Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link

Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.

Volume 31, Number 1—January 2025
Research Letter

Low IgG Seroconversion among Persons Vaccinated against Measles, Republic of Congo

Author affiliation: Laboratoire National de Santé Publique, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo (Y.V.T. Mavoungou, L.G. Gangoué, F. Koukouikila-Koussounda, C. Badzi Nkoua, P.I. Mayengue, P.C. Kiminou, P. Mahoukou, L.R. Dossou-Yovo, F.R. Niama); Université Marien Ngouabi, Brazzaville (Y.V.T. Mavoungou, L.G. Gangoué, F. Koukouikila-Koussounda, C. Badzi Nkoua, P.I. Mayengue, G. Ahombo, F.R. Niama); Direction of Epidemiology and Disease Control, Brazzaville (J.-M. Kankou)

Suggested citation for this article

Abstract

We report a low (38.7%; p<0.0001) level of IgG seroconversion in patients who were positive for measles virus IgM in the Republic of Congo, despite a history of vaccination. Considering this country’s recurring measles epidemics, more effective immunization strategies, including vaccine delivery methods, are needed to prevent measles outbreaks.

Under ideal conditions, the efficacy of a single dose of measles vaccine is ≈85% when administered to a 9-month-old child and 90%–95% when administered to a12-month-old child. The World Health Organization recommends the vaccine should be given in 2 doses and at a minimum vaccination coverage of 95% for each country (1). However, despite high vaccine efficacy under trial conditions and the widespread use of the 2-dose schedule worldwide, vaccine effectiveness is lower and much more variable in practice (2). Indeed, it has been shown that responses to measles vaccines vary among persons and some vaccinated children are unable to produce the immune responses necessary for protection against measles (3). The immune response to measles vaccination is thought to be influenced by various host factors, including antibodies acquired through maternal antibody transfer, host-specific genetic factors, HIV infection, malnutrition, and other forms of immunosuppression (4). The measles vaccine failure rate is ≈10% in developed countries but can be >30% in resource-limited countries (3,5).

Numerous difficulties, such as geographic inaccessibility of certain areas, have been cited as factors favoring the persistence of measles in many countries in Africa (Republic of Congo Ministry of Health and Population, unpub. data). Those factors could have a substantial effect on the ability to eliminate measles from the continent. The Republic of Congo is part of the World Health Organization’s strategic plan to eliminate measles in Africa and has implemented a multiyear plan to fight against measles, mumps, and rubella as one of its strategic objectives. The country has introduced the combined measles/mumps/rubella vaccine, which is administered in 2 doses to children, 1 dose at 9 months and 1 dose at 15 months of age (Republic of Congo Ministry of Health and Population, unpub. data). Despite those efforts, measles continues to circulate, prompting multiple large-scale vaccination campaigns. Recent surveillance data has shown a considerable proportion of measles cases among vaccinated persons. The detection of infection among persons assumed to be vaccinated could pose a challenge to the country’s efforts to eliminate the disease.

We hypothesized that vaccinated persons who tested positive for measles were not seroconverting. As part of routine measles surveillance activities, we determined the IgG seroconversion rates of vaccinated persons with confirmed measles. Using ELISAs, we analyzed a cohort of 191 patients who were IgM-positive for measles virus during 2020–2022 and who had a history of vaccination (>1 vaccine dose). We determined serologic differences between the last vaccination date and the date of illness onset that were >2 months apart. The significance level was set at p<0.005.

The median patient age was 4 (interquartile range 2–7) years; children <5 years of age accounted for 101 (52.9%) patients, and that age group showed a significant difference in IgG seroconversion rate (p<0.0001) (Table). For most patients, the median interval between the date of disease onset and date of last vaccination was 23 (interquartile range 4–53) months; most (n = 111 [58.1%]) patients had an interval of 2–48 months. The overall seroconversion rate was 38.7% (p<0.0001). Among patients who received 1 dose of vaccine, only 57 (38%) seroconverted (p<0.0001), and we did not observe a significant difference in seroconversion among patients who received >2 doses (p = 0.1221). Among persons who received >2 doses of vaccine, only 41.5% seroconverted compared with 58.5% who remained IgG negative (Table).

We also estimated the effect of the interval between the date of disease onset and date of last vaccination on IgG production. A longer interval increased the IgG production rate, although the number of persons who produced IgG was significantly lower (p<0.0001) (Table).

Our findings revealed a high number of patients who only received 1 dose of measles vaccine, indicating a need to reinforce the booster and postvaccination follow-up system for vaccinated children. Overall, a relatively low rate of IgG seroconversion was observed in both single- and double-dose vaccine recipients. Similar results were observed in Turkey, where low IgG seroconversion against measles virus was observed in children >9 months of age (6). Reasons for the low number of persons who underwent IgG seroconversion after receiving >2 vaccine doses remain unclear. This finding might be linked to problems with the cold chain system of transport and storage or exposure of vaccines to light, because the measles vaccine is photosensitive; thus, inadequate training of personnel might be partially responsible for low seroconversion numbers (7). In large-scale vaccination campaigns, persons who do not seroconvert could be vaccine nonresponders (8). IgG levels have also been shown to decrease below the protective threshold in persons 10–14 years of age who received their 2 doses of vaccine at 8 and 18 months of age (9).

In conclusion, considering the recurring measles epidemics in the Republic of Congo, the findings from this study raise many questions about the effectiveness of the country’s measles vaccination strategy. Effective administration of vaccines and immunization strategies are needed to prevent outbreaks and might be more effective than vaccination campaigns that interrupt measles virus transmission during ongoing outbreaks.

About the Author

Ms. Mavoungou is a PhD candidate at Marien Ngouabi University, Republic of Congo. Her research interests mainly focus on evaluating measles vaccine efficacy and the genetic variability of the virus during repeated epidemics that occur despite multiple large-scale vaccination campaigns.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank Edouard Ndinga and Da Domanfoul for their assistance and Christian Pika for statistical analysis.

This study was performed at the National Public Health Laboratory, Republic of Congo, supported by the World Health Organization through measles and rubella surveillance activities.

Top

References

  1. World Health Organization. Measles outbreak guide. 2022 [cited 2024 Nov 29]. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240052079
  2. Masters  NB, Wagner  AL, Ding  Y, Zhang  Y, Boulton  ML. Assessing measles vaccine failure in Tianjin, China. Vaccine. 2019;37:32514. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Clifford  HD, Hayden  CM, Khoo  SK, Naniche  D, Mandomando  IM, Zhang  G, et al. Genetic variants in the IL-4/IL-13 pathway influence measles vaccine responses and vaccine failure in children from Mozambique. Viral Immunol. 2017;30:4728. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. World Health Organization. WHO immunological basis for immunization series: module 7: measles: update 2020 [cited 2024 Nov 29]. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241516655
  5. Akande  TM. A review of measles vaccine failure in developing countries. Niger Med Pract. 2007;52:1126.
  6. Yalçin  SS, Karasimav  DE, Yurdakök  K. Measles vaccine failure in 9-month-old infants. Çocuk Enfeks Derg. 2015;9:15360. DOIGoogle Scholar
  7. Doshi  RH, Mukadi  P, Shidi  C, Mulumba  A, Hoff  NA, Gerber  S, et al. Field evaluation of measles vaccine effectiveness among children in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Vaccine. 2015;33:340714. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Arima  Y, Oishi  K. Letter to the editor: measles cases among fully vaccinated persons. Euro Surveill. 2018;23:1800449.
  9. Wang  Q, Wang  W, Winter  AK, Zhan  Z, Ajelli  M, Trentini  F, et al. Long-term measles antibody profiles following different vaccine schedules in China, a longitudinal study. Nat Commun. 2023;14:1746. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Table

Top

Suggested citation for this article: Mavoungou YVT, Gangoué LG, Koukouikila-Koussounda F, Badzi Nkoua C, Mayengue PI, Kankou JM, et al. Low IgG seroconversion among persons vaccinated against measles, Republic of Congo. Emerg Infect Dis. 2025 Jan [date cited]. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid3101.240911

DOI: 10.3201/eid3101.240911

Table of Contents – Volume 31, Number 1—January 2025

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Fabien Roch Niama, National Public Health Laboratory, Molecular Biology Unit, Box 120, Général Charles de Gaule Ave, Brazzaville, Republic of the Congo

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: October 30, 2024
Page updated: December 13, 2024
Page reviewed: December 13, 2024
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external