Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link

Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.

Volume 30, Number 6—June 2024
Research

Chest Radiograph Screening for Detecting Subclinical Tuberculosis in Asymptomatic Household Contacts, Peru

On This Page
Methods
Results
Discussion
Suggested Citation
Figures
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Tables
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Downloads
Appendix
RIS [TXT - 2 KB]
Article Metrics
Metric Details
Related Articles
Nontuberculous Mycobacteria and Laboratory Surveillance, Virginia, USA
Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, and Ukraine, 2017–2022
Prioritizing Mental Health in PEPFAR
More articles on Tuberculosis
Author affiliations: Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA (Q. Tan, C.-C. Huang, M.C. Becerra, M.B. Murray); Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston (C.-C. Huang, M.C. Becerra, Z. Zhang, M.B. Murray); Partners In Health—Socios En Salud Sucursal Peru, Lima, Peru (R. Calderon, C. Contreras, L. Lecca, J. Jimenez, R. Yataco); University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA (J.T. Galea); Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (J.-Y. Feng, S.-W. Pan, Y.-H. Tseng, J.-R. Huang); National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei (J.-Y. Feng, S.-W. Pan, Y.-H. Tseng, J.-R. Huang); Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston (M.B. Murray)

Suggested citation for this article

Abstract

The World Health Organization’s end TB strategy promotes the use of symptom and chest radiograph screening for tuberculosis (TB) disease. However, asymptomatic early states of TB beyond latent TB infection and active disease can go unrecognized using current screening criteria. We conducted a longitudinal cohort study enrolling household contacts initially free of TB disease and followed them for the occurrence of incident TB over 1 year. Among 1,747 screened contacts, 27 (52%) of the 52 persons in whom TB subsequently developed during follow-up had a baseline abnormal radiograph. Of contacts without TB symptoms, persons with an abnormal radiograph were at higher risk for subsequent TB than persons with an unremarkable radiograph (adjusted hazard ratio 15.62 [95% CI 7.74–31.54]). In young adults, we found a strong linear relationship between radiograph severity and time to TB diagnosis. Our findings suggest chest radiograph screening can extend to detecting early TB states, thereby enabling timely intervention.

Recognizing the key role early detection plays in interrupting further tuberculosis (TB) transmission, the World Health Organization (WHO) has emphasized the need for global investment in that area. In line with that objective, the end TB strategy promotes the use of TB symptom and chest radiograph screening for active case finding (1).

Chest radiography has been widely used as a diagnostic and screening tool for TB (2,3). Currently, the impact of chest radiograph screening largely depends on its ability to detect patients with clinically apparent TB disease (4–6). Recent understanding of TB has revealed a heterogeneous period of pathophysiological transition with a spectrum of early TB states, ranging from the time of exposure to Mycobacterium tuberculosis to the onset of symptomatic active disease (7–10). However, asymptomatic early states of TB beyond latent and active disease can be potentially unrecognized using current diagnostic or screening criteria for TB (11–14).

Accessing chest radiograph screening in low-resource settings, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, has been challenging and has hindered early detection of disease. However, the WHO recommended chest radiography with computer-aided detection as a screening tool for TB in its 2021 guidelines (15), holding promise for the early detection and triage of TB.

In this study, we used data from a longitudinal cohort of household contacts of TB patients in Lima, Peru, to examine the frequency of baseline abnormal chest radiographs (defined as the presence of any intrathoracic abnormalities compatible with TB disease) in adult contacts who were initially classified as free from TB disease and in whom incident disease subsequently developed. We further evaluated the association between severity of radiograph abnormalities and time to occurrence of TB disease. Our objective was to assess whether baseline chest radiograph screening can identify early TB states among asymptomatic household contacts beyond active case finding.

Methods

Study Design and Participants

During September 1, 2009–August 29, 2012, we conducted a prospective longitudinal cohort study of household contacts of index TB patients in Lima, encompassing 20 districts and ≈3.3 million residents of urban areas and peri-urban, informal shantytown settlements. Peru is a middle-income country with TB services concentrated in district health centers. Chest radiograph was not recommended by Peru’s National TB Program Guidelines for community screening during the cohort study period. In the parent study, we enrolled 4,500 index patients >15 years of age with newly diagnosed pulmonary TB from 106 district health centers in Lima (16). The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Harvard School of Public Health and the Research Ethics Committee of the National Institute of Health of Peru. All study participants provided informed consent.

Procedures

Figure 1

Flowchart of enrollment in study of chest radiograph screening for detection of subclinical tuberculosis in asymptomatic household contacts, Peru. CXR, chest radiograph; SX–, no symptoms; SX+, symptoms; TST–, tuberculin skin test negative; TST+, tuberculin skin test positive.

Figure 1. Flowchart of enrollment in study of chest radiograph screening for detection of subclinical tuberculosis in asymptomatic household contacts, Peru. CXR, chest radiograph; SX–, no symptoms; SX+, symptoms; TST–, tuberculin skin...

In the parent study, health center clinicians diagnosed pulmonary TB according to Peru’s National TB program guidelines (17), which required >1 of 2 sputum smears to be positive for acid-fast bacilli by Ziehl-Neelsen staining or, in the absence of positive sputum smears, a chest radiograph consistent with TB. We then visited patient households to enroll all household contacts. We gave contacts with no history of TB infection or disease a tuberculin skin test (TST). Health center clinicians made the decision to request a baseline radiograph in symptomatic household contacts. To elucidate why clinicians ordered those radiographs, we compared baseline clinical characteristics in contacts who received a radiograph and those who did not. We screened all enrolled contacts for TB symptoms (cough for >14 days, coughing blood or phlegm, fever, shortness of breath, or night sweats). We used a standardized case report form to collect symptoms; that information was obtained by Spanish or Quechua speakers in private in health clinics or in persons’ homes. Household contacts chosen for evaluation by health center clinicians provided 2 sputum samples for smear microscopy and culture on solid media and were referred for a routine work-up that included a chest radiograph. Persons who did not receive a TB diagnosis at enrollment were then followed for the occurrence of TB disease over a 12-month period. Those in whom incident disease developed were given TB treatment according to Peru’s National TB guidelines (17). We collected demographic and health data for each enrolled contact consisting of height and weight; previous TB history; smoking or drinking addiction status; and any comorbidity of HIV infection, diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, kidney disease, or asthma. We limited our analysis to persons >15 years of age who were TST-positive (Table 1) and who did not receive a diagnosis of TB disease within the first 30 days after enrollment (Figure 1).

Radiograph Evaluation and Study Outcomes

We retrospectively evaluated chest radiographs of participants who received a radiograph within 10 days of enrollment. The digitalized anteroposterior films were reevaluated by 3 readers. The first and second readers were both senior pulmonologists with 10–15 years of experience in TB care and TB-related radiographic evaluation. The third reader was a senior radiologist specializing in TB with 20 years’ experience in chest radiologic evaluation for TB diagnosis. Radiologic findings and scoring were assessed following a well-established radiologic protocol (4,17–20) (Appendix). That protocol outlines 3 parameters: whether the radiograph is abnormal, whether abnormalities are suggestive of TB, and the extent of abnormalities (Appendix Table 2). The first reader was blinded to symptoms, TST results, and clinical outcomes. The second reader reviewed chest radiographs deemed abnormal by the first reader to validate those readings. Discrepant interpretations were resolved by a third reader who adjudicated on the basis of the protocol. The final scores for each radiograph were calculated by averaging the results from the 2 readers. Final decisions were reached by consensus. We considered a radiograph to be abnormal at enrollment if any intrathoracic abnormalities were present including cavitation, noncavitary lung lesions, hilar lymphadenopathy, and pleural disorders (Appendix). We classified a parenchymal lesion as noncavitary if we found patchy or confluent consolidation, ground glass opacity, noncalcified nodules, calcified nodules (Ghon focus), diffuse micronodules (miliary pattern), fibrosis, bronchiectasis, collapse (atelectasis), and hyperinflation (18,19). We further categorized those abnormal findings as TB-suggestive or TB-nonsuggestive (Appendix). To grade the extent of abnormalities, we reported the percentage of lung affected by any pathological abnormality for each of 3 zones (upper, middle, and lower) in each lung. We estimated the total percentage of lung affected by summing the percentages of the 6 zones (0–6) (Appendix) (18). We defined the study outcome as incident TB disease detected during a 12-month follow-up period in participants in whom TB disease had been ruled out at baseline.

Statistical Analyses
Associations between Baseline Abnormalities and Incident TB Disease

We used a Cox proportional hazards model to investigate the association between baseline chest radiograph abnormalities and the occurrence of incident TB disease. We categorized participants into 4 groups: those with no TB symptoms and normal chest radiograph (SX–CXR– group); those with TB symptoms and normal radiograph (SX+CXR– group); those with no TB symptoms and abnormal radiograph (SX–CXR+ group); and those with TB symptoms and abnormal radiograph (SX+CXR+ group). We first performed a univariate analysis, followed by a multivariate model that adjusted for potential confounders: age, sex, alcohol use, tobacco use, diabetes, TB history, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, kidney disease, asthma, and body mass index (BMI). We considered that older household contacts and those with a history of TB might be more likely to have residual abnormalities on radiographs that were unrelated to recent TB exposure (21,22). We therefore repeated our analyses in 3 age subgroups: persons 16–24 years of age, 25–44 years of age, and >45 years of age. In a second sensitivity analysis, we restricted our analyses to contacts with no known previous TB history.

Association between Severity of Radiograph Abnormality and TB Progression Trajectory

We used linear regression to evaluate the association between the extent of abnormality on baseline radiograph and the trajectory of TB progression, indicated by the time to the occurrence of TB disease, among household contacts in whom incident TB disease developed during the 1-year follow-up period. Similar to the process discussed previously, we repeated the analyses in 3 age groups and among persons with no known previous TB history, conducting those analyses separately.

To determine whether consistent baseline radiograph readings could serve as an indicator of the risk for incident TB, we compared the risk for incident TB among household contacts with concordant versus discordant radiograph readings. We conducted an analysis using the Pearson χ2 test to identify any association between the risk for incident TB and radiograph concordance. We performed all statistical analyses using R version 4.2.2 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, https://www.r-project.org).

Results

Among 9,166 adult household contacts, 4,506 (49%) were TST-positive at baseline; of those, 4,503 (99%) underwent symptom screening. Of the 3,610 persons with TB symptoms and 893 without symptoms at baseline, 1,489 (41%) persons with symptoms and 358 (40%) without symptoms underwent a chest radiograph at baseline. Those referred for chest radiograph were less likely to be male (37% vs. 45%; p = 0.001), HIV-positive (0.4% vs. 0.8%; p = 0.02), or have a previous history of TB disease (17% vs. 26%; p<0.001) (Appendix Table 1). The presence of TB symptoms was similar among those referred for radiograph and those not referred (19% vs. 20%; p = 0.54). Of the 1,847 subjects with a baseline radiograph, TB disease developed in 100 (5%) persons within 30 days after enrollment; we considered those to be coprevalent cases and excluded them from analysis (Figure 1).

Associations between Baseline Radiograph Abnormalities and Incident TB Disease
Subsequent TB in All Screened Participants

Figure 2

Associations between chest radiograph and symptom screening results and time to incident TB among tuberculin skin test–positive adults, Peru. N = 1,747, incident events = 52. CXR–, unremarkable chest radiograph; CXR+, abnormal chest radiograph; SX–, no symptoms; SX+, symptoms; TB, tuberculosis.

Figure 2. Associations between chest radiograph and symptom screening results and time to incident TB among tuberculin skin test–positive adults, Peru. N = 1,747, incident events = 52. CXR–, unremarkable chest radiograph; CXR+, abnormal...

Among the 1,747 persons who were determined to be TB-negative at baseline and who had a baseline radiograph, 52 (3%) received a diagnosis of incident TB disease within the next 12 months. Among those 52 persons, 25 (48%) of the diagnoses were confirmed through microbiological tests and 8% through chest radiograph and symptoms; the remaining 44% lacked diagnostic information. Of the 52 persons, 38 (73%) were asymptomatic at baseline and 27 (52%) had an abnormal chest radiograph result at baseline (Appendix Figure 1). Of the 27 with abnormal radiographs, 2 (7%) had cavities, 18 (67%) had noncavitary parenchymal lesions, 6 (22%) had hilar lymphadenopathy, and 4 (15%) had pleural disorders; 3 (11%) of the 27 radiographs were agreed upon by 2 readers to have >1 abnormality. (Appendix Table 3, Figure 2). The risk for TB disease in those with an abnormal radiograph was higher both among those with initial symptoms and those without symptoms than for persons with normal x-ray and no symptoms at baseline (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] of SX+CXR– vs. SX–CXR– was 2.24 [95% CI 0.92–5.74]; aHR of SX–CXR+ vs. SX–CXR– was 15.62 [95% CI 7.74–31.54]; aHR of SX+CXR+ vs. SX–CXR– was 26.50 [95% CI 9.98–70.36]) (Table 2; Figure 2). Among the 135 abnormal radiographs evaluated by 2 readers, readers agreed on the presence or absence of abnormalities in 133 (99%) films. The risk for TB disease was higher in contacts in whom readers disagreed on the presence of noncavitary parenchymal lesions (Appendix Table 4).

Subsequent TB by Age Groups

Figure 3

Associations between abnormal chest radiographs and time to incident TB among tuberculin skin test–positive adults in 3 age groups, Peru. A) 16–24-year age group (N = 370, incident events = 25); B) 25–44-year age group (N = 709, incident events = 13); C) >45-year age group (N = 668, incident events = 14). CXR–, unremarkable chest radiograph, CXR+, abnormal chest radiograph; SX–, no symptoms; SX+, symptoms; TB, tuberculosis.

Figure 3. Associations between abnormal chest radiographs and time to incident TB among tuberculin skin test–positive adults in 3 age groups, Peru. A) 16–24-year age group (N = 370, incident events = 25); B)...

The risk for incident TB disease fell from 7% in participants 16–24 years of age to 2% in persons 25–44 years of age and 2% in those >45 years of age (Appendix Table 5, Figure 3). A similar pattern was observed in participants with an abnormal radiograph at enrollment (Appendix Table 6, Figure 3). Among participants 16–24 years of age with abnormal radiographs at baseline, incident TB developed in 12 (50%) persons; 9 of those (75%) were asymptomatic at enrollment. In contrast, among those with an abnormal radiograph, TB developed in only 6 (13%) of those 25–44 years of age and 9 (14%) of those >45 years of age; of those, 3 (50%) persons 25–44 years of age and 8 (89%) persons >45 years of age were asymptomatic (Appendix Figure 6). The risk for subsequent TB disease was higher in both initially asymptomatic and symptomatic persons of all subgroups who had an abnormal baseline radiograph than in persons with a normal radiograph (Table 3; Figure 3).

Subsequent TB in Participants with No TB History

When we restricted our analysis to the 1,440 persons with no known TB history, the effect sizes for the associations between radiograph status and subsequent incident TB increased by 30% compared with the analysis that included adult contacts with a TB history. aHRs were 23.11 (95% CI 10.35–51.57) for SX–CXR+ versus SX–CXR– and 34.24 (95% CI 9.65–124.54) for SX+CXR+ versus SX–CXR– (Table 4).

Associations between Severity of Radiograph Abnormality and TB Progression Trajectory

Figure 4

Association between degree of baseline chest radiograph severity and time to developing incident TB among persons with abnormal radiograph findings by age group, Peru. Gray shading indicates 95% CIs. A) 16–24-year age group (n = 12). Mean difference −0.004 (95% CI −0.007 to −0.001); p<0.001, ρ = −0.71; B) 25–44-year age group (n = 6). Mean difference −0.0002 (95% CI −0.015 to 0.015); p = 0.96, ρ = −0.025; C) >45-year age group (n = 9). Mean difference 0.0006 (95% CI −0.004 to 0.005); p = 0.73, ρ = 0.14. ρ, Pearson correlation coefficient.

Figure 4. Association between degree of baseline chest radiograph severity and time to developing incident TB among persons with abnormal radiograph findings by age group, Peru. Gray shading indicates 95% CIs. A)...

The severity grade of the baseline radiograph was not significantly associated with time from enrollment to TB diagnosis (mean difference of −0.002 [95% CI –0.005 to 0.001] days; n = 27) among all adults in whom incident TB developed (Appendix Figure 5). However, we found a strong linear relationship between the radiograph severity grade and time to TB diagnosis among participants 16–24 years of age (mean difference of −0.004 [95% CI –0.007 to −0.001]; n = 12) but not among older persons (Figure 4). We also did not find an association between severity grade and time to incident TB among persons with no known TB history (mean difference of 0.002 [95% CI –0.006 to 0.001]; n = 19) (Appendix Figure 6).

Discussion

In this study, we found that among persons >15 years of age who were exposed to TB at home, those who were initially deemed TB-free but had an abnormal baseline chest radiograph had a 15-fold higher risk for incident TB developing during 12 months of follow-up than did persons with an unremarkable radiograph. That finding was more pronounced in household contacts with no TB history and in younger participants, who were less likely to have residual abnormalities on radiograph from past TB or other comorbidities. Our findings remained unaltered in multivariate models when we further adjusted for demographic and clinical variables, as well as history of comorbidity. Among young persons with abnormal radiograph who were initially deemed TB-free at baseline, incident TB developed in 50% during follow-up. The severity grade of radiograph abnormalities was a strong indicator of an early-state TB trajectory in young persons.

Although numerous investigators have examined the use of chest radiography in screening for clinically apparent TB, few have evaluated whether abnormal radiographs could help identify early TB. The idea of using chest radiograph examination for incipient pulmonary TB was first proposed by Dr. Francis Williams, the father of chest radiology in the United States, in 1899 (23). Chest radiography for mass screening and active case-finding for pulmonary TB was recommended by the New York City Health Department in the United States as early as the 1920s–1930s (24,25) and was widely implemented in industrialized countries in the 1940s–1960s, contributing to the success of TB control in developed countries (3,26). However, by the late 1960s, WHO no longer recommended active case finding through mass radiograph screening for developing countries because of financial constraints (27). Not until 2015 was chest radiograph screening re-recommended by WHO as part of the end TB strategy (1,27). Even today, radiograph screening remains inaccessible in resource-limited areas in many low- and middle-income countries. Screening criteria typically focus on previously underdiagnosed TB disease, which is known as the late stage of TB disease (26). As a consequence, the very early stage of TB, known as subclinical TB, which is characterized by minimal or atypical presentations on chest radiograph, could still be underrecognized.

Nonetheless, our findings are consistent with several previous studies. In a study conducted in Czechoslovakia among a district-level cohort of 7,800 adults followed during 1961–1964 (28), 44% of persons in whom incident TB developed during follow-up had a previous abnormal chest radiograph indicating inactive TB or a fibrotic lesion. In a cohort study conducted during 1950–1952 in Denmark, persons with fibrotic lesions and shadows suspicious of TB on chest radiograph had a >10-fold higher annual rate of subsequent TB during the follow-up period (29). Similarly, in cohort studies conducted in 1988 among Southeast Asian refugees in Seattle (30) and in the early 1980s among recent Asian immigrants to northern Canada (31), persons with radiograph abnormalities indicative of or interpreted as inactive TB had 6-fold higher and 19-fold higher risk for subsequent TB. Those studies demonstrate that different types of lesions on baseline radiograph are associated with varying risks of subsequent TB in different mass screening settings. In a 1981 study from Hong Kong, 176 smear- and culture-negative adults with TB-compatible lesions were monitored for up to 30 months (32). Of those, TB was eventually diagnosed in 30%; most cases occurred within the first 12 months of follow-up. Similarly, a 1985 study conducted in South Africa found that among 152 TST-positive gold miners with evolving apical lung lesions on baseline radiograph who were smear- and culture-negative, bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary TB developed in 58% during a 58-month follow-up period (33). In a recent systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of 34 cohorts observed in the prechemotherapy era of persons with untreated TB who underwent follow-up, progression from microbiologically negative to positive disease was observed at an annualized rate of 10% in those with initial radiographs suggestive of active TB and at a rate of 1% in those initially suggestive of inactive TB (12). Although the incidence rate in this systemic review is lower than in our study, only 1 of the studies cited previously focused on a cohort of household contacts with known exposure to TB. The higher incidence in our study might be because we did not require microbiological confirmation to classify incident disease.

The finding that chest radiography might help identify pathological changes before the onset of TB symptoms aligns with recent evidence from South Africa. Esmail et al. (34) followed 250 HIV-negative adults exposed to TB at home for >4.7 years. Among 14 persons in whom active disease developed during follow-up, 6 exhibited baseline abnormalities on computed tomography/positron emission tomography (34). The TB research community now widely acknowledges that TB follows a dynamic continuum, encompassing TB infection, asymptomatic incipient or subclinical TB, and symptomatic clinically manifested disease (7–10). A 1982 study by the International Union Against Tuberculosis Committee on Prophylaxis revealed that among 28,000 adults with radiograph-identified fibrotic pulmonary lesions compatible with TB, a 24-week regimen of isoniazid preventive treatment decreased tuberculosis incidence by 65% compared with the placebo group over a 5-year follow-up period (35). Those findings suggest that lung changes can be observed in the asymptomatic phase of TB. Given that the cost of computed tomography/positron emission tomography makes it impractical for many screening programs, radiography could play a pivotal role in early TB detection, enabling early interventions such as close follow-up, preventive therapy, or full-dose combination therapy in populations at risk.

Our study revealed that young persons 16–24 years of age with abnormal baseline chest radiograph had a 3-fold higher risk for TB than older adults with abnormal radiograph. The observed association between the severity of baseline radiograph abnormalities and the trajectory of early TB disease within this young age group further supports the notion that an abnormal radiograph might serve as an indicator of undiagnosed or subclinical TB in this specific population, whereas older adults are more likely to have abnormal radiographs caused by non-TB lung diseases. That notion is supported by 2 cross-sectional studies conducted in Malawi during 2018–2020 (36) and the 2016 Kenya national TB prevalence survey (37). Both those studies reported a high prevalence of non-TB abnormalities on chest radiographs among older adults, with the proportion increasing with age.

The first limitation of this study is that only 40% of TST-positive adults received a baseline radiograph independent of symptoms; the decision to request a radiograph was made by local health center clinicians. Second, we lacked lateral positioning radiographs, which might have led to misclassifications of abnormalities. Third, readings were initially blinded for the first reader, and only abnormal radiographs were subsequently validated by a second reader who was not blinded. Therefore, misclassification of findings could have occurred. The fact that the second reader only read the films initially deemed to be abnormal and was not blinded to this classification might have resulted in overidentifying abnormalities in keeping with the first reader’s interpretations, leading to inflated measures of inter-rater agreement and consequently overestimating the effect size of the association between abnormalities and subsequent TB disease. Because the radiographs initially read as unremarkable were not read by a second reader, some of those might have been classified as abnormal if all radiographs had been read. Fourth, the relatively high prevalence of previous TB history among household contacts raises the possibility that some abnormal baseline radiographs were a result of inadequately treated previous TB or residual, minimally active TB. We did not have previous treatment or drug sensitivity information for those contacts and so cannot rule out the possibility that a history of TB might contribute to the elevated risk for incident TB among those persons. However, we also observed that persons with TB history were less likely to undergo baseline examinations. Moreover, when we excluded those with TB history from the 1,747 contacts who underwent radiograph screening, we found that the effect size increased by 30%. Finally, health center clinicians were expected to follow the clinical diagnosis guidelines outlined by Peru’s National TB Program, but different clinicians might have applied varying criteria for TB diagnosis. The absence of a standardized set of criteria for TB diagnosis might have resulted in nondifferential misclassification, potentially influencing the results toward a null effect.

Overall, our study revealed a significant association between abnormal baseline chest radiograph results and subsequent diagnosis of TB among asymptomatic adults with recent TB exposure. The severity of baseline radiograph results also reflected the early TB progression trajectory. Our findings strongly support the wide use of chest radiography with computer-aided detection as a screening tool in exposed adults and prompt the development of accurate criteria and algorithms for human and artificial intelligence readers to effectively identify early TB states beyond active TB disease, leading to timely intervention and proper management.

Dr. Tan was previously a physician specialist in lung disease and tuberculosis at Jiangsu Province Hospital in China and is currently a research fellow of Global Health and Social Medicine at Harvard Medical School. Her primary research interests are the epidemiology of TB, diagnostic tools for subclinical TB, and feasible approaches for infection control and management in source-limited setting.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank the patients and their families, the healthcare personnel at the 106 participating health centers in Lima, and Guoqing Zhang for the third reader contribution to inter-reader validation of the chest radiograph.

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases grants U01AI057786, U19AI076217, U19AI111224, and U19AI142793

Q.T., M.B.M., and C.-C.H led the study design. M.B.M., L.L., M.B.C., J.T.G., J.J., and R.Y. designed and implemented the parent study. R.C. managed laboratory work. Q.T., J.-Y.F., S.-W.P., Y.-H.T. and J.-R.H. read and evaluated all radiography films. Z.Z. led data management. Q.T. and C.-C.H. analyzed the data. Q.T., C.-C.H., and M.B.M. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the paper writing.

Top

References

  1. World Health Organization. Implementing the end TB strategy: the essentials [cited 2023 Mar 6]. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-HTM-TB-2015.19
  2. World Health Organization. Systematic screening for active tuberculosis: principles and recommendations [cited 2023 Mar 6]. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/84971/9789241548601_eng.pdf
  3. Miller  C, Lonnroth  K, Sotgiu  G, Migliori  GB. The long and winding road of chest radiography for tuberculosis detection. Eur Respir J. 2017;49:1700364. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. World Health Organization. The WHO manual of diagnostic imaging: radiographic anatomy and interpretation of the chest and the pulmonary system 2012 [cited 2023 Mar 6]. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9241546778
  5. Law  I, Floyd  K, African  TB; African TB Prevalence Survey Group. National tuberculosis prevalence surveys in Africa, 2008-2016: an overview of results and lessons learned. Trop Med Int Health. 2020;25:1308–27. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Wetscherek  MTA, Sadler  TJ, Lee  JYJ, Karia  S, Babar  JL. Active pulmonary tuberculosis: something old, something new, something borrowed, something blue. Insights Imaging. 2022;13:3. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Drain  PK, Bajema  KL, Dowdy  D, Dheda  K, Naidoo  K, Schumacher  SG, et al. Incipient and subclinical tuberculosis: a clinical review of early stages and progression of infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018;31:e00021–18. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Migliori  GB, Ong  CWM, Petrone  L, D’Ambrosio  L, Centis  R, Goletti  D. The definition of tuberculosis infection based on the spectrum of tuberculosis disease. Breathe (Sheff). 2021;17:210079. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kendall  EA, Shrestha  S, Dowdy  DW. The epidemiological importance of subclinical tuberculosis. a critical reappraisal. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021;203:168–74. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Achkar  JM, Jenny-Avital  ER. Incipient and subclinical tuberculosis: defining early disease states in the context of host immune response. J Infect Dis. 2011;204(Suppl 4):S1179–86. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Huang  CC, Tan  Q, Becerra  MC, Calderon  R, Chiang  SS, Contreras  C, et al. The contribution of chest radiography to the clinical management of children exposed to tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022;206:892–900. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Sossen  B, Richards  AS, Heinsohn  T, Frascella  B, Balzarini  F, Oradini-Alacreu  A, et al. The natural history of untreated pulmonary tuberculosis in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2023;11:367–79. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kendall  EA, Wong  EB. Do chest x-ray-positive, sputum-negative individuals warrant more attention during tuberculosis screening? Lancet Respir Med. 2023;11:304–6. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Richards  AS, Sossen  B, Emery  JC, Horton  KC, Heinsohn  T, Frascella  B, et al. Quantifying progression and regression across the spectrum of pulmonary tuberculosis: a data synthesis study. Lancet Glob Health. 2023;11:e684–92. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. World Health Organization. WHO consolidated guidelines on tuberculosis: module 2: screening: systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. 2021 [cited 2023 Mar 6]. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240022676
  16. Becerra  MC, Huang  CC, Lecca  L, Bayona  J, Contreras  C, Calderon  R, et al. Transmissibility and potential for disease progression of drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2019;367:l5894. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ministry of Health Peru. General Directorate of People’s Health—national health prevention strategy and technical health standard for the control of tuberculosis [in Spanish]. 2006 [cited 2023 Mar 7]. http://bvs.minsa.gob.pe/local/MINSA/3731.pdf
  18. Ralph  AP, Ardian  M, Wiguna  A, Maguire  GP, Becker  NG, Drogumuller  G, et al. A simple, valid, numerical score for grading chest x-ray severity in adult smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis. Thorax. 2010;65:863–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lau  A, Lin  C, Barrie  J, Winter  C, Armstrong  G, Egedahl  ML, et al. The radiographic and mycobacteriologic correlates of subclinical pulmonary TB in Canada: a retrospective cohort study. Chest. 2022;162:309–20. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. US Department of Health and Human Services. Technical instructions for civil surgeons; tuberculosis medical examination. 2008 May [cited 2023 Mar 7]. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/22142
  21. Meghji  J, Simpson  H, Squire  SB, Mortimer  K. A systematic review of the prevalence and pattern of imaging defined post-TB lung disease. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0161176. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. van Kampen  SC, Wanner  A, Edwards  M, Harries  AD, Kirenga  BJ, Chakaya  J, et al. International research and guidelines on post-tuberculosis chronic lung disorders: a systematic scoping review. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3:e000745. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Williams  FH. Röntgen ray examinations in incipient pulmonary tuberculosis. Trans Am Climatol Assoc. 1899;15:68–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lerner  BH. New York City’s tuberculosis control efforts: the historical limitations of the “war on consumption”. Am J Public Health. 1993;83:758–66. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Edwards  HR. Administration of a Bureau of Tuberculosis in a City Department of Health. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1933;23:591–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Golub  JE, Mohan  CI, Comstock  GW, Chaisson  RE. Active case finding of tuberculosis: historical perspective and future prospects. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2005;9:1183–203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Raviglione  MC, Pio  A. Evolution of WHO policies for tuberculosis control, 1948-2001. Lancet. 2002;359:775–80. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Stýblo  K, Danková  D, Drápela  J, Galliová  J, Jezek  Z, Krivánek  J, et al. Epidemiological and clinical study of tuberculosis in the district of Kolin, Czechoslovakia. Report for the first 4 years of the study (1961-64). Bull World Health Organ. 1967;37:819–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Groth-Petersen  E, Knudsen  J, Wilbek  E. Epidemiological basis of tuberculosis eradication in an advanced country. Bull World Health Organ. 1959;21:5–49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Nolan  CM, Elarth  AM. Tuberculosis in a cohort of Southeast Asian Refugees. A five-year surveillance study. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988;137:805–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang  JS, Allen  EA, Enarson  DA, Grzybowski  S. Tuberculosis in recent Asian immigrants to British Columbia, Canada: 1982-1985. Tubercle. 1991;72:277–83. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hong Kong Chest Service; Tuberculosis Research Centre, Mad; British Medical Research Council. A study of the characteristics and course of sputum smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis. Tubercle. 1981;62:155–67. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Cowie  RL, Langton  ME, Escreet  BC. Diagnosis of sputum smear- and sputum culture-negative pulmonary tuberculosis. S Afr Med J. 1985;68:878.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Esmail  H, Coussens  AK, Thienemann  F, Sossen  B, Mukasa  SL, Warwick  J, et al. High resolution imaging and five-year tuberculosis contact outcomes. medRxiv. 2023. DOIGoogle Scholar
  35. International Union Against Tuberculosis Committee on Prophylaxis. Efficacy of various durations of isoniazid preventive therapy for tuberculosis: five years of follow-up in the IUAT trial. Bull World Health Organ. 1982;60:555–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Twabi  HH, Semphere  R, Mukoka  M, Chiume  L, Nzawa  R, Feasey  HRA, et al. Pattern of abnormalities amongst chest X-rays of adults undergoing computer-assisted digital chest X-ray screening for tuberculosis in Peri-Urban Blantyre, Malawi: A cross-sectional study. Trop Med Int Health. 2021;26:1427–37. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Mungai  BN, Joekes  E, Masini  E, Obasi  A, Manduku  V, Mugi  B, et al.; IMPALA Consortium. ‘If not TB, what could it be?’ Chest X-ray findings from the 2016 Kenya Tuberculosis Prevalence Survey. Thorax. 2021;76:607–14. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Tables

Top

Suggested citation for this article: Tan Q, Huang C-C, Becerra MC, Calderon R, Contreras C, Lecca L, et al. Chest radiograph screening for detecting subclinical tuberculosis in asymptomatic household contacts, Peru. Emerg Infect Dis. 2024 Jun [date cited]. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid3006.231699

DOI: 10.3201/eid3006.231699

Original Publication Date: May 06, 2024

1These authors contributed equally to this article.

Table of Contents – Volume 30, Number 6—June 2024

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Megan B. Murray, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 641 Huntington Ave, 4th Fl, Rm 4A07, Boston, MA 02115, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: April 19, 2024
Page updated: May 06, 2024
Page reviewed: May 06, 2024
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external