Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link

Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.

Volume 31, Number 9—September 2025

Research

Epidemiology of Chikungunya Hospitalizations, Brazil, 2014–2024

Author affiliation: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Medicina Tropical da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Brasília, Brasília (V.D. Pedí); Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Brasília, Brazil (V.D. Pedí, W.J. Martins); Ministério da Saúde, Brasília (D.L. Porto, G.V.A. de França)

Suggested citation for this article

Abstract

We describe 7,421 chikungunya hospitalizations in Brazil covered by the country’s unified health system during 2014–2024. Most (43.2%) hospitalizations occurred in 2016 and 2017, reaching 0.72 (95% CI 0.69–0.76) hospitalizations/100,000 population in 2016. Hospitalizations were more frequent among persons who were female (55.8%), identifying as brown or black (63.5%), and 1–19 years of age (31.4%). Intensive care unit admissions occurred in 1.4% of cases, predominantly among children <5 and adults >85 years of age. The overall in-hospital case-fatality rate was 1.1%, which increased substantially with age, reaching 11.5% among patients >90 years of age and 14.1% among men 85–89 years of age. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit had a case-fatality rate of 21.1%. The total cost of chikungunya hospitalizations was US $560,746 (US $76.26 per patient). Our findings provide insights for surveillance of the most severe chikungunya cases.

Chikungunya virus (CHIKV), an alphavirus of the Togaviridae family, is transmitted to humans by Aedes spp. mosquitoes, primarily Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus mosquitoes, and causes chikungunya in humans, commonly in tropical and subtropical regions worldwide (1). Phylogenetic analyses have categorized CHIKV into 3 main lineages: the East/Central/South African (ECSA) lineage, the West African lineage, and the Asian lineage (2,3).

By December 2022, CHIKV had been detected in >110 countries in Asia, Africa, Europe, and the Americas, and all regions with established Ae. aegypti or Ae. albopictus mosquito populations have reported local transmission of the virus (4). Since 2016, Brazil has been the epicenter of chikungunya epidemics in the Americas, and 1,700,762 suspected cases were reported nationwide during 2017–2024 (5). The country has a sizeable susceptible population, a favorable climate, and abundant populations of Ae. aegypti mosquitoes, which could contribute to the occurrence of rapid and localized chikungunya outbreaks, and high CHIKV infection rates are followed by periods of lower chikungunya incidence (5). In addition, seropositivity is highly heterogeneous in Brazil, and estimates range from 7.4% to 51% (6,7).

Chikungunya fever refers to the acute illness caused by CHIKV. Most (75%–95%) infected persons develop symptoms, which usually begin within 4 to 8 days after the bite of a CHIKV-infected mosquito. Symptoms can include fever, myalgia, and arthralgia, and CHIKV infection can cause decompensation of underlying conditions (8). Although chikungunya illness is generally self-limited, some patients—especially infants; older adults; and persons with underlying conditions, co-infections, or certain genetic traits—can develop atypical or severe forms. Those forms can involve neurologic disturbances, cardiovascular complications, hemorrhagic signs, or Guillain-Barré syndrome (911). The reported frequency of such manifestations varies across outbreaks and populations, from 0.3% during the 2005–2006 Réunion Island epidemic to 9.8% among hospitalized patients in French Guiana during 2014–2015 (12,13).

In 30%–40% of patients, chikungunya becomes chronic, persisting for >3 months and causing arthritis, fatigue, sleep disorders, myalgia, skin lesions, depression, and digestive disorders (1,14,15). Among the severe manifestations of CHIKV infection, cases of meningoencephalitis, bullous skin lesions, multiple organ failure with hemorrhage, and sepsis have been reported (16,17). Furthermore, CHIKV infection increasingly has been associated with substantial mortality rates, particularly because of complications, such as heart or cerebrovascular disease, renal impairment, cardiogenic or septic shock, or decompensated diabetes (1820).

Data from outbreaks in different countries shows that 0.6%–13.0% of patients with confirmed chikungunya are hospitalized (1,8,10,21). In Brazil, the unified health system, Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), provides universal access to healthcare, and in 2019, SUS covered almost 65% of all hospitalizations in the country (22). The SUS hospital information system, Sistema de Informação Hospitalar/SUS (SIH/SUS), is the country’s only source of information on hospitalizations. The system is mainly used to define the values for payment of medium- and high-complexity services provided by healthcare establishments throughout the country (23). We used SIH/SUS data to explore the epidemiology of chikungunya hospitalizations in Brazil during 2014­–2024, focusing on patient demographic characteristics, spatiotemporal dynamics, and costs covered by SUS.

Materials and Methods

Figure 1

Regions and federal units referenced in study of epidemiology of chikungunya hospitalizations, Brazil, 2014–2024.

Figure 1. Regions and federal units referenced in study of epidemiology of chikungunya hospitalizations, Brazil, 2014–2024.

We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study of chikungunya hospitalizations in Brazil, its 5 regions, and 26 states and the Federal District (Figure 1), using publicly available SIH/SUS data from Datasus (https://datasus.saude.gov.br/transferencia-de-arquivos). The SIH/SUS data reflect only hospitalizations covered by the public healthcare system and do not capture costs from private sector hospitalizations or out-of-pocket expenses.

We used data on chikungunya hospitalizations financed by SUS and registered in the SIH/SUS during January 1, 2014–December 31, 2024. We selected all hospitalizations that had chikungunya as the primary diagnosis and were registered with code A92.0 from the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10), as adopted by the Ministry of Health (24). Secondary diagnoses (i.e., conditions that coexisted at the time of admission) were only available in SIH/SUS dataset for 2014, and chikungunya was not reported as a secondary diagnosis during 2015–2024; therefore, our analysis was limited to chikungunya as the primary diagnosis.

We used the following variables in our analyses: year and month of hospitalization; sex; age in years, estimated from the patient’s date of birth and the date of hospitalization, classified into 5-year age groups; race/skin color, according to patients’ self-declarations and classified into white, black, brown, Asian, and Indigenous (25); and intensive care unit (ICU) admission and death, when applicable. We calculated length of hospital stay in daily rates, considering the patient’s stay in a hospital institution for an indivisible period of <24 hours and assuming midnight as the reference time for the start and end of the period for the daily rate, as defined by SIH/SUS.

We estimated case-fatality rates by dividing the number of deaths resulting from chikungunya by the number of chikungunya hospitalizations for each year. To calculate crude hospitalization rates, we used the annual population estimates based on the 2022 demographic census for Brazil (26). Thus, we defined crude hospitalization rates by region and state as the ratio between the number of chikungunya hospitalizations and the total population in the year, multiplied by 100,000 population. We calculated crude chikungunya hospitalization rates by year, region, state, sex, and age group.

We standardized annual hospitalization rates by age through the direct method, using the World Health Organization global standard population (27). We initially calculated the annual age-adjusted rate by multiplying each age-specific hospitalization rate times the world standard population in the corresponding age group. We summed the products across all age groups and divided by the total standard population to estimate the overall annual age-standardized hospitalization rate. We used R version 4.4.1 (The R Project for Statistical Computing, https://www.r-project.org) and the dsr package (https://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Archive/dsr) to calculate standardized hospitalization rates and 95% CIs by applying a method based on gamma distribution.

To describe the chikungunya-related hospitalization costs covered by the government of Brazil through SUS that were recorded in the SIH/SUS database, we considered the total hospitalization cost and its 2 components: professional services, which comprise doctors’ and dentists’ fees; and hospital services, which include daily rates, room rates, food, and other services. We also assessed costs of daily rates for patients admitted to the ICU.

We described quantitative data by using absolute and relative frequencies and quantitative variables through measures of central tendency (mean and median) and dispersion (SD and interquartile range [IQR]). We converted cost estimates from Brazil real (BRL) to US dollars (USD) by using annual exchange rates on July 1 of each year. We also provide the annual cost estimates in BRL adjusted for inflation to July 1, 2024, values by using the Consumer Price Index for Brazil, and we converted to USD by using the exchange rate on July 1, 2014.

We analyzed chikungunya hospitalizations registered in SIH/SUS compared with the total number of suspected and confirmed chikungunya cases notified in the Notifiable Diseases Information System (SINAN), applying the case definition adopted by the Ministry of Health (28) and using aggregated data available in Tabnet (5). Although publicly available data are restricted to chikungunya cases notified from 2017 onward, the SINAN system allows retroactive case registration and records both notification and symptom onset dates. Thus, we included all cases notified from 2017 onward that had symptom onset from January 2014 onward.

We performed data analysis by using TabWin version 4.1.5 (http://www.portalsinan.saude.gov.br/sistemas-auxiliares/tabwin), Stata version 13.0 (StataCorp LLC, https://www.stata.com), R version 4.4.1, and Microsoft Office 2024 (https://www.microsoft.com). Because we used anonymized and publicly available data, we were not required to submit the project for evaluation by a research ethics committee, as established by Resolution CNS/MS no. 510/2016.

Results

During 2014–2024, Brazil recorded 7,421 chikungunya hospitalizations in SIH/SUS, which corresponded to 0.4% of 1,698,976 suspected cases and 0.9% of 830,386 cases confirmed by laboratory or clinical-epidemiologic findings that were recorded in SINAN during the same timeframe and considering date of symptom onset. Hospitalizations followed the pattern of suspected and confirmed case curves during 2017–2024 (Appendix Figure 1).

Figure 2

Number of hospitalizations per year in study of epidemiology of chikungunya hospitalizations, Brazil, 2014–2024. A) Total number of hospitalizations per year; B) number of hospitalizations per year by region.

Figure 2. Number of hospitalizations per year in study of epidemiology of chikungunya hospitalizations, Brazil, 2014–2024. A) Total number of hospitalizations per year; B) number of hospitalizations per year by region.

Most (43.2%) hospitalizations occurred in 2016 and 2017, and we noted peaks in June 2016 (272 hospitalizations), February 2017 (254 hospitalizations), June 2017 (272 hospitalizations), May 2019 (147 hospitalizations), May 2022 (163 hospitalizations), March 2023 (153 hospitalizations), and April 2024 (114 hospitalizations) (Figure 2, panel A). Cases in the Northeast region accounted for peaks in June 2016 (253/272 cases) and June 2017 (240/272), comprising 93.0% of hospitalizations in June 2016 and 88.2% in June 2017. In addition, 88.3% of hospitalizations in May 2022 occurred in the Northeast region. In February 2017, the North region accounted for 53.5% of hospitalizations. In the Southeast region, peaks occurred in May 2019 (95 cases), March 2023 (95 cases), and April 2024 (67 cases) (Figure 2, panel B).

In Brazil, the highest crude hospitalization rates were in 2017 at 0.84 (95% CI 0.80–0.88)/100,000 population, and 2016 at 0.72 (95% CI 0.69–0.76)/100,000 population; we observed smaller peak of 0.49 (95% CI 0.46–0.52)/100,000 population in 2022. Standardized rates closely mirrored crude rates, with minor decimal differences; therefore, we decided to focus on the crude hospitalization rates (Table 1).

Figure 3

Annual hospitalization rates per region from study of epidemiology of chikungunya hospitalizations, Brazil, 2014–2024.

Figure 3. Annual hospitalization rates per region from study of epidemiology of chikungunya hospitalizations, Brazil, 2014–2024.

Among regions, the Northeast had the highest hospitalization rate in 6 of the 11 years analyzed, reaching the highest rate in 2016 (2.46 hospitalizations/100,000 population), and the states of Maranhão (9.05/100,000 population) and Rio Grande do Norte (2.66/100,000 population) had the highest rates that year (Table 2). Maranhão had the highest hospitalization rates in 2018 (2.86/100,000 population) and 2022 (4.6/100,000 population) (Figure 3; Appendix Figure 2).

Overall, most (55.8%) hospitalized chikungunya patients were female, and 63.5% of chikungunya hospitalizations were among persons who identified as brown or black, a pattern observed throughout the evaluated years. The median age of hospitalized patients was 34 (IQR 12–58) years and ranged from 27 years in 2015 (IQR 6–48 years) and 2021 (IQR 9–49 years) to 43 (IQR 13–65) years in 2024. Cases were concentrated among persons 1–19 years of age, who comprised 31.4% of overall hospitalizations. In 2017, the year with the highest number of hospitalizations, the predominant age groups were 1–9 years (236 [23%] hospitalizations), 10–19 years (205 [13.9%]), and 30–39 years (157 [10.6%]) (Table 3; Appendix Tables 1, 2).

When we stratified annual crude hospitalization rates by sex and age group, we observed similar patterns for male and female sex in age groups from 0 to 79 years, with few exceptions (Appendix Figures 3, 4). However, we observed notable differences in the 80–84, 85–89, and >90 age groups. For 2016, 2018, 2022, and 2023, we observed higher hospitalization rates among men 80–84 years of age compared with women in the same age group, and the largest difference was in 2019, when the hospitalization rate in men was 4 times higher than that observed among women (1.29 vs. 0.29/100,000 population) (Appendix Figures 3, 4). For persons 85–89 years of age, we observed the highest hospitalization rate in 2016, when the rate for men was nearly twice that of women (4.25 vs. 2.5/100,000 population). Persons >90 years of age had the highest recorded hospitalization rates during the study period, reaching 9.22/100,000 population among men in 2016, nearly 4 times higher than among women (2.66/100,000 population) (Appendix Figure 4).

Overall, the average length of hospital stay for chikungunya patients was 3.8 + 0.1 days, and the median stay was 3 (IQR 2–4) days, without substantial variations by sex or age during the study period (Appendix Table 1). Of note, patients admitted to the ICU had longer stays of 13.1 + 1.1 days than those not admitted to the ICU (3.6 + 0.1 days). In addition, patients who died during hospitalization also had longer (8.0 + 1.5 days) average stays than patients who survived (3.7 + 0.1 days).

Among all 7,421 chikungunya hospitalizations, 104 (1.4%) patients were admitted to the ICU, and that population was equally divided by male and female patients, 52 (50.0%) in each group. The age groups with the highest ICU admissions were adults >85 years of age (3.3%) and children <5 years of age (2.7%). The ages of patients admitted to the ICU varied greatly; the mean was 38.6 + 31.3 years, and the median was 37.5 (IQR 7.5–69) years. The highest percentages of ICU admissions were recorded in 2024 (3.5%) and 2023 (2.1%); admissions were more frequent in children <5 years of age (2.7%), but rates were similar among boys (2.7%) and girls (2.6%). Among persons >60 years of age, 1.9% were admitted to the ICU, predominantly men (2.3% vs. 1.6% women) (Table 3; Appendix Table 2).

Among the 84 hospitalized patients who died, 54.8% were male, 45.2% were female, and 26.4% were >80 years of age (mean 69.4 + 25.8 years; median 79.0, IQR 62–86 years). The highest case-fatality rates were recorded in 2020 (2.4%) and 2016 (1.8%) and substantially increased among persons >60 years of age, reaching 10.3% among persons 85–89 years of age and 11.5% among persons >90 years of age. Estimated rates were higher among men than women for the 85–89 age group (14.1% vs. 6.41%) and the >90 age group (13.7% vs. 9.7%). In addition, the case-fatality rate (CFR) was higher among persons admitted to the ICU than those who were not (21.1% vs. 0.8%) (Table 3; Appendix Table 3).

During 2014–2024, the total cost of chikungunya hospitalizations covered by SUS was ≈US $560,746 and the average cost per patient was ≈US $76.26 (median $47.38) (Appendix Tables 4, 5). After adjusting for inflation to 2024 values, total hospitalization costs for chikungunya in BRL increased by 26.7%, from BRL $2.28 million to BRL $2.89 million. However, when we used the 2024 exchange rate (1 BRL = US $0.179036) to convert inflation-adjusted values to USD, the total cost decreased to US $516,921.61, reflecting the cumulative depreciation of the BRL relative to the USD over the study period (Appendix Table 6).

The highest total hospitalization costs were recorded in 2017 (US $120,960.10) and 2016 (US $120,336.60). In contrast, the highest average costs per patient were observed in 2024 (US $85.69) and 2020 (US $84.24). Across the study period, hospital services accounted for 84.2% of the total chikungunya-related hospitalization costs, ranging from 79.5% in 2014 to 85.8% in 2020. ICU costs corresponded to 19.6% of the total hospitalization expenses during 2014–2024, reaching 42.1% in 2020 (Appendix Table 4).

Discussion

This study examined chikungunya-related hospitalizations in Brazil since 2014­, the year when the first autochthonous cases were reported in Oiapoque (Amapá state) and in Feira de Santana (Bahia state) (29). SIH/SUS data show ≈0.4% of suspected and ≈0.9% of confirmed chikungunya cases required hospitalization during 2014–2024, consistent with previous estimates of 0.6%–13.0% reported during outbreaks in various countries (1,10,21). Moreover, the pattern of chikungunya-related hospitalizations followed epidemic peaks in Brazil, particularly in the Northeast (2016, 2017, and 2022), North (2017), and Southeast (2019, 2023, and 2024) regions; we also noted an increase in the Central West region in 2024. Throughout the study period, publications documented chikungunya outbreaks in Northeast states, including in Maranhão (30), Bahia (31), and Alagoas (32,33), as well as in the North (34) and Southeast regions (35,36). Although cases have been reported in the South, most were likely imported from other regions (37). The increase in suspected and confirmed chikungunya cases since 2022 reflects multiple factors, including increased transmission in several states, particularly in the Southeast and Central West regions, and improved diagnostic capacity and clinical awareness. During the COVID-19 pandemic, disruptions in surveillance and healthcare services, combined with the prioritization of hospital resources for COVID-19 patients, likely contributed to underreporting of arboviral diseases and lower chikungunya hospitalization rates during 2020–2021.

We observed higher hospitalization rates among men >80 years of age compared with women in the same age groups, consistent with a study in Martinique and Guadeloupe from 2013–2015, where older adults, particularly persons >75 years of age, had increased hospitalization rates and ICU admissions (10). That study also reported an ICU admission rate of 7.4% among hospitalized patients, which is substantially higher than the 1.4% rate observed in Brazil during 2014–2024.

We observed an overall CFR of 1.1%, and CFR peaked at 2.4% in 2020. In another study that used data linked between the SINAN and Brazil’s mortality information system (SIM) for 2016 and 2017 (38), estimated CFR was 0.08% (0.8 death/1,000 cases) based solely on SINAN data. After adjusting for underreporting using SIM data, the corrected CFR increased to 0.57% (5.7 deaths/1,000 cases) (38). Our higher rate reflects the focus on hospitalized cases, which represent more severe clinical presentations.

In our study, CFR was substantially higher in men >85 years of age, and ICU admission correlated with CFR, which supports the hypothesis that those patients experienced more severe illness. During the 2014–2015 chikungunya outbreak in French Polynesia, 64 patients with confirmed chikungunya infection were admitted to ICUs, of whom 21 (32.8%) had severe sepsis or septic shock develop and 18 (28.1%) died (39). A 2025 meta-analysis also identified male sex, age >60 years, and chronic diseases, particularly diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease, as risk factors for chikungunya-related death (20). In our study, lack of data on underlying conditions in SIH/SUS precluded further risk assessment.

Among our cohort, 62 deaths occurred without ICU admission, which might indicate a lack of available ICU beds in the healthcare network or challenges related to case management and regulation. Furthermore, no deaths were recorded among persons 5–19 years of age, but ICU admissions among children <5 years reached 2.3% and CFR was 0.6% in that age group. Those findings are consistent with a previous study (40) that indicated that children, particularly children <6 months of age, are more susceptible to severe chikungunya complications, including neurologic and cardiac involvement, often leading to hospitalization (40).

Overall, the actual mortality burden of chikungunya is likely underreported because of limited clinical suspicion and co-circulating arboviruses, such as dengue. The extent of underreporting has been estimated to reach as high as 98% in some settings. For instance, in Minas Gerais, Brazil, the number of excess deaths was estimated to be 60 times higher than confirmed chikungunya deaths in 2023 (41); Pernambuco, Brazil, recorded 4,505 excess deaths in 2016 compared with 94 deaths officially attributed to chikungunya (42); and Puerto Rico identified 1,310 excess chikungunya deaths in 2014, but only 31 were confirmed through routine surveillance (43).

Another study analyzed hospitalizations from all causes in the SIH/SUS database from July 2018–June 2019 (44). That study reported 9.3 million hospitalizations and a total cost of BRL $183 billion (US $47.1 billion), ≈BRL $2,000 (US $515.30) per hospitalization, and an average length of stay of 6.9 days (44). Infectious diseases accounted for 9% of bed days and 21% of ICU days. In our study, we found ICU expenses comprised 19.6% of chikungunya-related hospitalization costs.

In another study of hospitalization costs (45), the authors estimated the cost of 256 chikungunya hospitalizations in Rio de Janeiro in 2019 and found costs totaled BRL $88,926.72 (US $23,235.39), a small share of the BRL $279.8 million (US $73.1 million) in total direct and indirect chikungunya-related costs. In our study, the cost of chikungunya-related hospitalizations is modest compared with the total estimated SUS hospitalization costs described by others (44). Indeed, the literature indicates that indirect costs account for the largest part of the total chikungunya-related cost, particularly during the chronic phase, which can be up to 5 times higher than the direct costs (46).

Some limitations of our study are inherent to secondary data sources, such as the quality of data entry and the absence of relevant variables for analyzing the topic of interest. The variables of sex and date of birth had no missing or inconsistent values. However, race/skin color was missing in 18% of chikungunya-related hospitalizations; this category was previously documented (47) and can distort observed differences between racial groups. Moreover, we could not identify whether the same patient was hospitalized >1 time during the study period or was admitted to private healthcare facilities. In addition, data on underlying conditions were not available, so we were unable to assess their role in the risk of hospitalization or death. We were not able to differentiate whether the hospitalizations for chikungunya occurred during the acute, post-acute, or chronic phase of the disease; thus, we were unable to investigate at which stage of chikungunya the risk of hospitalization is highest. Because we focused on chikungunya as the primary diagnosis at admission, this study might not have captured cases admitted during the postacute or chronic phases, particularly when hospitalizations result from the decompensation of underlying conditions. In addition, SIH/SUS lacks data on cause of death, possibly underestimating death related to complications of chikungunya; thus, our analysis was limited to reporting deaths among patients hospitalized due to chikungunya, which likely underestimates the overall mortality rate associated with the disease. Finally, SIH/SUS publicly available data do not include disaggregated cost components, which prevented assessment of the relative contribution of specific services to overall hospitalization costs.

In conclusion, although the SIH/SUS is an administratively collected database primarily intended for recording hospitalizations funded by the SUS and for reimbursing healthcare facilities for services provided, the system serves as a vital source of information on hospitalizations in Brazil, where most hospitalizations occur in SUS-affiliated facilities (22). Although chikungunya-related hospitalization costs for SUS are not substantial, SIH/SUS records provide insights into the profile of the most severe cases of the disease, including ICU admissions and case-fatality rates. Those data are particularly valuable for supporting the planning and organization of healthcare facilities to provide appropriate care according to the severity of each case, which will be especially vital in outbreak and epidemic scenarios.

Dr. Pedi is a veterinarian with the Brazilian Ministry of Health and serves at the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, where she is a member of the Research Group on Science, Technology, and Innovation for Governance and Territorial Development. Her primary research interests include arbovirus diseases, public health emergencies, and the One Health framework.

Top

References

  1. Bartholomeeusen  K, Daniel  M, LaBeaud  DA, Gasque  P, Peeling  RW, Stephenson  KE, et al. Chikungunya fever. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2023;9:17. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Krambrich  J, Mihalič  F, Gaunt  MW, Bohlin  J, Hesson  JC, Lundkvist  Å, et al. The evolutionary and molecular history of a chikungunya virus outbreak lineage. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024;18:e0012349. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Volk  SM, Chen  R, Tsetsarkin  KA, Adams  AP, Garcia  TI, Sall  AA, et al. Genome-scale phylogenetic analyses of chikungunya virus reveal independent emergences of recent epidemics and various evolutionary rates. J Virol. 2010;84:6497504. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. World Health Organization. Chikungunya [cited 2025 Mar 23]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/chikungunya
  5. Brazil Ministry of Health. Chikungunya fever—notifications recorded in the Notifiable Diseases Information System [in Portuguese] [cited 2025 Mar 23]. http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/tabcgi.exe?sinannet/cnv/chikunbr.def
  6. Skalinski  LM, Santos  AES, Paixão  E, Itaparica  M, Barreto  F, da Conceição Nascimento Costa  M, et al. Chikungunya seroprevalence in population-based studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Public Health. 2023;81:80. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. de Souza  WM, Ribeiro  GS, de Lima  STS, de Jesus  R, Moreira  FRR, Whittaker  C, et al. Chikungunya: a decade of burden in the Americas. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024;30:100673. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Rama  K, de Roo  AM, Louwsma  T, Hofstra  HS, Gurgel do Amaral  GS, Vondeling  GT, et al. Clinical outcomes of chikungunya: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024;18:e0012254. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cerbino-Neto  J, Mesquita  EC, Amancio  RT, Brasil  PEAAD. Events preceding death among chikungunya virus infected patients: a systematic review. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2020;53:e04312019. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dorléans  F, Hoen  B, Najioullah  F, Herrmann-Storck  C, Schepers  KM, Abel  S, et al. Outbreak of chikungunya in the French Caribbean islands of Martinique and Guadeloupe: findings from a hospital-based surveillance system (2013–2015). Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018;98:181925. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Rajapakse  S, Rodrigo  C, Rajapakse  A. Atypical manifestations of chikungunya infection. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2010;104:8996. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Economopoulou  A, Dominguez  M, Helynck  B, Sissoko  D, Wichmann  O, Quenel  P, et al. Atypical Chikungunya virus infections: clinical manifestations, mortality and risk factors for severe disease during the 2005-2006 outbreak on Réunion. Epidemiol Infect. 2009;137:53441. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bonifay  T, Prince  C, Neyra  C, Demar  M, Rousset  D, Kallel  H, et al.; Char Chik Working group. Atypical and severe manifestations of chikungunya virus infection in French Guiana: A hospital-based study. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0207406. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Santiago  RA, Bavaresco  SPP, Citrangulo  SG, Medronho  RA, Sampaio  V, Costa  AJL. Clinical manifestations associated with the chronic phase of Chikungunya Fever: A systematic review of prevalence. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025;19:e0012810. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Paixão  ES, Rodrigues  LC, Costa  MDCN, Itaparica  M, Barreto  F, Gérardin  P, et al. Chikungunya chronic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2018;112:30116. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hsu  CH, Cruz-Lopez  F, Vargas Torres  D, Perez-Padilla  J, Lorenzi  OD, Rivera  A, et al. Risk factors for hospitalization of patients with chikungunya virus infection at sentinel hospitals in Puerto Rico. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13:e0007084. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Crosby  L, Perreau  C, Madeux  B, Cossic  J, Armand  C, Herrmann-Storke  C, et al. Severe manifestations of chikungunya virus in critically ill patients during the 2013-2014 Caribbean outbreak. Int J Infect Dis. 2016;48:7880. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Brito  C, Falcão  MB, de Albuquerque  MFPM, Cerqueira-Silva  T, Teixeira  MG, Franca  RFO. Chikungunya: from hypothesis to evidence of increased severe disease and fatalities. Viruses. 2025;17:62. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Cerqueira-Silva  T, Pescarini  JM, Cardim  LL, Leyrat  C, Whitaker  H, Antunes de Brito  CA, et al. Risk of death following chikungunya virus disease in the 100 Million Brazilian Cohort, 2015-18: a matched cohort study and self-controlled case series. Lancet Infect Dis. 2024;24:50413. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Micheleto  JPC, Melo  KA, Veloso  FCS, Kassar  SB, Oliveira  MJC. Risk factors for mortality in patients with chikungunya: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trop Med Int Health. 2025;30:23545. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Silva Junior  GBD, Pinto  JR, Mota  RMS, Pires Neto  RDJ, Daher  EF. Impact of chronic kidney disease on chikungunya virus infection clinical manifestations and outcome: highlights during an outbreak in northeastern Brazil. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018;99:132730. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. 2019 National Health Survey: information on households, access to, and use of health services. Brazil, major regions, and states [in Portuguese]. Rio de Janeiro: The Institute; 2020.
  23. Bittencourt  SA, Camacho  LA, Leal  MC. [Hospital Information Systems and their application in public health]. Cad Saude Publica. 2006;22:1930. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Brazil Ministry of Health, Secretariat of Health Care. SIH–SUS Hospital Information System: technical operational manual of the system [in Portuguese]. Brasília: The Ministry; 2017.
  25. Government of Brazil. Official Diary of the Union: GM/MS Ordinance No. 344, of February 1, 2017. Provides for filling out the race/color question in health information system forms [in Portuguese]. Brasília: The Government; 2017.
  26. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. Methodological notes 01/2024: population projections, Brazil and federation units, estimates and projections, 2024 review [in Portuguese]. Rio de Janeiro: The Institute; 2024.
  27. Ahmad  OB, Boschi-Pinto  C, Lopez  AD, Murray  CJ, Lozano  R, Inoue  M. Age standardization of rates: a new WHO standard. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
  28. Brazil Ministry of Health, Secretariat of Health and Environmental Surveillance, Department of Strategic Actions in Epidemiology and Health and Environmental Surveillance. Health surveillance guide, 6th edition [in Portuguese]. Brasília: The Ministry; 2024.
  29. Nunes  MR, Faria  NR, de Vasconcelos  JM, Golding  N, Kraemer  MU, de Oliveira  LF, et al. Emergence and potential for spread of Chikungunya virus in Brazil. BMC Med. 2015;13:102. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Aragão  CF, Cruz  ACR, Nunes Neto  JP, Monteiro  HAO, da Silva  EVP, da Silva  SP, et al. Circulation of chikungunya virus in Aedes aegypti in Maranhão, northeast Brazil. Acta Trop. 2018;186:14. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Tauro  LB, Cardoso  CW, Souza  RL, Nascimento  LC, Santos  DRD, Campos  GS, et al. A localized outbreak of Chikungunya virus in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2019;114:e180597. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Tanabe  ELL, Tanabe  ISB, Santos  ECD, Marques  JPDS, Borges  AA, Lima  MC, et al. Report of East-Central South African Chikungunya virus genotype during the 2016 outbreak in the Alagoas State, Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2018;60:e19. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Charlys da Costa  A, Thézé  J, Komninakis  SCV, Sanz-Duro  RL, Felinto  MRL, Moura  LCC, et al. Spread of chikungunya virus East/Central/South African genotype in northeast Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:17424. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Naveca  FG, Claro  I, Giovanetti  M, de Jesus  JG, Xavier  J, Iani  FCM, et al. Genomic, epidemiological and digital surveillance of Chikungunya virus in the Brazilian Amazon. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13:e0007065. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lessa-Aquino  C, Trinta  KS, Pestana  CP, Ribeiro  MO, Sucupira  MVF, Boia  MN, et al. Detection of East/Central/South African genotype Chikungunya virus during an outbreak in a southeastern state of Brazil. Epidemiol Infect. 2018;146:20568. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Souza  TM, Azeredo  EL, Badolato-Corrêa  J, Damasco  PV, Santos  C, Petitinga-Paiva  F, et al. First report of the East-Central South African genotype of chikungunya virus in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. PLoS Curr. 2017;9:9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Resck  MEB, Câmara  DCP, Dos Santos  FB, Dos Santos  JPC, Alto  BW, Honório  NA. Spatial-temporal distribution of chikungunya virus in Brazil: a review on the circulating viral genotypes and Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus as a potential vector. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1496021. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Frutuoso  LCV, Freitas  ARR, Cavalcanti  LPG, Duarte  EC. Estimated mortality rate and leading causes of death among individuals with chikungunya in 2016 and 2017 in Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2020;53:e20190580. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Koeltz  A, Lastere  S, Jean-Baptiste  S. Intensive care admissions for severe chikungunya virus infection, French Polynesia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24:7946. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Ernould  S, Walters  H, Alessandri  JL, Llanas  B, Jaffar  MC, Robin  S, et al. [Chikungunya in paediatrics: epidemic of 2005-2006 in Saint-Denis, Reunion Island]. Arch Pediatr. 2008;15:25362. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Ribas-Freitas  AR, Neto  ASL, Rodrigues  R. Oliveira EAd, Andrade-Jr JS, Cavalcanti LPG. Excess mortality associated with chikungunya epidemic in southeast Brazil, 2023. Front Trop Dis. 2024;5:1466207. DOIGoogle Scholar
  42. Freitas  ARR, Cavalcanti  L, Von Zuben  AP, Donalisio  MR. Excess mortality related to chikungunya epidemics in the context of co-circulation of other arboviruses in Brazil. PLoS Curr. 2017;9:223. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Freitas  ARR, Donalisio  MR, Alarcón-Elbal  PM. Excess mortality and causes associated with chikungunya, Puerto Rico, 2014–2015. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24:23525. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Finkelstein  BJ, Borges-Junior  LH. Hospital beds in Brazil, SUS inpatients, demographic migration and procedure costs. J Bras Econ Saúde. 2020;12:27380.
  45. Gonçalves  TS, Carmo  CND, Marinho  DS. Estimated annual costs of Chikungunya fever in the municipality of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2024;27:e240026. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Tiozzo  G, de Roo  AM, Gurgel do Amaral  GS, Hofstra  H, Vondeling  GT, Postma  MJ. Assessing chikungunya’s economic burden and impact on health-related quality of life: Two systematic literature reviews. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025;19:e0012990. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Santos  HLPCD, Trindade  ES, Oliveira  ERA, Cordeiro  MVDS, Oliveira  RS, Lima  EC, et al. Trend of incompleteness of the race/color variable in hospitalizations due to COVID-19 whose outcome was death in Brazil, 2020-2022. Rev Saude Publica. 2024;58:37. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Tables

Top

Suggested citation for this article: Pedí VD, Porto DL, Martins WJ, de França GVA. Epidemiology of chikungunya hospitalizations, Brazil, 2014–2024. Emerg Infect Dis. 2025 Sep [date cited]. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid3109.250554

DOI: 10.3201/eid3109.250554

Original Publication Date: August 05, 2025

Table of Contents – Volume 31, Number 9—September 2025

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Page created: July 16, 2025
Page updated: August 05, 2025
Page reviewed: August 05, 2025
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external