Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link

Volume 31, Number 10—October 2025

Dispatch

Zoonotic Baylisascaris procyonis Infection in Raccoons, Mississippi, USA, 2023–2024

Author affiliation: The University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, Mississippi, USA (B.L. Huerta-Beltrán, N.M. Phillips); James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia (H. Zhao, R.S. Bradbury); Mississippi College, Clinton, Mississippi, USA (S. Mills, J. Berry, W. Janous, J. Ervin, K. Butler, A. Kalluru, F. Valerio, T. Selby, S.M. Hearst); Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks, Jackson, Mississippi, USA (B. Stefano); The University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson (S. Everman); Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, USA (G.T. Rosser); University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA (C.V. Hobbs)

Cite This Article

Abstract

Baylisascaris procyonis, an emerging zoonotic parasite, causes clinically significant visceral, ophthalmologic, and neurologic disease in humans. We screened raccoons (n = 46) collected from central and southern Mississippi for B. procyonis by necropsy (13.0% prevalence) and droplet digital PCR of feces (26.7% prevalence). Further surveillance to determine raccoon infection rates throughout Mississippi is indicated.

Baylisascaris procyonis roundworms are emerging zoonotic parasites that cause clinically significant visceral, ophthalmologic, and neurologic disease in humans. The 3 major categories of human Baylisascaris procyonis infection are neural larva migrans, ocular larva migrans, and visceral larva migrans (13). Raccoons (Procyon lotor) are the definitive host for B. procyonis roundworms (2,3). Case reports in the literature describe life-threatening neurologic disease manifestations of eosinophilic meningitis, which causes substantial illness and death (3). North American raccoons are human-habituated and thrive in urban and suburban areas, posing a serious health risk to humans (4,5).

Human B. procyonis infection occurs after ingestion of eggs from raccoon feces in contaminated soil from the environment, commonly in latrine areas in which raccoons defecate (6). Female B. procyonis roundworms produce >100,000 eggs/day/worm, and infected raccoons shed millions of eggs through fecal matter at latrine locations (1,7). Younger children and persons with developmental delays are more likely to become infected because of increased likelihood of ingesting eggs because of pica behaviors (3). In the United States, 33 cases of human B. procyonis infection have been reported (3). B. procyonis has previously been reported in states neighboring Mississippi, USA, in the southeast (5,810). We report the presence of B. procyonis roundworms in raccoons in Mississippi.

The Study

We collected raccoons (n = 46) during 2023–2024 from 8 different counties in central and southern Mississippi (Hancock, Harrison, Hinds, Humphreys, Lincoln, Pearl River, Yazoo, and Warren Counties). We used dog-proof traps or live traps with a scientific collection permit issued by the Mississippi Department of Wildlife Fisheries and Parks (permit no. 0207241); some collections were made from donated hunter-harvested raccoons. Raccoons were stored at −20°C until examined by necropsy. During necropsy, we examined the raccoon’s small and large intestines for the presence of B. procyonis nematodes. We collected and stored B. procyonis adult and juvenile worms in 70% ethanol before DNA analysis. At the time of necropsy, 45 of the raccoons contained fecal matter; we collected fecal samples collected from the large intestines of those animals and stored at −20°C before DNA analysis (Appendix). All animal protocols used in this study were approved by the Mississippi College Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol no. 072723) and Institutional Review Board (protocol no. 111621).

Figure 1

Phylogenetic trees of Baylisascaris procyonis cox1 genes from nematodes (n = 10) collected by necropsy in raccoons, Mississippi, USA, 2023–2024. Analysis was conducted using the general time-reversible plus gamma model. Bayesian posterior probabilities and bootstrap support values (1,000 bootstrap replicates) are shown for each node. GenBank accession numbers are in parentheses. Scale bar indicates number of substitutions per site.

Figure 1. Phylogenetic trees of Baylisascaris procyonis cox1genes from nematodes (n = 10) collected by necropsy in raccoons, Mississippi, USA, 2023–2024. Analysis was conducted using the general time-reversible...

We confirmed B. procyonis presence in necropsied raccoons by morphology (Appendix Figure, panel A), Sanger sequencing and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) analysis of fecal samples (n = 45), and sequencing of helminth DNA (n = 46) (Table; Appendix). PCR and Sanger sequencing using B. procyonis cox1, cox2, ITS1, 18s, and 28S primers revealed 100% identity to B. procyonis sequences in GenBank (accession nos. MW385486, AF179908, NC_016200, U94368, MZ092854) (11,12). We submitted DNA sequences to Genbank (accession nos. PV593814 [18s], PV594051 [28s], PV594407 [ITS1], PV600642 [cox2], and PV610700–9 [cox1]). Phylogenetic analysis of the cox1 sequences (n = 10) showed 100% identity with B. procyonis nematodes collected from raccoons in the United States, China, and Norway (Figure 1) (11,12). Necropsy of raccoons revealed B. procyonis positivity in 2/8 counties (Humphreys and Yazoo); positivity rates were >50%. The number and length of B. procyonis nematodes found in infected adult and juvenile raccoons varied (Appendix Table 1). Higher infection rates were seen in juvenile raccoons than in adult raccoons, as previously reported (1). Identification of B. procyonis eggs in fecal samples was hindered by freezing-induced morphological damage, making identification and positivity assessment difficult using traditional microscopic methods (Appendix Figure, panel B).

Figure 2

Locations of Mississippi counties sampled in study of zoonotic Baylisascaris procyonis in raccoons, Mississippi, USA, 2023–2024. Map indicates geographic center of counties sampled (white circles) and heatmapping estimates of B. procyonis positivity at the county level on the basis of fecal analysis using droplet digital PCR. Scale bar indicates 75.0 miles.

Figure 2. Locations of Mississippi counties sampled in study of zoonotic Baylisascaris procyonis in raccoons, Mississippi, USA, 2023–2024. Map indicates geographic center of counties sampled (white circles) and heatmapping estimates of ...

Our ddPCR analysis of fecal DNA revealed B. procyonis positivity in 6 of the 8 counties in Mississippi (Hancock, Hinds, Humphreys, Lincoln, Pearl River, and Yazoo) (Table). The ddPCR results estimated an infection rate of >50% in Hancock, Humphreys, Lincoln, and Yazoo Counties; the mean infection rate was 26.7% across all 8 counties surveyed. The mean + SE concentration of Baylisascaris sp. DNA in positive fecal samples was 2.28 + 1.84 (range 0.16–22.17) (Appendix Table 2). Heatmapping of ddPCR results estimates B. procyonis positivity in raccoons throughout large portions of central and southern Mississippi and high positivity along the Mississippi–Louisiana border (Figure 2).

Conclusions

We report evidence of B. procyonis roundworms in Mississippi, previously reported in neighboring states in the southeastern United States, including Louisiana, Georgia, Tennessee, and Arkansas (5,8,9,13,14). Using necropsy, we found an overall B. procyonis roundworm statewide prevalence of 13.0% across all counties tested.

Fecal analysis using ddPCR detected more B. procyonis infections than did necropsy analyses; the average statewide positivity rate was 26.7% across all counties, similar to the 31.7% fecal prevalence reported in Louisiana (5) using quantitative PCR (qPCR) techniques. ddPCR analysis indicated positive results from raccoons in Handcock, Hinds, Humphreys, Lincoln, Pearl River, and Yazoo Counties. Fecal positivity using ddPCR ranged from 17.6% to 100.0%. The limitation of convenience sampling in some counties might account for higher detection rates; only 1–3 raccoons were sampled in 4 counties. Racoon infection rates also varied by season, age, racoon population crowding, and age of animals (6,15). Overall, the infection rate estimate based on ddPCR data was higher and indicated the parasite was more widespread than was suggested by visual examination through necropsy alone. This discrepancy might be explained by the difficulty of conducting comprehensive necropsy across the entire intestine of raccoons, where some nematodes might have been overlooked; the difficulty of L3 and L4 larvae detection; or the migration of intestinal nematodes into the stomach after host death. We also found that freezing fecal samples altered B. procyonis egg morphology, making parasite eggs harder to identify using traditional microscopic methods. Overall, fecal analysis using ddPCR proved to be a simpler, more sensitive, and more comprehensive sampling strategy, supporting it as the preferred approach to estimate infection rates for this parasite of human–health concern.

The data represented in this study are limited by the small sample size from each county, and this study serves as proof of concept that this parasite is demonstrable in Mississippi racoons, indicating the need for increased provider awareness and animal surveillance because of the human pathogenic potential of this parasite. Taken together, the data estimate low prevalence across much of the surveyed range and spots of hyperendemicity. Future large-scaled surveillance efforts to more accurately estimate infection rates and fully assess the geographic range of this parasite in Mississippi are needed. Overall, our data suggest that raccoons in Mississippi harbor B. procyonis infection, representing a danger to human health.

Mr. Huerta-Beltrán is currently pursuing a master’s degree at the University of Southern Mississippi. His research primarily focuses on using molecular techniques to investigate aquatic and threatened species.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank the local Mississippi residents who donated raccoons to this study.

This work was supported by the Mississippi IDeA Network of Biomedical Research Excellence, funded by an Institutional Development Award from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under grant number P20GM103476. This work was also funded by Mississippi College Office of Research.

Top

References

  1. Sorvillo  F, Ash  LR, Berlin  OGW, Morse  SA, Degiorgio  C, Morse  SA. Baylisascaris procyonis: an emerging helminthic zoonosis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:3559. DOIGoogle Scholar
  2. Pai  PJ, Blackburn  BG, Kazacos  KR, Warrier  RP, Bégué  RE. Full recovery from Baylisascaris procyonis eosinophilic meningitis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:92830. DOIGoogle Scholar
  3. Lipton  BA, Oltean  HN, Capron  RB, Hamlet  A, Montgomery  SP, Chancey  RJ, et al. Baylisascaris procyonis roundworm infection in child with autism spectrum disorder, Washington, USA, 2022. Emerg Infect Dis. 2023;29:12325. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gatcombe  RR, Jothikumar  N, Dangoudoubiyam  S, Kazacos  KR, Hill  VR. Evaluation of a molecular beacon real-time PCR assay for detection of Baylisascaris procyonis in different soil types and water samples. Parasitol Res. 2010;106:499504. DOIGoogle Scholar
  5. Straif-Bourgeois  S, Cloherty  E, Balsamo  G, Gee  L, Riegel  C. Prevalence of Baylisascaris procyonis in raccoons trapped in New Orleans, Louisiana, 2014–2017. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2020;20:226. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Graeff-Teixeira  C, Morassutti  AL, Kazacos  KR. Update on baylisascariasis, a highly pathogenic zoonotic infection. Vol. 29. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016;29:37599. DOIGoogle Scholar
  7. Ogdee  JL, Henke  SE, Wester  DB, Fedynich  AM. Assessing potential environmental contamination by Baylisascaris procyonis eggs from infected raccoons in southern Texas. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2017;17:1859. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Huang  MHJ, Demarais  S, Brookshire  WC, Strickland  BK. Analysis of supplemental wildlife feeding in Mississippi and environmental gastrointestinal parasite load. Front Vet Sci. 2022;9:995437. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Blizzard  EL, Davis  CD, Henke  S, Long  DB, Hall  CA, Yabsley  MJ. Distribution, prevalence, and genetic characterization of Baylisascaris procyonis in selected areas of Georgia. J Parasitol. 2010;96:112833. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhao  H, Zendejas-Heredia  PA, Colella  V, Arguello  I, Brookes  K, Panicker  IS, et al. Surveillance of soil-transmitted helminths and other intestinal parasites in shelter dogs, Mississippi, USA. One Health. 2024;20:100956. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Xie  Y, Zhang  Z, Niu  L, Wang  Q, Wang  C, Lan  J, et al. The mitochondrial genome of Baylisascaris procyonis. PLoS One. 2011;6:e27066. DOIGoogle Scholar
  12. Nadler  SA, Hudspeth  DSS. Phylogeny of the Ascaridoidea (Nematoda: Ascaridida) based on three genes and morphology: hypotheses of structural and sequence evolution. J Parasitol. 2000;86:38093. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Souza  MJ, Ramsay  EC, Patton  S, New  JC. Baylisascaris procyonis in raccoons (Procyon lotor) in eastern Tennessee. J Wildl Dis. 2009;45:12314. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Al-Warid  HS, Belsare  AV, Straka  K, Gompper  ME. Baylisascaris procyonis roundworm infection patterns in raccoons (Procyon lotor) from Missouri and Arkansas, USA. Helminthologia. 2017;54:1138.
  15. Weinstein  SB. Baylisascaris procyonis demography and egg production in a California raccoon population. J Parasitol. 2016;102:6228. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid3110.250658

Original Publication Date: September 25, 2025

Table of Contents – Volume 31, Number 10—October 2025

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Scoty M. Hearst, Mississippi College, 200 S Capitol St, Clinton, MS 39056, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: September 25, 2025
Page updated: September 25, 2025
Page reviewed: September 25, 2025
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external