Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link

Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.

Volume 30, Number 9—September 2024
Dispatch

Retrospective Seroprevalence of Orthopoxvirus Antibodies among Key Populations, Kenya

Figures
Tables
Article Metrics
Author affiliations: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (K. Loeb, K.A. Milner, C. Lemaille, B. Martens, D. Stein, J. Lajoie, S.Y. Shaw, K.R. Fowke, J. Kimani, L. McKinnon, J. Kindrachuk); Cadham Provincial Laboratory, Winnipeg (D. Stein); University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya (J. Lajoie, K.R. Fowke, J. Kimani, L. McKinnon); University of California–Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA (N.A. Hoff, A.W. Rimoin); Institut National de Recherche Biomédicale, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo (P. Mbala-Kingebeni); University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (R.S. Noyce)

Suggested citation for this article

Abstract

We identified a cluster of mpox exposures among key populations in Kenya through retrospective serologic screening. We identified strong seropositivity among sex workers and gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. These findings demonstrate the need for increased mpox surveillance among mpox-endemic and mpox-endemic–adjacent regions in Africa.

Mpox (formerly monkeypox) is a zoonotic viral disease caused by monkeypox virus (MPXV) that saw rapid geographic expansion resulting in a global epidemic in 2022 (1). MPXV consists of 2 distinct clades (clades I and clade II); clade I infections are associated with greater disease severity (1,2). Clade II MPXV is subdivided into 2 subclades (clades IIa and IIb); clade IIb is linked to the global epidemic (3,4). Although zoonosis has been the primary driver of human infections and outbreaks have occurred primarily in tropical forest regions within mpox-endemic countries, during the 2022 epidemic, >90% of infections were linked to secondary transmission, mainly through close, intimate (often sexual) contact. Historically, mpox has primarily affected younger populations; however, most of those mpox cases were associated with clade I (3). The average age of clade IIb mpox case-patients during the 2022 epidemic was >30 years; most were male (98.7%) and identified as gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) (84%) (4). During the 2022 epidemic, common clinical characteristics for mpox included fever, physical asthenia or lethargy, lymphadenopathy, and rash; atypical lesion location also was noted.

MPXV reemerged in Nigeria in 2017 and resulted in ongoing endemic circulation. In contrast to historic mpox, disease has been more prevalent in urban regions and among adults (5). Human-to-human transmission and a high proportion of genital ulcers also were noted. More recently, transmission of clade I MPXV associated with intimate contact has been reported in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), including geographic expansion and cases in multiple large urban areas (6).

MPXV genome sequencing demonstrated linkages between reemergence in Nigeria and global expansion in 2022 (7,8). Given the reemergence of mpox in Nigeria with sustained nonzoonotic transmission, ongoing global circulation, rapid expansion in DRC, and acquisition associated with intimate contact, an urgent need exists for expanded mpox surveillance in Africa, particularly among key populations at increased risk for infection. Given the paucity of mpox surveillance data and the role of Nairobi (capital city of Kenya) as a major economic and transit center in Africa, we undertook retrospective orthopoxvirus (OPXV) serologic screening that focused on key populations.

The Study

Figure

Retrospective assessment of orthopoxvirus antibody seropositivity among key populations, Nairobi, Kenya, 2013–2018. Orthopoxvirus seropositivity was assessed in banked samples acquired from 792 sex workers. A) Seropositivity was determined by ELISA using UV-inactivated vaccinia virus. Cutoff line indicates baseline seropositivity. Positives were determined as 3 SDs above the cutoff. Horizontal bar indicates median. B) Age distribution across all seropositive and seronegative samples. Horizontal bars indicate median with upper quartile above, lower quartile below. OD450, optical density at 450 nm.

Figure. Retrospective assessment of orthopoxvirus antibody seropositivity among key populations, Nairobi, Kenya, 2013–2018. Orthopoxvirus seropositivity was assessed in banked samples acquired from 792 sex workers. A) Seropositivity was determined by ELISA...

We used historic serum samples from male and female sex workers (n = 656) enrolled at the Sex Workers Outreach Program (SWOP) in Nairobi, Kenya (9). We assayed samples for IgG seropositivity by using a modified ELISA assay with UV-inactivated vaccinia virus (VACV). We screened samples by using a 1:50 dilution (10). We collected samples during 2013–2018; age range of participants was 19–69 years at sample acquisition (Table). Female sex workers accounted for 72.3% (474/656) of our sample population, followed by other (non–sex workers or nonidentified; 18.4% [122/656]) and GBMSM (9.3% [61/656]). We defined seropositivity on the basis of absorbance values >3 SDs above baseline. Most (76.7% [503/656]) samples were provided by persons 20–55 years of age; we found the highest percentage of seropositive samples among participants 20–39 years of age (37.4% [37/99]) and 40–55 years of age (36.4% [36/99]) among all seropositive samples tested. We detected 89% seropositivity among persons living with HIV; however, HIV positivity was high (85.8% [563/676]) among the sample population (Figure; Appendix Figure).

We next selected 111 samples from the ELISA screen for subsequent analysis by the OPXV IgG Panel (Meso Scale Discovery, https://www.mesoscale.com), which includes 5 MPXV antigens: A29, A35, B6, E8, and M1 and their corresponding VACV orthologs. We tested samples by using 1:500 dilutions. Cross-reactivities for the assay range from 198% (MPXV A35R and VACV A33R) to 43.4% (MPXV E8L and VACV D9L), and lower limits of quantitation ranged from 0.021 to 0.058 AU/mL. We selected 86 samples that met seropositive criteria from the ELISAs (>3 SDs above baseline) and 25 seronegative or borderline samples. We blinded samples during testing and repeated sampling on a subset of blinded samples for validation. Average age for participants from whom samples were taken was 49 years (range 29–74 years); samples were from female sex workers, GBMSM, and non–sex workers. We detected OPXV seropositivity across all age groups in our sample cohort, and had strong signals (>10,000 AU/mL) within all age groups, including persons born after cessation of the global smallpox vaccination program (11). OPXV-positive samples included 5 samples from persons in the 20–39-year age group, with calculated concentrations of >1,000 AU/mL. Our data suggest MPXV exposure among groups already at increased risk for infection in Kenya.

Conclusions

The reemergence of clade II MPXV in Nigeria in 2017, followed in 2022 by the rapid global expansion of clade II MPXV across non–mpox-endemic regions and the continued expansion of the current clade I outbreak in DRC, highlight the need for ongoing mpox surveillance. Given the geographic proximity and expansive shared borders of multiple countries in East Africa with DRC, frequent movement of persons across those regions, and the role of Nairobi as a commercial and tourism center, expanded mpox surveillance is needed urgently.

Although MPXV transmission between humans has historically occurred through close contact with infected persons (2,1012), transmission during the global mpox epidemic was strongly linked to close, intimate (including sexual) contact. Transmission through close and sexual contacts have been observed during the ongoing mpox outbreak in DRC.

Given the risk for further expansion of MPXV in Africa, we screened for indications of historic mpox exposures in key populations at increased risk for infection in Kenya. Our data suggest that unreported MPXV exposures have occurred within key populations. The smallpox vaccination campaign in Kenya ended in 1972 (although vaccinations may have occurred later), and only importation-related cases were reported after 1970 (11). Thus, seropositivity against VACV and MPXV in persons <52 years of age in our sample population is strongly indicative of environmental exposure to an orthopoxvirus independent of variola virus. Although camelpox virus has been reported among camels in northern Kenya, few human orthopoxvirus infections have been reported in the region and zoonosis is rare (12). Camelpox cannot be discounted given antigenic similarities to other human orthopoxviruses; however, the clustering of seropositivity among key populations in our study suggests an alternative virus source. No other orthopoxviruses are known to infect humans in Kenya; thus, our serologic data suggest potential MPXV exposure.

Our findings highlight the need for expanded and sustained mpox surveillance that includes non–mpox-endemic regions close to areas with active mpox outbreaks. In addition, stigmatization and fear of repercussions or persecution encountered by sex workers and GBMSM communities may have also limited the historical identification of mpox in non–mpox-endemic regions of sub-Saharan Africa.

One limitation of our study stems from the antigenic similarity among human orthopoxviruses. The MPXV antigens we used in this study have VACV orthologs, and the seropositivity we detected cannot definitively identify prior mpox nor differentiate MPXV clades. However, given the seropositivity among persons within key populations linked to sex work and dense sexual networks, including persons born after the global smallpox vaccination program ended, our data support expanded mpox surveillance in regions proximal to mpox-endemic areas.

In summary, our data suggest that mpox introduction among sex workers in Kenya probably occurred before identification of MPXV reemergence in Nigeria, the 2022 epidemic, and the ongoing outbreak in DRC. The source of these exposures could have included undiagnosed mpox circulation and introduction from either Central or West Africa, considering the lack of clade-specific determination through serologic screening. Thus, a definitive need exists to establish enhanced surveillance for groups at elevated risk for MPXV infection in Kenya and surrounding regions.

Ms. Loeb is a MSc student at the University of Manitoba. Her research interests include emerging infectious diseases and public health. Mr. Milner is a medical student and is completing a BSc in Medicine program at the University of Manitoba. His research interests include infectious diseases and clinical medicine.

Top

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Sex Worker Outreach Program participants for their continued partnership on this and other investigations.

This work was supported by the International Mpox Research Consortium through funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and International Development Research Centre (grant no. 202209MRR-489062-MPX-CDAA-168421), the US Department of Defense, Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Monkeypox Threat Reduction Network (grant no. HDTRA1-21-1-0040), and the US Department of Agriculture Non-Assistance Cooperative Agreement (grant no. 20230048).

Top

References

  1. Weaver  JR, Isaacs  SN. Monkeypox virus and insights into its immunomodulatory proteins. Immunol Rev. 2008;225:96113. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. McCollum  AM, Damon  IK. Human monkeypox. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58:2607. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Jezek  Z, Szczeniowski  M, Paluku  KM, Mutombo  M. Human monkeypox: clinical features of 282 patients. J Infect Dis. 1987;156:2938. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. World Health Organization. Mpox (monkeypox) outbreak: global trends [cited 2024 April 10]. https://worldhealthorg.shinyapps.io/mpx_global
  5. Yinka-Ogunleye  A, Aruna  O, Dalhat  M, Ogoina  D, McCollum  A, Disu  Y, et al.; CDC Monkeypox Outbreak Team. Outbreak of human monkeypox in Nigeria in 2017-18: a clinical and epidemiological report. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19:8729. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kibungu  EM, Vakaniaki  EH, Kinganda-Lusamaki  E, Kalonji-Mukendi  T, Pukuta  E, Hoff  NA, et al.; International Mpox Research Consortium. Clade I–associated mpox cases associated with sexual contact, the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Emerg Infect Dis. 2024;30:1726. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gigante  CM, Korber  B, Seabolt  MH, Wilkins  K, Davidson  W, Rao  AK, et al. Multiple lineages of monkeypox virus detected in the United States, 2021-2022. Science. 2022;378:5605. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ndodo  N, Ashcroft  J, Lewandowski  K, Yinka-Ogunleye  A, Chukwu  C, Ahmad  A, et al. Distinct monkeypox virus lineages co-circulating in humans before 2022. Nat Med. 2023;29:231724. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Omollo  K, Lajoie  J, Oyugi  J, Wessels  JM, Mwaengo  D, Kimani  J, et al. Differential elevation of inflammation and CD4+ T cell activation in Kenyan female sex workers and non-sex workers using depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate. Front Immunol. 2021;11:598307. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Sejvar  JJ, Chowdary  Y, Schomogyi  M, Stevens  J, Patel  J, Karem  K, et al. Human monkeypox infection: a family cluster in the midwestern United States. J Infect Dis. 2004;190:183340. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fenner  F, Henderson  DA, Arita  I, Jezek  Z, Ladnyi  ID. Smallpox and its eradication. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1988. p. 963–4 [cited 2024 Apr 10]. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/39485
  12. Balamurugan  V, Venkatesan  G, Bhanuprakash  V, Singh  RK. Camelpox, an emerging orthopox viral disease. Indian J Virol. 2013;24:295305. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Table

Top

Suggested citation for this article: Loeb K, Milner KA, Lemaille C, Martens B, Stein D, Lajoie J, et al. Retrospective seroprevalence of orthopoxvirus antibodies among key populations, Kenya. Emerg Infect Dis. 2024 Sep [date cited]. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid3009.240510

DOI: 10.3201/eid3009.240510

Original Publication Date: August 09, 2024

1These first authors contributed equally to this article.

Table of Contents – Volume 30, Number 9—September 2024

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Jason Kindrachuk, University of Manitoba, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 523-745 Bannatyne Ave, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0J9, Canada

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: July 30, 2024
Page updated: August 09, 2024
Page reviewed: August 09, 2024
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external