastern Ukraine (2).

The 3 P. aeruginosa isolates belonged to 3 distinct strains (Table). All 3 isolates had high MICs to 20 of the 23 antibiotics tested (Appendix Table 1). Only colistin and cefiderocol appeared effective in vitro, although MRSN 110818 was susceptible to imipenem/relebactam using US Food and Drug Administration breakpoints (MIC 2 mg/L). All 3 carried carbapenemases, ESBLs, and 16S methyltransferases (Table). MRSN 110818 and 110817 belonged to well-known (ST357) and emerging (ST773) epidemic, high-risk clones that are increasingly associated with horizontally acquired β-lactamases (9). The single blood isolate was assigned to ST1047.

E. faecium MRSN 110820 carried 8 AMR genes, including the vanA operon (Table). The strain was assigned to ST117, a member of clonal complex 78.

Gaps in such services as infection control, caused by limited resources and personnel, are exacerbating the transmission of MDR organisms in Ukraine. As a result, healthcare networks in Europe now consider prior hospitalization in Ukraine to be a critical risk factor for colonization of MDR organisms (7,10). Healthcare practitioners treating citizens of Ukraine need to be cognizant of the increased risk for MDR organism transmission and infection imposed by the conflict in Ukraine and implement appropriate infection control measures to mitigate their spread.

Dr. Mc Gann is a microbiologist and deputy director of the Multidrug-Resistant Organism Repository and Surveillance Network in Silver Spring, Maryland, USA. His primary research interests are the emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance and using whole-genome sequencing techniques to unravel bacterial epidemiology.

Top

Acknowledgments

Isolates for this study were collected under the auspices of routine public health surveillance. Sequences have been deposited into GenBank (BioProject nos. PRJNA950448, PRJNA950449, PRJNA950450, and PRJNA950451). The Multidrug-Resistant Organism Repository and Surveillance Network (MRSN) is a department within Walter Reed Army Institute of Research’s Bacterial Diseases Branch, a unique entity that serves as the primary surveillance organization for antibiotic-resistant bacteria across the Army, Navy, and Air Force.

Funding for this study was provided by the US Department of the Army, Operation and Maintenance, Army. Material has been reviewed by the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. There is no objection to its presentation and/or publication. The opinions or assertions contained herein do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.

Top

References

  1. Kazmirchuk  A, Yarmoliuk  Y, Lurin  I, Gybalo  R, Burianov  O, Derkach  S, et al. Ukraine’s experience with management of combat casualties using NATO’s four-tier “Changing as Needed” healthcare system. World J Surg. 2022;46:285862. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Kondratiuk  V, Jones  BT, Kovalchuk  V, Kovalenko  I, Ganiuk  V, Kondratiuk  O, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of antibiotic resistance in military hospital-associated bacteria from war injuries in the Eastern Ukraine conflict between 2014 and 2020. J Hosp Infect. 2021;112:6976. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Higgins  PG, Hagen  RM, Podbielski  A, Frickmann  H, Warnke  P. Molecular epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from war-injured patients from the eastern Ukraine. Antibiotics (Basel). 2020;9:579. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Wand  ME, Bock  LJ, Bonney  LC, Sutton  JM. Mechanisms of increased resistance to chlorhexidine and cross-resistance to colistin following exposure of Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates to chlorhexidine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;61:e0116216.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Simner  PJ, Beisken  S, Bergman  Y, Ante  M, Posch  AE, Tamma  PD. Defining baseline mechanisms of cefiderocol resistance in the Enterobacterales. Microb Drug Resist. 2022;28:16170. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Shaidullina  ER, Schwabe  M, Rohde  T, Shapovalova  VV, Dyachkova  MS, Matsvay  AD, et al. Genomic analysis of the international high-risk clonal lineage Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 395. Genome Med. 2023;15:9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Sandfort  M, Hans  JB, Fischer  MA, Reichert  F, Cremanns  M, Eisfeld  J, et al. Increase in NDM-1 and NDM-1/OXA-48-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in Germany associated with the war in Ukraine, 2022. Euro Surveill. 2022;27:2200926. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Giannouli  M, Cuccurullo  S, Crivaro  V, Di Popolo  A, Bernardo  M, Tomasone  F, et al. Molecular epidemiology of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in a tertiary care hospital in Naples, Italy, shows the emergence of a novel epidemic clone. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:122330. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Del Barrio-Tofiño  E, López-Causapé  C, Oliver  A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa epidemic high-risk clones and their association with horizontally-acquired β-lactamases: 2020 update. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;56:106196. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Zwittink  RD, Wielders  CC, Notermans  DW, Verkaik  NJ, Schoffelen  AF, Witteveen  S, et al.; Dutch CPE and MRSA Surveillance Study Groups. Multidrug-resistant organisms in patients from Ukraine in the Netherlands, March to August 2022. Euro Surveill. 2022;27:2200896. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figure
Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2908.230567

Original Publication Date: July 05, 2023

Table of Contents – Volume 29, Number 8—August 2023

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Page created: June 29, 2023
Page updated: July 20, 2023
Page reviewed: July 20, 2023
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external