Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link

Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.

Volume 31, Number 12—December 2025

Dispatch

Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Clade 2.3.4.4b Virus Infection in Poultry Farm Workers, Washington, USA, 2024

Author affiliation: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (Y. Hatta, J.A. De La Cruz, Y. Jang, J.C. Frederick, K.A. Lacek, J.C. DaSilva, D. Cui, P. Carney, J. Liddell, K.W. Radford, N. Burnett, S. Schatzman, E.A. Pusch, M. Johnson, H.T. Nguyen, B.L. Rambo-Martin, L. Gubareva, J. Stevens, C.T. Davis, M.K. Kirby, H. Di); Washington State Department of Health, Shoreline, Washington, USA (T. Murray, B. Hiatt, P. Trinh, A. Unutzer, A. Black)

Suggested citation for this article

Abstract

Poultry workers in Washington, USA, were infected with highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) virus and recovered. The viruses were clade 2.3.4.4b genotype D1.1, closely related to viruses causing poultry outbreaks. Continued surveillance and testing for influenza A(H5) clade 2.3.4.4b viruses remain essential for risk assessment and pandemic preparedness of zoonotic influenza viruses.

The global spread of A/goose/Guangdong/96-lineage highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) virus of the A(H5) subtype has resulted in numerous clades, subclades, and genotypes because of continuous genetic drift and reassortment. HPAI H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b virus is the most widespread globally; since December 2021, that clade has circulated in wild birds in the United States, affecting millions of poultry, mammalian wildlife, domestic livestock, and companion animals (1,2). In 2024, two distinct genotypes were responsible for ongoing outbreaks in the United States, B3.13 mainly in dairy cattle and D1.1 mainly in poultry, but outbreaks of both genotypes were reported in cattle and poultry (3,4).

Sporadic human infections with clade 2.3.4.4b viruses have also been reported in the United States. During April 1, 2024–June 30, 2025, a total of 70 human cases were reported, including 41 cases after dairy cattle exposure, 24 after exposure to commercial poultry flocks, 2 after exposure to backyard flocks, and 3 with an unknown exposure source (5,6). In response to reported human infections with clade 2.3.4.4b viruses in the United States and other countries, several 2.3.4.4b A(H5) prepandemic candidate vaccine viruses (CVVs) have been made available for pandemic influenza preparedness (7).

In late 2024, the Washington State Public Health Laboratory detected influenza A(H5) virus by real-time reverse transcription PCR among specimens from poultry workers experiencing influenza symptoms. We investigated isolates from human cases in Washington to determine virus transmissibility to humans and susceptibility to existing CVVs.

The Study

During October 23–November 5, 2024, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC; Atlanta, GA, USA) received multiple presumptive influenza A(H5)–positive human clinical specimens from the Washington State Public Health Laboratory. Testing at CDC confirmed HPAI A(H5) virus in 8 poultry farm workers. All 8 cases occurred in adults exposed to H5N1 virus–infected poultry during depopulation efforts to control an outbreak among poultry in Washington. Each affected person reported conjunctivitis, and some also reported respiratory symptoms (6). The mean cycle threshold (Ct) value to detect influenza A matrix gene from the H5-positive specimens was 33 (range 25–36.9).

After multiple genetic sequencing attempts at CDC, we obtained complete hemagglutinin (HA) gene sequences from 5 confirmed cases and partial or complete neuraminidase (NA) gene sequences from 4 confirmed cases. On the basis of the available HA and NA sequences, the viruses in the specimens belonged to HPAI H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b. Sequences of the internal gene segments were only available from 4 human cases at various levels of completion. We observed minimal genetic variation among human cases; we submitted all available gene sequences to GISAID (https://www.gisaid.org) and GenBank (Appendix Table 1).

We attempted virus isolation by inoculating the positive specimens in 10–11-day-old embryonated chicken eggs, MDCK cells, or both. We isolated A/Washington/239/2024 from a conjunctival specimen in MDCK cells and isolated A/Washington/254/2024 and A/Washington/255/2024 from the conjunctival specimens in eggs. We also isolated A/Washington/240/2024 in eggs from both conjunctival and nasopharyngeal specimens (Table).

Figure 1

Neighbor-joining phylogenetic trees of highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) clade 2.3.4.4b viruses isolated from poultry farm workers, Washington, USA, 2024. A) Hemagglutinin gene segment; B) neuraminidase gene segment. Green font indicates influenza A(H5N1) D1.1 viruses from Washington; red font indicates prepandemic candidate vaccine virus A/Ezo red fox/Hokkaido/1/2022. Bootstrap values >50, generated from 1,000 replicates, are labeled on branch nodes. Scale bars indicate nucleotide substitutions per site.

Figure 1. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic trees of highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) clade 2.3.4.4b viruses isolated from poultry farm workers, Washington, USA, 2024. A) Hemagglutinin gene segment; B) neuraminidase gene segment. Green font...

Since late 2021, at least 6 distinct introductions of clade 2.3.4.4b A(H5) viruses from Europe and Asia (genotypes A1–A6) have occurred in the United States. Each introduction was followed by reassortment events that generated many different genotypes (8,9). Phylogenetic analysis of the 8 gene segments from H5N1 viruses in the specimens of the Washington human cases determined that they belonged to genotype D1.1. That genotype derived from the Eurasian genotype A3 and acquired North American wild bird lineage polymerase basic (PB) 2 (am24 group), polymerase acidic (am4 group), nucleoprotein (am13 group), and NA (am4N1 group) gene segments (Figure 1; Appendix Figures 1–6). Genotype D1.1 is different from genotype B3.13, which derived from the Eurasian genotype A1 after acquiring North American wild bird lineage PB2 (am2.2 group), PB1 (am4 group), nucleoprotein (am8 group), and nonstructural (am1.1 group) gene segments after reassortment.

Phylogenetically, HA sequences from the Washington human cases belonged to the Eurasian ea3 group and were closely related to viruses detected from the Washington poultry outbreak. Those HA sequences also resembled sequences from wild birds detected in British Columbia, Canada, during 2024 (Figure 1, panel A). The HA sequences from the Washington D1.1 human cases did not contain mutations known to be associated with increased infectivity or transmissibility among humans (FluSurver, https://flusurver.bii.a-star.edu.sg). The NA gene segments of H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b viruses circulating in the United States have been predominantly Eurasian lineage since their introduction (8). However, the D1.1 viruses detected in the Washington cases all contained North American lineage N1 NA genes closely related to those of H5N1 viruses detected in poultry and wild birds in British Columbia in 2024 and H1N1 viruses detected in wild birds in the United States and Canada in 2023 (Figure 1, panel B). The available NA and internal gene sequences from the Washington D1.1 human cases lacked changes associated with reduced antiviral susceptibility or mammalian adaptation. They also lacked PB2-M631L mutation that was detected in most B3.13 viral sequences (1012).

Figure 2

Glycan microarray analysis of highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) clade 2.3.4.4b virus isolated from poultry farm workers, Washington, USA, 2024. Clade 2.3.4.4b genotype D1.1 H5N1 virus A/Washington/240/2024 was isolated from a confirmed Washington human case. Glycans containing α-2,3 sialic acid and α-2,6 sialic acid are shown. Error bars reflect SDs from 6 independent replicates on the microarray. Details of the glycan structures are listed in Appendix Table 2.

Figure 2. Glycan microarray analysis of highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) clade 2.3.4.4b virus isolated from poultry farm workers, Washington, USA, 2024. Clade 2.3.4.4b genotype D1.1 H5N1 virus A/Washington/240/2024 was isolated from...

The HA sequences from the Washington D1.1 viruses also lacked changes previously associated with increased binding to mammalian-like α2,6 sialic acid receptors. Glycan microarray analysis of the representative virus isolate A/Washington/240/2024 suggested that the Washington D1.1 H5N1 virus retained preferential binding to avian-like α2,3 sialic acid receptors (Figure 2). Three A(H5) clade 2.3.4.4b prepandemic CVVs are available: IDCDC‐RG78A (A/American wigeon/South Carolina/22-000345-001/2021), NIID-002 (A/Ezo red fox/Hokkaido/1/2022), and IDCDC-RG71A (A/Astrakhan/3212/2020). Compared with the most closely related CVV, NIID-002 (HA group ea3), the HA sequences from Washington H5N1 D1.1 viruses (also HA group ea3) all carried 2 amino acid differences at T36A and N476D (mature H5 numbering); neither substitution was located within putative antigenic sites. The HA from Washington H5N1 D1.1 viruses also had 3 amino acid differences relative to IDCDC-RG71A (HA group ea3) and 6 relative to IDCDC‐RG78A (HA group ea1), and 1 difference in the putative antigenic site D (Appendix Table 3). Hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assays indicated that all available Washington H5N1 D1.1 virus isolates cross-reacted well with ferret antisera raised against each of the 3 clade 2.3.4.4b CVVs. Ferret antiserum raised to NIID-002 and IDCDC‐RG78A cross-reacted with the D1.1 viruses at heterologous HI titers equal to or within 2-fold of the homologous HI titer (Table). Ferret antisera raised against IDCDC-RG71A cross-reacted with the D1.1 viruses at heterologous HI titers 2- to 4-fold lower than the homologous HI titer. Ferret antiserum raised against A/Texas/37/2024, the virus isolated from an H5N1 human case in 2024 associated with a dairy cattle outbreak (genotype B3.13), also cross-reacted well with the Washington D1.1 H5N1 virus isolates at heterologous HI titers <2-fold of the homologous HI titer (Table).

Conclusions

We detected human cases of HPAI H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b genotype D1.1 in poultry farm workers in Washington. Additional human cases of H5N1 D1.1 virus infection have been subsequently reported, including a fatal human case detected in Louisiana, USA (13), and 2 severe human cases, 1 detected in British Columbia, Canada (14), and 1 in Wyoming, USA (15). Among the virus genomes detected in the Washington cases, we noted no changes that are known to be associated with mammalian adaptation, increased infectivity, or transmissibility among humans. Washington H5N1 D1.1 virus retained avian-like α2,3 sialic acid receptor binding preference and cross-reacted well with ferret antiserum raised against A(H5) clade 2.3.4.4b prepandemic CVVs available to vaccine manufacturers. Nonetheless, continued surveillance and testing of clade 2.3.4.4b A(H5) viruses remain essential for influenza pandemic preparedness.

Dr. Hatta is a senior service fellow in the Influenza Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. Her research interests focus on improving influenza vaccine effectiveness by developing new vaccine platforms and performing antigenic characterizations.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank the persons who provided specimens and information for this investigation. We also thank Trent Bullock for his editorial assistance.

This study was supported by the Influenza Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Top

References

  1. Abdelwhab  EM, Beer  M. Panzootic HPAIV H5 and risks to novel mammalian hosts. Npj Viruses. 2024;2:22. DOIGoogle Scholar
  2. Caliendo  V, Lewis  NS, Pohlmann  A, Baillie  SR, Banyard  AC, Beer  M, et al. Transatlantic spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 by wild birds from Europe to North America in 2021. Sci Rep. 2022;12:11729. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Caserta  LC, Frye  EA, Butt  SL, Laverack  M, Nooruzzaman  M, Covaleda  LM, et al. Spillover of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus to dairy cattle. Nature. 2024;634:66976. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Krammer  F, Hermann  E, Rasmussen  AL. Highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1: history, current situation, and outlook. J Virol. 2025;99:e0220924. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. H5 bird flu: current situation [cited 2025 Sep 24]. https://www.cdc.gov/bird-flu/situation-summary/index.html
  6. Garg  S, Reinhart  K, Couture  A, Kniss  K, Davis  CT, Kirby  MK, et al. Highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) virus infections in humans. N Engl J Med. 2025;392:84354. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. World Health Organization. Zoonotic influenza: candidate vaccine viruses and potency testing reagents [cited 2025 Sep 24]. https://www.who.int/teams/global-influenza-programme/vaccines/who-recommendations/zoonotic-influenza-viruses-and-candidate-vaccine-viruses
  8. Youk  S, Torchetti  MK, Lantz  K, Lenoch  JB, Killian  ML, Leyson  C, et al. H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza clade 2.3.4.4b in wild and domestic birds: Introductions into the United States and reassortments, December 2021-April 2022. Virology. 2023;587:109860. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Tawidian  P, Torchetti  MK, Killian  ML, Lantz  K, Dilione  KE, Ringenberg  JM, et al. Genotypic clustering of H5N1 avian influenza viruses in North America evaluated by ordination analysis. Viruses. 2024;16:1818. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Nguyen  T-Q, Hutter  CR, Markin  A, Thomas  M, Lantz  K, Killian  ML, et al. Emergence and interstate spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) in dairy cattle in the United States. Science. 2025;388:eadq0900. DOIGoogle Scholar
  11. Nguyen  HT, Chesnokov  A, De La Cruz  J, Pascua  PNQ, Mishin  VP, Jang  Y, et al. Antiviral susceptibility of clade 2.3.4.4b highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) viruses isolated from birds and mammals in the United States, 2022. Antiviral Res. 2023;217:105679. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Signore  AV, Joseph  T, Ranadheera  C, Erdelyan  CNG, Alkie  TN, Raj  S, et al. Neuraminidase reassortment and oseltamivir resistance in clade 2.3.4.4b A(H5N1) viruses circulating among Canadian poultry, 2024. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2025;14:2469643. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. First H5 bird flu death reported in United States [cited 2025 Jan 6]. https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2025/m0106-h5-birdflu-death.html
  14. Jassem  AN, Roberts  A, Tyson  J, Zlosnik  JEA, Russell  SL, Caleta  JM, et al. Critical illness in an adolescent with influenza A(H5N1) virus infection. N Engl J Med. 2025;392:9279. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC A(H5N1) bird flu response update [cited 2025 Feb 26]. https://www.cdc.gov/bird-flu/spotlights/h5n1-response-02262025.html

Top

Figures
Table

Top

Suggested citation for this article: Hatta Y, De La Cruz J, Murray T, Hiatt B, Jang Y, Frederick JC, et al. Highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) clade 2.3.4.4b virus infection in poultry farm workers, Washington, USA, 2024. Emerg Infect Dis. 2025 Dec [date cited]. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid3112.251118

DOI: 10.3201/eid3112.251118

Original Publication Date: December 23, 2025

1These authors contributed equally to this article.

Table of Contents – Volume 31, Number 12—December 2025

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Han Di, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Mailstop H23-6, Atlanta, GA 30329-4027, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: November 20, 2025
Page updated: December 23, 2025
Page reviewed: December 23, 2025
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external