Volume 30, Number 12—December 2024
Dispatch
Chikungunya Outbreak Risks after the 2014 Outbreak, Dominican Republic
Table
Category | Household serologic survey† |
Acute febrile infection illness‡ |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All study participants, n = 397 |
CHIKV seropositive, n = 319 | CHIKV seronegative, n = 78 | All study participants, n = 275 |
CHIKV seropositive, n = 62 | CHIKV seronegative, n = 213 | ||||
Province | |||||||||
San Pedro de Macorís | 311 | 260 (84) | 51 (16) | 131 | 34 (26) | 97 (74) | |||
Espaillat | 86 | 59 (69) | 27 (31) | 135 | 25 (19) | 110 (81) | |||
Other |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
3 (33) |
6 (67) |
|||
Year of birth | |||||||||
Before 2014 | 392 | 319 (81) | 73 (19) | 110 | 60 (55) | 50 (45) | |||
2014 | 3 | 0 | 3 (100) | 14 | 1 (7) | 13 (93) | |||
After 2014 |
2 |
0 |
2 (100) |
151 |
1 (1) |
150 (99) |
|||
Median age, y (IQR) |
32 (17.4–55.5) |
31.9 (18–55.5) |
32.7 (13–56.3) |
6.7 (4.0–10.0) |
10.7 (9.5–11.4) |
5.3 (3.7–7.5) |
|||
Age group, y | |||||||||
1–5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 118 | 1 (1) | 117 (99) | |||
6–10 | 43 | 28 (65) | 15 (35) | 114 | 37 (32) | 77 (68) | |||
11–20 | 95 | 81 (85) | 14 (15) | 43 | 24 (56) | 19 (44) | |||
21–40 | 99 | 81 (82) | 18 (18) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
41–60 | 87 | 68 (78) | 19 (22) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
≥61 |
73 |
61 (84) |
12 (16) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
Sex | |||||||||
F | 250 | 206 (82) | 44 (18) | 131 | 37 (28) | 94 (72) | |||
M |
147 |
113 (77) |
34 (23) |
144 |
25 (17) |
119 (83) |
|||
Place of birth | |||||||||
Dominican Republic | 384 | 309 (80) | 75 (20) | 270 | 61 (23) | 209 (77) | |||
Other |
13 |
10 (77) |
3 (23) |
5 |
1 (20) |
4 (80) |
|||
Educational attainment | |||||||||
No formal education | 23 | 17 (74) | 6 (26) | 153 | 12 (8) | 141 (92) | |||
Primary | 112 | 95 (85) | 17 (15) | 119 | 49 (41) | 70 (59) | |||
Secondary | 123 | 104 (85) | 19 (15) | 2 | 1 (50) | 1 (50) | |||
Technical | 13 | 11 (85) | 2 (15) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
University | 37 | 26 (70) | 11 (30) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Missing or not available |
89 |
66 (74) |
23 (26) |
1 |
0 |
1 (100) |
|||
Occupation | |||||||||
Active worker | 91 | 67 (74) | 24 (26) | 1 | 1 (100) | 0 | |||
Houseperson | 82 | 72 (88) | 10 (12) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Student | 130 | 102 (78) | 28 (22) | 161 | 58 (36) | 103 (64) | |||
Retired | 12 | 10 (83) | 2 (17) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Unemployed | 79 | 67 (85) | 12 (15) | 3 | 0 | 3 (100) | |||
Preschool | 0 | 0 | 0 | 110 | 3 (3) | 107 (97) | |||
Other |
3 |
2 (67) |
2 (67) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
Self-reported prior infection | |||||||||
Chikungunya | 108 | 97 (90) | 11 (10) | NA | NA | NA | |||
Dengue | 14 | 14 (100) | 0 | NA | NA | NA | |||
Zika | 3 |
3 (100) | 0 | NA |
NA | NA |
*Values are no. (%) except as inidicated. CHIKV, chikungunya virus; NA, not applicable. †Serologic status was assessed for household serologic survey participants using chikungunya plaque reduction neutralization test (n = 202) and ELISA to detect CHIKV IgG (n = 195). ‡Serologic status for all acute febrile illness surveillance participants was assessed using chikungunya plaque reduction neutralization test.
1These first authors contributed equally to this article.
Page created: October 10, 2024
Page updated: November 26, 2024
Page reviewed: November 26, 2024
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.