Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 30, Number 11—November 2024
Synopsis

Mortality Rates after Tuberculosis Treatment, Georgia, USA, 2008–2019

Sarah Gorvetzian1, Antonio G. Pacheco, Erin Anderson, Susan M. Ray, and Marcos C. SchechterComments to Author 
Author affiliation: Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (S. Gorvetzian, S.M. Ray, M.C. Schechter); Fundaçāo Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (A.G. Pacheco); Georgia Department of Public Health, Atlanta (E. Anderson, S.M. Ray, M.C. Schechter)

Main Article

Table 2

TB diagnosis and treatment characteristics stratified according to posttreatment death, HIV infection, and place of birth in study of mortality rates after TB treatment, Georgia, USA, 2008–2019*

Characteristics No. (%) patients
Overall cohort Posttreatment deaths HIV positive US-born persons
Total no. patients
3,218
233
328
1,557
Case verification
Culture confirmed 2,391 (75) 190 (8) 243 (10) 1,213 (51)
Clinical case 743 (23) 39 (5) 83 (11) 327 (44)
Other†
48 (2)
4 (8)
2 (4)
17 (35)
Site of TB disease
Pulmonary 2,551 (80) 202 (8) 270 (11) 1,306 (51)
Extrapulmonary TB
631 (20)
31 (5)
58 (9)
251 (40)
Cavitary disease, n = 2,551 patients with pulmonary disease‡
No 1,513 (59) 116(8) 214 (14) 729 (48)
Yes
1,038 (41)
86 (8)
56 (5)
577 (56)
Sputum smear, n = 2,551 patients with pulmonary disease‡
Negative 1,254 (49) 95 (8) 137 (11) 650 (52)
Positive 1,192 (47) 98 (8) 124 (10) 600 (50)
Missing data
105 (4)
9 (9)
9 (9)
56 (53)
Drug susceptibility, n = 2,357 patients with available results‡
RIF/INH susceptible 2,077 (88) 167 (8) 189 (9) 1,029 (50)
RIF susceptible/INH resistant 250 (11) 20 (8) 50 (20) 158 (63)
RIF resistant
30 (1)
1 (3)
3 (10)
10 (33)
Completed tuberculosis treatment
Yes 2,973 (93) 218 (7) 303 (10) 1,514 (51)
No 211 (7)§ 15 (7) 25 (12) 43 (21)

*INH, isoniazid; RIF, rifampin; TB, tuberculosis. †Other comprised positive smear/tissue (n = 6) and positive nucleic acid amplification (n = 42). ‡Number of patients used in denominator to calculate percentage in overall cohort column. §Incomplete treatment included adverse treatment events (n = 11), uncooperative or refused treatments (n = 12), lost to follow-up (n = 87), moved out of jurisdiction (n = 6), or reason was missing (n = 95).

Main Article

1Current affiliation: University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Page created: September 12, 2024
Page updated: October 22, 2024
Page reviewed: October 22, 2024
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external